Karnataka HC reserves order on RCB marketing head's interim relief plea for June 12
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], June 11 (ANI): The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday reserved the order on the petition filed by RCB's marketing head Nikhil Sosale, seeking interim relief on the ground that his arrest in alleged connection with the Bengaluru stampede was illegal.
The High Court reserved the order for June 12 at 2:30 pm.
Earlier today, both parties submitted their arguments in front of the Court.
Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty, representing the state government in the HC, said, 'My submission is that relief sought under Article 226 is impressible unless lordships declare arrest is illegal and petition is not maintainable.'
'Legality of arrest is to be considered, from the facts we have presented, the legality of arrest,' Advocate General said.
'Statement made by CM has nothing to do with the arrest. Look at the grounds of arrest of each of the accused, milord. The petitioner was fleeing,' he said.
The AG further claimed that organisers were responsible for the stampede that claimed the lives of 11 people.
'Even assuming arrest is illegal, only a WHPC is maintainable and not a petition under Section 482. Grounds of arrest are to be given at the earliest, and in the instant case, they have been supplied,' Shetty said.
The Advocate General also mentioned that Sosale is not in their custody but in judicial custody.
The Karnataka HC questioned the state government, 'Who has to obtain the license? They are employees of the company. Don't look at them as the company.'
Replying to this, the AG said that the company act through its directors.
'On behalf of the company, petitioners are supposed to take a license. It is for them to show that they are not responsible,' he said.
The High Court emphasised that the court will look at them as individuals, not as a company.
'We will not identify the company with an individual. Leave this company aside. Let us look at them as individuals,' the Court said.
The HC further asked, 'How do you know who is responsible today?'
Advocate General Shetty said, 'He was fleeing away, milord, and he admits that he was taking care of the affairs of the company.'
The HC said, 'Before you arrested these people and grounds of arrest were furnished. Your submission is those are the reasons why you arrested him as a person responsible for the event.'
Senior Advocate Sandesh Chouta, representing the RCB marketing head, said, 'According to them, the person who was invited for the celebration has been arrested. You have suspended police officials. But even DyCM has been invited.'
'That is an incorrect submission, milord. The invitation is only by RCB,' the Advocate General countered.
A day after the stampede that claimed the lives of 11 people, the Karnataka police suspended multiple IPS officers, including the Bengaluru city police Commissioner, B Dayananda. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC stays new rule for FYJC quotas in minority colleges
Mumbai: Bombay HC Thursday stayed a clause in the May 6 GR that introduced reservations for SC/ST/OBC/SEBC for FYJC admissions in minority institutions in the state. "Till further orders, we direct that insofar as minority institutions are concerned for admissions to FYJC, the mandate of social reservation shall not be made applicable… Consequent steps may be taken by state govt," said Justices Makarand Karnik & Nitin Borkar. They directed the govt to file its reply in 4 weeks and posted the hearing for Aug 6. On Wednesday, the judges had asked state to consider withdrawing the clause and issue a corrigendum. Clause 11 of the GR mentions that social and parallel reservations will apply to vacancies after filling minority seats in minority institutions. However, as govt pleader Neha Bhide said Thursday there are no instructions to withdraw the clause, the HC heard the matter on merits for grant of interim reliefs. The judges heard two petitions challenging the contentious clause of the GR by which govt brought minority institutions under the purview of social reservations. The first petition was filed by Solapur's Shri APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce. The second was a joint petition by south Mumbai colleges, including St Xavier's, KC, HR, Jai Hind and Maharashtra College, along with Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions. Senior advocate Milind Sathe, for the Mumbai colleges, and advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, relied on Articles 15 (5) and 30 of the Constitution emphasising on the right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutes. They also brought to HC's notice clause 18.9 of the GR that makes social reservations generally applicable to FYJC admissions in all colleges. They cited decisions — including HC's 2017 verdict in the St Xavier's College case — that minority educational institutions, both aided and unaided, are exempt from backward class reservations. In July 2018, Supreme Court upheld the HC verdict. "We are saying, insofar as minority institutions in all seats, there is no cannot be imposed by govt," argued Sathe. Govt pleader Neha Bhide countered that the May 6 GR does not interfere with the rights of minority institutions; they have the right to fill 50% of their seats. It is only when seats remain unfilled and have been surrendered, that the policy is being made applicable to these seats, she said, adding: "Social reservation is an obligation put on state for filling up seats. " The judges "prima facie" found substance in the submissions of the petitioners' advocates' and granted interim relief. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
New Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
When grandstanding drowned governance in Bengaluru
The tragedy that unfolded at Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium—where a celebration spiralled into a stampede—was synthetic, foreseeable and entirely self-inflicted. It was not a case of public enthusiasm gone awry; it was the culmination of a toxic brew of political theatre, administrative apathy and corporate vanity. It laid bare a deeper crisis: a collapse of institutional judgement and a contemptuous disregard for the sanctity of public life. The government's response—suspending the city police commissioner and other senior officers in haste—only served to expose the rot. Scapegoating of honest officers has become the easiest way to deflect accountability. This time, it crossed an ethical line. When spectacle replaces governance, tragedy ensues. What exactly was the occasion for the grand felicitation? Royal Challengers Bengaluru—a private IPL franchise that, let us remind ourselves, had only won a trophy—was feted like a conquering army on the grand steps of the Vidhana Soudha, the symbol of Karnataka's democratic and constitutional dignity. With the governor, chief minister, deputy CM, and chief secretary playing hosts, it resembled a swearing-in ceremony, not a sports meet. Why does the state machinery spring into action to elevate a private commercial venture? The RCB brand is not a public institution; it is a business. Unlike our Ranji Trophy-winning state teams that have brought glory to Karnataka for decades but have never been feted in this manner, RCB's success—modest and long in coming —was transformed into a photo-op, a media spectacle. The motivation was not celebration; it was proximity to celebrity, optics over ethics, and power over prudence. The people came not just because they loved the sport or the team—they came because the state, the Karnataka State Cricket Association , and RCB whipped up a frenzy. Social media was used irresponsibly to amplify the call. No prior assessment was done of the crowd expected. No crowd control plan was in place. Was any consultation done with the police commissioner—the person whose job is to ensure the security of citizens? Was his and his ground-level team's advice heeded? When things went tragically wrong, the same officer was summarily suspended. A career officer known for his integrity and professionalism was cast as the villain in a theatre of public incompetence. This has rightly caused outrage. The public recognises what this is: an old playbook of punishing the wrong person so that those truly responsible may escape scrutiny.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC upholds 12-yr jail term for man convicted of raping elderly woman
New Delhi: Delhi High Court has upheld the 12-year jail sentence of a man convicted of raping a 60-year-old woman, finding her testimony "cogent, consistent, and free from material embellishments." Justice Sanjeev Narula, in a recent order, observed that the survivor's account remained "unshaken under the rigour of cross-examination" and suffered from no material infirmity that would warrant rejection. "Her testimony inspires confidence and stands as a credible and trustworthy narrative of the incident," the court said. Rejecting the convict's plea for a reduced sentence, the HC noted that the crime was committed under grave circumstances—against a vulnerable survivor, and while the accused—24-year-old man at the time of crime—was in an inebriated state. "The sentence awarded by the trial court is neither excessive nor disproportionate. Rather, it is commensurate with the seriousness of the crime and the circumstances under which it was perpetrated," the court ruled. According to the prosecution, the incident took place in June 2017 when the accused forcibly entered the survivor's shanty during the early hours, gagged her, and committed the assault. Although the accused denied the charges and claimed inconsistencies in the survivor's version, the court held that her testimony alone was sufficient to sustain the conviction. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Referring to established jurisprudence, the court reiterated that in cases of sexual assault, a survivor's sole testimony can be the basis for conviction if found to be credible and of "sterling quality". In this case, the court said, the woman's version not only withstood judicial scrutiny but was also corroborated by medical evidence, expert testimony, and statements by the investigating officer. The consistent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court has underscored that in prosecutions relating to sexual offences, the solitary statement of the survivor, if it inspires the confidence of the court, requires no further corroboration, it added. Crucially, DNA analysis conducted in the case confirmed the allegations and directly linked the accused to the crime, further strengthening the prosecution's narrative. "The evidence presented was reliable, admissible, and consistent with the survivor's version," the court said, finding no ground to interfere with the trial court's "well-reasoned findings." Addressing the argument that no independent witnesses were produced, the court clarified, "The law does not mandate public witnesses in every case, particularly when the act occurs in an enclosed area and at a time when most people would be asleep." Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
