logo
Married immigrants trying to get green cards could be deported, new Trump-era guidance says

Married immigrants trying to get green cards could be deported, new Trump-era guidance says

Independent8 hours ago
Immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens have long expected that they won't be deported from the country while going through the process of obtaining a green card.
But new guidance from Donald Trump's administration explicitly states that immigrants seeking lawful residence through marriage can be deported, a policy that also applies to immigrants with pending requests.
Immigration authorities can begin removal proceedings for immigrants who lack legal status and applied to become a lawful permanent resident through a citizen spouse, according to guidance from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued this month.
The policy also applies to immigrants with pending green cards through other citizen family members.
People who entered the country illegally aren't the only ones impacted. Under new guidance, immigrants trying to get lawful status through a spouse or family member are at risk of being deported if their visas expired, or if they are among the roughly 1 million immigrants whose temporary protected status was stripped from them under the Trump administration.
Immigrants and their spouses or family members who sponsor them 'should be aware that a family-based petition accords no immigration status nor does it bar removal,' the policy states.
The changes were designed to 'enhance benefit integrity and identify vetting and fraud concerns' and weed out what the agency calls 'fraudulent, frivolous, or non-meritorious' applications, according to USCIS.
'This guidance will improve USCIS' capacity to vet qualifying marriages and family relationships to ensure they are genuine, verifiable, and compliant with all applicable laws,' the agency said in a statement.
Those changes, which were filed on August 1, are 'effective immediately,' according to the agency.
Within the first six months of 2025, immigrants and their family members filed more than 500,000 I-130 petitions, which are the first steps in the process of obtaining legal residency through a spouse or family member.
There are more than 2.4 million pending I-130 petitions, according to USCIS data. Nearly 2 million of those petitions have been pending for more than six months. It is unclear whether those petitions involve immigrants who either lost their legal status or did not have one at the time they filed their documents.
Previously, USCIS would notify applicants about missing documents or issue a denial notice serving as a warning that their case could be rejected — with opportunities for redress.
Now, USCIS is signaling that applicants can be immediately denied and ordered to immigrant courts instead.
Outside of being born in the country, family-based immigration remains the largest and most viable path to permanent residency, accounting for nearly half of all new green card holders each year, according to USCIS data.
'This is one of the most important avenues that people have to adjust to lawful permanent status in the United States,' Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School, told NBC News.
Under long-established USCIS policies, 'no one expected' to be hauled into immigration court while seeking lawful status after a marriage, Mukherjee said. Now, deportation proceedings can begin 'at any point in the process' under the broad scope of the rule changes, which could 'instill fear in immigrant families, even those who are doing everything right,' according to Mukherjee.
Obtaining a green card
The high-profile arrest and threat of removing Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil put intense scrutiny on whether the administration lawfully targeted a lawful permanent resident for his constitutionally protected speech.
And last month, Customs and Border Protection put green card holders on notice, warning that the government 'has the authority to revoke your green card if our laws are broken and abused.'
'In addition to immigration removal proceedings, lawful permanent residents presenting at a U.S. port of entry with previous criminal convictions may be subject to mandatory detention,' the agency said.
Another recent USCIS memo outlines the administration's plans to revoke citizenship from children whose parents lack permanent lawful status as well as parents who are legally in the country, including visa holders, DACA recipients and people seeking asylum.
The policy appears to preempt court rulings surrounding the constitutionality of the president's executive order that unilaterally redefines who gets to be a citizen in the country at birth.
That memo, from the agency's Office of the Chief Counsel, acknowledges that federal court injunctions have blocked the government from taking away birthright citizenship.
But the agency 'is preparing to implement' Trump's executive order 'in the event that it is permitted to go into effect,' according to July's memo.
Children of immigrants who are 'unlawfully present' will 'no longer be U.S. citizens at birth,' the agency declared.
Trump's order states that children whose parents are legally present in the country on student, work and tourist visas are not eligible for citizenship
USCIS, however, goes even further, outlining more than a dozen categories of immigrants whose children could lose citizenship at birth despite their parents living in the country with legal permission.
That list includes immigrants who are protected against deportation for humanitarian reasons and immigrants from countries with Temporary Protected Status, among others.
The 14th Amendment plainly states that 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.'
The Supreme Court has upheld that definition to apply to all children born within the United States for more than a century.
But under the terms of Trump's order, children can be denied citizenship if a mother is undocumented or is temporarily legally in the country on a visa, and if the father isn't a citizen or a lawful permanent resident.
More than 150,000 newborns would be denied citizenship every year under Trump's order, according to plaintiffs challenging the president's order.
A challenge over Trump's birthright citizenship order at the Supreme Court did not resolve the critical 14th Amendment questions at stake. On Wednesday, government lawyers confirmed plans to 'expeditiously' ask the Supreme Court 'to settle the lawfulness' of his birthright citizenship order later this year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump claims 'good chance' he could soon meet Putin after 'very good talks'
Trump claims 'good chance' he could soon meet Putin after 'very good talks'

ITV News

time23 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Trump claims 'good chance' he could soon meet Putin after 'very good talks'

President Donald Trump could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week, as part of US efforts to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war. The announcement came hours after Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in Moscow - a meeting Trump said was "highly productive" in which "great progress was made". Trump has not met Putin since his return to office in January. While it would be a significant milestone in the 3-year war and bolster Trump's attempts to be seen as a global peacemaker, there's no promise that this meeting could end the conflict. But Trump admitted he had some reservations, telling reporters on Wednesday, "I've been disappointed before with this one." A meeting between the two presidents has not been scheduled yet, and no location has been determined. Trump also announced that there could be a meeting with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, telling reporters, "there's a very good prospect that they will" meet. Zelenskyy has been willing to meet face-to-face with Putin to end the conflict, but Russia has repeatedly rejected the idea. Trump has met Zelenskyy several times this year, including a heated meeting in the Oval Office in February, which led to the Ukrainian President leaving early after Trump told him "you're gambling with World War 3". The US President hasn't met with Putin yet in his second term, but met with him five times during his first presidency. Witkoff's meeting with Putin on Wednesday came days before the White House's Friday deadline for Russia to reach a peace deal with Ukraine, or face 100% secondary tariffs. Secondary tariffs would target Russia's trading partners in an effort to isolate Moscow in the global economy, potentially including nations that rely on Russia for oil and natural gas, like China and India. Relationships between Trump and Russia have been growing strained. On August 1st, Trump announced he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be "strategically positioned" near Russia, after the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, made "inflammatory" remarks online. He has also expressed increasing frustration with Putin over Russia's escalating strikes on civilian areas in Ukraine. The intensified attacks have occurred even as Trump has urged the Russian leader in recent months to relent. President Zelenskyy announced that he had spoken to Trump on Wednesday, alongside other European leaders. "It seems that Russia is now more inclined to agree to a ceasefire," Zelenskyy said, adding that the pressure on Moscow "is working," without elaborating. Zelenskyy stressed it was important to make sure Russia does not "deceive us or the United States' when it comes to 'the details' of a potential agreement. Kyiv proposes that Ukraine and its allies soon 'talk to determine our position, our common position, and our common view.'

US energy exporters face likely letdown in any US-India trade deal
US energy exporters face likely letdown in any US-India trade deal

Reuters

time23 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US energy exporters face likely letdown in any US-India trade deal

LITTLETON, Colorado, Aug 7 (Reuters) - The fresh 25% tariffs slapped on Indian goods by U.S. President Donald Trump this week are being viewed by many as a negotiating tactic designed to force India to buy more U.S. energy products and other goods going forward. But even though India's fast-growing economy is the fifth largest globally, India's energy importers may have far less room to maneuver than they might appear. Tight corporate operating margins, cost-sensitive consumer markets, binding long-term import contracts and slowing economic growth all limit India's ability to spend big on U.S. oil, LNG, coal and refined products over the near term. At the same time, India's location at the base of Asia means it is far closer to other major energy product exporters than it is to the United States, which would trigger sharply higher shipping costs if it were to switch to U.S.-origin products. No doubt some Indian corporations will be cajoled into pledging major U.S. purchases and investments during upcoming trade negotiations, which may boost sentiment in Washington, D.C. But U.S. exporters of oil, gas, coal and fuels that are hoping for massive, viable and binding purchase commitments by Indian buyers are likely to be left disappointed. It's not just its import needs that India has to worry about. The United States is by far India's largest export market, and has accounted for nearly 20% of all Indian exports in recent years, according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) data. In 2024, the value of India's exports to the United States was just over $80 billion, while its imports from the U.S. totalled just under $45 billion. As the U.S. is more than twice as large as India's next largest export market - the United Arab Emirates - it will be nearly impossible for the country to replace lost U.S. consumers with other buyers. That means that trade negotiators will remain committed to healing trade ties with Washington as quickly as possible, and will be looking at every possible means of reducing the trade imbalance. The rapid rise in India's purchases of Russian crude oil since mid-2022 has been a sore point for the U.S. and Europe, and has been a focal point during the recent trade talks. Average monthly crude oil flows from Russia to India jumped from around 3.2 million barrels a month between 2018 and 2021 to 50 million barrels a month since mid-2022, data from Kpler shows. That more than 15-fold surge in Russian oil purchases by India provided Moscow with critical import earnings while it grappled with the fallout from its war in Ukraine, and seriously undermined international efforts to cut funding to Moscow. However, while India's refusal to join Western-led sanctions drew ire from the international community, its willingness to step up imports of Russian oil ensured that its refiners and fuel consumers were shielded from any rise in global oil prices. Indeed, the opposite has occurred as Indian importers were able to extract steep discounts from Russian oil sellers who were desperate to secure sales wherever they could. Those cheap imported Russian barrels in turn allowed major Indian refiners such as Reliance ( opens new tab to expand supplies and fuel the country's economic growth since 2020. Indian authorities have stated that providing energy security for its 1.4 billion population has been the main driver of its oil import programme, and that the new tariffs are unfair given that the country is only acting in its own self-interest. What's more, any aggressive pivot away from cheap Russian oil to pricier U.S. crude would drastically change the economic outlook for Indian oil refiners and consumers, and likely result in a surge in fuel prices that would cause economic harm. Since 2022, the official prices of the main grade of Russian oil imported by India have averaged around $70 a barrel, which is around $10 cheaper than the price of the main U.S. crude for export over that same period, data from LSEG shows. As Indian importers likely secured their Russian oil supplies at even lower prices, the real discount compared to U.S. prices is likely larger. That in turn means that there is almost no prospect of Indian refiners being able to profitably switch to U.S. crude any time soon, even if pressured to do so. U.S. trade negotiators have touted U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a means of reducing trade gaps, as a single LNG cargo can cost several million dollars. However, Indian energy product importers have arguably even less scope to switch out current suppliers for the U.S. here. The primary limiting factor is that Indian gas importers are already locked into long-term purchase deals with suppliers such as Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, and face stiff penalties for breaking contracts. And even if Indian buyers were prepared to tear up those deals in favor of buying from the U.S. instead, they would face a surge in shipping costs that could make overall cargo costs uneconomical. The journey time for an LNG tanker from the U.S. to India is around 30 days, which is six times longer than the trip from Qatar. U.S. coal exporters will likely face similar difficulties in dislodging Indonesia from India's coal import pipeline. The Indonesia to India shipping time is around 11 days, compared to around 27 days for the trip from the U.S. East coast. Such a yawning gap in journey times and shipping costs means that India's trade negotiators may not be able to rely on its energy consumers to close the trade gap, and will need to look elsewhere to secure a trade deal with the U.S. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.

Bank of England likely to cut interest rates today as new Trump tariffs kick in
Bank of England likely to cut interest rates today as new Trump tariffs kick in

The Guardian

time23 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Bank of England likely to cut interest rates today as new Trump tariffs kick in

Update: Date: 2025-08-07T06:17:51.000Z Title: Dozens more countries face higher taxes on exports to US as new Trump tariffs come into effect Content: Dozens of countries face higher taxes on their exports to the US now that Donald Trump's latest wave of country-specific tariffs has come into force. The sweeping 'reciprocal' levies announced by the White House a week ago – just before a previous 1 August deadline was due to elapse – were in place as of a minute past midnight Washington time on Thursday. Key details of Trump's latest tariffs include: The rates range from 41% on Syria, 40% on Laos and Myanmar and 39% on Switzerland to 10% for the UK. The levies will be on top of the usual tariffs applying to US-bound goods. Brazil's 'reciprocal' rate is 10%, for example, but its total levy is 50% after Trump added a 40% levy over the prosecution of ex-president Jair Bolsonaro. India's 25% tariff rate could rise to a total of 50% after Trump imposed an additional charge for buying oil from Russia. The European Union is the only US trading partner where its baseline rate – set at 15% after a framework deal – will include previous tariffs. It means, for example, cheeses that are normally hit with import duties of 14.9% will be taxed at 15% and not 29.9%. Trump first unveiled the raft of country-specific rates on 2 April, which he called 'liberation day', claiming the world had long been ripping off the US. On Wednesday, meanwhile, Trump said he would impose a 100% tariff on computer chips – likely raising the cost of electronics and household goods – but that US-produced chips would be exempt. Update: Date: 2025-08-07T06:17:14.000Z Title: Introduction: Bank of England interest rate decision today Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. With the UK economy looking weak, but inflation rumbling away, and a trade war raging, these are tricky times to be a central banker. And at noon today, the Bank of England will reveal whether its policymakers have decided to lower borrowing costs, or leave them unchanged – and, significantly, whether they all agreed on the decision! The City is widely expecting a quarter-point cut in interest rates, to bring Bank rate down from 4.25% to 4%. Some of the nine members of the BoE's monetary policy committee may push for a deeper cut, fearing that rising unemployment and weakening economic activity is flashing the alarm. On the other side of the table, though, hawkish MPC members may point to inflation - which rose to 3.6% in June - as a reason to leave rates on hold. Guillermo Felices, global investment strategist at PGIM Fixed Income, says a 25 basis point (quarter-point) cut is 'almost a done deal', adding: We expect a further 50bps of rate cuts over the 3 following meetings, as the Monetary Policy Committee begins to put more weight on the weak labour market. There are MPC members that already see a greater urgency to cut rates, as indicated by the 6-3 vote split to hold at the last meeting. The Bank also has to weigh up the impact of Donald Trump's trade war. The UK's trade deal with the US means the direct impact from tariffs is relatively limited, but there is the global situation to consider too. Earlier this morning, the latest wave of country-specific tariffs came into force, a week after Trump announced them. Switzerland failed to reach a last-minute deal to lower its rate from 39%. Swiss president Karin Keller-Sutter reportedly left Washington empty-handed last night, following a meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 7am BST: Halifax house price index for July Noon BST: Bank of England interest rate decision 12.30pm BST: Bank of England press conference 1.30pm BST: US weekly jobless report

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store