Abortions set to resume at Wyoming's only clinic following court ruling
Wyoming's only abortion clinic will reopen and begin providing care after a judge on Monday suspended two laws restricting abortion in the state.
Wellspring Health Access said it will resume abortions on Thursday, following a temporary injunction granted by a district court judge, which halted the laws from taking effect as the case progresses.
One law would require clinics providing surgical abortions to be licensed as outpatient surgical centers. The other would require women to get an ultrasound before a medication abortion. The ultrasound legislation passed despite a veto from Gov. Mark Gordon (R).
The clinic has been unable to see patients since the evening of Feb. 27, when Gordon signed the licensing requirement bill into law. The legislation required abortion clinics to be regulated as 'ambulatory surgical centers' and for physicians to have specific admitting privileges, licensing and data reporting requirements.
Opponents say the licensing legislation is a type of TRAP law — an abbreviation for Targeted Regulations of Abortion Providers — that singles out the medical practices of doctors who provide abortions and imposes requirements that are more costly and burdensome than those imposed on other medical practices. They are designed to regulate clinics and abortion access out of existence even if abortion remains legal.
Julie Burkhart, Wellspring's president and founder, said the clinic will reopen on Thursday.
'We are delighted and relieved that we can once again see patients at our clinic in Casper. Individuals from every corner of Wyoming rely on us for quality, reliable reproductive health care,' Burkhart said in a statement. 'We look forward to reopening our doors — starting Thursday — and welcoming patients from across the Mountain region and beyond.'
Wyoming has sought to enact two abortion bans since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022: one banning abortion broadly, and another banning abortion medication specifically. Both were declared unconstitutional by a state judge in November.
The Wyoming Supreme Court heard arguments in that case last week but is unlikely to rule for several months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
ICE officers stuck in Djibouti shipping container with deported migrants
Three officers and eight detainees arrived at the only US military base in Africa unprepared for what awaited them. Defense officials warned them of 'imminent danger of rocket attacks from terrorist groups in Yemen,' but the ICE officers did not pack body armor or other gear to protect themselves. Temperatures soar past 100 degrees during the day. At night, she wrote, a 'smog cloud' forms in the windless sky, filled with rancid smoke from nearby burning pits where residents incinerate trash and human waste. Advertisement The Trump administration has urged the Supreme Court to stay Murphy's April order requiring screenings under the Convention Against Torture, which Congress ratified in 1994 to bar the US government from sending people to countries where they might face torture. In a filing in that case Thursday, officials told the Supreme Court that Murphy's order violates their authority to deport immigrants to third countries if their homelands refuse to take them back, particularly if they are serious offenders who might otherwise be released in the United States. Advertisement Officials said the conditions in Djibouti highlight the dangers of Murphy's order. 'A small number of ICE personnel are currently guarding dangerous criminals around-the-clock in a converted conference room, under threat of rocket attacks and other security and health hazards — disrupting the base's operations, consuming critical resources intended for service members, and harming national security,' Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in the filing. In her declaration, Harper said officers and detainees began to suffer symptoms of a bacterial upper respiratory infection soon after deplaning, including 'coughing, difficulty breathing, fever, and achy joints.' Medication wasn't immediately available. She wrote that the flight nurse has since obtained treatments such as inhalers, Tylenol, eye drops, and nasal spray, but they cannot get tested for the illness to properly treat it. 'It is unknown how long the medical supply will last,' Harper wrote. The officers spend their days guarding eight immigrants convicted of crimes that include murder, attempted murder, sex offenses, and armed robbery, court records show. Harper said Defense Department employees 'have expressed frustration' about staying in close proximity to violent offenders. Harper said ICE has had to deploy more officers available to work in 'deleterious' conditions to give the initial crew a break. Currently 11 officers are assigned to guard the immigrants and two others 'support the medical staff,' she said. They work 12-hour shifts guarding immigrants, taking them to get medication and to use the restroom and the shower in a nearby trailer, one at a time. Officers pat down the detainees, searching them for contraband. Advertisement At night and on breaks, officers sleep on bunk beds in a trailer, with one storage locker apiece. Some wear N95 masks even while they sleep because the air is so polluted it irritates their throats and makes it difficult to breathe. The area is dimly lit, which Harper wrote poses a security risk to the officers. Department of Homeland Security officials seized on the court filings to criticize the judge. 'This Massachusetts District judge is putting the lives of our ICE law enforcement in danger by stranding them in [Djibouti] without proper resources, lack of medical care, and terrorists who hate Americans running rampant,' said DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin on X. 'Our @ICEgov officers were only supposed to transport for removal 8 *convicted criminals* with *final deportation orders* who were so monstrous and barbaric that no other country would take them. This is reprehensible and, quite frankly, pathological.' But a lawyer for the detainees said they are also worried about their health, whether they are shackled and, the circumstances that DHS has created for them. 'We're increasingly concerned about the conditions of the detainees,' said Trina Realmuto, an attorney for the deportees. Murphy had said DHS abruptly launched the deportation flight even though it plainly violated his April 18 preliminary injunction barring them from removing people without due process. Federal law prohibits sending anyone — even criminals — to countries where they might be persecuted or tortured. Advertisement Although McLaughlin said officials couldn't deport them to their home countries, Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum said at a news conference last month that the US government did not inform her of the Mexican national sent to Djibouti, Jesus Munoz Gutierrez, who was convicted of second-degree murder in Florida 20 years ago, court records show.
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
Our New Podcast
Health care for transgender youths is deeply personal and important to thousands of American families. It's also one of the most divisive cultural and political issues of our time. Twenty-seven states have banned surgery, hormone treatments or puberty blockers for minors. The Supreme Court will decide soon whether those bans are constitutional. The Times just published a special six-part podcast on the history of these treatments and the contentious debate. It reflects two years of work by Azeen Ghorayshi, who has reported on the intersection of gender and science for a decade, and Austin Mitchell, a senior audio producer. Jodi, who oversees Times newsletters, spoke to Azeen about the project's ambition, how she got people to open up, the biggest surprises in the reporting and how her own work has been weaponized. How was this project different from your prior work on this beat? What were the big unanswered questions you set out to explore? With this audio series, the interviews are more like long, in-depth conversations. People can connect more easily when they hear others in this way, and it can help challenge assumptions. The big question we were trying to answer was, How did we get here? The science and the politics have gotten so entangled, but something this reporting made clear is that politics has been baked in all along. The show is titled 'The Protocol,' after the Dutch Protocol, which grew out of the pioneering treatments in the Netherlands in the 1990s and 2000s. Why start there? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me.
Despite declarations that something needs to be done about the declining birth rate in the United States, neither President Donald Trump nor the Republican Party has the desire to protect pregnant people. If they did, the Trump administration wouldn't have made its latest move to restrict abortion nationwide. On Tuesday, June 3, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services rescinded a Biden-era policy that directed hospitals to provide emergency abortions if it was needed to stabilize a pregnant patient. The guidance and communications on it apparently 'do not reflect the policy of this Administration.' I, like many people who support abortion rights, know what this will lead to. It means more pregnant people will die. Does that reflect the policy of the administration? The Biden policy was implemented in 2022, following the fall of Roe v. Wade, and argued that hospitals receiving Medicare funding had to comply with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The former administration argued that this included providing emergency abortions when they were needed to stabilize a patient, even in states that had severe abortion restrictions. Opinion: A brain dead pregnant Georgia woman is a horror story. It's Republicans' fault. This wasn't entirely a surprise. In 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas could ban virtually all abortions in the state, including abortions that would have occurred under the old EMTALA guidelines. Still, it's terrifying to see this crucial policy eliminated. It's already dangerous to be pregnant in the United States. Our maternal mortality rate is much higher than in other wealthy countries. Same with our infant mortality rate. This will only exacerbate these tragedies. In states with abortion bans, the risks are even greater. A study from the Gender Equity Policy Institute found that people living in states with abortion bans were twice as likely to die during or shortly after childbirth. This is also backed by anecdotal evidence, including the 2022 deaths of two women in Georgia after the state passed a six-week ban. A different study found that infant mortality rates increased in states with severe restrictions on abortion, including an increase in deaths due to congenital anomalies. The Trump administration does not care about what is medically necessary to save someone's life. They don't care about whether the children supposedly saved by rescinding this policy will grow up without their mother. They care about their perceived moral superiority. They care about controlling women. Why would anybody want to have a child under that Republican way of thinking? Opinion: We're worrying about the wrong thing. Low birth rate isn't the crisis: Child care is. I want to say I'm surprised that the Trump administration would allow women in need of emergency care to die. Yet this is clearly aligned with the Republican stance on abortion, just like it's aligned with the actions that the party has taken to make it harder for women to access necessary care. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Whether you like it or not, abortion is a necessary part of health care. It saves lives. Alexis McGill Johnson, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood, laid it out plainly. 'Women have died because they couldn't get the lifesaving abortion care they needed,' she said in a statement. 'The Trump administration is willing to let pregnant people die, and that is exactly what we can expect." Again, this is the administration that wants young women like me to have children and improve the country's birth rate. This is an administration that claims to care about women and children. I know I wouldn't want to have a child while Trump continues to make it unsafe to be pregnant and give birth. I hate that this is the reality. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump just made healthcare more dangerous for pregnant women | Opinion
