Four-year-old pupils taught about surrogacy, 'tummy mummies' and 'donated sperm or eggs' in lessons blasted as 'highly inappropriate' by parents and campaigners
Reception classes are told that children can have a 'tummy mummy' as well as a 'mummy and/or daddy who will be their parents' when learning about the basics of reproduction.
Among 'key vocabulary' four and five-year-olds must learn are 'surrogacy' and 'donated sperm or eggs' in a module titled: 'Where do babies come from?'
Parents and campaigners say it is 'highly inappropriate' to teach these topics to such young children, saying it is only likely to confuse them.
They add that the concepts should be introduced only to much older children 'as part of lessons on thorny ethical issues such as euthanasia and abortion'.
Industry estimates suggest about 500 children are born through surrogacy in the UK each year – equating to just 0.08 per cent of children born in England and Wales in 2023.
About half of these children result from arrangements involving foreign surrogates, and campaigners warn this often leads to poor women in developing countries being exploited.
Helen Gibson, founder of Surrogacy Concern, said she is 'appalled' to see surrogacy being taught to such young children and has written to the Department for Education (DfE) to raise concerns.
She said: 'Surrogacy is higher risk for severe pregnancy complications, it is unethical, exploitative and highly contentious.'
However, pro-surrogacy groups have lobbied MPs for the practice to be 'included in schools', a document seen by the Mail shows.
The DfE said the teaching material was developed by a private relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) provider and is not compulsory in all primary schools, adding: 'The RSHE guidance is clear that where schools choose to do so they must make sure they teach age-appropriate topics.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Zapping the brain with a tiny device on the ear could boost fitness without people having to lift a finger, study claims
A small device that zaps a major nerve connecting the heart and brain could one day help improve fitness for coach potatoes and people with heart failure, an early trial suggests. Wearing the stimulator for just 30 minutes a day increased oxygen intake during exercise by four per cent, according to researchers - who hope it could eventually be used to help more inactive people. The device, clipped to the outer ear, sends gentle electrical pulses to increase the activity of the vagus nerve, which plays a key role in regulating heart function. Led by researchers at University College London and Queen Mary University of London, the study involved 28 healthy volunteers. Half were given the nerve stimulator to wear for 30 minutes every day for a week, while the other half were given a dummy device. Following a two-week break, the groups swapped devices. All of those taking part in the trial had an exercise test at the beginning and end of the week they wore the stimulator. The trial, published in the European Heart Journal, found the 'dysfuntion' of the vagus nerve is 'strongly associated with impaired exercise tolerance'. Put simply: those wearing the nerve stimulator were able to exercise more intensely than when wearing the dummy device. After a week, the stimulator increased oxygen intake during exercise by 4%. It also boosted maximum breathing rate by an average of four breaths per minute, and maximum heart rate by four beats per minute during exercise. Gareth Ackland, a professor of perioperative medicine at Queen Mary University of London School of Medicine, said: 'Maintaining physical activity is essential for every aspect of cardiovascular, emotional, and cognitive health. 'The outcome of the trial is consistent with the significant body of evidence pointing to an important role of the brain in optimising exercise performance and regulating the activity of the immune system, helped by the vagus nerve'. Blood samples were also take from five people, with researchers suggesting wearing the nerve stimulator for a week helped reduce inflammation. Prof Ackland added: 'We will need to carry out larger trials to confirm our findings, but the results of this study in healthy volunteers suggest that increasing vagus nerve activity can improve fitness and reduce inflammation, potentially offering new approaches to improve heart health.' Professor Bryan Williams, chief scientific and medical officer at the British Heart Foundation, which funded the study, said: 'This early study suggests that a simple technology, which harnesses the connection between the heart and the brain, can lead to improvements in fitness and exercise tolerance. 'While more research is needed involving people with cardiovascular disease, this could one day be used as a tool to improve wellbeing and quality of life for people with heart failure.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
DIY cervical cancer tests most likely to be used if offered by GPs
DIY cervical cancer tests are more likely to be used if they are offered by a GP during a routine appointment, a study suggests. From January next year, at-home kits will be offered to women who have rarely or have never attended their cervical screening. The tests, which can be performed at home, look for the human papillomavirus (HPV) – the virus which is linked to the majority of cases of cervical cancer. A new study examined the most effective ways women can be approached about performing the tests themselves at home. Researchers from Queen Mary University of London and King's College London performed a study across 13 GP surgeries in west London. They found that under-screened women were more likely to take up the offer of a self-sample test if they were 'opportunistically' approached when they were visiting a GP for another reason. Fewer tests were returned when under-screened women were sent a test in the post, or were sent a letter inviting them to get a self-sampling kit. Of 449 women opportunistically offered a self-sample kit, 333 (74%) accepted the offer and 234 (52%) returned a sample within six months. Meanwhile, 198 of the 1,616 women sent a kit in the post (12%) and 76 of the 1,587 women sent a letter inviting them to order a kit (5%) returned a self-sample within six months. 'We showed that the uptake of self-sampling was by far the highest among women who were opportunistically offered kits in primary care,' the researchers wrote in the journal eClinicalMedicine. But the researchers said that more work was needed to ensure women who took up the offer returned their sample. 'Substantial numbers accepted (an opportunistic offer) or ordered (sent a letter) a kit but did not return a sample and over a quarter of those whose self-sample was HPV positive did not follow through with a clinician sample,' the authors added. They suggested that text or phone reminders 'could be valuable'. Senior researcher, Professor Peter Sasieni from Queen Mary University of London, said: 'Our study showed that offering a self-sample kit in person was the most effective method of encouraging women to complete their cervical cancer screening tests. But he said that a 'combination of approaches may be best for enabling more women to participate in cervical screening'. The NHS offers cervical screening tests – previously known as smear tests – to all women aged 25-64 every three years. But many people do not take up the offer, with a number citing a lack of time, discomfort or embarrassment. Data published by the NHS last November showed five million women are not up to date with routine check-ups.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Why five-a-day might not be enough – and the number of plants you should be eating
Eating five fruits and vegetables a day might not cut it, research suggests, with those who eat 11 different plants a day proving to be healthier. People in the UK eat a median of eight different plants a day – including spices and fat-based oils – with some eating just two daily, researchers from King's College London found. But eating a more diverse range of plant-based foods, such as fruit, vegetables, pulses and herbs, is associated with better heart and metabolic health. Researchers found that a diverse diet improved cholesterol levels, blood sugar markers, better overall diet quality and higher intakes of key nutrients, including fibre, vitamins, and minerals. Dr Eirini Dimidi, senior lecturer in nutritional sciences at King's College London and senior author of the study, said: 'Current dietary guidance in the UK often emphasises quantity, such as 'five-a-day' for fruit and vegetables. 'Our findings suggest that dietary variety, across all plant-based food groups, may be just as important for improving diet quality and lowering the risk of cardiometabolic diseases.' The research, published in the journal Clinical Nutrition, analysed data on more than 670 adults from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey between 2016 and 2017. Participants from the survey were split into three groups based on how many different plants they ate. Those in the low-diversity group ate around 5.5 different plant foods per day, the moderate-diversity group 8.1 types, and those in the high-diversity group included roughly 11 different plant foods in their daily diets. Blood tests revealed that people who ate less of a variety of plants in their diet had lower HDL cholesterol, known as 'good cholesterol'. Lower levels of this type of cholesterol could make you more likely to have a heart problem or a stroke. They also found that HBA1C concentration – blood glucose levels – is lower for every one-unit increase in plant diversity. However, the study also found that people who ate a variety of plants generally had a healthier lifestyle. For example, only 6 per cent of people in the high-diversity group smoked, compared with 30 per cent in the low-diversity group. They had also consumed more total sugar, likely due to greater intake of fruits and fruit juices. Although excess sugar can have negative health effects, fruits provide additional beneficial nutrients such as fibre and antioxidants, which may help offset these impacts on blood sugar and overall health. Researchers found vegetables were the largest contributors (21.0 per cent) to diversity, followed by plant-based fats and oils (18.8 per cent), and fruit (17.0 per cent). Dr Dimidi said: 'While higher diversity was associated with better nutrient adequacy overall, key shortfalls remained even among those with the most diverse plant-based diets, particularly for fibre and several micronutrients which are important for maintaining a strong immune system and health bones and tissues.' She added: 'In addition to fruits and vegetables, legumes, nuts, seeds, herbs and spices are great plant-based food sources that can help us to introduce more plant diversity into our diets.' The British Nutrition Foundation highlights that adults should eat 30g of fibre a day - roughly the same amount as you can get from eating five fruits and vegetables a day or by eating 30 plants a week including nuts, seeds, beans and spices in addition to fruit and vegetables. Nutritionist Kim Pearson, who specialises in weight loss, told The Independent: 'Rather than just focusing on quantity, like ticking off five-a-day, we should also be thinking about variety. We know that eating a broader range of plant foods provides a wider range of nutrients and supports gut health, this study highlights how it may also impact metabolic health markers like blood sugar balance and blood lipid levels. 'The fibre and polyphenols found in different fruits, vegetables, pulses, nuts, seeds, and herbs all help to feed beneficial gut bacteria. A healthy microbiome is closely linked with metabolic health, immune function, and even mood. Aiming for eleven different plants a day is a great goal. 'This may sound like a lot, but simple strategies like adding a sprinkle of herbs, a mix of salad leaves, a handful of seeds, or trying a new vegetable each week can all help increase variety.' Dietitian Dr Duane Mellor told The Independent: 'This does not go against the idea of five-a-day, it just suggests we should vary the plants we eat. This goes beyond fruit and vegetables and includes herbs, seeds and pulses. Enjoying a variety of foods is key, perhaps more than focusing on eating a certain number.'
