
Australians equally distrust Trump and Xi, survey finds
Australians are equally distrustful of both U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, according to a new survey, complicating Canberra's task of managing ties with its key security ally and biggest trading partner.
A new survey released by the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney showed that 72% of respondents said they didn't trust Trump to act responsibly in global affairs, just edging out the 71% who said they didn't trust China's Xi. When asked whether Trump or Xi would be a better partner for Australia, the two leaders were tied at 45% apiece.
The results come as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese attends a Group of Seven meeting in Canada, where he could hold his first face-to-face meeting with the U.S. president. Albanese will be hoping to negotiate an exemption on U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs for Australia, as well as trying to secure Trump's support for AUKUS following the announcement in Washington of a review of the security accord.
Albanese's balancing act with Trump is a difficult one. Australians' faith in the U.S. has deteriorated following the president's return to the White House. Trust in America as a global player has fallen to just 36%, by far the lowest result in the Lowy survey's 20-year history.
Yet despite an aversion to Trump, Australians aren't ready to move away from the U.S. as the nation's primary security partner. The survey showed consistent support for the U.S. alliance, with 80% of respondents saying the U.S. was important for Australia's security.
Meanwhile, attitudes toward China have slightly improved, although Beijing is generally considered less reliable than the U.S. across most metrics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
BOJ likely to weigh slowing reductions in gov't bond purchases
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- The Bank of Japan could consider slowing the pace of its reduction of government bond purchases from next April under the current tapering program at its two-day policy meeting that started Monday. The board members of the central bank are expected to discuss whether to maintain or ease the pace of its bond-buying reduction amid recent surges in super long-term yields, while likely deciding to keep the policy rate unchanged at around 0.5 percent. The BOJ decided in July last year to cut its government bond purchases by 400 billion yen ($2.8 billion) per quarter through next March in a shift toward policy normalization. The meeting comes after yields on longer-term government bonds soared last month due partly to fears about the country's fiscal health following a series of pledges by lawmakers to cut the consumption tax rate. While the BOJ is widely expected to extend the tapering program beyond next fiscal year, the market is focused on whether the central bank, the largest holder of government bonds, will take steps to prevent market volatility. Following a decade of unorthodox monetary easing to tackle deflation, including massive asset purchases, the BOJ raised interest rates in March last year for the first time in 17 years. It began quantitative tightening last August to reduce its bloated balance sheet. The bank has maintained its plan of raising rates further if the economy and prices move in line with its expectations, but is likely to be cautious in deciding on the next rate hike amid uncertainty over Japan-U.S. negotiations on steep tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. BOJ chief Kazuo Ueda said earlier this month that the bank will not push hard to raise its policy rate unless economic and price conditions are projected to improve, noting the "extremely high" uncertainty due to hefty U.S. tariffs. He also said that the tariffs could cause "the global economy to slow down and squeeze profits of domestic companies."


NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
G7 leaders arrive in Canada for summit that starts Monday
The leaders from the Group of Seven members have arrived in western Canada for their summit that starts on Monday. US tariffs, the situation in the Middle East and Russia's invasion of Ukraine will likely be on the agenda. The leaders are expected to discuss the global economic outlook on the first day. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who will attend, spoke to reporters on Sunday ahead of the meeting in Kananaskis. In an apparent reference to the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, she said: "Let us keep trade between us fair, predictable and open. All of us need to avoid protectionist measures. This is an important message that the G7 can send to the markets and to the world." Von der Leyen also expressed concern about the conflict between Israel and Iran, adding that "it will be a topic at G7 without any question." She reiterated the European Union's view that "Iran can never have a nuclear weapon." "A diplomatic solution remains the best way in the long run to address concerns about Iran's nuclear program." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is scheduled to join the G7 leaders on the second day of the summit. White House officials announced that Trump and Zelenskyy will hold one-on-one talks on the sidelines.


Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: A plea to stop Washington sticking its nose in U.S. Steel
Nippon Steel Corp.'s move to acquire U.S. Steel finally got the seal of approval from the U.S. government after it intervened and set conditions. We give high marks to the partnership agreed to by private-sector companies of Japan and the United States. The U.S. government needs to respect Nippon Steel's autonomous management and not meddle in it. Prior to winning the presidential election last November, Donald Trump vowed to block the acquisition. But he has since toned down his attitude and said he would allow 'investment' by Nippon Steel. Still, he expressed qualms about the Japanese company's goal of making U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Nippon Steel made its intentions known about 18 months ago. The plan to make U.S. Steel a subsidiary was approved with the signing of a presidential order just before the deadline that revised one signed by Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, to stop the acquisition. U.S. Steel is a noted corporation that at one time boasted the world's largest share of crude steel production. But it has fallen on hard times. Even if the U.S. government was trying to protect this symbol of U.S. industrialization from being controlled by foreign capital, the argument that an acquisition by a company from Japan, a U.S. ally, would create a risk in U.S. national security and in an important supply chain lacked logic. It was a mistake to try to push through protectionist policy. It is only right that the U.S. government did an about-face and allowed U.S. Steel to become a wholly owned subsidiary. As a condition for having its acquisition approved, Nippon Steel agreed to sign a national security agreement with the U.S. government. The U.S. side will have some influence over company management through the issuance of 'golden shares' to the U.S. government that grant it veto power over important management decisions. In addition to the 2 trillion yen ($13.8 billion) for the acquisition, Nippon Steel will also invest about 1.6 trillion yen on production facilities by 2028. The agreement appears to include wording on the composition of the U.S. Steel corporate board as well as production capacity in the United States. But using that agreement to flex its muscle will limit Nippon Steel's management freedom and perhaps thwart the rebuilding of U.S. Steel on the path to sustained growth. Concerns about the investment environment in the United States could lead other Japanese companies to take a more cautious stance about investing there. The interests of both Japan and the United States will not be served by such a development. Prior to approving the acquisition, Trump doubled the tariff rate on steel and aluminum to 50 percent. Trump seems to be trying to take credit for increased investment in the United States through his high tariff policy. But the acquisition plan was well under way before the increased tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Trying to claim that Nippon Steel's investment was the result of the tariff policy is a wishful boast. Trump also suddenly indicated that the 25-percent additional tariff on imported autos would be raised. That was a high-handed move that could deal a crippling blow to the Japanese economy. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump will soon meet for talks on the tariffs. Tokyo should not simply compromise just because the acquisition was approved but continue to seek a retraction of all the tariff measures. --The Asahi Shimbun, June 15