Man tried to mow down cop with car: court
Mr Dullard was due to enter his pleas on Monday morning to the allegation he tried to murder Brevet Sergeant Mark Woods during a routine traffic stop in March last year.
Police allege Mr Dullard, from Victoria, struck Sergeant Woods with his vehicle on the Barrier Highway at Ucolta, about 250km north of Adelaide, and then fled the scene.
A police chopper tracked him for 45 minutes before police apprehended him.
Sergeant Woods, based at Orroroo, suffered non life-threatening injuries in the alleged hit-and-run and paramedics flew him to Royal Adelaide Hospital for treatment. Matthew James Dullard is charged with the attempted murder of a police officer. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
Police have charged Mr Dullard with attempted murder, aggravated endangering life, causing harm by dangerous driving and leaving the scene of an accident after causing harm by careless driving.
In his earlier appearances, the court was told the 43-year-old man had been diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2019.
He initially refused to co-operate with either the police or any legal representation.
On Monday, Director of Public Prosecutions Martin Hinton KC asked Justice Julie McIntyre to adjourn the matter for two weeks, telling her he needed time to query a doctor about their report into Mr Dullard's mental competence. South Australian police officer Mark Woods suffered non life-threatening injuries in the alleged hit-and-run. Supplied Credit: News Corp Australia
'I've considered the report … I have a number of questions for the doctor,' he said.
'I don't know yet whether in light of the answers to those questions I'll be seeking a further report or will determine to concede mental incompetence.'
Mr Dullard's defence team did not oppose the request and Justice McIntyre listed July 21 for Mr Dullard's arraignment.
Justice McIntyre allowed Mr Dullard to appear by telephone for his next appearance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
an hour ago
- 9 News
Detective who collared murderer Murdoch reveals how he linked cases
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here The South Australian detective who collared outback killer Bradley Murdoch has spoken for the first time. Geoff Carson told 9News how he linked a mystery man in the Riverlands to the monster who killed Peter Falconio and shares his theory on what Murdoch did with the backpacker's body. Now retired, Carson was the small-town cop who solved a national mystery. Now retired, Geoff Carson was the small-town cop who solved a national mystery. (Nine) "At the start of the new century, it was the most talked about crime at the time, who would've done such a brazen act," he said. The breakthrough began with a single phone call. "He says, 'I don't care what you're doing, I need to see you right now', and he said the name of his daughter and he said that she'd been raped." In South Australia's Riverland, a woman and her 12-year-old daughter had been abducted by a violent monster. They were bound and gagged, and put in the back of a truck that belonged to Murdoch. The South Australian detective who collared outback killer Bradley Murdoch has spoken for the first time. (Nine) After a 20-hour ordeal, the victims were paid for their silence and let go. When Carson took their statement, something clicked. "Little pocket notebook, I wrote down, halfway down the page, Falconio, then a question mark, it just rang to me straight way," Carson said. The previous year British backpackers Falconio and Joanne Lees had been ambushed along a remote stretch of highway in the Northern Territory. Lees escaped into the scrub after being bound with the same cable ties as the Riverland victims. "In 40 years of policing I hadn't come across someone who'd done that before, so it was a unique type of behaviour, I thought," Carson said. When Murdoch was arrested over the abduction of the mother and daughter, Carson made contact with the Northern Territory. Peter Falconio was shot dead in the NT. (Nine) "I said I reckon I got your fella," he said. But NT Police had already crossed Murdoch off their list. So Carson took matters into his own hands. He bundled up cigarette butts and milk cartons marked with the killer's DNA, evidence that would lead to a match and a warrant for Murdoch's arrest. For the Riverland rapes a jury found there wasn't enough evidence to convict Murdoch. But on the day he was acquitted police were waiting at Adelaide's Supreme Court. The monster was charged for an outback murder. But Carson remains determined to solve that mystery once and for all. He says he was given one clue, a remark Murdoch had made to a friend. "He said to this old fella, 'If I was ever going to get rid of a body, I'd put it into the grate off on the side of the road, like the flood mitigation, bury it in one of those because no one would ever find it, no one would ever dig in there'," Carson said. Falconio's remains may still be missing but the case isn't closed. The reward for information was recently raised to $500,000. "Anyone who has lost a loved one wants to be able to put that loved one to rest," Carson said. "They want to know that they are finally at peace, the Falconio's haven't got that." police South Australia murder crime national Australia CONTACT US
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
WA dad who impregnated daughter, 14, has jail term reduced
EXCLUSIVE Warning: Graphic content A father who googled fake DNA tests after he impregnated his biological 14-year-old daughter has had his jail term reduced after the original sentence was found to be 'unjust'. The forklift driver from Western Australia, who cannot be named for legal reasons, pleaded guilty in 2024 to 40 counts of sexual offending against his daughter, which came to light after the girl fell pregnant with his child. The man committed the offences between 2019 and 2022 while the girl was aged 11 to 14. He also pleaded guilty to five counts of possessing child exploitation material after filming several of the acts. In August 2024, he was sentenced to 14 years and six months in prison for the offending. However, the father appealed the sentence on the basis that he was only given a 10 per cent discount for an early guilty plea, arguing it should have been 25 per cent. The man's lawyer, Mark Gunning, told the court that a 10 per cent discount was 'manifestly inadequate' given that his client had spared the girl the need to testify at trial. WA Director of Public Prosecutions lawyer Natalie Sinton said the 10 per cent discount was not 'unreasonable' as the father had filmed his acts and the girl had given birth to his child, making the prosecution case 'overwhelmingly' strong. The WA Supreme Court appeals panel ruled the 10 per cent discount was 'unreasonable' and 'plainly unjust'. The panel resentenced the man and increased the discount to 22 per cent for counts 1, 2 and 3, and 20 per cent for the remaining counts – reducing the sentence to 12 years. 'As strong as the State's case was in relation to all of the counts, counts 1, 2 and 3 were slightly weaker, having regard to the fact that they were not videoâ€'recorded,' the panel decision stated. 'Brazen' offending During the appeal process, the court heard how the offending came to light after the girl's school reported the pregnancy. The daughter then confided in her mother, who had separated from the father in 2010, that the baby was his. The court heard how the father made several Google searches on his phone after being first interviewed by police in 2023, which included 'Can a mother refuse a paternity test Australia', 'What does a fake DNA test look like?', 'How long can a drug test pick up meth?' and 'Can police see deleted DMs?' He also read a news article which was entitled: 'Man jailed for fake DNA test to deny parentage of two sons.' A DNA test later confirmed the baby was his. The appeals panel pointed out in their decision that the offending was 'brazen'. 'Sometimes, it occurred when there were other children in the house. On one occasion, it occurred when there were other children in the room,' The WA Supreme Court decision stated. The 12-year sentence is backdated from March 28, 2023. He is already eligible for parole.
Daily Telegraph
a day ago
- Daily Telegraph
‘Pure evil': Epstein survivors and their families horrified as co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell suddenly framed as a ‘victim'
Don't miss out on the headlines from World. Followed categories will be added to My News. Multiple victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell have expressed their disgust at suggestions she could receive 'preferential treatment' from the government, or perhaps even a presidential pardon. They are increasingly, palpably worried that Maxwell's monstrous crimes, particularly those committed against underage girls, are being forgotten. Maxwell, who has never admitted to her role in Epstein's sex trafficking scheme, was the person chiefly responsible for procuring minors for him to abuse. She enticed them into his orbit, groomed them, and used various methods to keep them trapped. The victims have long alleged that Maxwell also participated in the sexual abuse. Get all the latest news happening around the world as it happens — download the app direct to your phone. Epstein and Maxwell in 2005. Picture: Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images Last month, as the Trump administration struggled to neutralise a public backlash against its handling of the Epstein files, the man Donald Trump had appointed Deputy Attorney-General – his own former defence lawyer, Todd Blanche – went to visit Maxwell. Mr Blanche spoke to Epstein's partner and chief co-conspirator for two days. Lawyers representing Maxwell, who are currently trying to get the Supreme Court to throw out her convictions on child sex trafficking charges, later said she had discussed about a hundred people connected to the Epstein case. Obvious fears arose among Maxwell's victims. Did the government intend to seek a shortening of her 20-year prison sentence in exchange for her co-operation? Was President Trump open to pardoning her, which would set her free immediately? And how would the obvious conflicts of interest be navigated? Mr Trump, who was friends with Epstein and Maxwell for about 15 years and whose name reportedly appears 'multiple times' in the Epstein files, wants to be absolved of any suggestion he was involved in their crimes (and, we should note, there is at the moment no evidence he was). Maxwell, obviously, wants to get out of jail, something she almost certainly cannot achieve without Mr Trump's grace. Every incentive compels her to be, ahem, helpful to the President. And this is someone with a long record of lying, including while under oath. Perhaps nothing is amiss, but the ingredients for a potentially corrupt quid pro quo are there. You can understand why Epstein's survivors are suspicious. Mr Trump, his now-wife Melania (then named Knauss), Epstein and Maxwell in 2000. It should be stressed that the Trumps are far from the only famous people to have been pictured with them. Picture:Two other elements have fed into their building unease. First, on the fringes of America's right-wing media, some bloviaters have started to speak of Maxwell as a 'victim'. 'I think this is great,' Newsmax anchor Greg Kelly said last week, for example, referring to the government's overtures towards her. 'I do have a feeling that she just might be a victim. She just might be. There was a rush to judgment, there was a lot of chaos there for a while. 'Granted, she hung out with Jeffrey Epstein, and I know that's apparently not good.' Apparently! (Oh, and Maxwell did much more than merely 'hang out' with Epstein, as we shall explore in a moment. Apparently some folks need to be reminded.) Second, today we learned that the government had quietly moved Maxwell from her jail in Florida to a lower security one in Texas, which houses several female celebrity inmates. The fraudster Elizabeth Holmes is there, for example. Why move Maxwell? That has not been explained. Hence an angry statement released today, co-signed by Annie and Maria Farmer, both of whom were victims of Epstein and Maxwell, plus the family of Virginia Giuffre, who did so much to expose the pair's crimes before taking her own life earlier this year. Virginia Roberts Giuffre outside court in 2019. Picture: Barry Williams/Tribune News Service via Getty Images 'It is with horror and outrage that we object to the preferential treatment convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has received,' the statement reads. 'Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency. 'Yet, without any notification to the Maxwell victims, the government overnight has moved Maxwell to a minimum security prison. This is the justice system failing victims right before our eyes. 'The American public should be enraged by the preferential treatment being given to a pedophile and a criminally charged child sex offender. 'The Trump administration should not credit a word Maxwell says, as the government itself sought charges against her for being a serial liar. 'This move smacks of a cover-up. The victims deserve better.' Annie and Maria Farmer in 2019. Epstein and Maxwell. Picture: US District Court/AFP Some other remarks worth mentioning, here. 'My little sister is one of her victims, and so am I,' Maria Farmer told MSNBC, slamming politicians who 'want to entertain Ghislaine Maxwell' and 'act like we victims should not be heard from'. Her sister Annie told The Daily Mail any deal between the government and Maxwell would 'be devastating' and 'feel like a slap in the face'. 'It doesn't sit well that this is all happening without any involvement from the people they asked to testify in her case, or other victims,' she said. 'It's hard not to be anxious.' Theresa Helm said any leniency shown towards Maxwell 'would mean the complete crumbling of this justice system'. 'We all deserve a pathway to justice. We don't deserve to have it, yet again, robbed from us,' she told MSNBC. 'It truly does seem like an upside down world.' During an interview about Maxwell's case in 2021, which feels relevant in this discussion, Sarah Ransome described Maxwell as 'the chief orchestrator' who had 'forced' her into the room where Epstein raped her. 'It actually makes me sick that she is claiming to be a victim, or have any form of innocence' said Ms Ransome. 'This is the same woman that grabbed my arm and forced me into a room to be raped by Jeffrey. It was brutal. 'And I remember limping from Jeffrey's bedroom. I remember looking at Ghislaine, and she had this evil smirk on her face. She knew I was there to be raped, and she enjoyed it.' Sarah Ransome outside court in 2021. Picture: Bryan R. Smith/AFP Speaking to CNN this week Ms Giuffre's brother, Sky Roberts, said Maxwell 'deserves to rot in prison, where she belongs'. 'Because of what she's done to my sister, and so many other women. It's absolutely a pure sense of evil,' Mr Roberts said. 'She wasn't stolen. She was preyed upon,' he added, alluding to Mr Trump's complaint this week that Epstein 'stole' staff from his Mar-a-Lago resort, including Ms Giuffre. '(Maxwell) wasn't just a recruiter. She participated, and viciously participated, with these girls, abusing them.' He said his sister described Maxwell as a 'monster' from 'a nightmare'. Maxwell. And Epstein. Journalist Tara Palmeri, who has reported extensively on the Epstein case and knows multiple victims, described recent events as 'infuriating'. 'Because I know so much about her. I know the damage she did to these girls,' Ms Palmeri said on her YouTube channel. 'So many of them are more angry with her, for the abuse, than Epstein. She was the one that violated them. She was the one that called Annie Farmer's mother and said, 'Don't worry, I'll take care of her, you can let her go to the ranch.' That was where Ghislaine Maxwell was the first one to touch Annie, and then Epstein jumped in. 'She was involved in the actual molestation of these girls. She didn't just bring them to Jeffrey Epstein.' All these comments are worth remembering, going forward. Ghislaine Maxwell was not Epstein's sidekick, she was his partner, and is no less culpable. She wasn't pulled into the web of his sex trafficking scheme – if anything, she was chiefly responsible for weaving it. She should not be pitied. Or trusted. Twitter: @SamClench Originally published as 'Pure evil': Epstein survivors and their families horrified as co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell suddenly framed as a 'victim'
