Johnson shuts door on House vote before September on releasing Epstein files
Speaker Mike Johnson on Monday said he does not plan to allow votes on any measures related to the Jeffrey Epstein case in the House's final week in Washington before a weekslong recess, despite intense pressure from some of his own GOP members to go on the record on the issue.
Some of U.S. President Donald Trump's most loyal supporters in Congress have been pressing party leaders to allow for a vote to show they support transparency around the Epstein saga — an issue that continues to animate the MAGA base even as Trump has repeatedly sought to blame Democrats for fanning the flames.
The House forcing the Trump administration to turn over materials against its will would represent a remarkable rebuke of the president by his base. But the push has shown little forward momentum among the party's leadership on Capitol Hill.
Johnson told CNN on Monday the full House would not vote on a pending measure from members of his own party – a non-binding resolution calling for the release of additional Epstein files – before the chamber's August recess, which is slated to begin at week's end.
'My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing, and if further congressional action is necessary or appropriate, then we'll look at that, but I don't think we're at that point right now, because we agree with the president,' he said.
As part of a deal to approve the White House's rescissions package last week, Johnson reached an accord with GOP holdouts that allowed the House Rules Committee to advance that non-binding resolution calling for the Epstein files release. But it is unclear if that measure will make it to the House floor, with Johnson firmly standing behind Trump on the matter.
'There is no daylight between the House Republicans … the House and the president on maximum transparency,' Johnson said, adding that Trump wants 'all the credible files' on Epstein to be released and asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce grand jury testimony related to the case and 'all of that is in process right now.'
Still, a bipartisan group of House members — led by Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie — is seeking to circumvent Johnson and force a vote on a separate bill calling for the release of the files. Massie will need a majority of House members to sign on to what's known as a discharge petition to force a floor vote.
That measure wouldn't be considered by the full House until after Labor Day at the earliest if Massie is successful.
Johnson's leadership team had been privately signaling they would not bring up any Epstein measures this week, two Republicans familiar with the matter told CNN.
Enough GOP support secured to force vote
Ten House Republicans have now signed onto Massie's measure – a level of GOP support that would trigger a full vote by the GOP-controlled House on the measure if all Democrats supported it, as expected. But don't expect a new tranche of documents to immediately be made public.
A vote to compel the full House to consider the effort can't come until after Labor Day at the earliest when lawmakers return from their five-week summer recess. That's because Massie and California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna are using a discharge petition.
That procedural maneuver requires seven legislative days before House lawmakers can formally collect the necessary signatures. Once they prove they have support from 218 members, it would force party leaders to bring it to the floor.
Trump's attorney general has asked for grand jury material to be made public – which also is likely to be a slow-moving effort, and one that requires court approval. But the Massie and Khanna measure goes significantly further, requiring the Trump administration to release 'all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to Epstein within 30 days.
It would also require the White House to release a 'list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials' — a list that Trump's base has been demanding.
Khanna previously told CNN's Jake Tapper that he would deliver 'all 212 Democrats' on the measure. While many Democrats previously decried the promotion of conspiracy theories about Epstein, they have in recent days pushed for greater transparency, arguing Trump is trying to protect himself and aiming to further drive a wedge between Trump and his base.
'Why do we think President Joe Biden or President Barack Obama's names are being invoked because Donald Trump is running scared, and the Trump administration is running scared. What are they hiding from the American people, release the files so that the American people can make a decision on their own,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters during a press conference Monday.
With all Democrats behind the effort, 10 Republicans would be more than enough to meet the necessary 218 threshold. Along with Massie, the Republicans already on board are: Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Eric Burlison of Missouri, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, Eli Crane of Arizona, Cory Mills of Florida, Tom Barrett of Michigan, Max Miller of Ohio and Nancy Mace of South Carolina.
The move, of course, could end as many things in Congress do – with a lot of talk, a little corresponding action. Last week, Republicans held up a vote to approve a US$9 billion package of spending cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting, something Trump wanted, as they debated what to do on the Epstein case. They settled for the non-binding resolution calling for the release of additional files – which doesn't immediately force any action and to which Johnson has been noncommittal.
Even continued talk of the Epstein case, though, is likely to irk Trump. Over the weekend, the president seemed to acknowledge the intractability of the subject as he noted he had ordered the release of grand jury materials.
'With that being said, and even if the Court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request. It will always be more, more, more. MAGA!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
By Manu Raju, Sarah Ferris and Alison Main.
CNN's Nicky Robertson and Arlette Saenz contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
5 minutes ago
- National Post
What will happen if Canada Post workers reject 'final offers'?
Labour experts say another postal service strike is unlikely after unionized Canada Post workers rejected their employer's latest round of offers in a forced vote and the parties mull their next steps. Article content The Canadian Union of Postal Workers said Friday that the roughly 55,000 members represented by the union shot down the Canada Post's latest proposal, which would've seen wage hikes of about 13 per cent over four years and restructuring to add part-time workers to the deal. Article content Article content Article content Some 68.5 per cent of urban mail carriers who voted were against the deal, while their rural and suburban colleagues were 69.4 per cent against. Article content Article content Adam King, assistant professor in the labour studies program at the University of Manitoba, said the forced ratification vote ordered by the federal government and administered by the Canada Industrial Relations Board was a 'distraction.' Article content 'Hopefully, at the end of the day, we see an agreement reached at the table — where it should have been in the beginning,' he said in an interview. Article content 'Canada Post management is really going to have to put something on the table that the union actually thinks members will accept.' Article content Negotiations for a new collective agreement have been ongoing for more than a year and a half. The federal government asked CIRB to step in and scuttle a holiday season postal strike late last year, but the parties remain at an impasse. Article content Article content The Crown corporation requested Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu send its most recent proposals from late May — calling them the 'final offers' — to a forced vote from workers. Article content Article content Canada Post said in a statement Friday that it was 'disappointed' in the vote results and that it was weighing its next steps. Article content CUPW said in a bulletin to members last week that its negotiators are ready to head back to the bargaining table. Article content King acknowledged that while the vote didn't go in Canada Post's favour, it wasn't a 'resounding' rejection, with more than 30 per cent of voters coming out in favour of the deals as presented. Article content Larry Savage, professor in the department of labour studies at Brock University, said that apparent division in the ranks of CUPW would make it difficult to get members on a picket line. Article content 'Even if you could effectively organize a strike, it's not obvious to me that it would produce the results the union's looking for,' Savage said in an interview.
CTV News
5 minutes ago
- CTV News
Alberta MLAs push for U.S. trade at Boston conference
Three Alberta MLAs are in Boston this week to participate in talks aimed at improving trade relations between Alberta and the U.S. A team of Alberta MLAs is in Boston this week to advocate for barrier-free trade with the United States. The three MLAs, Glenn van Dijken, Angela Pitt and Chelsae Petrovic, will be attending the National Conference of State Legislators, a large summit where lawmakers from across the U.S. discuss policy and partnerships. According to the province, they're pushing for barrier-free trade with our American neighbours, highlighting Alberta as a reliable source for energy and agriculture. 'Given the sheer number of influential American legislators attending the NCSL, it's crucial to make sure Alberta is well represented in the room,' said van Dijken in a statement. The U.S. is Alberta's biggest trading partner, receiving more than $162 billion in exports last year. Energy products accounted for about $133.4 billion. The MLAs left for Boston on Aug. 2 and will return on Aug 7. Their schedules show them participating in a series of policy sessions, meetings and networking events. The trip south of the border comes amid the larger trade dispute between Canada and the U.S. While speaking on a U.S. talk show over the weekend, Dominic Leblanc, Canada's minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, said recent meetings in Washington were cordial and constructive. He added that he remains optimistic a deal can be done.
35 minutes ago
The costs of Trump's tariffs are starting to add up for Americans. Here's how
Little by little, the costs of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs are starting to show for American businesses and consumers. News of the tariff impact is mounting, from the Detroit Three automakers (new window) announcing they'll face extra costs this year totalling into the billions, to the stainless steel cookware manufacturer (new window) in Tennessee hit with a $75,000 US tariff bill on one shipment, right down to the coffee shops (new window) considering boosting the price of a cup because of tariffs on Brazil. Until recently, companies have somewhat shielded U.S. consumers from the full effects of the tariffs, either by rushing supplies into the country ahead of Trump's deadlines or absorbing the levies as a cost of doing business. But with tariffs on imports from roughly 100 U.S. trading partners due to rise this week (new window) from their current baseline of 10 per cent, tariff-related costs are headed nowhere but up. Alex Durante, senior economist of the Tax Foundation, a Washington-based policy and advocacy group, says the tariffs are hitting a broad range of U.S. businesses that rely on imports. I think the administration is going to have a really hard time trying to convince the American people that some of the price increases they're seeing are because of other factors not related to the tariffs, Durante said in an interview with CBC News. I just don't think most people are going to be fooled by that, he said. WATCH | Carney's point man on tariffs takes Canada's message to U.S. television: Trump, cabinet deny tariffs costing Americans While on a macro level the U.S. economy is generally chugging along just fine (new window) despite Trump's tactics, there's some fresh data suggesting the tariffs are acting as a drag: Trump and his cabinet members quickly brush aside any evidence that the tariffs are costing Americans, with the president even firing the head of the federal statistics agency (new window) that produces the country's employment report. We have a lot of money coming in, much more money than the country has ever seen, by hundreds of billions of dollars, Trump said Sunday when a reporter asked about tariffs. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer flat-out denied that Trump's tariffs policies are a factor in the jobs slump. I don't read tariff policy into that number, Greer told the CBS program Face the Nation (new window) on Sunday. Enlarge image (new window) Coffee producer Ricardo Rufino Jr. shows off processed coffee beans at Boa Esperanca farm in Braganca Paulista, Brazil, on Monday. The country is facing the prospect of 50 per cent tariffs on its products exported to the U.S., leaving some American coffee shops considering whether they'll have to raise prices. Photo: Associated Press / Andre Penner But if you're willing to look around, you can find plenty of examples of U.S. businesses feeling the pinch. Reuters news agency is compiling examples of how major companies around the world are responding to Trump's tariffs, such as hiking prices and issuing profit warnings. Retailers, big brands raising prices The Reuters tracker (new window) currently shows 22 U.S. companies raising prices, including retail giants (Walmart, Best Buy), footwear brands (Nike, Crocs, Birkenstock) and big-name makers of household goods (Colgate-Palmolive, Procter & Gamble, Clorox). It's hard to imagine many American consumers haven't bought something from those businesses this year. Other big-name U.S. firms have in recent days reported tariff impacts: Tech giant Apple (new window) says it faced $800 million in tariff-related costs last quarter alone, and expects that to rise to $1.1 billion this quarter. says it faced $800 million in tariff-related costs last quarter alone, and expects that to rise to $1.1 billion this quarter. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (new window) blames tariffs in part for a 5.1 per cent quarterly decline in revenue in its consumer goods division, which includes brands like Fruit of the Loom. blames tariffs in part for a 5.1 per cent quarterly decline in revenue in its consumer goods division, which includes brands like Fruit of the Loom. Tool manufacturer Stanley Black & Decker (new window) estimates its tariff costs will hit $800 million this year. Those corporate figures don't touch on another trend emerging in the U.S. economy: the downturn in visits by international travellers, dramatically so from Canada (new window) . Perhaps that's not exactly tariff-related, but Trump slamming other nations on trade by describing them as nasty, unfair and ripping off the U.S. is not exactly what you'd call a warm and welcoming tourism ad campaign either. WATCH | Economist says Canada has a better deal on Trump's tariffs than other countries: Higher prices could impact public opinion While some polling (new window) suggests more Americans disapprove of tariffs than approve, the issue does not appear to be a crucial source of public-opinion damage to Trump and the Republicans — at least not yet. That could change if the tariff costs on businesses accumulate so much that consumers can't help but see the impact. We know from the most recent presidential election that voters really disliked seeing higher prices, said Durante. He sees trouble ahead whether businesses pass along all, some or none of the extra tariff costs to consumers. If they're absorbing the price increases, that's less money that they could use to invest in their own businesses and jobs and further production, Durante said. So, even if we don't see the tariffs fully impacting final consumer prices, these are still some pretty harmful effects. Mike Crawley (new window) · CBC News · Senior reporter Mike Crawley has covered Ontario politics for CBC News since 2009. He began his career as a newspaper reporter in B.C., spent six years as a freelance journalist in various parts of Africa, then joined the CBC in 2005. Mike was born and raised in Saint John, N.B. Follow Mike Crawley on Twitter (new window)
