Silencers, night vision and cultural hunting: Shooters Party reveals its demands
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party leader Robert Borsak said the proposed council of seven members – four of whom would be nominated by shooters organisations – would operate under the oversight of a newly appointed hunting minister. It would take on some of the responsibilities of the Game Council of NSW, which was abolished after a scathing report into its operations in 2013.
Then-premier Barry O'Farrell said at the time: 'Essentially it made the point that the Game Council was both the promoter and the operator in relation to hunting activities across NSW as well as the regulator. That posed an unacceptable risk to the government.'
Under the latest proposal, the new body would have less control over revenues from licensing than the Game Council had, but according to a briefing paper on the changes written by the Shooters Party and provided to some NSW MPs, it would oversee licensing and policy development.
'The bill supports a new licensing framework, including a proposed Conservation Hunting Licence, to manage ethical public land access and encourages the use of advanced technology (e.g. night vision, thermal scopes, sound moderators) for humane and efficient pest control on private land,' the briefing paper says.
Loading
It would also create bounties for pest animals such as pigs, feral cats and foxes, providing what it said was a cost-effective way to support government-funded pest control.
Borsak said the proposed changes would also increase access to Crown land for hunters, but could not say which land. He said he understood the government would support the proposal. A spokesperson for Agriculture Minister Tara Moriarty said the bill would go through 'internal party processes this morning'.
The O'Farrell government called for a report into the original Game Council after its chief executive was arrested for illegally hunting on private land. He was later convicted of illegal hunting and firearms charges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
The Age
2 days ago
- The Age
Dancing in streets as bike riders ousted
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. TRANSPORT Elizabeth Street residents in North Richmond like me haven't stopped dancing in the street since Yarra Council's decision to scale back the bike lane and reinstate parking to both sides of the road (″ Mayor backpedals on wider bike lanes for privileged few ″, 13/8). The nightmare for we long-suffering Elizabeth St residents began in the depths of the COVID-19 lockdown in June 2020 when we received a flyer in our letterbox with a bike rider cycling down Elizabeth St and a notification of imminent works to upgrade the long-standing bike lane and remove ″some parking″. The jackhammers soon started, the newly planted street vegetation was destroyed, with the former Greens council digging up my side of the street first and installing a bike lane so wide semi-trailers could park in it. Residents then realised parking could only realistically be on the opposing north-side of Elizabeth thus halving our existing parking. Elizabeth St residents were aghast when the new bike lane nirvana was complete and rallied together, even with all the COVID-19 restrictions, lockdowns and curfews. There were Microsoft Teams upon Microsoft Teams meetings between residents and the council – complete with translators for the high number of people from non-English speaking backgrounds and many Elizabeth St professional residents lending their PCs, tablets and even their living rooms to disadvantaged residents in the street who didn't have computers or internet at home. It all amounted to nothing, and Elizabeth St residents stopped taking part in the former council's sham consultation process. But, on Tuesday, the new Yarra Council listened to its Elizabeth St residents and voted to modify the bike lane and restore parking to both sides of our street. Residents in Elizabeth St, North Richmond, will finally have their street back. Dora Houpis, Richmond Bike riders, rich and poor, want a better city (Re ″ Mayor backpedals on wider bike lanes for privileged few ″, 13/8). We're passionate bike riders, rich and poor, and we want a better city. We ride to work, school drop-off, the shops, the market – it's how we get around. Yarra's population is forecast to grow by 45,440 by 2046 and if everyone drives the place will seize up. We want a safe bike lane in Elizabeth Street as part of a network for all bike riders from everywhere. Richmond housing towers redevelopment could have a bike lane away from Elizabeth Street, the Vietnamese Buddhist temple could have drop off and pick up zones with parking nearby. There are alternatives. Bikes are a cheap, practical, healthy way of getting around. Oh and Gen Z, feeling ripped off again? Going for you first job in AI's brave new world? Grab a bike, it will lift your spirits. Elizabeth Clarke, Richmond West treated with contempt by Allan government Re ″ Marelen wastes thousands of hours commuting to work. She wants two things to change ″, 14/8. In the absence of a functional state opposition, thank heavens we have The Age to do their job of calling current and previous Labor state governments to account for their consistent neglect of the western suburbs of Melbourne. What does it say about the Allan government, that it is prepared to drag the state deeper in dept for SRL East when the same value capture case can be made for catch up strategic economic development supported by better rail infrastructure? And whatever happened to East Werribee tech employment precinct? We don't need another vision talkfest, the people of the west deserve the chance to cross examine the relevant ministers as to why they are and long have been treated with such contempt. So much for Labor governments past and present planning for all Victorians, or at least those who voted for them. Bernadette George, Mildura THE FORUM Crash and burn politics Opposition Leader's Sussan Ley's words about being a consensus-seeking politician lasted barely a month. She is sounding more like Tony Abbott and Peter Dutton every day. She's criticised the government despite interest rates falling, because it recognised Palestine as part of a bipartisan solution, because Anthony Albanese hasn't visited Donald Trump, because Australia has some of the lowest tariff increases under Trump's regime. She's already damned the results of the economic roundtable discussions that haven't been held yet. Every chance she gets, she slams the government. Obviously, she has no idea what consensus and bipartisanship mean. She is wooing those on the right rather than those in the middle where the bulk of the votes she needs are. As a pilot, you would think that she'd know that continually turning right will take you nowhere, will cause you to run out of fuel, and to crash and burn. Greg Tuck, Warragul Beyond recognition Recognising Palestine and a two-state solution is just a diplomatic issue and the easiest to resolve. And it's a good start. But what about the West Bank and the illegal settlements? That's Palestine too. What about control over the Temple Mount; a feature fiercely claimed by two incompatible religions as uniquely spiritual to them alone? And what about Jerusalem? Palestine will claim it as their capital city as does Israel. Plenty of potential for further friction, disagreement and slaughter for years to come. Andrew Barnes, Ringwood Changing course Re your correspondent's letter (″The West is dreaming″, 14/8). I don't recall any country rushing out to recognise Palestine after the attacks on October 7, 2023. What's changed since then has been the conduct of Israel and its unwillingness to try to mitigate the careless killing and starvation of thousands of Palestinians. Recognition of Palestine is a way of trying something new to change the course of this conflict. More and more countries in the world are coming around to this thinking. Cao Phan, Glen Iris
