logo
Discrimination in football reached record high during 2024-25 season, damning Kick It Out report reveals

Discrimination in football reached record high during 2024-25 season, damning Kick It Out report reveals

Daily Mail​4 hours ago
Kick It Out received almost 1,400 reports of discrimination during the 2024-25 season, the anti-discrimination charity has revealed.
There were 1,398 reports of abuse, which is a new record high, up from 1,332 in the 2023-24 campaign.
The data shows a rise in sexism, transphobia, and faith-based abuse, with racism remaining the most reported form of discrimination.
There was a big spike in sexism and misogyny, with the number of complaints rising by 67 per cent, with a rise also in youth football.
Kick It Out chief executive Samuel Okafor said: 'These figures show that discrimination remains deeply embedded across the game, but the rise in abuse in youth football should be a wake-up call.
'No one should be facing hostility simply for taking part.
'What we're seeing now is that fans aren't just reporting abuse, they're demanding action. There's been a clear shift this season in how people are calling out sexist behaviour, both online and in stadiums, and asking football to treat it as seriously as any other form of hate.'
'At the same time, it's clear that online platforms are still falling short. The volume of abuse remains high, and too often, those responsible face no consequences.
'Fans are doing their part by speaking up. It's now up to football authorities, tech companies and government to show they're listening, and to act.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scott Hanson reveals fate after ESPN's new billion-dollar deal to takeover RedZone sparks fan meltdown
Scott Hanson reveals fate after ESPN's new billion-dollar deal to takeover RedZone sparks fan meltdown

Daily Mail​

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scott Hanson reveals fate after ESPN's new billion-dollar deal to takeover RedZone sparks fan meltdown

Scott Hanson has confirmed he will be retained as host of NFL RedZone after ESPN's new billion-dollar deal acquired the show and sparked a fan meltdown that the iconic broadcaster may now longer be the property's presenter. Hanson confirmed the news, promising to continue to be the narrator for seven hours of live football every Sunday during the regular season. RedZone shows live highlights from every NFL game as they happen, allowing fans to not channel surf and see all the major plays from the gridiron in one medium. Although changes to the presentation may happen under the ESPN banner, losing Hanson was a step too far for some, with a massive sigh of relief coming from NFL fans. 'It's official. (& for those wondering: yes, I will still be hosting RedZone.) Fired up for a great season! Optimistic about this new partnership! (& I get to call @AdamSchefter 'colleague' for the 2nd time in my career… nice bonus!),' Hanson said on X. Schefter, the NFL's chief news-breaker, replied, 'My honor.' RedZone is moving to ESPN after the sports-programming network acquired the iconic show Still a little up in the air with the move to ESPN is whether RedZone will stay commercial free, which would be a first for the sports programming network. Hanson did not comment on that on his post, drawing the ire of some fans. RedZone was on its own channel for cable packages, allowing the need for no ads. 'If there's commercials I'm taking my talents to StreamEast,' one NFL fan said. 'I can already see you co hosting with Buzz Lightyear one week because Disney owns RedZone now,' a second football fan said. The first edition of RedZone under the NFL banner takes place in a little over a month, with beloved fans of Hanson and the format waiting for any word on if there will be changes after ESPN's monster deal. As part of the deal in acquiring the NFL Network, RedZone, and other properties, the NFL now owns a 10% stake in ESPN.

How AFL coach found out he was going to be sacked with five words in a phone call - before he took a sly shot at his club disguised as a joke
How AFL coach found out he was going to be sacked with five words in a phone call - before he took a sly shot at his club disguised as a joke

Daily Mail​

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How AFL coach found out he was going to be sacked with five words in a phone call - before he took a sly shot at his club disguised as a joke

Sacked Melbourne Demons coach Simon Goodwin was at home on August 4 when his phone rang - and it wasn't good news. On the other end was Brad Green, the club's president. 'Mate, we need to talk,' Green reportedly said. And so began the premiership-winning mentor's immediate exit from the Demons. Green was then joined at Goodwin's house by head of football Alan Richardson, interim chief executive David Chippindall and board member Angela Williams. The quartet wanted to present a united front, and deliver the news to Goodwin personally. After delivering a historic flag in 2021, Goodwin deserved that. Given the Demons currently sit in 12th spot, the coach, 48, was somewhat blindsided by the decision. Other clubs are in far worse positions, namely West Coast, Richmond and North Melbourne. But Goodwin - who also won premierships as a player with the Adelaide Crows in 1997 and 1998 - knows the AFL is a results business. Another season where Melbourne won't play finals footy was deemed unacceptable by club management, so Goodwin was moved on. Polarising commentator Kane Cornes felt the playing group - and Goodwin - haven't evolved and the decision was inevitable. 'If you're looking at all the important factors, the way they play has been the issue for years,' he said on Channel 7's The Agenda Setters this week. 'They are stuck in 2015 with their game styles, contest and defence, he (Goodwin) hasn't been able to improve that. He hasn't had a game style that stacks up in 2025. 'He hasn't been able to solve that. The (club) culture is (also) a mess, the senior players appear to do whatever they want.' Goodwin fronted the media on Tuesday at the MCG - and the departing coach couldn't resist firing off a bullet disguised as humour. 'I'm going to miss the players first and foremost,' he said. 'I have some amazing relationships with some blokes I've coached for an incredibly long what I won't miss is driving down to Casey.' It was a reference to the senior playing group often commuting to Casey Fields in Cranbourne - more than 50km from the CBD - for training sessions. Goodwin - who has already been linked to a move to Sydney next season - will receive a reported payout of $1.2million from the Demons, as he was contracted until 2026. Assistant Melbourne coach Troy Chaplin will step in as caretaker coach for the remainder of this season ahead of fixtures against the Western Bulldogs, Hawthorn and Collingwood.

NWSL says it has ‘no duty of care' for women suing San Diego Wave over assault claims
NWSL says it has ‘no duty of care' for women suing San Diego Wave over assault claims

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

NWSL says it has ‘no duty of care' for women suing San Diego Wave over assault claims

In a filing last month, the National Women's Soccer League denied all allegations contained in a lawsuit brought by former San Diego Wave employees and called for the suit to be 'dismissed in its entirety,' claiming that the league has 'no duty of care' to the six women suing the club and the league. The 2024 suit contains allegations of sexual assault of an employee by a co-worker while both employed at the club, along with claims of sexual harassment, racial discrimination, disability discrimination, failure to investigate and prevent harassment and discrimination. In the answer to the allegations filed on 8 July to the Superior Court of California in San Diego, the NWSL's legal representatives, Los Angeles firm Arentfox Schiff, deny that the six former Wave employees were 'damaged or harmed' because of any act of the league. The NWSL's lawyers claim 'the doctrine of consent,' inferring that the sexual assault and harassment claims were based on consensual encounters, and also that certain allegations are beyond California's statute of limitations. The NWSL's defense also claims it had no duty of care to San Diego Wave employees as any incidents that occurred were between the individuals and the club – not the league. According to legal experts interviewed by the Guardian, the NWSL's response to the lawsuit is a catch-all answer that aims to cover all possible angles of defense. 'The defendant has simply listed every affirmative defense that could apply to any of the claims,' said Professor David Oppenheimer, clinical professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. 'The common term for such an answer is 'boilerplate.' The purpose is to preserve any conceivable defense.' An NWSL spokesperson said the league could not comment on pending litigation. Arentfox Schiff did not respond to requests for comment and clarification. The six women who filed the lawsuit include one who claims she was sexually assaulted by a San Diego Wave co-worker, another who claims she was sexually harassed by the same co-worker, and Brittany Alvarado, a former videographer for the Wave, claiming workplace-related violations. Three other women are named in the suit for similar alleged violations. Alvarado brought attention to the workplace environment at San Diego Wave after she posted on social media in 2024 that the 'NWSL must take immediate action to remove Jill Ellis from both the San Diego Wave and the league entirely.' Ellis, the former USWNT head coach, was Wave president at the time of the events alleged in the lawsuit and had a hands-on role in managing the club. Ellis has since departed San Diego to take a senior role at Fifa as its chief football officer. Ellis is not a defendant in the lawsuit but is named within it, described as having 'set an abusive and toxic workplace culture' and 'once asking random men in Kansas City about their penises'. (Ellis has filed a separate defamation suit against Alvarado based on her social media post.) The Guardian previously revealed that a 2024 investigation by the NWSL into San Diego Wave management found that the club's front office 'could have done more' to address a sexual assault allegation but found no specific issue with how the claim was handled because the alleged victim did not use the term 'sexual' when describing her experience. The San Diego Wave is a co-defendant in the case with the NWSL. As reported by the Guardian, Jane Doe 1 alleges that a night out in San Diego with a co-worker led to 'inappropriate activities including a game of 'Sexy Jenga' that led to him pressuring her into non-consensual sexual acts'. Jane Doe 1 alleges that later at her apartment, while she was drunk, she was pressured into 'sexual activity that she explicitly stated she did not consent to'. The NWSL's defense argues that consent was given. Under California law, consent requires an individual to freely give agreement to engage in sexual activity 'and voluntarily and have knowledge of the nature of the act or transaction involved.' Sign up to Moving the Goalposts No topic is too small or too big for us to cover as we deliver a twice-weekly roundup of the wonderful world of women's football after newsletter promotion Another woman, 'Jane Doe 2', alleged in the lawsuit she was sexually harassed by the same San Diego Wave employee who this time sent her non-work related messages and images via Snapchat that became increasingly sexual in nature. Jane Doe 2 claims she was terminated by the club after she did not work the minimum number of shifts in her non-full-time role – shifts that were assigned by the alleged harasser. 'In a negligence case, consent is a potential defense when the plaintiff has agreed to participate in an activity knowing that there are significant risks of harm, and willing to subject themselves to them,' Oppenheimer said. 'The best examples come from sports, but for the athletes … In this case, for the statutory claims under the civil rights laws, there is no defense of consent.' Oppenheimer offered a hypothetical scenario for the NWSL to launch a successful defense: '[The] defendant proves that as each employee was hired they were warned, 'You need to know that this is a toxic workplace. We permit emotional and sexual harassment, we retaliate against people who complain, and we fire people in bad faith. If you don't want to subject yourself to this, don't work here.' That might be enough to defend themselves on the negligent hiring and management claim, but it would subject them to liability on the statutory discrimination claims.' The defense also claims the case should be dismissed because the plaintiffs delayed bringing the lawsuit and that a two-year statute of limitations under California law should be enforced. The earliest claims made in the case took place in mid-2022. The suit was filed in October of 2024. The NWSL's lawyers cite a section of California code of civil procedure stipulating that there is a two-year statute of limitations to sue for 'An action for assault, battery, or injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.' California law stipulates elsewhere that there is a 10-year statute of limitations for criminal sexual assault claims (the NWSL case in question is civil). The NWSL claims it cannot be held accountable for events described in the lawsuit because they fall outside the relationship between the league and the Wave. The league claims it did not know the incidents occurred nor should it have known. The former San Diego Wave employees have requested a trial by jury.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store