‘Really upsetting': Couple's $252k nightmare
A Melbourne couple's dream home renovation to allow them to become foster carers has turned into 'big black hole' with a bitter dispute emerging, involving an alleged bucket of poo, and the house uninhabitable after more than a year of works.
Lucy* and Leo* claim their renovation has turned into 'a disintegration of the house', ballooning costs and a disgusting find on the home's doorstep.
'(Somone) took a bucket into our home and defecated in our house and then left it outside our front door in the garden,' Lucy told news.com.au.
The couple claimed they were later locked out of their property after the building company did not return to open the locks when the contract was terminated.
'There was a huge lock and a huge chain. Leo had to get a grinder to get the lock off,' Lucy said. 'We shouldn't have to break into our own house.'
But surprisingly, while the couple who are in their mid 40s, are furious with the building company – they have also criticised National Australia Bank for what they see as its contribution to the nightmare scenario.
The bank advised reducing the construction payment schedule from 11 to six instalments resulting in what the couple claim was an alarming overpayment to the company.
'The bank made us change the payment schedule, which allowed the building company to access more money upfront,' Lucy claimed.
'It means the building company were being overpaid at each stage.'
In a letter to the building company in March this year, the couple's lawyers stated the value of the work completed sat at $168,000, despite the couple already paying out $252,000.
Demolition of part of the home began in 2023 and yet the house still resembles a building site, said Lucy, forcing the couple to end the contract at the end of March this year.
'It's so disheartening,' she said.
In March, a building surveyor made directions to the building company to fix a number of works. Defects had also been identified in an expert's report from last year with 10 issues yet to be rectified, the couple's lawyers claimed.
'My partner had to pull out the installation in the roof as the builder had allowed birds to nest and plastered over it and did not remove the bird's nest,' Lucy noted.
The couple requested immediate repayment of $87,000 from the building company earlier this year. Now the couple's lawyers are preparing a case to take to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
The building company did not respond to request for comment.
Do you have a story? Contact sarah.sharples@news.com.au
MORE: Tradie's colossal 5.5m find in Aus backyard
Lucy is worried they can't finish the house and will be forced to sell with a loss of $700,000.
Before the renovation the house was worth $1.1 million with the valuation set to jump to $1.25 million to $1.3 million after works were completed.
'We had a real estate agent come through to tell us what we can get now if we sell it incomplete and he told us we would be lucky to get $800,000,' she said.
'So we would lose $400,000 for our principal place of residence and lose $300,000 paid out on legal fees and the builder. That is a $700,000 loss and I can't do that to Leo when he has worked his arse off to pay the mortgage.
'It's a really terrible situation and it's highly stressful.'
Meanwhile, the couple claim they felt unsupported by NAB when making the second last payment of $84,000.
'I rang them and said 'I just want to pay half as we don't have what we are paying for here',' she said.
But she was told by NAB that if she didn't want to pay the full amount that an option was to either to go through an assessment with the credit team as to whether the payment schedule could be changed. Otherwise, they could terminate the building company's contract, reapply for a loan and 'start again'.
Lucy is critical that NAB touts flexibility when it comes to the loan but said that isn't the case and said terminating wasn't an option.
'In that situation, we would have half a house and would be faced with getting sued by the builder and the suing part would have exceeded us making the payment, as it could have been over $100,000,' she said.
When the couple eventually terminated the contract earlier this year they claimed the house was already more than 290 days overdue.
'We can't live there. We have to live in my one bedroom apartment as newlyweds but we've got two little dogs and have to take them out five to six times a day and it's just not fair,' Lucy said.
The couple are now paying the mortgage on the apartment and house, as well as the construction loan, with their request to remain on interest only payments rejected by NAB.
'We are typical Aussie battlers – we don't have lucrative jobs,' Lucy noted.
Meanwhile, Leo believes banks should introduce more inspections before payments are made.
'We are in debt for a house that should have been completed in May last year,' he said.
'It's been compounded by the bank giving us only one option, which was a construction loan of six repayments. If it was a broader range of say 11 repayments and proper inspections we wouldn't be in this situation.'
Lucy said the couple felt like they were 'fobbed' off after lodging complaints with NAB over the handling of the construction loan and have taken the matter to dispute resolution service, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).
The couple knocked back an initial offer from NAB of two months repayment of interest, Lucy said.
They then declined an offer made during the AFCA proceedings, which are continuing, with another meeting being held on Tuesday.
'We are in a housing crisis and we have an empty house and have one we could offer up for rent and we can't do it. It's terrible. We would love to be in position to put our friend, who is a pensioner in the unit, but I can't help. I can't help children as I can't have foster kids in a one-bedroom apartment,' Lucy said.
'I mourn and cry about our freedom of choice as it's so limited. Our life is on hold until we can sort out the bank and the building company.'
Lucy wants to raise more awareness about construction loans, sounding the alarm that she believes consumers are being put at a disadvantage with reduced payment stages, which are generally seen as standard in the industry.
'The banks may think its efficiency or streamlining but it's actually to the detriment to the customer,' she said.
'If I was able to keep the 11 progress payments as per the original contract, I would pay interest on $56,000 for the work completed to date. But because of NAB's product design limitation, I am paying interest on $252,000 and funded the building company for 90 per cent of the work in a house we cannot occupy.'
She believes many other Aussies are also impacted by the same scenario.
NAB would not comment on the specific customer issues.
'Customers have control over releasing payments to a builder as a project progresses under a construction loan. They do this when they are satisfied with the progress of each stage the builder has reached,' said NAB executive Megan Bond.
'It is industry standard for these payments to be made in five stages. This structure ensures customers are entering into an agreement with financially solvent builder.
'Any request to deviate from the agreed payment schedule needs to go through a review process.'
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the Victorian Building Authority (VBA) said they had received three complaints regarding the building company over the last two years.
'Two of the three have been dealt with,' they noted.
'The VBA is waiting on more information from the third complainant before progressing the matter.'
The VBA has sent out an inspector to examine the building work and complete a report.
The couple did not want to name the building company publicly as the dispute is ongoing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Over the top' house sells for $18.5m
It was described as capturing 'the romance and timeless beauty of a Mediterranean villa', and the house known as 'Formentera' certainly does that. You won't find too many grand Australian homes with internal finishes quite like this. Even its latest vendors, sources say, considered them a bit 'over the top'. The grand six-bedroom home at 86 Lang Rd, Centennial Park, has just sold for $18.5m after 27 days on the market via Ray White Double Bay's Ashley Bierman and Thomas Popple, in conjunction with Ben Collier and Daniel Acocks at The Agency. But it had been on the market since last September with Collier, initially with hopes of $23m. The result fell at the lower end of its latest $18.5m-$20m guide, with the buyers known to be banker Andrew Cox and his partner, Pru, moving from 22 Attunga St, Woollahra that's listed with Collier. They no doubt factored in a reno for the Lang Rd mansion, to bring it more in line with Australian contemporary tastes. The recent Wentworth Courier House of the Week property, which gets its name from the smallest of the Spanish Balearic Islands, is currently owned by Rob Speedie, Novotech CFO, and Annabelle Mooney, the former JPMorgan managing director. The pair bought the four-storey house in 2021 for $12.5 million from car dealers Paul and Elizabeth Warren, of the Peter Warren Automotives clan. Perhaps it was these previous owners who were behind the 'exquisite hand-painted ceilings, architectural detailing, and a warm Mediterranean palette'. The marble kitchen, with its island bench, Ilve cooker and integrated Sub-Zero fridges, has all the mod cons, but is probably set for a makeover. What would have sold the place, though, was the 854sqm landholding in a prime location on millionaire's row in Centennial Park, with the buyers looking beyond the current design of the 650sq m of internal living space. As Kirsten Craze wrote in her recent feature: 'Outdoors, the landscaped grounds include a European parterre front yard with a pond and manicured hedges, as well as a rear yard with a huge pool, a paved terrace and lawn. 'The first floor is home to a family bathroom plus four bedrooms including the palatial primary and secondary suite, both with large dressing rooms, balconies and deluxe ensuites. 'One more level includes a fifth bedroom or teenager retreat with adjoining sitting room, a walk-in wardrobe and ensuite. Above the double lock up garage and utility room, a convenient one-bedroom au pair or guest apartment comes complete with a kitchen and bathroom, as well as its own private entrance. 'Across from Centennial Park, Formentera is within easy access of Woollahra shops, Oxford St, the Allianz Stadium precinct, Entertainment Quarter, horse riding and the Sporting Club of Sydney.'
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Osborne shipyard traders face nervous wait in new AUKUS review
For Port Adelaide bakery owner Philip Donnelly, the AUKUS pact has brought a sense of long-term security. In the years to come, the local workforce is set to grow by thousands — with nuclear submarine workers to be based at the nearby Osborne Naval Shipyard. But uncertainty has reverberated across the Pacific following Thursday's announcement that the US government will review the agreement. Mr Donnelly, who said he has invested in the area as a business owner and resident, found the news concerning. "There was a lot of confidence around the initial announcement, and a lot of investment in infrastructure and in business," he said. "I know a lot of people have invested money into manufacturing so I'm sure they'd be waking up feeling pretty nervous about the future events and to see how they unfold." But the review did not come as a shock for others in the area. Port Adelaide Traders Association chair Ryan Jones had predicted an evaluation would take place following the US election. "I was surprised it took them this long," he said. "We kind of expected it. We saw that happen in the UK, when Keir Starmer got in." The federal and state governments took a similar view in the wake of the announcement, downplaying concerns about the future of the agreement. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he remained "very confident" AUKUS would be delivered. He suggested the 30-day review was no different to one conducted by the Australian government, and said Australia had been briefed in advance about the review. Hindmarsh MP Mark Butler, whose electorate takes in the shipyard, said the community had dealt with changes to defence policy over a period of several years. But he acknowledged the review had caused "a lot of nervousness" in the community. "What the community wants, what the workforce down there want, is certainty," he said. "Over the last decade it was, 'do we buy them off the shelf from Japan?', 'do we invest in French technology?' Former US president Joe Biden announced the AUKUS deal in 2021, when Australia terminated an earlier deal to purchase submarines from France. Since then, AUKUS has enjoyed bipartisan support in all three countries — with senior Trump administration having spoken in support of it. But late last month, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth requested that Australia significantly boost its defence spending "as soon as possible". US defence officials have said the AUKUS review will ensure the pact aligns with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda. Hundreds of millions of dollars have already been invested to prepare Australia for AUKUS, and to ensure Osborne has the capability to construct nuclear submarines. A new $480 million training academy is under construction, and university places have been designated to build the workforce. Despite the review, Premier Peter Malinauskas said the government remained confident the submarines would be built in South Australia. "I can understand people's concerns and the reason for the questions, that's natural," he told ABC Radio Adelaide. Mr Malinauskas also dismissed calls for the federal government to conduct its own review, pointing to the amount of work already underway. "It's a bit unfortunate from my perspective that the Lefevre Peninsula at Osborne is a bit out of sight out of mind — you've got to get in a car and drive down there to if you want to see what's going on," he said. "But if you go there … where they're building the skills and training academy, there is lorry after lorry doing earthmoving works to build an over $400 million facility, which is under construction, which is going to hold the principal training facility for people working on SSN-AUKUS. "So, things are happening." The state opposition and Greens both called for parliamentary committees to probe the AUKUS deal. Shadow Treasurer Sam Telfer said Australian governments must be proactive in shoring up the agreement. "A review in itself doesn't mean a big change but the potential for there to be that change needs to be something which is prominent in the mind of both the premier and the prime minister," he said. Greens parliamentary leader Robert Simms said the future of South Australia was too reliant on the Trump administration under the AUKUS arrangement. "We know, and South Australians have seen this over many years now, that promises of submarine jobs often fail to materialise," he said. "What we should be doing instead is considering alternatives for green manufacturing here in South Australia."
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Jacob Greber to replace Laura Tingle as 7.30 political editor, ABC announces
Award-winning journalist Jacob Greber will join 7.30 as political editor, the ABC has announced. Greber takes over from Laura Tingle, who stepped down from the role last month to become the public broadcaster's global affairs editor. Greber, who is the ABC's chief digital political correspondent, has had an almost 30-year journalism career covering economics, politics and world affairs. "It's an incredible time to join 7.30 with Sarah Ferguson and the team. Our audience rightly demands clarity and insight about the people who govern us and the challenges we face as a nation," Greber said. "I also salute Laura Tingle — an absolute class act and fearless force of nature. I'm humbled and thrilled to pick up where she's left off." The announcement was made during Thursday night's program, with 7.30 presenter Sarah Ferguson breaking the news to viewers. Greber will continue to write regularly for the ABC News website and app and appear on the Politics Now podcast and weekly politics program Insiders. Greber's journalism career started in the journalistic equivalent of the mail room — as a copyboy in the Canberra press gallery. He covered Queensland state politics for The Courier-Mail before moving to Switzerland — his father's homeland. There he worked for the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation and then Bloomberg News in Zurich, covering the European economy and Switzerland's global banks. That experience parlayed perfectly into a role at the Australian Financial Review on his return to Australia in 2012. He started as economics correspondent in Canberra before a three-year stint as US correspondent in Washington DC in 2018, before returning as senior political correspondent. He joined the ABC in 2024. ABC director of news Justin Stevens said he was thrilled to see Greber join 7.30, the nightly current affairs show that he himself used to lead as executive producer. "Jacob has been a fantastic addition to the ABC and has just come off a superb election campaign," he said. "7.30 is a flagship program for ABC News and Jacob joins a brilliant team. We can't wait to have him on the program." Greber takes up the new role from July 7. Tingle, who also joined the ABC from the AFR, was 7.30's political reporter for six years. She starts her new role in early July.
