The Panel with Sarah Perriam-Lampp and Peter Dunne Part 1
To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following:
See terms of use.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Labour's Education Spokesperson Defiant After Ignoring Stanford's NCEA Meeting Requests
Labour's education spokesperson is defiant after rejecting offers to engage with the government about education reforms, saying she does not see it as a missed opportunity. Documents show Willow-Jean Prime rejected Education Minister Erica Stanford's offers to work with her on changes to NCEA and curriculums until after decisions had already been made. That's despite her, and Labour leader Chris Hipkins, criticising the government for not taking a more bipartisan approach with more consultation over proposals to scrap the NCEA secondary school qualifications system. Stanford announced the plan to scrap NCEA this week, saying she would consult the sector on the idea over the next six weeks. Minister's requests to work together went ignored for months The documents released under the Official Information Act show Stanford approached Prime via text message the first day she was named as Labour's education spokesperson in March, taking over from Jan Tinetti. "Congrats on your new role! Will need to get you up to speed with the NCEA change process. Jan and I had started working cross party on this given the importance of our national qualification. Would be good if we could meet first and I can run you through were we are at and what the process is." Stanford continued to try to contact Prime, but the emails show she could find no response - eventually emailing Hipkins instead on 1 July. "Dear Chris, I've sought on multiple occasions to get input from your Education spokesperson on NCEA curriculum reform, with no response. It is important to have cross-party collaboration regarding a national qualification, and the offer remains open to arrange a briefing from officials or from the Professional Advisory Group. I look forward to hearing from you," she said. A response came from Prime's office the following day, saying she considered the email and was declining the invitation to be involved. On 25 July, Prime sent a letter asking to meet and discuss curriculums and assessments on seven specific points. Stanford responded on 3 August saying she had reached out on multiple occasions, but "key decisions have now been taken to formulate proposals for consultation". "These decisions have been informed by months of evidence-based advice and professional input from the Professional Advisory Group. Having received no response to my emails and then a decline to my invitation in July, unfortunately the opportunity to influence the substantial direction of the proposal is no longer available. "Work has continued and we are now ready for broader sector consultation. I am committed to working constructively, and I would like to arrange for you to receive an official briefing on the NCEA proposal and our curriculum work programme, as has been previously offered." She offered to meet with Prime after that briefing and to discuss "the next phase of work". Prime defiant, calls for more consultation At Labour's caucus retreat in Christchurch, Prime told reporters she had been prioritising engaging with the sector rather than speaking to the minister - and did not see it as a missed opportunity. "It was really important to me to understand from the sector what the issues are with NCEA and other things, and what the potential solutions to that are before engaging with the minister. "I wanted to engage with experts. I wanted to talk widely in the sector, so not take something I had heard from one conversation in one group and run off to the minister's office and, you know, make some claims about something. So I have spent a lot of time engaging with the sector so that I am informed." Prime said she had done her engagements with the sector, and come away with the impression they did not know what the government was doing. "It was very secretive, and nobody knew what was going on. That concerned me," she said. "Nobody knew anything or could not speak to anything because they had to sign NDAs." Asked if she regretted not engaging with Stanford, she acknowledged she could have been more proactive. "Oh, look, I probably could have said 'this is why I need to take my time and please assure me that I can have the time that I need to do this'," she said. "But I was not given any timeframes from the minister that 'we have only this amount of time to engage, because I'm going to announce and there's only six weeks subsequent to that'." "The minister has a timeframe and is rushing this." She called for a longer consultation period with the sector, and to take the feedback on board. "Is this genuine consultation or not? Has the decision been made or is the minister open to the feedback from the sector, from myself and from others, or is it simply notifying that this is what is going to happen?" Labour leader backs his MP Labour leader Chris Hipkins said he first became aware Prime had ignored Stanford's engagement requests in July. He stood by his MP, though he said she could have replied to the Minister. "Willow-Jean Prime indicated that she wanted to meet with the stakeholder groups before meeting with the minister, I don't think that's unreasonable. "I did indicate to her I think it would have been better if she'd gone back to the minister and told her that that was what she was doing." Hipkins, who has talked up the importance of bipartisanship, denied Labour's position on the process of overhauling NCEA was hypocritical. He said the coalition had not engaged in good faith and he knew this from experience, having involved National in Labour's NCEA review when he was Education Minister. "Something as important as a big change to our national qualification system should follow significant consultation and deliberation and consensus building. "I think this has been a very closed process that Erica Stanford has operated, and I think that now we need to make sure that it's opened up, that people have meaningful and genuine consultation." 'I would sack her' - Deputy PM Seymour Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said he would sack one of his MPs if they ignored a meeting request. "If I was in Chris Hipkins' position I would sack her but of course, I'm used to having quality ACT Party MPs who could fill a role. "Chris Hipkins may be in the invidious position that she's the best he's got," he said. Seymour said he didn't buy Prime's explanation that she wanted to engage with the sector before talking to the Minister. "If you're in opposition and you get such an invitation, you're generally very grateful. I received very few such invitations in opposition, but when I did, I jumped at them for the opportunity to have a briefing and have some input."
NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
UN urges halt to Israeli military takeover plan in Gaza
UN human rights chief Volker Turk on Friday said that 'the Israeli Government's plan for a complete military takeover of the occupied Gaza Strip must be immediately halted'. Under the plan to 'defeat' Hamas in the Gaza Strip, the Israeli army 'will prepare to take control of Gaza City while
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Greens gather for annual meeting focused on building voters' trust
Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick is "stoked" heading into the annual meeting. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick says there's "no point being right", if the party is not in a position to make change in parliament. The caucus and party faithful are gathering for their annual meeting in Wellington central this weekend. The party had a tumultuous start to the term. This time last year, Swarbrick led the party alone, with co-leader Marama Davidson out of action, fighting cancer. She also fielded questions about former MP Darleen Tana's future, as the party mulled swallowing its pride and invoking the waka-jumping laws to get rid of her. With Davidson back and Tana now gone, it's been relatively steady going for the party this year. It put out its own 'Green Budget' in May - a plan that promised free doctor visits, dental care and an income support scheme, funded by a suite of wealth taxes. Swarbrick said she was "stoked" heading into this year's annual meeting. "I'm feeling really, really good," she said. "We're in a position where we have released four sizable and substantive policy pieces. "Being in this position now, with Marama back, and having a really strong, really capable, really focused team, it's just going to be awesome." The co-leaders have been out and about this year, holding meetings through local branches, as part of a nationwide roadshow. Swarbrick has been to Northland, Christchurch, Dunedin, Gisborne and Taranaki, where she said she met a lot of "Green-curious" voters. "A lot of people have been turning up, who have felt very strongly that the status quo of politics is not working for them, and so they're interested in understanding what our proposals, what our solutions actually are." The Green Party had no shortage of policy on the table, but Swarbrick said that wasn't enough. "There's no point being right, if we are left clinging to our mountains of evidence, when the last tree is cut down. "The Greens have long prided themselves on having the evidence and the facts, and the basis for the policies that we're putting out there, but clearly - unfortunately - that hasn't been enough to get us into a position of commanding a large enough portion of the vote to get those sizable, transformative policies across the line." She said the Greens were focused on building the public's trust with the party in the coming year. "Having those policies is critical, so that people know that we have a backbone, we actually know what it is that we're talking about, but the far more critical ingredient is building trust," Swarbrick said. "That is the work that we've been doing on the ground, organising with people and having them understand that things can be so much better, if we all occupy our power and make it a reality." Swarbrick said, no matter what Labour went on to announce, the electorate knew where the Green Party stood on a swathe of issues. "We intend to be in a position to negotiate government, where we have been completely transparent about the things that we want to do." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
