logo
TRADING DAY Whirlwind fades, calm returns

TRADING DAY Whirlwind fades, calm returns

Reuters5 hours ago

ORLANDO, Florida, June 25 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist
After two days of strong gains in world stocks amid the widespread relief over cooling Middle East tensions, relative stability was the hallmark of trading on Wednesday, with major asset classes moving in much narrower ranges.
In my column today I look at U.S. foreign direct investment - was the sharp decline in the first quarter an anomaly, or a warning of what's to come in the brave new tariff world? More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today.
Today's Key Market Moves
Whirlwind fades, calm returns
The MSCI All Country index and Nasdaq 100 touched new record highs for a second session, and Asian and emerging market stocks posted solid gains earlier in the day. But the Dow, U.S. small caps and benchmark European indexes all fell.
The euro's march higher is taking its toll, and European stocks have underperformed since the brief Israel-Iran war broke out on June 13. The euro on Wednesday rose for a fifth straight day to $1.1665, its highest since October 2021.
Sterling hit its highest since February 2022 at $1.3670, and Britain's FTSE 100 slipped to its lowest this month. Bank of England policymakers may be secretly cheering the pound's rally, however, if it helps tame inflation pressures.
The latest Citi/YouGov survey of UK consumers' inflation expectations on Wednesday showed that long-term inflation expectations among the British public rose to the highest since September 2022.
One sector faring better in Europe on Wednesday, though, was defense, after NATO leaders agreed big increases in defense spending, especially from Europe. U.S. defense stocks have moved in the other direction this week following the Iran-Israel ceasefire.
On the policy and macro front, Fed Chair Jerome Powell's second day of congressional testimony passed off without fireworks, although there were sparks in his exchanges with some lawmakers. He reiterated his view that the central bank is right to wait and see what the impact is from tariffs before considering further rate cuts.
U.S. foreign investment slump - anomaly or warning?
Much of the 'de-dollarization' debate has focused on foreign exposure to U.S. securities like stocks and bonds. But investors shouldn't ignore foreign direct investment flows, the traditionally sticky capital that may also be sending out warning signals.
Foreign direct investment typically involves an overseas entity acquiring the assets of a company in another country or increasing its holdings, often via the purchase of machinery, plants or a controlling stake. FDI is therefore considered a longer-term investment compared to portfolio flows, which can be more volatile.
U.S. President Donald Trump says he has attracted record foreign investment into the country. Indeed, the White House has a page on its website with a "non-comprehensive running list of new U.S.-based investments" since Trump's second term began. The running total is in the trillions of dollars and includes pledges from several foreign countries.
Included are more than $4 trillion in U.S.-bound investments pledged by the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Japan and Saudi Arabia. During Trump's trip to the Middle East last month, he said the U.S. is on track to receive $12-$13 trillion of investments from countries around the globe, which includes "projects mostly announced ... and some to be announced very shortly."
These flows may emerge in full, in time. But official figures on Tuesday showed that FDI in the first quarter actually fell to $52.8 billion, the lowest total since the fourth quarter of 2022. That's well below the quarterly averages of the past 10 and 20 years.
The Commerce Department figures also showed that the U.S. current account deficit widened to a record $450.2 billion in the quarter, or 6% of U.S. GDP, meaning FDI inflows barely covered 10% of that shortfall.
Should the Trump administration be worried?
The short answer is probably not, at least not yet.
FDI flows are typically far smaller than portfolio flows into equity and fixed income securities, so from the perspective of funding the current account deficit, the drop in FDI is not as pressing a concern.
On the other hand, if foreign investors are also buying fewer U.S. securities, capital from elsewhere will be needed to fund that deficit.
Additionally, America's balance of payments data in the first quarter was hugely distorted by domestic consumers and businesses front-running Trump's tariffs, loading up on imports before the duties kick in later this year.
Trump's bet is that the deficit will shrink this year and beyond as his 'America First' policies spur more "onshoring" from domestic firms as they bring production back home and the weakening dollar helps U.S. manufacturing by making exports more competitive. The subsequent boom will attract investment from companies and governments overseas. In theory.
However, these dynamics work both ways.
For example, the European Union is by far the largest provider of U.S. FDI, accounting for 45% of the total in 2023, according to Citi. The combination of the continent's German-led fiscal splurge, U.S. tariffs and 'de-dollarization' concerns could easily crimp that flow, perhaps significantly.
Another potential risk to U.S.-bound FDI is 'Section 899' - the possible tax of up to 20% on foreigners' U.S. income that could be part of Trump's budget plans. A Tax Foundation report in May found that Section 899 would "hit inbound investment from countries that make up more than 80 percent of the U.S. inbound FDI stock."
Industry pushback may water down Section 899, but it remains a cloud on the U.S. investment horizon.
The U.S. is the world's biggest recipient of FDI, with a 25% share of global volumes in 2023, up from around 15% before the pandemic, according to Citi. Its economy is the largest in the world, a thriving hub of innovation, pioneering technology, artificial intelligence and money-making potential.
That will always attract FDI. Whether it attracts as much in this new environment remains to be seen.
What could move markets tomorrow?
Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bezos spoke to Trump as he tries to seeks more government contracts for Blue Origin, WSJ reports
Bezos spoke to Trump as he tries to seeks more government contracts for Blue Origin, WSJ reports

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Bezos spoke to Trump as he tries to seeks more government contracts for Blue Origin, WSJ reports

June 25 (Reuters) - Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos spoke to U.S. President Donald Trump at least twice this month as he tries to capitalize on a feud between rival SpaceX founder Musk and Trump and bag more government contracts, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday. The CEO of Blue Origin, Dave Limp, also made a trip to the White House to meet with Trump's chief of staff, the WSJ said, citing people familiar with the matter. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.

I told my boss I'd reply to his email once the weekend was over. What followed was a text blow-up I NEVER saw coming...
I told my boss I'd reply to his email once the weekend was over. What followed was a text blow-up I NEVER saw coming...

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

I told my boss I'd reply to his email once the weekend was over. What followed was a text blow-up I NEVER saw coming...

A heated exchange between a boss and his employee over weekend work expectations has ignited a firestorm online, with many condemning the manager's outdated views on work-life balance. The controversy began when the boss sent a message to his employee: 'Hey, did you see my email?' The employee responded, 'Hi, I noticed the email notification, but it's the weekend. I'll get to it first thing Monday morning.' Unimpressed, the boss replied, 'I wouldn't send an email at the weekend that wasn't important. I do expect a quick response to things like this, regardless of the day.' The employee, seeking to maintain personal boundaries, explained, 'Oh ok, sorry. It's been a long week, and I could really do with keeping my weekend separate if that's ok. I am out at the moment, is there any way I can look at it on Monday?' The boss's response was scathing: 'Honestly, I am so bored of hearing lines like this from your generation. Like seriously? What happened to just putting in a bit of effort and taking their career seriously? 'It's just take, take, take with you lot. I am fed up. Men used to work every hour of the day, seven days a week. I need a response today on that email.' The employee, attempting to de-escalate, replied, 'It's not about taking, I am just exhausted from the week. I am out at the moment, but I will try and look at it later on this evening if I have a chance.' The boss concluded, 'This is beyond disappointing. We are talking about one small email response, it isn't like I am asking for the world. We'll talk on Monday.' Workplace expert Ben Askins shared the exchange on TikTok, criticising the boss' approach. He questioned, 'Are you paying them for seven days of work? Because you actually get to control the time that you're paying them. 'And the time that they're not being paid, that's actually nothing to do with you.' Askins highlighted the unrealistic expectations some employers have. 'This misunderstanding of 'I pay you for five days a week, therefore I should get seven days of 24 hours of your time' is such a weird concept people have that we have got to cut out.' He also pointed out the potential consequences of such management styles, noting, 'The reason he's so burnt out is because he's not enjoying his job and he's not having a very good work environment.' Addressing the broader issue, Askins emphasised, 'The reason is you have to work for 30, 40, 50 years of your life, right? 'So if you burn yourself out in three to four years and cause yourself to completely fall apart, you're not going to make it. It's a marathon, not a sprint.' The exchange has sparked widespread discussion about generational differences in work culture and the importance of respecting employees' personal time. Askins concluded, 'The amount of red flags in this one tiny message is mind-blowing. The generation the boss is from had it the easiest out of everyone.' Hundreds weighed in on the discussion. 'But realistically older generations didn't have email or mobiles, so couldn't be harassed in this way. It's not a decent comparison,' one said. 'The initial text should have been ignored until Monday morning too,' another added. A worker shared, 'My boss messages me out of hours all the time. I leave him on unread until 10am on a Monday. My level of pettiness grows weekly with every message he sends from Friday night onwards.' On the other side of the argument, a woman said: 'Am I the only one that would just read the email and reply? It might of been something so minor or a basic answer that makes everything easier or closes a sale or solves a huge problem. Give and take.' The incident serves as a reminder of the evolving expectations in the modern workplace and the need for employers to adapt to foster a healthy work environment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store