logo
Osborne shipyard traders face nervous wait in new AUKUS review

Osborne shipyard traders face nervous wait in new AUKUS review

For Port Adelaide bakery owner Philip Donnelly, the AUKUS pact has brought a sense of long-term security.
In the years to come, the local workforce is set to grow by thousands — with nuclear submarine workers to be based at the nearby Osborne Naval Shipyard.
But uncertainty has reverberated across the Pacific following Thursday's announcement that the US government will review the agreement.
Mr Donnelly, who said he has invested in the area as a business owner and resident, found the news concerning.
"There was a lot of confidence around the initial announcement, and a lot of investment in infrastructure and in business," he said.
"I know a lot of people have invested money into manufacturing so I'm sure they'd be waking up feeling pretty nervous about the future events and to see how they unfold."
But the review did not come as a shock for others in the area.
Port Adelaide Traders Association chair Ryan Jones had predicted an evaluation would take place following the US election.
"I was surprised it took them this long," he said.
"We kind of expected it. We saw that happen in the UK, when Keir Starmer got in."
The federal and state governments took a similar view in the wake of the announcement, downplaying concerns about the future of the agreement.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said he remained "very confident" AUKUS would be delivered.
He suggested the 30-day review was no different to one conducted by the Australian government, and said Australia had been briefed in advance about the review.
Hindmarsh MP Mark Butler, whose electorate takes in the shipyard, said the community had dealt with changes to defence policy over a period of several years.
But he acknowledged the review had caused "a lot of nervousness" in the community.
"What the community wants, what the workforce down there want, is certainty," he said.
"Over the last decade it was, 'do we buy them off the shelf from Japan?', 'do we invest in French technology?'
Former US president Joe Biden announced the AUKUS deal in 2021, when Australia terminated an earlier deal to purchase submarines from France.
Since then, AUKUS has enjoyed bipartisan support in all three countries — with senior Trump administration having spoken in support of it.
But late last month, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth requested that Australia significantly boost its defence spending "as soon as possible".
US defence officials have said the AUKUS review will ensure the pact aligns with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.
Hundreds of millions of dollars have already been invested to prepare Australia for AUKUS, and to ensure Osborne has the capability to construct nuclear submarines.
A new $480 million training academy is under construction, and university places have been designated to build the workforce.
Despite the review, Premier Peter Malinauskas said the government remained confident the submarines would be built in South Australia.
"I can understand people's concerns and the reason for the questions, that's natural," he told ABC Radio Adelaide.
Mr Malinauskas also dismissed calls for the federal government to conduct its own review, pointing to the amount of work already underway.
"It's a bit unfortunate from my perspective that the Lefevre Peninsula at Osborne is a bit out of sight out of mind — you've got to get in a car and drive down there to if you want to see what's going on," he said.
"But if you go there … where they're building the skills and training academy, there is lorry after lorry doing earthmoving works to build an over $400 million facility, which is under construction, which is going to hold the principal training facility for people working on SSN-AUKUS.
"So, things are happening."
The state opposition and Greens both called for parliamentary committees to probe the AUKUS deal.
Shadow Treasurer Sam Telfer said Australian governments must be proactive in shoring up the agreement.
"A review in itself doesn't mean a big change but the potential for there to be that change needs to be something which is prominent in the mind of both the premier and the prime minister," he said.
Greens parliamentary leader Robert Simms said the future of South Australia was too reliant on the Trump administration under the AUKUS arrangement.
"We know, and South Australians have seen this over many years now, that promises of submarine jobs often fail to materialise," he said.
"What we should be doing instead is considering alternatives for green manufacturing here in South Australia."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australian motorists could be spared fuel price rises as tensions in Iran simmer
Australian motorists could be spared fuel price rises as tensions in Iran simmer

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Australian motorists could be spared fuel price rises as tensions in Iran simmer

Australian motorists are being urged not to panic after the price of crude oil rose in recent days on the back of the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Motorists in Australia could be spared from the worst of the fallout from the Middle-East, even as the price of the commodity surges. Futures markets for Brent oil have spiked in recent days and are now buying $US75 a barrel, when it was just over $US65 this time last week. It comes as tensions out of the Middle East flare up, after Israel undertook preâ€'emptive attacks on Iran. It said the strikes were aimed at eliminating Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missile capabilities, but the fears in the market are based on what Iran will do in response. If it hits neighbouring oilfields or blocks the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 per cent of the world's oil supplies are shipped, the price of the commodity could skyrocket. But NRMA spokesman Peter Khoury said every time there were geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, there was an initial knee jerk reaction from the market before it stabilised. He said Australian motorists should remain calm. 'What we are seeing here is an initial reaction to what has happened in the last few hours in Iran, but this is not uncommon,' he told NewsWire. 'Until you see those increases rise and they start occurring in the Asian markets then Australian motorists shouldn't be panicking.' Mr Khoury said currently there were no issues that there will be supply issues. 'It is important that it is put into context – we get our oil from Asia, we get our refined fuel from Asia, so there's no need to panic,' he said. AMP chief economist Shane Oliver wrote in his latest note fuel prices could be on the rise, but it would need the price of oil to remain elevated. 'Oil prices were already rising this month on signs of increasing risks and have spiked further – with the rise so far this month threatening a flow of around 12 cents a litre for Australian petrol prices if sustained at these levels,' he said. Swissoquote Bank senior analyst Ipek Ozkardeskaya said the price of oil would either rise or fall depending on Iran's response. 'One scenario is de-escalation, which could bring oil back below $US70 per barrel, around the 200-day moving average, shifting the market's attention back to supply-demand dynamics, trade disruptions, and renewed pressure on Russian oil,' she wrote in an economic note. 'The other scenario is broader escalation, potentially pushing oil prices toward $US90 –$100 per barrel – hopefully only temporarily.' Dr Oliver said the flow on impacts from this could see inflation spike over the short term. 'While petrol prices could spike on the latest Israel/Iran conflict, the RBA is likely to look through any boost to inflation as temporary and focus more on any drag to growth.' Despite the rise in costs, Dr Oliver reminded motorists the price of crude oil had just gone back to levels it was this time last year. He also believes subdued consumer confidence, weak business conditions and easing inflation would all add to a case for a rate cut. 'Following the weak March quarter GDP data our base case is for 0.25 per cent rate cuts in July, August, November and February taking the cash rate to 2.85 per cent. The money market sees about an 88 per cent chance of a 0.25 per cent cut in July and just over three cuts by year end.

Expert says Australia's 'chronically over-budget' warship project should be scrapped
Expert says Australia's 'chronically over-budget' warship project should be scrapped

9 News

timean hour ago

  • 9 News

Expert says Australia's 'chronically over-budget' warship project should be scrapped

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Chronically over-budget, significantly delayed and lacking firepower - that's the expert assessment of a major warship project they say should be scrapped. The Hunter Class frigate project is already seven years behind schedule and many billions of dollars more expensive than initially anticipated. In 2018, British company BAE Systems won a $35 billion tender to build nine frigates, or $3.8 billion each, with the first scheduled to be in service by 2027. Australia's next Hunter-class frigates will be based on this British design. (Nine) By 2020 the price tag had blown out to $45 billion or $5 billion a piece, and Defence is now estimating it will cost $27 billion to build just frigates, or $9 billion each, with the first to be in service by 2034 - seven years late. BAE Systems is the company that will build Australia's AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines. Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge said the Hunter Class project was the "high point of decadence" in Defence decision-making. He said Defence adjusted the original BAE British design with a series of add-ons, including different combat and radar systems - which made it massively more expensive. "That frigate program is beyond scandalous - It's entered ludicrous mode for a wasteful use of taxpayer money and a very slow, small contribution to Australian military power," Shoebridge said. Australia's next Hunter-class frigates will be based on this British design. (Nine) He said the Hunter had just 32 missiles, which was a third of the weaponry of the Chinese cruiser that circumnavigated Australia in March. "We're in a very dangerous world and a very dangerous period in the world, and waiting to the mid-2030s and into the 2040s for three frigates for this amount of money, makes no sense. "We could go to the Japanese or the South Koreans and get a properly armed cruiser much faster than BAE is delivering this program." Defence analyst Dr Marcus Hellyer was equally scathing of the Hunter frigate, saying Navy's adjustments to the design had not only significantly increased its cost, but the frigate's weight, taking it from 8000 tonnes to more than 10,000 tonnes, making it slower. "It is monstrously expensive," Hellyer said. "And I would say, if you're in a hole, stop digging. "The government itself has decided it can't wait for the Hunter Class frigate, so it has kicked off a new frigate program and it is considering a competition between a German design and a Japanese design. "So the government itself has pretty much said we need to do something different - in a sense, they're halfway there already." Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the Hunter frigate project would not be cut despite its problems. "I wish I had a time machine to go back to 2016 and avoid the mistakes that the Coalition government made, but we've moved on," Conroy said. "We've got the project on track. Steel is being cut right now, we've signed the contract, there are about 2500 people working on this project right now. "The fastest way of delivering new capability for the Royal Australian Navy, is following through on this, building this project, now that we've fixed up many of the mistakes the Coalition government made." navy Australia defence national CONTACT US Auto news:Is this the next Subaru WRX? Mysterious performance car teased.

Dump it, Trump, dump it! Save us the trouble.
Dump it, Trump, dump it! Save us the trouble.

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Dump it, Trump, dump it! Save us the trouble.

Before we consider increasing the defence budget we should be looking at how this money would be better spent now (' AUKUS review a chance to rethink our alliances ', June 13). It's fairly obvious that AUKUS is a bad investment. Apart from the fact that our submarine delivery looks to be jeopardised by the US failing to meet the quota for its own fleet, according to experts, nuclear subs are not the type we need. The delivery time is too distant, and they are likely to be made obsolete by other defence technologies. We should cut our losses and ditch this dud deal. Roger Johnson, New Lambton Heights Trump's administration is reviewing the AUKUS deal to see if it meets the criteria for 'America First'. That says it all: America's interests will always be its primary concern. We need to rethink the AUKUS deal and create a defence strategy that maintains our sovereignty while we are still an active partner in the alliance with the United States. Australia cannot afford to plough billions of dollars into a strategy for an end product (nuclear submarines) that may never materialise, or be superseded by new technologies. Leo Sorbello, Leichhardt The longer Trump is president, the more Australia's ties with America become quicksand. If Australia is to have any chance of building a credible defence capacity, we jeopardise our security by putting our faith in the increasingly erratic and autocratic leader of a once-great ally. Trump's America-first agenda and contradictory political allegiances are plainly a serious threat to Western democracy. Do we really want to be America's vassal in such a precarious world? Bruce Spence, Balmain May I humbly suggest that our PM tells Donald Trump to keep his non-existent submarines and that we simply pretend we have some? Given they're supposed to be so stealthy and invisible, our non-existent enemies will never know. Thus, we get the deterrence effect and can now afford a truckload of public housing and other useful social services. Tim Parker, Balmain Disaster it is but ironic to say, 'It's time to recognise that since the AUKUS deal was announced, circumstances have changed'. No, they haven't. The circumstances under which AUKUS was announced involved a hubristic Australian prime minister, Scott Morrison, desperately trying to salvage a reputation he had already trashed before the electorate finally woke up and voted him out of office. In America, we face the prospect of having to relate to an even greater threat to intelligent leadership, the world's biggest liar, egomaniac, self-absorbed buffoon, Donald Trump. No change. Just different individuals. Let's get us the hell out of AUKUS, away from a USA-dominant sphere of influence, and be 'the grown-up country'. Frederick Jansohn, Rose Bay Morrison and Turnbull are both in this paper talking about submarines. I'm sure if I looked hard enough I'd find Abbott bemoaning the end of Western civilisation or whatever cultural crusade he is on this week. I long for the days when the Letters page was filled with indignant outrage and calls for ex-PMs to be silent whenever Paul Keating had the temerity to comment on Sydney's architecture. Derek Elmes, Faulconbridge Something seems very wrong. The party (the Coalition) that claims to be the best economy managers has, in about two decades, saddled Australia with two massive white elephants. First, Tony Abbott ruined the NBN with his fibre-to-the-node scheme, which cost more than the original and left us with a horse-and-cart model. Not to be outdone, Scott Morrison left us with a World War II defence plan that focused on submarines. We can only hope Trump cancels it with a child-like stamping of his feet. Meanwhile, the Coalition is still focused on keeping Trump happy in an equally childlike display. Philip Dowle, Wickham We can only hope and pray that Trump scraps the nuclear submarine deal. It would save us the embarrassment of having to cancel it ourselves. I suspect most Aussies would prefer not to be tied to the untrustworthy Trump regime, on this or any other deal, for that matter. Let's face it, subs will probably be useless war machines by the time they are delivered. Should the deal survive, it will probably cost us twice the original estimate and take twice as long to complete too. Unsurprisingly, the Coalition already has its knickers in a knot over the review. Without the AUKUS subs deal, they'd have to come up with another thought bubble – and vision isn't one of their strong suits. Graham Lum, North Rocks Rumour has it that Donald Trump thinks AUKUS is the month before September. Brian Roach, Westleigh I reckon this might be at least the 250th letter today opposing AUKUS and the submarines deal, but we will still be stuck with this horrible deal made at the whim of Scotty and Boris. I'd back the combined wisdom of Herald letter writers. Tom Lockley, Pyrmont Offer for Albanese James Massola muses (' Albanese needs to make Trump an offer he can't refuse ', June 13) on what our PM needs to do to respond to Trump, AUKUS and all the other uncertainties with our US relationship. While I think most Australians worry about Trump, we can't ignore the fact that the US has run its economy into the ground being sheriff for democracies the world over. While it would be nice to spend more on aid than defence, that's wishful thinking. Maybe us grey nomads could endorse some tax reform to fund increased defence spending that keeps our kids and grandkids safe. After all, our fathers and grandfathers did much more by laying down their lives for us. It's time to act, not react. Brian Barrett, Padstow As James Massola reports on the 'big meet', the Trump administration demands the rest of the world do what Trump wants. This leaves Australia isolated in a fragile part of the world. Albanese expects (maybe) to get a sideline meeting with Trump at the G7 summit. What an insult to Australia. Despite our once close relationship, we obviously can't expect any favours from the world's No.1 bully. Time to review our strategic partnerships and call Trump's bluff. Denis Suttling, Newport Beach Don't seize, desist! So, the Liberals have 'seized' on the AUKUS review (' Turnbull, opposition seize on AUKUS review ', June 13). What hypocrisy! The 'deal' they instigated involves us paying the US a bucketload of money now in order that they may, if they feel like it, sell us a couple of submarines in future for an even more eye-watering sum. I hope the review ends it. Brenton McGeachie, Hackett (ACT) They told us Crown would not have pokies. We didn't bet on it If every other state in Australia can function without the ridiculously high number of poker machines that NSW has, then our state government can no longer fail to set targets to reduce gambling harm (' Crown ramps up push to allow 500 cashless pokies in casino ', June 13). The most recent audit incredibly predicts it would take 55 years for NSW to reduce its poker machine numbers to the national average. How did we get here? These symbols of greed and misery cannot be ignored indefinitely, nor indeed be added to the Barangaroo behemoth. Lorraine Hickey, Green Point It wasn't that long ago that we, the people of Sydney, were assured by the NSW government that poker machines would not be allowed at Crown Casino. It would be a classy joint, we were told. In 2013, then premier Barry O'Farrell said: 'Star City has 1500 poker machines. The VIP gaming facility at Barangaroo, should it proceed, will not have any. It's a high value, high worth individual enterprise. It's not a full-blown casino. It'll be restricted.' The cynics among us said: Sure, just give it a few years and see; before long, there will be pokies at Crown Casino. Perhaps the cynics were only realists. Politics, big business, property development and gambling – it's always a heady, if sadly predictable, mix in our fair state. Ross Duncan, Potts Point I might be the odd one out to say this, as I have never played a pokie in my life, but Crown casinos having cashless pokie licences is probably a lesser evil than the reluctance to introduce cashless pokies in all parts of the state. The government must stop pussy-footing and instead introduce drastic reforms to reduce harm from pokies on families, which has a domino effect on our health system due to depression, even suicide, and economically for families who lose their house and/or relationship. Giving Crown cashless pokies will be a boost, not that it is going to solve any problems, but at least other pokies in various clubs will be forced to follow the cashless methodology quickly. Mukul Desai, Hunters Hill If this passes, and poker machines are introduced into Crown Barangaroo, it will make a mockery of the original agreement and the trust that the people of Sydney and NSW had in the government to uphold it. Jenny Stephenson, Wollongong Free to air discontent Loss of employment through restructures, often driven by business decisions, is a fact of life, and dealing with it can be challenging; I know, I have been there twice (' TV pushed out by scary alternativ e', June 13). Waleed Aly has naturally sought to lay blame for the axing of his pet project on Channel 10's parent, US Paramount, along with a rapidly evolving alternative to traditional free-to-air station offerings for a diverse and highly discerning audience. Will I miss The Project? No. In all its 16 years I have never watched it. Allan Gibson, Cherrybrook Waleed Aly spells out how the rise of social media and streaming is destroying free-to-air television. Now with AI and the personal information that the tech bros control, the danger is to democracy itself as they line up behind Trump. It is encouraging to see, Michael Koziol ('Marines deployed as Trump says governor should be arrested', June 11), that the Californian governor is at last using words such as 'dictatorial' and 'shock troops out of control'. It has been plain to see for years that Trump plans to be a dictator. It may already be too late to protest. Gary Barnes, Mosman Online streaming and social media have changed how people consume news and current affairs, sadly resulting in free-to-air channels cancelling programs such as Q&A, The Drum and The Project. Social media undercuts traditional media. It is created at low or no cost by persons unknown and is rarely moderated or reviewed. The content often polarises opinion, as algorithms amplify existing bias and/or illusion. Trump's greater reach via social media contributed to his election win over the Democrats, even though the masses who elected him will experience worse outcomes under his regime. Free-to-air stations need to ensure they educate us with in-depth political, environmental and economic news and provide a platform for civil discourse for better policy formation, or we risk following the US down a rabbit hole. Anne Matheson, Gordon My children, born in the mid and late 1990s, never read newspapers and rarely watch TV, yet they are still tuned in to news events and current popular culture, which they get from other sources. Once us oldies go, there will be even less support for the traditional print and TV news outlets, which will possibly become an oddity. Con Vaitsas, Ashbury Supermarket planning Thank you, MP Kellie Sloane (' Lib calls for Rose Bay to be spared housing bid ', June 13), please add Roseville and Killara to your list of suburbs that have been unfairly targeted. Neither of these suburbs has a major supermarket. Margie Christowski, Roseville Aside from not being a town centre, Rose Bay is on a narrow peninsula. There are basically only two roads in and out. Irene Thom, Vaucluse He made life a beach The beauty and power of music is evident in Brian Wilson's life (' Pop music's genius composer Wilson rode waves of brilliance and torment in equal measure, dead at 82 ', June 13). Despite his damaged life, he created songs we love. Thank you. Music gives us joy, solace, dreams and memories, and touches every emotion and our souls. Today I am remembering Saturday night dances with fast feet, swinging skirts, many petticoats and big smiles. Bea Hodgson, Gerringong Postscript This week the first subject of note, which went on for days, was the King's Birthday Honours List. Honours lists normally bring in opinions, usually along the lines of 'Why are the lists so male heavy?' and 'Why do so many men get gongs for simply doing their well-paid jobs?' . We certainly got plenty of those this week, but nothing like the number of letters about Scott Morrison getting the country's highest honour, the Companion of the Order of Australia, just for being prime minister, or, officially, for his service to the public and the parliament (in other words, his well-paid job). The collective intake of breath was heard across the land, followed by the sharpening of knives. Yes, a few people wrote in saying that the honour was well-deserved because Morrison got Australia through COVID-19. The rest stopped choking only long enough to mention holidays in bushfire emergencies, hoses, handshakes refused, extra ministries and, most of all, robo-debt. Then there was discussion about sanctions being applied to two senior Israeli politicians. Opinion was generally in favour, although there were strong arguments against. Also, many questions about who deserves punishments in this world (spoiler alert: mostly Donald Trump). Trump always brings in letters, sometimes at the end of the week there have been so many high crimes and misdemeanours that it's hard to keep them in order. At the start of this week, it was Trump and the ongoing misery of Gaza. In the middle of the week, it was Trump and the Los Angeles troubles. And by the end of the week, it was all about AUKUS as Trump seemed to be vacillating about the agreement. The letter writers strongly advise walking away from AUKUS without a backward glance. There was also spirited discussion about illegal house building with the hope of forgiveness afterwards. There was, shall we say, no support at all for this. The last big story was mourning the Herald 's wonderful cartoonist John Shakespeare, who died this week at 63. Letters of lamentation poured in, remembering a lovely man. Harriet Veitch, acting letters editor

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store