logo
'Trump let Iran make nukes he's mad about - he's at war for a Nobel Peace Prize'

'Trump let Iran make nukes he's mad about - he's at war for a Nobel Peace Prize'

Daily Mirror23-06-2025
If there is one disease which lies behind the constant spasms of horror with which our days our currently blighted, it is the human race's inability to remember what happened five minutes ago.
Once upon a time, journalists would go to the pub, and then bed. Sometimes they'd go to bed with each other, because they'd been to the pub. But they'd wake up in the morning and go "blimey, an earthquake in Japan. I had better find a good story of my own about this". And they would have to go deeper into a story and its origins.
Today they don't drink, barely know their colleagues, and wake up to emails from a 24-rolling news ecosystem that demands constant feeding. Journalists think "blimey, everyone else is ahead of me" and scramble to catch up. No-one has time to think, which is why no-one has told you that Donald Trump just bombed Iran for making nuclear weapons that Donald Trump let them make.
I wish I was making this stuff up, but no-one's got time for that. It's imperative people start remembering how we got to the cliff edge, because we did it by skipping about blindfold and if we don't stop soon we're going to go right over.
America gave Iran nuclear technology in 1957. The aim was 'atoms for peace', to create wealth, and allies in the Middle East. After years of the world's greatest democracy propping up a cruel monarchy, the shah fell, the mullahs arose, and Iran was in less-friendly hands. The 1980s was taken up with a war against Iraq, but in the 1990s two Gulf Wars and continued US tinkering led the mullahs to the not-entirely-mad opinion that a nuclear weapon was the best way of keeping the Great Satan at bay.
Israel, quite reasonably, was less than chuffed. And as technology sped up it became imperative to find ways of stopping Iran getting a weapon that apocalyptic fundamentalists would see very little reason not to detonate, slap-bang in the middle of a resource-rich, conflict-heavy trade route. And so in 2015, six countries signed a deal with Iran. In return for checks that it wasn't building The Bomb, everyone was open for business.
And for three years the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action worked. Germany, China, Russia, France, the UK, China and the US lifted economic sanctions, and every 90 days would ratify everything was non-nuclear and tickety-boo. But such a vague agreement could not withstand the arrival of Donald Trump, whose tiny hands happily dismantled everything that made Barack Obama look good.
In 2018 when Benjamin Netanyahu - yes it really is all the same people - gave a speech claiming his spy agency Mossad had stolen 100,000 documents showing Iran had lied and was enriching uranium, Trump saw a 30-second clip and decided it must be true. It might have been. The other nations in the deal didn't think so. But rather than renegotiate, send in inspectors, react as any sane human might, Trump just went "nah", and pulled out of the deal.
The other countries tried to keep it going. The International Atomic Energy Authority said there was no enrichment. But the US whacked the regime with sanctions, and Iran said it too would pull out unless they were lifted. They were not. In 2020 the IAEA said Iran had tripled its uranium stockpile, a year later it blocked access to inspectors, and by 2023 it had weapons-grade material.
Over the same period, Iran's population suffered. A third were ground into poverty. The economic woes weakened the regime just enough to make it lash out. Iran was behind terror attacks worldwide, former Republican Guards were linked to planned assassinations of ex-Trump officials, and it faced internal protests too. Then Iran funded the October 7 massacre by Hamas. Cue Netanyahu, who was leading a rickety coalition and facing jail the moment it fell, cue the war in Gaza, cue pro-Palestine protests, and cue a lot of blaming Iran.
This isn't hard to figure out or remember. It's just that the constant churn of new things to hold our attention never scrolls back to the start of the liveblog, or delves into the third page of search results. Iran is definitely run by a bunch of rotten eggs who could well have been pulling the radioactive wool over the world's eyes in return for a financial boost to stabilise their rule. But the best way of fixing that wasn't walking away from the only half-arsed deal anyone had. It was making a better deal, and if Trump had actually written his own biography rather than paying someone else to make him look good, he might have known how to do it.
Trump's withdrawal was supported by Israel and Saudi Arabia, with 63% of US voters, most of the planet and his own advisers screaming at him not to. It was "a horrible one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made", he insisted. "It didn't bring peace and it never will." And so he destabilised and raised the oil price with sanctions, screwed regional trade which meant the price of wheat rose and people starved across several countries, and gave fresh targets to jihadis.
Back in office for a second time, Trump wants a legacy and more than anything he wants the Nobel Peace Prize that Obama got, largely for diplomatic efforts with the Muslim world. Trump pledged to end the war in Ukraine "on day one" and it only got worse; he suggested building a golden beachside golf club in Gaza, and got laughed at. So his eye turned to Ayatollah Khameini, and the country which the US has done so much to make worse, for so long.
Anyone with an ounce of realism in their body might wonder at the convenience with which the B-2 bombers and their bunker-busting payload were able to fly in unmolested, after the Israelis had suddenly switched attention from Gaza to take out the Iranian air defences a week earlier. It does seem odd that the imminent threat Netanyahu had predicted in 2018 bloomed 7 years later, 6 months after Trump returned to office and only after his other draft entries for the peace prize had evaporated.
We might also ponder why the US president with the worst personal polls in history at this point in his leadership might be in want of some surgical strikes to appease his Muslim-hating base, and whether it would do him any harm if there were a couple of small terror attacks on US bases that would give an excuse to bomb the mullahs to the table.
And having thought this far, we could ask ourselves how close to the edge of nuclear catastrophe Trump will allow the world to careen before he picks up the phone to "make a deal" which will be the bigliest, most beautiful peace deal of all time. And whether it will be worse than the one we used to have, before he ripped it to shreds out of petulance and exploited the disastrous consequences for the sake of vanity.
With Iran alone, Trump has cost the world trillions. Now he is about to march an entire planet to the gates of hell, just so he can look good for marching everyone back again. And this plan works if he is a diplomatic genius able to unpick decades of crapola, and capable of remembering why and how it happened in the first place.
But when all he watches is 24-hour rolling news, with constant updates about new stuff that isn't new at all, the best we can hope for is that the Nobel Committee gives him the prize now, just to make him stop.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's military chief in Pentagon talks after Donald Trump pledges a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine - but British peacekeeping troops 'won't be sent to the frontline'
UK's military chief in Pentagon talks after Donald Trump pledges a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine - but British peacekeeping troops 'won't be sent to the frontline'

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

UK's military chief in Pentagon talks after Donald Trump pledges a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine - but British peacekeeping troops 'won't be sent to the frontline'

The UK's top military chief is set to hold meetings in Washington DC today following Donald Trump 's promise of security guarantees for Ukraine. Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, is expected to attend talks at the Pentagon to thrash out how Ukraine would be defended from future attack in the event of a peace deal with Russia. It follows crunch talks at the White House on Monday between the US President and European leaders, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. After the emergency summit in the Oval Office - held in the wake of Mr Trump's talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week - Sir Keir said there had been a 'common understanding' about a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine. The PM added this was an 'Article 5-like guarantee', which could mirror the 'collective defence' clause of the NATO treaty that states that an attack against one NATO ally is considered an attack against all NATO allies. Sir Keir has pledged to put British troops on the ground in Ukraine as part of efforts by the so-called 'coalition of the willing' of Ukrainian allies to help ensure a potential peace agreement with Russia holds. But, during the Pentagon talks on Wednesday between military chiefs from the coalition of the willing and their American counterparts, Sir Tony is expected to state that UK peacekeeping troops would not be on the frontline with Russia. US President Donald Trump told Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday that America would help guarantee Ukraine's security in a deal with Russia A British official told The Guardian: 'Wednesday is a really important moment. 'Nothing happens in Washington without the President giving the green light, so Trump giving his support to security guarantees on Monday kickstarted a lot of activity.' Another said Sir Tony would echo pledges made by Defence Secretary John Healey, who recently said Britain was willing to deploy troops to Ukraine 'to secure the safe skies, safe seas and to build the strength of the Ukrainian forces'. They added that ministers envisaged this as meaning logistical and training support rather than sending battalions of frontline troops who could end up in combat. Security minister Dan Jarvis this morning said the flurry of diplomatic talks in recent days had 'brought the prospect of peace much closer' in Ukraine. Speaking on Times Radio, he said: 'We've always strongly supported Ukraine's integration, both in terms of their potential desire to be members of the European Union and membership of NATO. 'We don't think that any limitation should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its co-operation with third countries, and Russia certainly shouldn't be able to have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to the European Union or NATO.' Mr Jarvis added: 'I think it is important to make the point that very significant progress has been made. 'I think the Alaska summit and the talks in Washington over the previous days have brought the prospect of peace much closer than they had been previously.' But, despite the growing hopes that the three year-long conflict in Ukraine could soon be brought to an end, former Russian prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov warned that Mr Putin is 'absolutely not' ready for peace. He told Times Radio that the Russian leader was 'absolutely not' serious about striking a peace deal, despite Mr Trump's suggestion trilateral meeting - potentially in Budapest - between himself, Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. 'He doesn't want to have the high-level meeting. He doesn't want to meet to sit down with Zelensky,' Mr Kasyanov, a leading Putin critic, said. 'It will be some of a humiliating event for him. That's why he will be avoiding it. You're correct that the ball is on Putin's court, but he will continue dragging out time, continue his offensive operation, believing that he will win the war of attrition. 'He simply managed to avoid imposing just tough sanctions as a result of Alaska meeting.'

GOP Rep's 'no tax on tips' backfires on social media
GOP Rep's 'no tax on tips' backfires on social media

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

GOP Rep's 'no tax on tips' backfires on social media

A Republican politician unintentionally provoked a wave of criticism in a misguided attempt to promote President Donald Trump's 'No Tax on Tips' initiative. Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks (pictured) shared two photos to X on Monday after she dined at Sundown Bar and Grill in Iowa for lunch on Sunday. In one of the pictures, Miller-Meeks smiles broadly while showing off the receipt for her meal - a chilly steak sandwich and some nuggets - which totaled $18.19 including tax. But it was her tip which has left online commentators so divided. Miller-Meeks left $21 in bills, along with several coins on the table to cover her bill, amounting to a tip of about $3. 'I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she's thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns,' she wrote. Despite offering a 20 percent tip on her meal, Miller-Meeks has been slammed for the sum. 'Imagine showing the world you're a cheapskate,' one furious X user wrote. 'Did you really only tip $3? And broadcast it as a win?' Her defenders pointed out that she left a 20 percent tip on her bill, an amount generally considered a good - or at the very least, standard - tip at restaurants in the US. One person, defending Miller-Meeks, responded to another user who had been particularly critical of her tip. 'Why are you trying to make someone who tipped 20% seem stingy? Oh I know, you want internet clout from libs,' the commenter said. 'Further, what are your tipping habits? Do you think 20% is to [sic] little?' Anthony Fakhoury, a spokesperson with Miller-Meeks' office, told CBS : 'The Congresswoman left a 20% tip. 'Unlike Democrats, she did not vote to increase taxes on hardworking Iowans. "No Tax on Tips" means more money in the pockets of servers, not the IRS.'

How many wars President Trump don really end?
How many wars President Trump don really end?

BBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • BBC News

How many wars President Trump don really end?

As President Donald Trump dey try negotiate to end di Russia-Ukraine war, im bin dey tok about im track record for peace negotiations since im start im second term for office. Im bin tok for White House on 18 August, wen European leader put pressure on am to push for ceasefire, im claim say: "I don end six wars… all of dis deals I make am without even mentioning di word 'ceasefire'." Di following day di number im tok rise to "seven wars". Di Trump administration say a Nobel Peace Prize na "something wey suppose don happun " for di "peacemaker-in-chief", and dem list di "wars" im claim to end. Some last just days - although na di result of long-standing tensions - and e no dey clear whether some of di peace deals go last. Trump also use di word "ceasefire" plenty times wen im tok about dem for im Truth Social platform. BBC Verify dey torchlight dis conflicts and how much credit di president go take for ending dem. Israel and Iran Di 12-day conflict begin wen Israel hit targets for Iran on 13 June. Trump confam say Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu inform am ahead of di strikes. Di US bin carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites - a move wey many feel say sharpely end di conflict. On 23 June, Trump post say: "Officially, Iran go start di CEASEFIRE and, on di 12th Hour, Israel go start di CEASEFIRE and, on di 24th Hour, di world go salute Officially di END to DI 12 DAY WAR." Afta di war end, Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei insist say im kontri don secure a "decisive victory" and im no mention a ceasefire. Israel dey suggest say dem fit strike Iran again to counter new threats. "No agreement on permanent peace or on how to monitor Iran nuclear programme going forward," Michael O'Hanlon argue, im be a senior fellow for di Brookings Institution think tank. "So wetin we get hia na more of a de facto ceasefire dan an end to war, but I go give am some credit, as di weakening of Iran by Israel - wit US help - dey strategically significant." Pakistan and India Tensions between dis two nuclear-armed kontris don dey for many years, but for May kasala break out sake of di attack for Indian-administered Kashmir. Afta four days of strikes, Trump post say India and Pakistan don agree to a "FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE". Im say dis na di result of "a long night of talks wey United States". Pakistan thank Trump and later recommend am for di Nobel Peace Prize, im torchlight Trump "decisive diplomatic intervention". India, however, play down tok of US involvement: "Di tok regarding cessation of military action happun directly between India and Pakistan under di existing channels wey dey established between both militaries," Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri tok. Rwanda and di Democratic Republic of Congo Di long-standing wahala between dis two kontri enta anoda afta di M23 rebel group seize di mineral-rich territory for eastern DR Congo earlier in di year. For June, di two kontris sign a peace agreement for Washington wit di aim to end decades of conflict. Trump say e gohelp increase trade between dem and US. Di text call for "respect for di ceasefire" agreement between Rwanda and DRC for August 2024. Since di latest deal, both sides dey accuse each oda of violating di ceasefire and di M23 rebels - wey di UK and US say get links to Rwanda - don threatened to walk away from di peace toks. "Fight-fight still dey between Congo and Rwanda - so dat ceasefire never really hold water," na so Margaret MacMillan, one professor of history wey bin teach for di University of Oxford. Thailand and Cambodia On 26 July, Trump post for im Truth Social say: "I dey call di Acting Prime Minister of Thailand, right now, to request a Ceasefire, and END to di War, wey currently dey happun." A couple of days later, di two kontris agree to an "immediate and unconditional ceasefire" after less dan a week of fighting for di border. Malaysia bin hold di peace toks, but President Trump bin threaten to stop separate negotiations on reducing US tariffs (dat na taxes on imports) unless Thailand and Cambodia stop dia fight- fight. Both of dem dey heavily depend on exports to US. On 7 August, Thailand and Cambodia reach agreement wit di aim to reducing tensions along dia shared border. Armenia and Azerbaijan Di leaders of both kontris say Trump suppose receive di Nobel Peace Prize for im efforts to secure a peace deal, wey White House announce on 8 August. "I think im go get good credit hia - di Oval Office signing ceremony fit don push di parties to peace," na so Oga O'Hanlon tok. For March, di two goment bin tok say dem ready to end dia nearly 40-year conflict wey dey centred on di status of Nagorno-Karabakh. Di most recent, serious outbreak of fight-fight na for September 2023 wen Azerbaijan bin seize di enclave (wia many ethnic Armenians dey live). Egypt and Ethiopia No "war" hia for di president to end, but tension don dey for long between dis two kontris sake of one dam on for River Nile. Ethiopia Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam dem complete am dis summer, Egypt argue say di water e dey get from di Nile fit dey affected. Afta 12 years of disagreement, Egypt's foreign minister tok on 29 June say tok-tok with Ethiopia don stop completly. Trump say: "If I be Egypt, I'go want get water for di Nile." Im promise say US go resolve di issue sharp-sharp Egypt welcome Trump words, but Ethiopian officials no too happy wit di tok. No official deal dey ground between Egypt and Ethiopia to resolve dia differences. Serbia and Kosovo On 27 June, Trump claim say im prevent outbreak of war between dem, e say: "Serbia, Kosovo bin ready fight each oda, e for be big war. I tell dem if un try am, na im be say una no go do trade wit United States. Dem say, well, maybe we no go fight again." E don tey wey dis two kontris get issue wit each oda - na legacy of di Balkan wars wey happun for 1990s – di tensions begin rise again in recent years. "Serbia and Kosovo no dey fight or fire each oda, so dis no be war to end," Prof MacMillan tell us. Di White House point us towards Trump diplomatic efforts for im first term. Wia di two kontris sign economic normalisation agreements for Oval Office wit di president for 2020, but war no dey dat time. Additional reporting na from Peter Mwai, Shruti Menon and Eve Webster.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store