logo
Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's legal fight isn't over

Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's legal fight isn't over

Yahoo2 days ago

While Justin Baldoni's suit against Blake Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds has been dismissed, she isn't done fighting her claims against her 'It Ends With Us' director and co-star - and Baldoni isn't done fighting back.
Michael Gottlieb, the attorney representing Lively in her civil sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit against Baldoni, told CNN the actress intends to continue pursuing her lawsuit against Baldoni.
In a conversation with Jake Tapper on Monday, Gottlieb said Lively is 'determined to see her claims through and to pursue them to have a full public accountability of what she's alleged happened to her.'
His statement came the same day a judge dismissed Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds, as well as their publicist. He also dismissed a separate claim from Baldoni against the New York Times, who first reported Lively's allegations.
Gottlieb added that the power couple feels 'vindicated' by the ruling, as well as 'grateful to the individuals and organizations that have stood by Ms. Lively as she's pursued these claims.'
'I think that today is a message that these kind of retaliatory lawsuits that are really designed to silence and punish people who speak up won't work. They are not going to work. They won't be tolerated by our justice system and they will not be successful,' Gottlieb added. 'And I think that's an important message for those who want to speak up against the mistreatment that they may face in their workplaces.'
Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, responded with a statement provided to CNN on Tuesday.
'Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling,' he said.
'The Court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations. This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign,' the statement continued. 'With the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking.
Freedman ended his statement by thanking 'the Internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity.'
It was yet another chapter in a nearly year-long legal feud between Lively and Baldoni, which grew to include Reynolds, the couple's publicist, Leslie Sloan, and the New York Times.
Lively filed a civil rights complaint in December 2024 claiming that she was sexually harassed by Baldoni during production of the film and then was retaliated against for speaking up about her alleged mistreatment.
He quickly denied her claims, fling suit against her and Reynolds in January 2025 alleging that the superstar couple sought to 'destroy' him and his career, after hijacking his film, 'It Ends With Us.'
Baldoni also sued the New York Times as the first to report on Lively's allegations of sexual harassment alleging that the newspaper published an article 'rife with inaccuracies, misrepresentations, and omissions' that relied on Lively's 'self-serving narrative.'
Motions to dismiss filed by Lively, Reynolds, Sloan and the New York Times were all granted on Monday.
'We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit for what it was: a meritless attempt to stifle honest reporting,' a spokesperson for the New York Times said on Monday. 'Our journalists went out and covered carefully and fairly a story of public importance, and the court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism. We will continue to stand up in court for our journalism and for our journalists when their work comes under attack.'
In his ruling Monday, the judge held that Baldoni can file an amended complaint on the allegations of tortious interference with contract, relating to Reynolds and Lively, and breach of implied covenant, relating to Lively, by June 23.
Gottlieb acknowledged that the judge's ruling allowed for Baldoni to file an amended complaint relating to what he called 'ancillary or side claims,' but he underscored that the core defamation allegations are 'gone from the case.'
CNN's Elizabeth Wagmeister contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tiffany Tang clarifies "late for a month" for 2015's "Diamond Lover"
Tiffany Tang clarifies "late for a month" for 2015's "Diamond Lover"

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tiffany Tang clarifies "late for a month" for 2015's "Diamond Lover"

12 Jun - Tiffany Tang's camp recently released a lawyer's statement to clarify rumours about the actress, after a producer unwittingly tainted her good name in an effort to shower praise for Dilraba Dilmurat The issue sparked recently, when producer Liu Yang reposted an interview with Dilraba where she spoke about nearly getting replaced in her 2015 drama, "Diamond Lover", and validated the story, saying that the team had an emergency meeting where they worked together to protect Dilraba. He then said that the lead actress was late for a month in joining the production, which made him add more scenes to Dilraba's character and subsequently helped the actress shoot to stardom through the drama series. His post sparked a huge debate among netizens, especially Tiffany's fans, seeing that Tiffany was the lead actress in the drama. In response to the situation, the actress' team shared their statement via their law firm, saying that Tiffany had negotiated with the crew in advance when participating in the filming of the relevant series, and joined the crew in time according to the agreement between the two parties. It added that there was no "late arrival" situation as rumoured on the Internet, that the information released by the relevant users was seriously untrue, which had caused the public to misunderstand and seriously damaged Tiffany's public image. (Photo Source: Tiffany IG, TVtime)

Today's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for June 12
Today's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for June 12

CNET

time2 hours ago

  • CNET

Today's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for June 12

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today's Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles. Today's NYT Mini Crossword plays off a two-letter technological feature that people tend to either love, or hate. It's found its way into everything we do these past few years, and now it's also in the crossword. Need some help with today's Mini Crossword? Read on. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips. The Mini Crossword is just one of many games in the Times' games collection. If you're looking for today's Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET's NYT puzzle hints page. Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword Let's get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers. The completed NYT Mini Crossword puzzle for June 12, 2025. NYT/Screenshot by CNET Mini across clues and answers 1A clue: ___ chi Answer: TAI 4A clue: Financially compensated Answer: PAID 5A clue: Some things off the top of your head? Answer: HAIRS 6A clue: Feels sick Answer: AILS 7A clue: ___ Peacock, character in Clue Answer: MRS Mini down clues and answers 1D clue: Coin flip call Answer: TAILS 2D clue: Shows on TV Answer: AIRS 3D clue: Requests at the bar, informally Answer: IDS 4D clue: Decent poker holding Answer: PAIR 5D clue: Person who loves attention Answer: HAM How to play more Mini Crosswords The New York Times Games section offers a large number of online games, but only some of them are free for all to play. You can play the current day's Mini Crossword for free, but you'll need a subscription to the Times Games section to play older puzzles from the archives.

Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his controversial COVID commentary
Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his controversial COVID commentary

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his controversial COVID commentary

Podcaster Joe Rogan claimed Tuesday that two unnamed former presidents were involved in the protest against his skeptical discussions about COVID-19. Spotify received backlash in 2022 for allowing Rogan, one of its biggest stars, to spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. Musician Neil Young famously removed his content from Spotify in protest over Rogan's rhetoric, saying he no longer wanted to share a platform with him. "And then all of a sudden, I hear that Neil Young wants me removed from Spotify. I was like, 'What the f--- is going on? This is crazy,'" Rogan said Tuesday. "Spotify got calls from two former presidents," he added. Rogan Slams Cnn For 'Force-feeding Me Morons' Instead Of Delivering News Then-Biden White House press secretary Jen Psaki commented on the controversy directly. After Spotify announced it would flag podcasts that cover COVID-19, Psaki responded, "So this disclaimer, it's a positive step, but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out misinformation while also uplifting accurate information." Read On The Fox News App "Our hope is that all major tech platforms — and all major news sources for that matter — be responsible and be vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as COVID-19," she added. But Rogan said that instead of being censored or deplatformed, "I grew by 2 million subscribers in a month." "People started listening," he said, despite how his critics attacked his reputation. "And they started listening, like, 'Oh, he's really reasonable and pretty humble about all this stuff and just asking questions.'" Rogan also condemned how media outlets attacked his use of Ivermectin to treat his COVID-19 by referring to it as a horse dewormer. "I'm, like, 'Why aren't you guys concentrating on the fact that a 55-year-old man is fine three days later during the worst strain?' It was during the Delta where everybody's freaking out. 'This one's going to kill us all.' And I was fine in three days," he said. Rogan described the whole experience as a "wake-up call" that opened his eyes about the liberal legacy media. "It's so dirty. It's such a dirty business," Rogan said. "God, I used to have massive respect for journalists. If I had never done this podcast, I would be your regular schmo out there with, you know, just spitting out all the company lines and all the blast all over the news." "I kind of liked it better then," he said with a laugh. "I didn't think the world is filled with demons, money-hungry demons that are willing to sacrifice human lives in the pursuit of revenue." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Ek addressed the pushback against hosting Rogan during the company's earnings call in February 2022. "I think the important part here is that we don't change our policies based on one creator, nor do we change it based on any media cycle," the chief executive said at the time. "Our policies have been carefully written with the input from numbers of internal and external experts in this space – and I do believe they're right for our platform." Fox News Digital reached out to Spotify for comment and did not receive an immediate article source: Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his controversial COVID commentary

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store