Saudi Justice Ministry launches unified translation services on e-Litigation platform to speed up court cases
The Ministry of Justice in Saudi Arabia has formally launched a centralized translation service through its e-Litigation platform, streamlining all judicial translation processes to support efficient legal communication and case handling.
A system-wide overhaul of
judicial translation services
The Unified Translation Center is now operational on the e-Litigation platform, enabling centralized management of judicial translation requests. The service encompasses the entire translation process, from the initial request by a beneficiary to completion, within a single digital workflow.
The platform automates the receipt of translation requests, which can originate from lawsuits or judicial departments, and coordinates their assignment to translators.
It also provides tools for monitoring and supervision, ensuring the status of each request can be tracked throughout its lifecycle.
The integration allows beneficiaries, such as litigants, legal representatives, and courts, to follow the progress of their translation requests step-by-step, aiming to improve the quality, speed, and efficiency of translation services within judicial procedures.
Addressing language barriers in Saudi courts
The Unified Translation Center, under the Ministry of Justice, offers remote interpretation services for non-Arabic speakers during court hearings.
By utilizing videoconferencing and the e-Litigation system, interpreters, including those specializing in sign language, can assist in real time, ensuring accurate understanding between judicial panels and individuals involved in legal proceedings who do not speak Arabic.
This initiative was launched with a clear goal: to eliminate communication barriers in courtrooms and legal environments, providing transparent interpretation to safeguard due process and individual rights.
It emphasizes accuracy and ensures that non-Arabic speakers are given full clarity and participation during legal procedures.
Platform access through Najiz
The Najiz platform, which serves as the Ministry of Justice's unified digital services portal, hosts the translation functionality. In August 2023, the Ministry introduced a dedicated feature on Najiz titled 'Request for an Interpreter'. This allows non-Arabic speaking users to request translation services directly online.
Najiz is part of a broader effort by the Ministry to provide comprehensive judicial services digitally, aimed at improving user experience and service accessibility.
Institutional context and evolution
The Ministry of Justice is one of the most longstanding government entities in Saudi Arabia. Established by Royal Order in 1962, the Ministry was tasked with overseeing all courts and fulfilling their administrative and financial needs. Although it was founded in 1962, the Ministry began executing its formal duties in 1970 under the leadership of the first appointed Minister of Justice, Mohammed Bin Ali al-Harkhan, who served until 1975.
Among all ministries under the Council of Ministers, the Ministry of Justice is one of only three that has never undergone a name change, merger, or dissolution, the others being the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Health. The Ministry is headquartered in Riyadh and is managed by a Minister appointed via Royal Order, who also holds membership in the Council of Ministers.
Vision 2030 and strategic justice reforms
The broader modernization of judicial services, including digital translation and litigation processes, is aligned with the national transformation program Saudi Vision 2030.
The Ministry's active reform phase began after the first meeting of the Council of Economic and Development Affairs in 2016, where His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, Crown Prince and Prime Minister, launched the Vision.
As part of this alignment, the Ministry of Justice adopted thirteen strategic goals, all contributing to systemic improvements across its various sectors.
These sectors include:
Judiciary
Enforcement
Documentation
Reconciliation
Advocacy
Judicial Training Center
Each plays a role in transforming legal services to be more efficient, accessible, and aligned with global standards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
10 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Draft BIS norms spark debate over cost burden on small sellers
iStock Growing compliance hurdles are threatening the growth trajectory of India's online retail boom, say experts. India's booming e-commerce sector, expected to reach $315-330 billion by 2030, is facing regulatory challenges that industry leaders warn may slow its growth a webinar hosted recently by the Policy Consensus Centre (PCC) on August 14, 2025, policy experts and sellers voiced a common concern: the growing web of overlapping rules, particularly the Bureau of Indian Standards' (BIS) draft guidelines for retail e-commerce. While the panel acknowledged the need for consumer protection, they cautioned that the draft norms—despite their good intentions—could lead to the duplication of existing laws and increase compliance costs for small businesses. This, they warned, could ultimately undermine the very entrepreneurs the digital marketplace is meant to empower, especially those from the MSME ecosystem. A sector at a crossroads E-commerce has transformed from an 'experimental curiosity' two decades ago to nearly 7% of India's retail market today, said Arindam Goswami, Co-founder and Partner, Policy Consensus Centre. But with that growth has come 'a mixed bag of overlapping and often duplicative obligations' imposed by multiple ministries and regulators. 'Overregulation of platforms will inevitably trickle down to sellers, mostly MSMEs and home-grown entrepreneurs,' Goswami stated, emphasising that regulation must be proportionate, coherent, and mindful of the realities faced by micro-sellers. A crucial aspect of the deliberation involved the draft guidelines proposed by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Aimed at strengthening consumer trust through uniform practices, it has drawn a mixed response. Although the intent of the proposal garnered significant backing, the panel identified potential redundancies with current regulations outlined in the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, along with forthcoming data protection legislation. Enforcement without warning Sudden enforcement continues to be one of the most significant challenges for small sellers. 'BIS confiscations brought my business to a standstill for weeks,' said Amandeep Budhiraja, founder of Lucky Sales and brand owner of JustToyz. The high-resolution image requirement, he noted, is unworkable for household sellers who 'don't even have the equipment' for professional product shoots. A simple photo shoot can cost Rs 2,000—more than the value of many items sold also flagged practical contradictions: BIS inspectors advising traders not to open and inspect products before sale, even if returns later reveal defects, and sellers having to repeat identical tests to meet multiple standards for domestic and export markets. 'The umbrella should cover it all,' he argued, 'otherwise micro sellers can't even think of exporting.' Legal concerns over scope From a legal standpoint, the question is whether BIS is straying into operational regulation better left to existing laws, according to panellists. 'Our existing rules are sufficient,' said Shashi Mathews, Partner at IndusLaw. 'With established rules already in place, adding duplicate layers of regulation serves little purpose. Platforms, as intermediaries, cannot be held fully responsible for the entire supply chain. Piling on more obligations risks pushing sellers out of the ecosystem,' he said, pressing for international reciprocity so products meeting global standards don't need duplicative Indian certification. Swapnil Yadav, Senior Manager (Public Policy) at NASSCOM, took a pragmatic line. While some provisions are duplicative, he said, others address gaps—such as explicit anti-counterfeiting measures—and should be retained. But requiring platforms to disclose material composition or environmental impact, he cautioned, is unrealistic when small sellers often lack that data.'The responsibilities need to be redistributed between platforms and sellers,' Yadav argued, adding that intermediaries like logistics providers should also be covered. He called for technology to bridge the compliance divide: 'Tech should be an ally, not create a digital cleavage between large and small players.'Dharmender Jhamb, Partner & Leader-Fintech at Grant Thornton Bharat LLP, highlighted India's pioneering role in regulating 'dark patterns'—deceptive design practices that mislead users into unintended purchases. 'Transparency before a purchase, clear consent mechanisms, and robust dispute resolution are positives in the BIS draft,' he said, adding that they build trust, which is beneficial for the long-term health of e-commerce. However, Jhamb warned that small firms lack the tools to self-audit for such patterns and called for government-approved toolkits to avoid compliance BIS draft's prohibition on 'preferential treatment' by marketplaces stirred debate. Competition lawyer M.M. Sharma supported the intent, saying it could address issues like platforms promoting their private labels over independent sellers. But others noted that preferential placement is common in offline retail and argued that distinguishing between legitimate and anti-competitive preference is global trade headwinds and domestic cost pressures, panelists urged the government to use this moment to rationalise the rulebook. 'Targeted deregulation and streamlining could be the growth catalyst the sector needs,' said Goswami. The panellists further highlighted that the issue also has export implications: easing compliance for B2C shipments could open global markets to small Indian sellers, especially if AI and automation are used to meet product display and disclosure requirements at low cost. Way forward With the BIS draft still under consultation, much will depend on how the final framework balances consumer protection with ease of doing business. For an industry projected to power the next phase of India's retail growth, the outcome could define whether regulation becomes a growth enabler or a brake on innovation, panelists said. Despite diverging views on specific provisions, the panelists further converged on a few shared principles. They agreed that regulation is necessary, but it must steer clear of duplication. Consumer trust, they emphasised, rests on transparency rather than bureaucratic overload.
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
BlueStone Jewellery IPO listing date tomorrow. Here's what GMP signals about the debut of shares on Dalal Street
BlueStone Jewellery IPO Listing: The equity shares of jewellery maker BlueStone Jewellery and Lifestyle Ltd are set to make their Dalal Street debut on Tuesday. The initial public offering (IPO) of the company received decent response and investors now focus on BlueStone Jewellery IPO listing date. The public issue was open from August 11 to 13, and the IPO allotment was finalised on August 14. BlueStone Jewellery IPO listing date is tomorrow, August 18. BlueStone Jewellery shares will be listed on both the stock exchanges, BSE and NSE. 'Trading members of the Exchange are hereby informed that the equity shares of BlueStone Jewellery and Lifestyle Limited shall be listed and admitted to dealings on the Exchange in due course,' a notice on the BSE said. Ahead of the BlueStone Jewellery IPO listing tomorrow, investors watch out for the trends in the grey market premium (GMP) to gauge the estimated listing price. Here's what BlueStone Jewellery IPO GMP today ahead of the listing signals. The trends for BlueStone Jewellery shares in the unlisted market remains muted, with no grey market premium (GMP). BlueStone Jewellery IPO GMP today is ₹ 0 per share, market experts said. This indicates that in the grey market, the BlueStone Jewellery shares are trading at par to their issue price, without any premium or discount. BlueStone Jewellery IPO GMP today signals that the estimated listing price of the shares would be ₹ 517 apiece, which is equal to the IPO of ₹ 517 per share. The bidding for the IPO was open from Monday, August 11, to Wednesday, August 13, while the IPO allotment date was August 14. BlueStone Jewellery IPO listing date is August 19, and the equity shares will be listed on BSE and NSE. BlueStone Jewellery IPO price band was set at ₹ 492 to ₹ 517 per share. The company raised ₹ 1,540.65 crore from the book-building issue which was a combination of fresh issue of 1.59 crore equity shares worth ₹ 820 crore, and offer-for-sale (OFS) of 1.39 crore shares amounting to ₹ 720.65 crore. BlueStone Jewellery IPO was subscribed 2.70 times in total, according to NSE data. The Retail Individual Investors (RIIs) category was booked 1.35 times, while the Non Institutional Investors (NII) portion was subscribed 55%. The Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs) category received 4.28 times subscription. Axis Capital is the book running lead manager and Kfin Technologies is the BlueStone Jewellery IPO registrar. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Planning a career in the UAE? Here's what to know about 13 types of work permits
Agencies Working in the UAE requires more than just an employment offer, every worker must hold a valid permit issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MoHRE). These permits legally authorise employment, regulate the relationship between employer and employee, and ensure compliance with UAE labour laws. For employers, choosing the right permit is critical to avoid penalties and delays in hiring. For professionals, knowing the available options helps in selecting the right pathway to enter or continue working in the country. With 13 different types of work permits, ranging from recruitment from abroad to freelance and part-time arrangements, the system offers flexibility for diverse categories of workers. Streamlined hiring with the Work Bundle As part of the government's Zero Bureaucracy Programme, the UAE launched the Work Bundle, an integrated digital platform simplifying the hiring process. Employers can complete permit and visa procedures, conduct medical assessments, and handle Emirates ID services in one place. This advancement reduces application steps from 15 to 5, required documents from 16 to 5, in-person visits from 7 to 2, and processing time from 30 working days to just 5. 13 types of work permits in the UAE Permit type Who it's for / Purpose Validity Recruitment from outside UAE Hiring workers from abroad 2 years Transfer permit Moving a worker to a different UAE company 2 years Family sponsorship permit Enables residents under family sponsorship to work 2 years Temporary work permit Assigns a worker to another company for a short term Short-term Mission work permit For project-based work by non-UAE workers Project duration Part-time work permit Enables employment on reduced hours or multiple employers As per contract Juvenile work permit For workers aged 15–18 under safe, restricted conditions 1 year Student training & employment permit For students aged 15+ in training roles 3 months UAE/GCC national work permit Employment permit for UAE or GCC nationals 2 years Golden visa holder work permit For Golden Visa holders joining UAE companies 2 years National trainee work permit For training UAE citizens per qualifications 12 months, renewable Freelance work permit For self-employed individuals without employer sponsorship Varies Private teacher work permit For qualified tutors offering private lessons 2 years, free of charge Key issuance conditions Permissions are granted only if the following criteria are met: The worker is at least 18 years old (except juvenile/student arrangements). Job aligns with the company's license and registered activity. The employer holds a valid trade licence and is compliant with labour regulations. Workers in regulated professions must meet qualification standards. An authorised representative must submit the application on behalf of the company. Failure to comply, such as submitting false documents, inactivity, or breach of systems like the Wages Protection System, may lead to permit refusal or cancellation. Renewals, cancellations & costs Renewals follow the same issuance requirements. All necessary documents and fees must be submitted; the charges range from AED 250 to AED 3,450 depending on company classification, A, B or C. Non-compliant firms fall under category C and face higher require a formal employer request, complete documentation, settlement of any fines, and confirmation that the employee has received all dues. Enforcement: Suspension for violations New permits may be suspended if a firm: Violates MoHRE fee rules, Provides poor labour accommodation, Is accused of human trafficking, or Abuses MoHRE digital systems. Suspensions remain until infractions are resolved. Why it matters From novice professionals to seasoned jobseekers, this guide clarifies the legal landscape of work permits in the UAE. With the Work Bundle's streamlined approach and a clear understanding of permit types, navigating employment laws just got simpler for both employers and employees. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. IndiGo's GIFT City unit: Simple expansion or is there more to it than meets the eye? GST cut to benefit; but who gains the most? Good, bad, ugly: How will higher ethanol in petrol play out for you? Why are mid-cap stocks fizzling out? It's not just about Trump tariffs. Stock Radar: This hotel stock is showing signs of bottoming out; time to buy? Logistics sector: Be tactical in the face of head & tailwinds; 6 logistics stocks with an upside potential of over 30% Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 25% in 1 year History of wealth creators: Everything should be in context, whether it is PE or PEG; on a standalone basis they mean nothing
