Parents react to passage of House bill banning cell phone use in Alabama public schools
Representative Leigh Hulsey of Helena tells CBS 42 News that the teachers were asking for this. Hulsey said that when you look at the data, cell phone use is hurting academic performance and the students' well-being. A Pew Research Center survey conducted in November of 2023 indicated that 72% of U.S. high school teachers say students being distracted by cellphones is a major problem.
Busy mother of twins Tayroya Hawthorne is also a substitute teacher at Minor Middle School. She didn't mince words when asked how she feels about the passage of the bill in the house that would ban cell phone use in Alabama public schools during classroom hours.
'If you can just tell them like put your phone away or keep it in your pocket as long as it's not out,' she explained. 'But as far as you're talking about putting it in their locker turning it off, somebody run up in the school and my baby got to run to their locker to get they phone and risk being shot, I don't agree with it,' she said.
According to HB166 students would not be allowed to possess a wireless communication device in any public elementary or secondary school building during the instructional day 'unless the wireless communication device is turned off and stored in a locker, backpack, car, or similar storage location.'
Homewood Library Foundation hosting block party
'I feel it's necessary for some children and necessary for some cases, very needed, maybe the kids will learn more,' remarked Jameisha Watson.
She has a daughter in the 9th grade at Minor High School, and a 7- and 8-year-old at Midfield Elementary. While supportive of the measure in general, she believes there should be exceptions:
'Some kids actually need a cell phone for safety reasons, so I think for some reasons some kids may need to have it.'
While mother of three Tiffany Bennett of Roebuck plans to send her kids to private school, she's supportive of the measure:
'I think it's a great idea,' she said. 'Cell phones are very distracting, especially during classroom work, they just distract the kids, there's just so much going on online, and social media, I'm just excited about it actually.'
The bill now moves onto a state Senate committee. Right now, Alabama schools have local control, so school systems make their own rules and policies under their local school board and superintendent.
Jefferson County Public Schools policy states that the use of personal wireless communication devices such as cell phones, smartwatches or wearable technology, iPads, iPhones, or other electronic communication devices are prohibited during school hours or while being transported on a school bus without specific authorization by school officials.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
4 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Sheldon H. Jacobson: ‘Made in America' is alive, well and misunderstood
The president supports purchasing goods that are 'made in America.' To encourage this, Donald Trump has imposed tariffs on imports from literally every country that the U.S. does business with, with 10% to 15% as the floor baseline. His hope is that tariffs would push more companies to move their manufacturing and production operations stateside, which he believes would reduce the $1.2 trillion trade deficit in goods (in 2024). Yet the aspirational goal of buying goods made in America is misguided and largely an unreachable myth. Many well-known American companies rely on importing their consumer goods. Apple imports the majority of its iPhones, with China accounting for 80% of its manufacturing capacity. With 155 million iPhone users in the U.S., and iPhones holding over 57% of the smartphone market, Americans' love affair with iPhones is here to stay, independent of where they are assembled. Nike manufactures nearly all of its athletic shoes and sportswear abroad, with Vietnam, China and Indonesia as their primary factory locations. It is difficult to attend a college football game without seeing the Nike swoosh somewhere on the field, given that the company sponsors the majority of top-ranked college football teams. Its presence at March Madness is also indisputable, sponsoring 60% of the men's and women's teams that participated in the 2025 tournament. None of these teams are prepared to boycott Nike because it manufactures its products overseas. Wrangler, the company known for its jeans, makes most of its clothing items oversees. For those intent on buying items made in America, they do make a few lines domestically (the 27406 and 1947 collections). Another popular jean manufacturer, Levi-Strauss, also manufactures the majority of its products overseas. The reason that such iconic all-American companies have moved their production capacity to China, Vietnam, Bangladesh, India and Mexico, among others, is cost. Labor costs in these countries are significantly lower than in the U.S. Given that American consumers are highly price sensitive, they demand lower prices. Since consumer spending is 70% of the nation's gross domestic product, which now rests at around $30 trillion, anywhere costs can be reduced to keep prices competitive is an opportunity that companies have exploited, and they will continue to do so. Yet all the companies listed manufacture nondurable goods, which have short shelf lives. Indeed, measuring 'made in America' only at the most basic or lowest level of consumption is misleading. In a free-market economy, new ideas for companies that are nurtured and grown in America is what should define 'made in America.' Indeed, it is the American entrepreneurial spirit that defines what is 'made in America,' not the actual operations and facilities that produce the products. One place to look for future 'made in America' companies is the number of patents issued in the U.S. Nearly 400,000 patents were issued in 2020, the largest number in history. However, the recent downward trend is a red flag for 'made in America' companies yet to be launched. Focusing on where companies are launched, and how they succeed is what makes them American. New business applications have been surging, with 5 million such applications filed in 2023, providing some hope that 'made in America' companies continue to be a priority. And nowhere is such entrepreneurship being fostered and grown more than at American universities. Almost one-third of college students aspire to launch their own business. Where students study is also important, as they often launch their new business in the same state. This makes universities the ideal incubator for new businesses. All such economic value is why efforts to remake higher education are misguided, destructive and will ultimately hurt not only universities, but everyone. The president's dislike of DEI may be his publicly stated reason behind his attacks on higher education. Yet throwing the baby out with the bathwater will stifle American entrepreneurship and make everyone, across all socioeconomic groups, poorer. Indeed, the president's approach in controlling higher education will provide headwinds to achieve his objective of economic growth and prosperity. Long after he has left office, the carnage of his actions will be felt for all. 'Made in America' is more than just about goods produced and services delivered. It is about companies launched, new innovations uncovered and inspired entrepreneurship. That is where the focus on 'made in America' should be, and facilitating such an environment is what can 'Make America Great Again.'
Boston Globe
5 days ago
- Boston Globe
Longmeadow middle school librarian arrested on child pornography charge, federal prosecutors say
In a conversation with an undercover officer, McGinley allegedly said 'he had 'students' who were '11-14 years old' but 'ha[d]n't touched them sexually,'' prosecutors said. In the chat, he made graphic statements about them, prosecutors said. On Aug. 8, investigators seized two iPhones, an Apple Watch, a tablet, and two laptops during a search of McGinley's home and allegedly found more than 100 files of child pornography on his phone, prosecutors said. Authorities are continuing to search the devices. Advertisement Investigators also found a locked case in McGinley's basement that allegedly contained 'assorted children's clothes, a Santa costume, diapers, and apple sauce packets,' prosecutors said. It also held a toolbox with boys' underwear and bedding stuffed inside, prosecutors said. If convicted, McGinley could face five to 20 years in prison and a fine of as much as $250,000, prosecutors said. Advertisement In a letter to families Wednesday, the superintendent of the Longmeadow Public Schools, Martin O'Shea, said the district is cooperating with investigators and is in contact with the state Department of Children and Families. 'Our highest priority is and always will be student safety and well being,' O'Shea said. 'LPS has policies and protocols in place to protect students through student education, staff training, and the use of background checks and mandatory reporting.' O'Shea said the allegations against McGinley were 'highly troubling and disturbing.' He said school counselors, social workers, and administrators will be available to support students and staff. He said the school system has asked the US attorney's office and the FBI to join school officials for an 'in-person and remotely accessible informational meetings.' O'Shea said details on those events are forthcoming. 'Our community has always shown strength in difficult times,' he wrote. 'I have no doubt that we will come together now with the same care and resilience to support one another.' Nick Stoico can be reached at
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Apple's US manufacturing promises are 'uneconomic' & unrealistic
On Wednesday at the White House, President Trump and Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook announced Apple's additional $100 billion investment into US manufacturing, for a total of $600 billion. Needham & Company senior media and internet analyst Laura Martin joins Market Catalysts with Julie Hyman to discuss the latest. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. So, Tim Cook joining President Trump at the White House Wednesday evening to announce the company's plan to invest another $100 billion into the US on top of the 500 billion it pledged earlier this year. The company's looking to avoid painful tariff pressures, bringing more of a supply chain and advanced manufacturing to the US. We want to get an analyst take on this investment with Laura Martin, Needham & Company senior media and internet analyst. Good to see you, Laura. Hi. So, I've seen some analyst commentary this morning that the way Tim Cook handled this was masterful, right? He presented a a gift to President Trump, like a little statuette, I guess you would call it, you know. I I'm curious to get your take on this and and how you think Cook has sort of finessed this situation. So, I wish they'd started at 200 million the first time. So when he raised it by 100 billion yesterday, it would have been 300 instead of six. But I think this is a way to buy down tariffs currently from India and China and get an exemption for Apple while promising to spend money over a four-year term, but if it ends up going past Trump, they may never have to actually deliver on. Well, that that was going to be my question here, you know, do they actually spend this money? What do they actually spend it on? Or is just is this indeed sort of a waiting game? So, I think they'll like they've already made commitments, and we saw a couple of the companies that they announced yesterday, um, in Texas saying, hey, they just got a $2.5 billion deal with Apple, like they just signed it because Apple has to go in and sign contracts with all these people. But these are $2 billion dollar contracts, and they just committed 600 billion over four years. So I think they're gonna have trouble spending that much money in America over the next four years. But more important, the more important question is, are they going to get tariff relief from India and China because it'd be horrible if they didn't, and that was hurting the prices of their iPhones today, and yet they have this horrible commitment to spend all this money, um, which will increase the cost of iPhones frankly, over the next four years. And so I guess there's no way of knowing if they're going to get that tariff relief, and and your sort of like backdrop for this stock. You I know you have a hold, uh, rating on it right now is that, you know, there has to be an iPhone iPhone replacement cycle. I imagine an iPhone replacement cycle is not going to be helped if iPhones get more expensive. Correct. I you know, our estimate is that if they moved all of the manufacturing assembly to America, iPhone prices would triple, and they start at like $1,200, $1,400 per iPhone. So like it's sort of uneconomic to bring a lot of the, um, a lot of the assembly back to America, but I understand that they really do need to get tariff relief right now for the new iPhones that go on sale in September, starting in September. And do you expect that they will also take a hit to margins, or is Apple able to pass on a lot all maybe all, if not most of that cost? I believe they'll pass on all of the costs, and they will not take a margin hit. Related Videos Russia deal will be 'a canary for the markets' on US–China talks Ford announces $2B US investment to make cheaper EV pickup Barrick Mining's Q2 beat & $1B Mali business loss: What to know Trump confirms Nvidia will pay 15% of China chip sales to US Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
