
Woman who bought €3,000 emerald and ring from Dublin jeweller discovers it's a fake
A customer of a Dublin-based jeweller who has filed for bankruptcy is 'disappointed but not surprised' to learn that a €3,000 emerald and diamond ring she purchased contains fake gemstones.
Shuwan Li, who ran Empress Fine Jewels on Johnson's Court off Grafton Street, was being pursued for debts of €1.5m when she went bankrupt in March.
The Sunday World recently revealed that another customer took legal action against Empress Fine Jewels, which was ordered to pay her nearly €35,000, after diamond rings she entrusted to the store were reported stolen while being taken by a pensioner on a bus to another location to be cleaned.
In the aftermath of publicity surrounding this case, another woman decided to have her triple diamond emerald cluster ring — which she bought from the jewellery shop in December 2023 — tested.
An independent valuer examined the ring using specialist technology and has in recent days confirmed the woman's suspicions that the stones are fake.
This customer, who does not wish to be identified, said she visited a number of jewellers in search of an emerald ring before attending Empress Fine Jewels in mid-December 2023.
If it seems too good to be true, then it probably is
'The initial price I was quoted was €4,200 but I got the price down to €3,000. That was the red flag I didn't see. As they saying goes, 'if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is,'' she said.
The woman said she did not expect to be sold fake emeralds from the jewellery shop on Johnson's Court, near more established jewellers in the Grafton Street area.
She said she was provided with a valuation report from Empress Fine Jewels upon purchase, which stated that the '18ct gold triple diamond emerald cluster ring' had a 'market value' of €4,200.
This document, as well as the woman's €3,000 invoice, have been seen by this newspaper. However, in recent weeks, the woman decided to have her emerald and diamond ring tested by a Dublin valuer to establish the authenticity of the gemstones.
The independent goldsmith has now confirmed that the gemstones are not emeralds and the diamonds are also fake.
Shuwan Li
Sources familiar with the case say it is likely that the ring is in fact only worth a couple of hundred euro. The customer has not made a complaint to An Garda Síochána. She feels it 'might not be worthwhile' as it would be highly unlikely she would get her money back given that Ms Li has filed for bankruptcy.
When she bought the piece of jewellery, the ring needed to be resized, so it took a few weeks for her to receive it.
'When I did get it, I always felt it wasn't the same ring I had chosen in the shop. It was too shiny. I always had concerns about it and now it is confirmed that it is fake. It was a wicked thing to happen but at the same time, there are far worse things going on in the world,' she said.
'You live and learn. I was duped. I had decided to treat myself and I wanted an emerald ring. Of course, I wish it didn't happen. I will probably still wear it on the odd occasion. I've accepted that it is fake and decided to just move on, because there's nothing that can be done now.
'I just hope it hasn't happened to too many other people and I would like people to be aware,' she added.
An independent valuer confirmed the ring's emeralds and diamonds were not real
Efforts were made to contact Ms Li for comment. Court filings show Ms Li had just €100 in cash and €21.88 in her bank account when she sought to have her €1.5m debts wiped out. Her only personal assets were a €3,000 engagement ring and a €900 wedding ring.
The Sunday World reported in recent weeks that another Dublin woman obtained a judgment of almost €35,000 against Empress Fine Jewels and Ms Li earlier this year after four rings she left in for cleaning were reportedly stolen.
She took a civil case against the business and a Circuit Court judgment seen by this newspaper ordered that Shuwan Li, trading as Empress Fine Jewels and Empress Fine Jewels Ltd, reimburse her €34,180. However, court documents also reveal that Ms Li filed for bankruptcy on March 3 this year, so the woman who sued her is unlikely to be compensated.
Shuwan Li Mooney ran a jewellery shop in Dublin city centre
On May 8, 2024, the woman left four rings worth around €35,000 into the store to be cleaned. They included her wedding and engagement rings, and two other pieces with rare stones.
She received a call the next day from the jeweller, telling her the rings had been stolen from a person travelling on a Dublin Bus.
She was told a pensioner had been entrusted to take the jewellery to another premises to be cleaned by a specialist and used a bus to get there. Gardaí were told the alleged robbery took place on the pensioner's return journey.
This is not the first time Empress Fine Jewels has been before the courts
The customer said she had no idea that her rings were to leave the premises for cleaning. She said she was 'flabbergasted' that the items would be taken elsewhere, and also that they would be transported on a bus by a pensioner, who appeared frail, given his use of a walking aid.
Gardaí have obtained CCTV of the man on the bus and later took a preliminary statement from him. The customer has also given gardaí a formal statement.
The investigation remains open, but there have been no arrests and no significant developments in terms of recovering the missing rings.
This is not the first time Empress Fine Jewels has been before the courts.
Last year, an agreement was reached to resolve a High Court row between the business and an Italian jewellery distributor over €500,000 worth of jewels.
World Diamond Group (WDG) sued Shuwan Li and Empress Fine Jewels.
Among the claims were that Shuwan Li made an alleged threat to 'put people in the river' in the midst of the fallout between the diamond sellers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
12 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Insurance algorithms firm claims breach of intellectal property rights
A Dublin registered company involved in providing data analytics for insurance brokers has claimed in the Commercial Court that two firms are breaching its intellectual property in relation to product algorithms used in selling insurance to customers. XS Direct Holdings Ltd, part of a larger XS Direct Group, is suing Mulsanne Insurance Co Ltd, registered in Gibraltar, and Ormiston Holdco Ltd, registered in Jersey, seeking a declaration that an intellectual property assignment agreement of September 2023 is validand enforceable. It is also seeking damages. A co-plaintiff with XS is Dublin registered Beach Point Capital (BPC) Ireland Lending DAC and BPC Ireland Lending II DAC which are senior lenders to the XS Group and hold certain security over the assets ofXS Direct Holdings and certain related companies including XS DirectInsurance Brokers Ltd. BPC Lending II appointed receivers over XS Direct Insurance Brokers in February 2022 and holds a fixed charge over certain valuable intellectual property rights with the XS Group. READ MORE XS Direct Group founder and CEO, Chris McCann, says the most valuable aspect of its product is algorithms which are based on data and claimsmade during the period following the initial writing of the XS Directcore product. It represents 12 years of accumulating the necessary data and its revision which informs the underwriting and pricing models. Its attractiveness was that it facilitated the sharing of risk withinsureds via high levels of excess which results in lower premiums forcustomers who don't have, for example, no claims bonuses and who might be otherwise outside the standard market for other insurers. The case was admitted to the Commercial Court on Monday by Mr Justice Michael Twomey on the application of Hugh O'Keeffe SC, for XS and on consent from John O'Donnell SC, for the defendants. Mr O'Keeffe said the claim for damages was in excess of £3.5 million (€4 million) and there is very considerable complexity to the case. Counsel also said there had been efforts to have the disputearbitrated but it was ultimately agreed this would not lead to aresolution. In an affidavit, Mr McCann of XS, said the firm's core product has been particularly successful in the UK since it was launched there in 2009. In 2022, Mulsanne Insurance, the first defendant, was interested inentering into an intellectual property licensing agreement of the product when XS Direct Insurance ceased trading that year, he said. A heads of terms agreement was entered into between a newlyincorporated XS company, XSV IP Ltd, and Mulsanne Insurance which thenbecame an underwriting entity using the XS algorithms, he said. While Mulsanne honoured its first payment obligation of more than £98,000, no further payments were received by XSVI IP, he said. In March 2024, Ormiston Holdco, the second defendant, said it was no longer supporting Mulsanne's delivery of all sections of the XSproduct and proposed walking away from the deal, he said. Mr Justice Twomey approved directions for the progress of the casethrough the Commercial Court. He added that while he had heard whathappened in relation to mediation efforts, there could still be someother independent form of resolution to the dispute.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Plan to hike personal injury awards will lead to higher premiums, warns Aviva
Plans by Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to hike personal injury awards by 16.7 per cent will only drive-up costs for consumers and businesses, one of the country's leading insurers has said. Mr O'Callaghan is preparing to bring a memo to Cabinet on Tuesday to pave the way for draft legislation that would give effect to a proposal by the Judicial Council to hike personal injury awards by 16.7 per cent. The planned blanket hike has been met resistance from insurers and business lobby groups, who say that the increase will be passed directly on to consumers and companies. Aviva Insurance said on Monday the proposal 'can only be seen as a short-sighted political manoeuvre that will only drive-up costs for consumers and businesses, many of whom are already struggling with cost-of-living challenges'. READ MORE It said the move would 'disproportionately benefit the legal profession', with the financial burden 'falling squarely on consumers and small businesses'. Declan O'Rourke, the group's chief executive, said the approach 'risks undoing years of hard-won progress in stabilising the insurance market'. [ Insurers and businesses call for injury guidelines reform as 17% rise planned Opens in new window ] 'It is the wider public who will ultimately pay the price through higher insurance premiums, rising legal costs, and the potential unravelling of hard-won reforms designed to bring stability and fairness to the personal injuries system,' he said. Mr O'Rourke said 'immediate and decisive action' is required from the Government, or there is 'a real risk of sliding back into a claims culture that benefits only those who profit from legal complexity and inflated awards'. 'It is not too late to take action to stop this increase and move forward with meaningful reform, starting with a more transparent, balanced, and evidence-based approach to reviewing personal injury guidelines,' he continued. How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax Listen | 22:03 Mr O'Rourke said a proposal to extend the review period from three years to seven was welcome, but that locking in a 16.7 per cent increase for seven years would 'inflict far greater damage, delivering a serious blow to consumers and businesses alike'. 'Benchmarking must come first,' he said. 'We need to get this right before imposing such a long-term burden on the public. 'The suggested proposal to benchmark damages against EU norms raises serious concerns, particularly as the public was led to believe this was already embedded in the original guidelines. If such benchmarking was conducted, why was the research never published?' He added that the Government should ask the Judicial Council to benchmark awards, particularly for minor injuries, across other European Union (EU) jurisdictions, 'where the awards are up to 10 times lower than in Ireland'. The Department of Justice said Mr O'Callaghan has 'consulted extensively' with his colleagues in Government and has also considered the latest reports on claims from the Central Bank. 'He is acutely aware of the impact that any such amendments to increase damages for personal injuries will have on insurance premiums, competitiveness and the business community,' the department said. It also said any decision taken 'must provide' for the effective operation of the Personal Injuries Resolution Board, which has 'resulted in significant reductions in damages for personal injuries in recent years'. The Department said a decision will be taken by Government 'shortly' on the proposals.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Jim O'Callaghan welcomes faster processing of planning and environmental cases
The number of planning and environment cases that have been resolved has doubled since a new fast-tracking approach was introduced in the courts. The planning and environment list was set up in December 2023 to expedite legal proceedings that were holding up housing and infrastructure projects. The Court Service's Annual Report for 2024 shows 253 planning and environmental cases were resolved last year, up from 129 in 2023, an increase of 96 per cent. Cases related to issues such as residential developments, renewable energy projects and commercial developments. READ MORE There were 108 active cases in the list when it commenced and 221 cases came in during last year. About a third of cases last year involved a development located in Dublin. Minister for Housing James Browne announced last month that he is bringing forward a Bill that would extend planning permissions to take account of delays related to judicial reviews. Speaking after the launch of the service's annual report, Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan said the increase in the number of cases being resolved vindicated the decision to have a separate list for planning and environmental matters. 'Before the specialist list there were important infrastructural projects that just went into the standard judicial review list and waited to be progressed,' he said. 'I welcome the fact that there is this strategic planning list that is going to expediate cases and I think we are going to see a more efficient hearing of those cases.' In January, the Construction Industry Federation estimated that 13,000 homes were being held up because of judicial reviews. 'I'm concerned that we see housing proposals delayed because of judicial reviews,' Mr O'Callaghan added. Courts Service chief executive Angela Denning said the fact that personal injuries awards had almost halved in the space of a year was attributable to new guidelines. The guidelines were introduced by the Judicial Council following new legislation in 2019 which were approved by judges in 2021. Ms Denning said the Delaney case last year had given certainty to judges in the awards they could make. This involved a case taken by a woman who challenged the €3,000 award made to her after she fell on a footpath in April 2019 in Dungarvan, Co Waterford. The case went to the Supreme Court and the court ruled that the personal injuries guidelines were binding and had legal effect. As a result, personal injury awards went from €256 million in 2023 to €135 million last year. Circuit Court awards, capped at €60,000, dropped from €16 million to less than €13 million, and District Court awards fell from €2.2 million to €1.5 million.