Ramaphosa not likely to act as Motshekga defends SANDF chief's Iran trip
Defence and Military Veterans Minister Angie Motshekga has come to the defence of South African National Defence Force (SANDF) chief Rudzani Maphwanya following backlash over his recent remarks during a visit to Iran.
This week, Maphwanya sparked a diplomatic stir after claiming South Africa and Iran had 'common goals.'
His comments drew criticism from International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola and the Presidency, as they felt the SANDF chief had stepped into foreign policy matters.
ALSO READ: Ministries distance themselves from SANDF chief's comments in Iran
President Cyril Ramaphosa's office clarified that he had not been informed of or approved Maphwanya's visit to Iran, but highlighted that the authorisation came from Motshekga, which falls under her ministerial responsibility.
Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya explained that Maphwanya's remarks were unhelpful, particularly as the South African government is engaged in a 'very delicate exercise' to reset diplomatic relations with the United States (US), which has ongoing disputes with Iran.
Maphwanya to meet Ramaphosa as Motshekga back SANDF chief
Amid calls from the Democratic Alliance (DA) for a court martial against the SANDF general, Ramaphosa is scheduled to meet Maphwanya next week.
According to the Sunday Times, no disciplinary action will be taken against either Maphwanya or Motshekga.
Motshekga defended the SANDF chief, insisting that his visit to Iran was entirely appropriate.
'It's a coincidence that it [the trip] coincides with the tensions between Iran and the US and that we are negotiating on tariffs.
READ MORE: Ramaphosa unaware of 'ill-advised' Iran trip by SANDF chief – Magwenya
'This invitation is from last year. I sanctioned it last year. The event was postponed, and they then communicated back to say let's continue,' she told the publication.
The minister also told News24 that Maphwanya's comments had been misinterpreted.
'Is it because Iran is in conflict with America that we are now also not allowed to touch Iran. We have our own bilateral relations with countries,' she said.
SACP reacts
The South African Communist Party (SACP) similarly defended Maphwanya, arguing that his statements accurately reflected South Africa's foreign policy.
The party further asserted that his comments should not be compared to the actions of DA MP Andrew Whitfield, who was dismissed for travelling to the US on an unapproved trip while serving as deputy minister of trade, industry, and competition.
'This comparison is incorrect, as Maphwanya's visit took place within the framework of military regulations with the full knowledge of the minister of defence whereas Whitfield's visit was unauthorised,' the SACP said in a statement.
SACP denounces the manufactured public controversy following the visit of the Chief of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) to Iran.
The visit was part of South Africa's long-standing bilateral relations with Iran. pic.twitter.com/TA4Uc3OJL7
August 16, 2025
Maphwanya, appointed by Ramaphosa in 2021, is reportedly set to retire on 1 December this year.
Although the standard army retirement age is 60, he was requested to remain in service until the age of 65.
He will reach this age in November.
NOW READ: Explicit, obscene videos in uniform are unacceptable, SANDF warns members
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
5 minutes ago
- The Citizen
How will Ramaphosa deal with SA's foreign policy nightmare
South Affrica has a non-aligned foreign policy which has been seen as anti-U.S. A radical cabal already dominates SA's foreign affairs department. This week, the department – once studiously aloof from the ruling party's ideological feuds – showed it, too, has been drawn into the fray. During an official visit to Tehran, the country's top general pledged political and military solidarity with Iran against the US and Israel. It is the latest move in a quiet but fierce struggle inside the ANC between a dwindling band of what passes for moderates and an emboldened bloc of extremists, many with hard-line Islamist sympathies. The former cling to the fiction of a non-aligned SA. The latter see the present global disorder as their moment to cast the country as a heroic standard-bearer of the global south, leading the fight against 'Western imperialism' and 'US hegemony'. General Rudzani Maphwanya, chief of the SA National Defence Force (SANDF), met in Tehran an array of Iran's top military leadership in a calculated affront to Washington. The departments of international relations and cooperation (Dirco) and defence are now scrambling to disclaim his anti-US rhetoric, even as he publicly committed South Africa to joint military ventures with a pariah state. Such denials should be taken with a generous pinch of salt. It is inconceivable that Maphwanya acted without the blessing of both departments and of the Presidency itself. Maphwanya's actions are extraordinary for the head of a military in a democracy. If the trip was unsanctioned and Maphwanya's statements unapproved, the implications are grave. As chief of the SANDF, such unilateral actions would constitute a direct military intrusion into civilian affairs of near-treasonous proportions. Immediate dismissal and possible cash earnings from the SANDF would be warranted. The department's responses have been striking. Neither denied knowing about the general's trip but both issued statements stressing foreign policy is the responsibility of the Presidency and Dirco. The implication is that they did know, but the general went rogue. If the trip was sanctioned, the diplomatic dis aster that has been unleashed demands account ability at the highest levels. Ronald Lamola (Dir co), Angie Motshekga (defence), and Khumbudzo Ntshavheni (Presidency) should all be axed. But the Presidency flatly denies any knowl edge of the trip or giving permission for it. This statement is almost as extraordinary as the general's actions. If the President was kept in the dark and his ministers knew, they must be axed immediately. The point is that there is a military stirring that needs to be nipped in the bud. It should be extremely concerning, especially to the ANC's partners in the government of national unity, that there is a strong possibility the Islamist-led bloc dominating Dirco has found a like-minded, equally senior anti-US/anti-Israel faction within the SANDF. The rot is spreading, and the consequences are eye-popping. This is not non-alignment. It's a confirmation of the US position articulated by US President Donald Trump in the February executive order: South Africa is actively acting against the interests of America in its embrace of Iran. Domestically, the implications of a politically assertive military are equally alarming. This is the well-worn route taken by every 'liberation party' regime north of the Limpopo: a slide towards authoritarianism, one-party dominance, repression and the occasional military coup. SA is now caught between two forces: an increasingly radicalised foreign policy and a militarised ideological alignment. What began with a quiet capture of Dirco has metastasised into an open assertion of anti-Western sentiment at the heart of the SANDF. The president and his coalition partners in the GNU must ruthlessly excise the cancer. But they won't.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Cape Town journalists march in solidarity with media workers targeted and killed in Gaza
A march in Sea Point, Cape Town, on Sunday was the latest in a series of protests aimed at spotlighting the targeted killing of media workers in Gaza. Local journalists led the demonstration, expressing solidarity with their colleagues on the other side of the world. Hundreds of people marched along the Sea Point promenade in Cape Town on Sunday, 17 August, to protest against the targeted killing of journalists in the Gaza Strip. The march was led by local journalists holding a sign bearing the names of more than 200 Palestinian media workers who have reportedly been killed since 7 October 2023. The march was organised by Journalists Against Apartheid, with support from other organisations including Gift of the Givers, South African Jews for a Free Palestine and the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. The demonstration comes exactly a week after an Israeli airstrike on a media tent near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City killed six journalists. Among those killed were Al Jazeera correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh; camera operators Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal; local freelance reporter Mohammad Al-Khaldi; and Moaman Aliwa, a camera assistant. The Israeli military released a statement claiming it had targeted Al-Sharif because he allegedly headed a Hamas cell. However, the Israeli government has not provided evidence to back up these claims. The Al Jazeera Media Network and the South African National Editors' Forum (Sanef) have condemned the killing of Al-Sharif and his colleagues as an assassination and a 'blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom'. Sharif Mosa, a Palestinian photojournalist living in South Africa, spoke at Sunday's demonstration, describing the targeted killing of Gazan journalists as an attempt to 'steal' the Palestinian story by eliminating witnesses. 'Every colonial project survives on two weapons: physical extermination of the colonised people and control of the narrative. The power to erase, distort and rewrite reality,' said Mosa. '[These journalists] were killed not because they were in the wrong place, but because they were in the right place. Journalists are the antidote of colonial propaganda… Killing journalists is how Israel tries to maintain control over the narrative. But every journalist killed makes the truth louder, and today is a statement about that.' Crystal Orderson, a South African journalist, condemned the 'brutality' meted out against journalists in Gaza who were attempting to document the reality on the ground. 'The question today is, since when has journalism become a crime? Clearly, for the journalists like Anas [al-Sharif]… reporting the truth has become that crime,' she said. 'We're standing here today in solidarity… We grew up under apartheid, we knew the role of the media under apartheid… I want to remind the young journalists that it's important to tell the story of truth… [and] human suffering. We can't be silent. In newsrooms across South Africa, we need to stand up for the truth.' Al-Sharif and his colleagues were among many Palestinian journalists who have been documenting the devastation wrought by Israel's attacks on the Gaza Strip in the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas assault on Israel that killed 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage. Since then, Israeli forces have killed more than 60,000 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza. This includes a large number of media workers on the frontline. Waiting for death In the month before Al-Sharif was killed, both the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Irene Khan, the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, released statements expressing concern about his safety. This followed 'online attacks and unfounded accusations by the Israeli army' about Al-Sharif's affiliation with Hamas, according to the UN. Khan said that fears surrounding Al-Sharif's safety were well founded as 'there is growing evidence that journalists in Gaza have been targeted and killed by the Israeli army on the basis of unsubstantiated claims that they were Hamas terrorists'. The CPJ said the Israel Defense Forces had previously made unfounded claims that journalists it killed in Gaza were terrorists, including four Al Jazeera staff. At Sunday's march, Journalists Against Apartheid demanded that: Media organisations call Israel's killing of media workers 'what it is – a war crime'; Israel must immediately release all arbitrarily detained Palestinian journalists in the West Bank and Gaza; and The Israeli media ban must end, allowing foreign correspondents entry to Gaza. 'We stand in solidarity with protesters around the world who have condemned Israel's reprehensible killings this week. Governments must act immediately to protect remaining Palestinian journalists before all of Gaza's media workers are killed. We stand with international human rights organisations who recognise that Israel's military actions and policies in Palestine amount to apartheid and genocide,' said Journalists Against Apartheid. In late 2023, South Africa filed a case asking the International Court of Justice to declare that Israel was in breach of its obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention. Almost two years later, the case is still ongoing. International media ban Since 7 October 2023, no international journalists have been permitted entry to Gaza, other than a few controlled visits alongside Israeli soldiers that restricted independent reporting. Human rights investigators have also been barred. This has made Palestinian journalists working in the region the primary source of facts and reports about the effects of bombardments by Israeli forces and the growing threat of starvation among Gazans due to the blockade on aid. International media and human rights organisations, including the CPJ, have called for Israel to allow media workers and investigators into Gaza to document the situation on the ground. Restricted access to the region has made it challenging to establish the exact number of journalists killed. Sara Qudah, regional director for the Middle East and North Africa at the Committee to Protect Journalists, told Daily Maverick the organisation was often forced to rely on media reports when tracking the loss of life. 'The grave reality of documenting attacks on the press in the Israel-Gaza war is that we have known of instances where whole families have been killed in strikes, leaving no one to contact to verify details of a journalist or media worker's case. Other times, we face challenges getting hold of the outlet, or remaining family members don't even have information about the outlets the journalists worked at,' she said. The CPJ puts the number of journalists and media workers killed in the Israel-Gaza war between 2023 to 2025 at more than 190, which exceeds the number of press members that were killed worldwide in the previous three years (2020 to 2022). However, some organisations have estimated that the death toll is higher. DM
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
Tristan Tate defends Dricus against 'racist' comments
Tristan Tate – the brother of Andrew Tate – has defended Dricus du Plessis against critics who labelled him a 'racist'. Like the former UFC Middleweight World Champion, Tristan is known for his outspoken views on farm killings, 'white genocide,' and his endorsement of US President Donald Trump. Tristan, like Andrew, is also a former professional kickboxer. On his X account, Tristan Tate defended Dricus du Plessis against his critics. Tagging the former UFC Middleweight World Champion, Tristan posted: 'The hate @dricusduplessis is getting from people is totally unjustified.' He added, 'Chin up, champ, ignore the noise'. Tristan previously defended Dricus after fellow UFC fighter Israel 'Izzy' Adesanya claimed that the South African was 'not African'. He posted: 'Saying @dricusduplessis isn't African because he's white is super racist. 'He's African and so is Elon, do none of you know basic history?'. On X, many South Africans have accused Dricus of being a 'racist' after he publicly praised US President Donald Trump, who accused South Africa of promoting a 'white genocide'. Earlier this year, the 31-year-old said of the newly re-elected statesman: 'He is amazing, and I've had the privilege of meeting him. 'He said good changes are coming. He's holding many people and countries accountable for everything, and it's amazing to see'. Dricus also gave a 'big shout out to fellow South African Elon Musk for also doing the right thing.' Dricus du Plessis has praised Donald Trump and Elon Musk for speaking out about South Africa. Images via Instagram: @ufc Dricus – who has been vocal about farm killings – also infamously criticised South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Speaking to US interviewer Nina Drama ahead of his UFC title fight last year, the Pretoria MMA fighter accused the government of 'screwing up' the country. He said: 'It's the worst government in the world by a long shot. We are truly and exceptionally s**t…it's the most corrupt in the world.' He continued: 'Our country is beautiful, the people are amazing…..There are a lot of great people doing great work. But I have to say, the government is terrible. Do I admit the tenacity with which they screw up? It's astonishing'. Of President Cyril Ramaphosa, he added: 'He takes all the money.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
