logo
Healey quickly signs off on $190 mil to cover state child care bills

Healey quickly signs off on $190 mil to cover state child care bills

Yahoo30-05-2025

BOSTON (SHNS) – Child care services on the brink of running out of money are about to receive a last-minute funding jolt, but elder home care providers are still waiting for their own supplemental funding infusion.
The House and Senate agreed Thursday to a nearly $190 million bill (S 2521) to ensure child care providers serving low-income families continue to get paid in June. Gov. Maura Healey signed the bill around 4:30 p.m., spokesperson Karissa Hand told the News Service.
'For our early education and care providers, without the authorization of such spending, our providers will not receive their scheduled June child care financial assistance that's due them,' Senate Ways and Means Chair Michael Rodrigues said before the bill was unanimously approved.
The child care funding was part of a $530 million bill that the House approved last week.
'Our intent is to report this out in part, in order to ensure that these child care providers get the payments that they are due, take our time, and work on the rest of the supplemental budget in due time,' Rodrigues said. 'And hopefully, in the next few weeks, we'll be able to report that out for consideration by this branch.'
The bill Healey signed includes $95.6 million for the Department of Children and Families and Department of Transitional Assistance-related child care, as well as $94 million for income-eligible child care.
The Legislature in the fiscal 2025 budget appropriated about $357 million for DCF- and DTA-related child care and $417 million for income-eligible child care.
The Senate enacted the bill as Rodrigues showed New Bedford fourth graders around the Senate chamber.
'Just like that, we spent $189 million,' he told them.
The Legislature in recent years has heavily invested in child care and early education. Rodrigues pointed to the difficulty of funding with precision accounts that he said are 'caseload driven.'
'There are some that you just cannot be 100% accurate on,' he said.
Healey this month signed another bill steering $240 million to the Group Insurance Commission to cover claims for the rest of the fiscal year that were at risk due to underfunding in the fiscal 20225 state budget.
Other supplemental funding requests from Healey remain in limbo, including $60 million for elder home care services, $43 million for rental assistance, and $15.5 million to replace electronic benefits cards.
The unfunded obligations are piling up as tax revenues, apart from taxes on high earners, have softened. It's led to cautionary words about adjusting spending expectations, but the supplemental budgets keep flowing.
Betsey Crimmins, executive director of Mass Aging Access, which represents the state's 27 Aging Service Access Points and Area Agencies on Aging, said 'many' members have not received funding for services provided in March and April. Crimmins said the situation could have been avoided if the Legislature had approved the additional $60 million in funding, which organizations use to pay direct care workers.
'It's really difficult to know that the governor acknowledged the problem and did the right thing. The House acknowledged the problem and did the right thing,' Crimmins told the News Service. 'And for some reason, the Senate — we've nosed around, we've tried to talk to various people in the Senate. We haven't gotten anything back, other than it will be taken up.'
Some ASAPs have taken out loans to ensure providers continue getting paid in the interim, she said.
'There's just frustration because there's very real concern about going into a new fiscal year with incredible cash flow problems,' Crimmins said.
Minority Leader Bruce Tarr agreed to the bill, but expressed concern about supplemental spending trends.
'It is very concerning now, in the last several weeks, to be on the brink of a deficit with regard to insurance for public employees all across the commonwealth, and now child care providers all across the commonwealth,' Tarr said.
Early Education and Care Commissioner Amy Kershaw warned providers this month that stalled action on the supplemental budget might translate into delayed reimbursements.
Rodrigues, asked by the News Service why the Senate did not tackle elder home care alongside child care, said, 'The EEC account was imminently out of money.'
'That was almost like an emergency, and now we can be a little more diligent and deliberative on what else we do in the future,' he said. 'But it will be a very timely manner. We're ready to get it done.'
Crimmins questioned why the Senate is prolonging the process.
'This whole year, we have been very steadily beating the drum that we need the money,' Crimmins said. 'It hasn't changed — it's not gotten bigger, it's not gotten smaller. It was the hole that was identified, and it's the hole that continues to exist.'
Asked whether another supplemental budget could surface next week, Rodrigues said, 'I doubt it.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Advocates warn SNAP cuts could threaten food access for more than half a million Kentuckians
Advocates warn SNAP cuts could threaten food access for more than half a million Kentuckians

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Advocates warn SNAP cuts could threaten food access for more than half a million Kentuckians

KENTUCKY (FOX 56) — Advocates say cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) included in the budget reconciliation bill passed by the U.S. House in May would harm Kentucky families, children, and farmers. 'This bill puts food assistance at risk for over 575,000 Kentuckians,' said Jessica Klein, Policy Associate at the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy. 'The House proposal would not only be the biggest cut to SNAP in history, it would also fundamentally weaken what we know to be an effective anti-hunger program.' Klein pointed to provisions in the legislation that would require states to cover a portion of SNAP benefits, which the federal government has always covered. Kentucky auditor reviewing concerns surrounding Fayette County Public Schools finances She said this could saddle Kentucky with as much as $250 million in annual costs to ensure Kentuckians continue to get the grocery help they need. 'The group that would be most hurt by this is the 111,000 families with kids that would be subject to these requirements,' Klein said. 'That's putting food assistance at risk for 65,000 kids in Kentucky.' Emily Foster, a vegetable farmer and the manager of the Red River Gorge Farmer's Market, said her community, like many others, relies heavily on SNAP. 'SNAP doesn't just help families put food on the table; it strengthens our entire local food economy,' Foster said. 'When families spend SNAP benefits at the market, that money goes directly to our local farmers, who in turn spend it at local businesses, creating a ripple effect that benefits everyone.' Leah Feagin, food service director at the Mayfield Independent School District, says changes to SNAP enrollment could make it harder for kids to get food at school. Owensboro's blue bridge to close for up to 3 months Kentucky gas tax to see reduction next month Kentucky health officials urge vaccines after infant deaths 'In many districts, this could mean withdrawing from a universal free lunch program,' she said. 'This could mean students are going back to paying for their meals if they don't qualify for free or reduced meals, and many of those families are right on the border of having the benefit and not.' Advocates are calling on Kentucky State Senators Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul to reverse what they say are 'harmful cuts.' We reached out to both McConnell's and Paul's offices for comment and haven't heard back. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Far-left House candidate rallies around healthcare for illegal immigrants: 'How is it controversial?'
Far-left House candidate rallies around healthcare for illegal immigrants: 'How is it controversial?'

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Far-left House candidate rallies around healthcare for illegal immigrants: 'How is it controversial?'

Kat Abughazaleh, a 26-year-old Democratic candidate for Illinois' ninth congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives, said "every single person in the world deserves healthcare," even illegal immigrants. "How is it controversial?" Abughazaleh asked a CNN "NewsNight" panel on Thursday night. The young progressive candidate, with a campaign website that reads, "I don't have health insurance, and I'm running for Congress," repeatedly told the panel that every person is entitled to healthcare when asked if that includes illegal immigrants. "I'm such a monster… How is it controversial that I don't want someone to die in the hospital if they can't afford it?" Abughazaleh asked. Dems Warn House Republicans Will Pay Price At Ballot Box For Passing Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act is currently under consideration by a Republican-led White House and Congress. The president has championed the legislation as fulfilling his key campaign promises, including border security, American energy production and tax cuts. Read On The Fox News App Gop Rails Against 'Blatantly False' Dem Claims About Medicaid Reform In Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' House Republicans have celebrated Medicaid reform included in the megabill, which they say eliminates waste, fraud and abuse in the welfare program to deliver for Americans who need coverage most. Removing illegal immigrants from Medicaid is one of the key provisions of that Medicaid reform. Meanwhile, Democrats have railed against possible Medicaid cuts since Trump was elected in November. Every House Democrat voted against the bill, and Democrats are already defining Medicaid cuts as a driving issue ahead of competitive midterm elections in 2026. The bill does not cut Medicaid for the most vulnerable, according to Rep. Erin Houchin, R-Ind., who served on three major committees leading budget markup in the reconciliation process. Houchin told Fox News Digital that targeting waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicaid program cuts benefits to illegal immigrants, those ineligible to receive benefits who are currently receiving benefits, duplicate enrollees in one or more states and those who are able-bodied but are choosing not to work. "Your bill is going to cut coverage for 11 million Americans and it'll still cost more than universal healthcare. Healthcare is a human right, you absolute ghouls," Abughazaleh said in response to a Republican National Committee (RNC) rapid response account calling her comments, "madness." Abughazaleh said she is running for the U.S. House of Representatives because, "Our leaders are out of touch." The young Democrat is challenging Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., who has served decades in congress. Abughazaleh is a former staffer for the progressive watchdog group, Media Matters, and a progressive article source: Far-left House candidate rallies around healthcare for illegal immigrants: 'How is it controversial?'

Elon Musk's crash-out killed conservatives' momentum — and likely guaranteed passage of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Elon Musk's crash-out killed conservatives' momentum — and likely guaranteed passage of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's crash-out killed conservatives' momentum — and likely guaranteed passage of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'

Earlier this week, it looked like Elon Musk had delivered arch conservatives a gift when he trashed President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' On Tuesday, Musk called the legislation an 'outrageous, pork-filled, disgusting abomination.' It seemed like a boon for some of the fiscal conservatives in the Senate like Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin who criticized the fact the bill still blows up the deficit. Had Musk stopped there, he probably would have given fiscal conservatives additional leverage. House Speaker Mike Johnson had spent much of the first part of the year getting every faction of the House GOP on board with the bill despite fiscal conservative grumbling. But Johnson admitted during his weekly press conference that he had tried to call Musk with no response. Immediately, House Republicans and members of the Freedom Caucus — including its former chairman Scott Perry and Andy Ogles, who has tried to allow Trump to run for a third term — voiced their criticisms of the bill that they had when it was being deliberated. They could have voiced them at any moment but did not. It clearly showed that they had abandoned their fiscal conservative principles in fear of the pressure campaign from Trump. Had Musk kept his critiques strictly to the bill, the tech tycoon could have offered an effective counterweight to give conservatives leverage against leadership given his immense wealth and his wide reach as owner of X. But the world's richest man chose to blow that to smithereens when he turned the attacks personal. First, he said that Trump would not have won the presidency, Republicans would have lost the House and would have a smaller minority in the Senate had it not been for Musk's money, before huffing 'such ingratitude.' Then Musk lobbed the ultimate grenade when he said that Trump had not fully released the 'Epstein files' —information related to the late financier who parlayed his money into sex trafficking teenaged girls — because Trump was mentioned in them. The Tesla founder took it a step further by calling for Trump's impeachment. Not only did Musk's words permanently spike any chance for reconciliation, it killed any chances for budget reconciliation, the arcane process through which Republicans hope to pass the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who has spent much of the legislative process in the House trying to make the bill more conservative but ultimately voted for it, tried to split the difference. 'He's got concerns with the bill, he's a free American, and he can speak freely and and God bless him for what he's been doing to try to make improvements,' Roy told The Independent. 'Again, is it what Chip Roy would draft? Not even close. But did it move in the right direction to get to a place that I felt comfortable sending it to the Senate to see if they could make it better? Sure.' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who has spent much of the new Congress trying to declassify information related to Epstein, said it was too early to tell about the Senate bill since text did not exist. 'I've always been a big fan of going back to pre-Covid spending levels,' Luna told The Independent, but understood it would require negotiation. Rep. Andy Harris, the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, who ultimately voted 'present' on the bill last month, said he agreed. 'I still think his concerns about the deficit are real,' he said. But the damage might already be done. If Republican elected have learned anything in the past decade, they've learned that their voters are not so much devoted to conservative ideals; they're devoted to Trump. Deviation from Trump, even in the name of conservative principles like restraining spending and balanced budgets, amounts to heresy. Musk's decision to start talking about forming another political party further alienates him from the GOP. He is now no longer part of the Trump coalition or even the Republican coalition. That means that fiscal conservatives cannot depend on him to drop millions of dollars for people opposed to the reconciliation bill or if he does, that it will immediately be tainted as money coming from a heretic. This makes Senate and House leadership's job easier. It gives them a foil to oppose and allows critics of the bill to tied to Musk. And they've already seen that most Republicans' bluster about spending levels are just that given that they will ultimately fold. Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee spent much of the early parts of the reconciliation process intimating to reporters that he would not vote for the bill only to fold. As votes wrapped on Thursday, he did not seem worried about it all. 'It's just two biggest dogs in the pound, they're both gonna fight a little,' he said. Except now, Musk just defanged fiscal conservatives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store