Court overturns injunction blocking Washington state from regulating immigration detention center
A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, opens new tab that a lower-court judge wrongly held that a state law imposing new requirements on Geo Group's (GEO.N), opens new tab Northwest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Processing Center in Tacoma was inconsistent with federal law.
"This is an encouraging outcome in the fight for basic health and safety standards at private detention facilities," said Mike Faulk, a spokesperson for Washington Attorney General Nick Brown. "We are still reviewing this opinion and potential next steps."
Geo's lawyer, Dominic Draye of Greenberg Traurig, did not respond to a request for comment.
Geo owns, manages or leases more than 100 correctional facilities, immigration detention centers and treatment facilities nationally. Its center in Tacoma has about 1,575 beds and is among the largest such facilities in the country.
Washington's law, which the Democratic-led state adopted in 2023, requires Geo's center to provide nutritious food in a clean and safe facility. It also authorized inspections related to these requirements and the assessment of monetary penalties.
Geo sued state officials two months after the law took effect, claiming it was being singled out while Washington spared state-run facilities from tighter oversight.
The company argued that by doing so, the state law ran afoul of the so-called doctrine of intergovernmental immunity, a principle derived from the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause that generally prevents states from directly regulating the federal government or discriminating against it.
U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle in Tacoma last year agreed, saying the law impermissibly discriminates against Geo by imposing burdens on the federal contractor's center that do not apply to state-owned prisons.
But Senior U.S. Circuit Judge William Fletcher, writing for the panel, said state prisons holding criminals were the wrong comparison and that instead Geo's center should be assessed against private facilities holding civil detainees.
"GEO asks us to ignore the critical fact that inmates in Washington's prisons have been convicted of crimes, and that the conditions of their confinement are part of a penal regime," Fletcher wrote. "By contrast, none of the detainees held in the NWIPC has been convicted of — or even charged with — a crime."
That difference matters because, while Geo's center is the only such facility that could be regulated under the statute in question, the law could still be held to be valid if state law treats similarly situated entities in the same manner. Fletcher cited the existence of two residential treatment facilities in Washington where people could be held involuntarily in a similar fashion.
The 9th Circuit panel sent the case back to Settle to reassess the question based on a comparison to private facilities.
Fletcher's opinion was joined by U.S. Circuit Judges Ronald Gould and Jacqueline Nguyen. All three judges were appointed by Democratic presidents.
The case is The Geo Group Inc v Inslee, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-2815.
For Geo Group: Dominic Draye of Greenberg Traurig
For Washington: Marsha Chien of Washington State Attorney General's Office
Read more:
Judge blocks tighter Washington state oversight of immigration detention center
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Kamala Harris's stepdaughter says she has 'climate anxiety'... but fans spot detail that lays bare her hypocrisy
Former Vice President Kamala Harris 's stepdaughter has been blasted online for complaining about her 'climate anxiety' while also still using plastic bags. Ella Emhoff, a 26-year-old model and designer, shared a 'little check-in' with her TikTok followers this week, reflecting on how the past four years - and her stepmother's election loss - have sharpened her focus on the world around her. Environmental change, she noted, stood out as a major driver of the grief and overwhelm she's been experiencing. 'I think everything with the environment is really... f***ing getting to me,' Emhoff said in her video. 'I experience a lot of climate anxiety,' she added with an uneasy laugh. 'Like I think a lot of us do.' But her comments sparked a wave of backlash and accusations of hypocrisy, as she had been seen happily holding a plastic bag just the day before - a detail made all the more striking given her stepmother's previous push to ban single-use plastics. Kamala Harris first endorsed banning plastic straws during her failed presidential campaign during a climate change town hall meeting with CNN in September 2019. 'I think we should, yes,' Harris said when asked if she supported the idea. Just hours before her serious sit-down update, Emhoff posted a TikTok visiting a California-based thrift store, waving a plastic bag in the air while posing in front of the store's sign (pictured) However, when she launched her own campaign in 2024, she reversed her position and quietly dropped the proposed ban. Then, in January, fans expressed outrage after spotting Harris and her husband carrying plastic bags during a grocery store trip - similarly, branding the pair as hypocrites. The plastic bag stood in contrast to what the American would have perceived her to be: an environmentalist, given California's 10-cent fine on single-use bags and the long-term impact on the environment that plastics may pose. Harris' shock decision to walk back her controversial position proved to be an attempt by her failed campaign to make the Dem candidate seem 'more practical' on a host of issues. On Friday, Emhoff's nearly seven-minute video updated her 53,000 TikTok followers on her life since Donald Trump's landslide victory over her stepmom. She voiced her 'disgust' over the current state of global affairs, specifically citing genocide, the erosion of rights, loss of healthcare, and a pervasive sense of fear surrounding affordability and the livelihoods of everyday Americans. Emhoff then shifted her focus to her profound anxiety about the changing climate, admitting that although it's no laughing matter, the gravity of it often leaves her with nothing but a nervous laugh. 'It's scary, it is,' she said directly to the camera lens. 'All of these things are happening - and besides the small things we can do, and pushing for change and fighting and protesting - it's really hard not to sit in those moments where it feels so heavy,' she added. However, just hours before her serious sit-down update, Emhoff posted a TikTok visiting Remainders, a California-based arts and crafts thrift store. In the opening seconds of the clip, the 26-year-old model was seen outside the Pasadena store, waving a plastic bag in the air while posing in front of the store's sign. The video then cut to the store's interior, revealing rows of boxes filled with vintage and heirloom trinkets, before transitioning to Emhoff back at home, ready to share her finds with her followers. Sitting on her bed with her small dog resting behind her, she proudly displayed two bags full of treasures - one stuffed inside a plastic 'Have A Nice Day' bag. Meanwhile, her dog sported a leash fitted with - of all things - a green plastic poop bag. While some praised her for thrifting her supplies instead of supporting big businesses, many online quickly called out what they saw as blatant hypocrisy given her professed climate anxiety. 'Look at allllll the plastic bags,' one comment read. 'In fact, didn't you call for banning single use plastic bags, or was that just for everyone else but you?' Another comment said: 'You should probably not support a store filled with excessive plastic bins as shelves. It might worsen your climate anxiety. Not surprised one bit by the hypocrisy. People like you are truly doing a great amount of damage to our country. It's dangerous.' 'PRAYING FOR YOU THAT THE FALSE CLIMATE NARRATIVE ISN'T OVERWHELMING YOU,' wrote a third. But this isn't the first time Emhoff has been seen using plastic bags so casually. Many viewers were quick to call out Harris's flip-flopping on plastic use - all while criticizing Emhoff over the frequent flights taken by her stepmother and father. 'Please stop having your father and step mom fly private everywhere,' one angered user wrote under the model's video. 'It's giving me terrible climate anxiety,' they added, using Emhoff's own words against her. 'If not for them flying as much as they do privately, I believe the average temperature would be one degree lower.' Last month, Emhoff also shared a video of her farmers market haul - one that didn't exactly shy away from plastic use. She showcased two plastic bottles of tomato juice, tomatoes nestled in a small blue plastic container, fruit being taken out of plastic bags, and tofu wrapped in a sealed plastic package. Last year, she shared an organization video on Instagram, showing large plastic bags filled with dozens of skeins of yarn, which she unpacked and neatly arranged on her wall.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Kamala Harris' stepdaughter says she has 'climate anxiety'... but fans spot detail that lays bare her hypocrisy
Former Vice President Kamala Harris ' stepdaughter has been blasted online for complaining about her 'climate anxiety' while also still using plastic bags. Ella Emhoff, a 26-year-old model and designer, shared a 'little check-in' with her TikTok followers this week, reflecting on how the past four years - and her stepmother's election loss - have sharpened her focus on the world around her. Environmental change, she noted, stood out as a major driver of the grief and overwhelm she's been experiencing. 'I think everything with the environment is really... f***ing getting to me,' Emhoff said in her video. 'I experience a lot of climate anxiety,' she added with an uneasy laugh. 'Like I think a lot of us do.' But her comments sparked a wave of backlash and accusations of hypocrisy, as she had been seen happily holding a plastic bag just the day before - a detail made all the more striking given her stepmother's previous push to ban single-use plastics. Kamala Harris first endorsed banning plastic straws during her failed presidential campaign during a climate change town hall meeting with CNN in September 2019. 'I think we should, yes,' Harris said when asked if she supported the idea. Just hours before her serious sit-down update, Emhoff posted a TikTok visiting a California-based thrift store, waving a plastic bag in the air while posing in front of the store's sign (pictured) However, when she launched her own campaign in 2024, she reversed her position and quietly dropped the proposed ban. Then, in January, fans expressed outrage after spotting Harris and her husband carrying plastic bags during a grocery store trip - similarly, branding the pair as hypocrites. The plastic bag stood in contrast to what the American would have perceived her to be: an environmentalist, given California's 10-cent fine on single-use bags and the long-term impact on the environment that plastics may pose. Harris' shock decision to walk back her controversial position proved to be an attempt by her failed campaign to make the Dem candidate seem 'more practical' on a host of issues. On Friday, Emhoff's nearly seven-minute video updated her 53,000 TikTok followers on her life since Donald Trump's landslide victory over her stepmom. She voiced her 'disgust' over the current state of global affairs, specifically citing genocide, the erosion of rights, loss of healthcare, and a pervasive sense of fear surrounding affordability and the livelihoods of everyday Americans. Emhoff then shifted her focus to her profound anxiety about the changing climate, admitting that although it's no laughing matter, the gravity of it often leaves her with nothing but a nervous laugh. 'It's scary, it is,' she said directly to the camera lens. 'All of these things are happening - and besides the small things we can do, and pushing for change and fighting and protesting - it's really hard not to sit in those moments where it feels so heavy,' she added. However, just hours before her serious sit-down update, Emhoff posted a TikTok visiting Remainders, a California-based arts and crafts thrift store. In the opening seconds of the clip, the 26-year-old model was seen outside the Pasadena store, waving a plastic bag in the air while posing in front of the store's sign. The video then cut to the store's interior, revealing rows of boxes filled with vintage and heirloom trinkets, before transitioning to Emhoff back at home, ready to share her finds with her followers. Sitting on her bed with her small dog resting behind her, she proudly displayed two bags full of treasures - one stuffed inside a plastic 'Have A Nice Day' bag. Meanwhile, her dog sported a leash fitted with - of all things - a green plastic poop bag. While some praised her for thrifting her supplies instead of supporting big businesses, many online quickly called out what they saw as blatant hypocrisy given her professed climate anxiety. 'Look at allllll the plastic bags,' one comment read. 'In fact, didn't you call for banning single use plastic bags, or was that just for everyone else but you?' Another comment said: 'You should probably not support a store filled with excessive plastic bins as shelves. It might worsen your climate anxiety. Not surprised one bit by the hypocrisy. People like you are truly doing a great amount of damage to our country. It's dangerous.' 'PRAYING FOR YOU THAT THE FALSE CLIMATE NARRATIVE ISN'T OVERWHELMING YOU,' wrote a third. But this isn't the first time Emhoff has been seen using plastic bags so casually. Many viewers were quick to call out Harris's flip-flopping on plastic use - all while criticizing Emhoff over the frequent flights taken by her stepmother and father. 'Please stop having your father and step mom fly private everywhere,' one angered user wrote under the model's video. 'It's giving me terrible climate anxiety,' they added, using Emhoff's own words against her. 'If not for them flying as much as they do privately, I believe the average temperature would be one degree lower.' Last month, Emhoff also shared a video of her farmers market haul - one that didn't exactly shy away from plastic use. She showcased two plastic bottles of tomato juice, tomatoes nestled in a small blue plastic container, fruit being taken out of plastic bags, and tofu wrapped in a sealed plastic package. Last year, she shared an organization video on Instagram, showing large plastic bags filled with dozens of skeins of yarn, which she unpacked and neatly arranged on her wall.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nigel Farage hails Epping Council's migrant hotel win 'a great victory' after weeks of anarchy following sex assault charge - and makes call to 'step up the pressure'
Nigel Farage has hailed the decision to move migrants out of a controversial asylum hotel as a 'great victory' - as he called for it to be 'inspiration' to the rest of Britain. Council leaders yesterday won the first stage of their battle to close the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, on planning permission grounds after it became an epicentre of anti-immigration protests, including some which turned violent. The demonstrations were sparked when a migrant living at the hotel was charged with a series of sexual offences, including some against a 14-year-old girl. Writing in The Telegraph, the Reform UK leader welcomed the decision by the High Court in London to grant the temporary injunction. Mr Farage said: 'This is a great victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. Let it also be an inspiration to the rest of Britain.' 'Now the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain,' he added. 'Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex. 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win.' The new junction means that the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site by September 12. It came after the Home Office unsuccessfully attempted to block the legal challenge, claiming its closure would cause 'acute difficulties' and breach asylum seekers' 'fundamental human rights'. The decision was also welcomed by jubilant locals who were pictured opening bottles of Prosecco outside The Bell Hotel. Mother Sarah White, 40, one of the protest organisers, said the news was 'amazing'. She said: 'This is great news - it is fantastic. This is not just for Epping but the rest of the country. Hopefully this is the sign of things to come. 'I really do hope they do not put these people in houses of multiple occupancy within our community now. 'That would be a kick in the face and we would fight it. 'But today's news is really positive. Families and women will be able to sleep easier at night knowing they will not be there. 'It's been a disgrace we have had to fight like this.' Sarah said they would be talking to other towns where migrant hotels are. She added: 'We will start protesting with towns up and down the country. We are standing shoulder to shoulder with them as well. 'We want to show this is bigger than Epping, it is impacting the whole country.' Maureen Chapman, 73, has lived in Epping for 50 years and said she felt 'under threat' by the hotel being there. Yesterday she said: 'This has restored my faith in humanity. It has restored my faith in common sense. Thank God, somebody has actually listened to the people. 'Locals have finally been heard and it feels like it has taken a very long time for that to happen. 'I hope councils up and down the country hear this message loud and clear. These hotels are not wanted and if local people rally around as a community, their voices can be heard.' Admin assistant Sarah Corner, 44, added: 'I am so pleased. Today is a huge day for the people of Epping. It is absolutely amazing. 'I only hope people now don't go through the same hell as we did. 'I was so worried every night. I only live half a mile away from the hotel. 'When there was the news of the alleged sexual assaults, it was horrific. I felt sick. 'We can all now hopefully get on with our lives.' Edward Brown KC, for the Home Office, warned the High Court the move 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. It would also 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's legal duty to avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights, he said. The barrister added: 'The balance of convenience can never favour a course of conduct that creates a real risk of interfering with fundamental human rights. 'If the injunction is granted by the court, it will substantially impact on the Home Secretary's statutory duties. 'The local authority should in fact have given some consideration to the wider public interest in this application.' He added that the injunction bid 'causes particular acute difficulties at the present date'. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said it was 'good news and a victory for the mums and dads I spoke to in Epping who just want their children to be safe'. She added: 'Putting a hotel full of young male illegal immigrants in the middle of a community like Epping was always going to lead to issues. 'They need to be moved out of the area immediately. 'But Epping is just one of many towns struggling with these asylum hotels. 'Labour have no solution, they're not smashing any gangs and small boat arrivals are at record highs. 'I do have a plan - bring back a proper deterrent and remove all illegal arrivals immediately, so towns like Epping never have to deal with this again.' Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'Residents should never have had to fight their own Government just to feel safe in their own town.' He accused Labour of deciding to 'tear up the deterrents the Conservatives put in place', such as the Rwanda asylum scheme. Outside the Royal Courts of Justice, Epping council leader Chris Whitbread said: 'This is a decision that's important to Epping Forest, but also important to have councils up and down the country, and it shows that the Government cannot ignore planning rules, just like no-one else can ignore planning rules.' He added: 'This is only the start of a process and subject to appeal, we recognise that, but all things being equal, the Bell Hotel will be empty by September 12, and that's really important for the students, residents, businesses of Epping Forest.' Addressing local residents, he went on: 'If they decide to go outside the Bell Hotel, don't protest, don't over-celebrate. This is the beginning. It is not the end.' The Home Office had not been represented at a previous hearing in the case on Friday. But yesterday the department asked to be allowed to intervene Mr Justice Eyre was due to hand down his ruling on whether the injunction should be granted. Philip Coppel KC, for Epping Forest District Council, said the Home Office's request was 'a thoroughly unprincipled application made in a thoroughly unprincipled way'. He added that the department knew of the injunction bid last week but 'sat on their hands'. It comes after a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel. A resident at the hotel, Hadush Kebatu, 41, from Ethiopia, was charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity. The incidents allegedly happened within two days, just over a week after the 41-year-old arrived in the UK by boat. Raphael Pigott, defending, told a hearing at Colchester magistrates' court on July 17: 'I believe he is here as a refugee or asylum seeker, and that he arrived informally on a boat.' It is alleged Mr Kebatu tried to kiss a schoolgirl as she ate pizza near a busy high street, and the next day attempted to kiss an adult near a fish and chip shop in the town centre, telling her she was 'pretty' while putting his hand on her leg. He then encountered the girl again and tried to kiss her, a court was told. Mr Kebatu has denied the offences and is in custody. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences. A series of protests have taken place outside the hotel since the alleged incidents. There was violence outside the premises last month after 'anti-immigration' campaigners clashed with 'anti-racism' demonstrators. Activists brawled in the streets while police battled to contain the chaos. Twenty-eight people have since been arrested in relation to disorder, and 16 of them have been charged. Police chiefs have already described the unrest at The Bell as a 'signal flare' for another summer of disorder. At a hearing on Friday the council told the High Court the housing of asylum seekers at the property was becoming a 'very serious problem' which 'could not be much worse'. Barristers for the council claimed Somani Hotels breached planning rules as the site is not being used for its intended purpose as a hotel, stating there was an 'overwhelming case for an injunction'. Somani Hotels defended the claim with its barristers telling the court in London that a 'draconian' injunction would cause asylum seekers 'hardship'. They added that 'political views' were not grounds for an injunction to be made. They also said that contracts to house asylum seekers were a 'financial lifeline' for the hotel, which was only one per cent full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers. Opening Friday's hearing Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said: 'Epping Forest District Council comes to this court seeking an injunction because it has a very serious problem. 'It is a problem that is getting out of hand; it is a problem that is causing a great anxiety to those living in the district. 'There has been what can be described as an increase in community tension, the catalyst of which has been the use of the Bell Hotel to place asylum seekers. 'The problem has arisen because of a breach of planning control by the defendant.' He continued that the site 'is no more a hotel than a borstal to a young offender' for asylum seekers and that Somani Hotels had not had 'the courage of conviction to seek a certificate of lawful use', which would have 'resolved the matter in its favour'. Mr Coppel also referenced the alleged sexual assault of the teenage girl, and said several schools were in the nearby area. He said: 'Having this sort of thing go on in such a concentration of schools with no measures in place to stop a repetition is not acceptable. 'It really could not be much worse than this.' Another factor in favour of granting an injunction would be removing a 'catalyst for violent protests in public places'. The barrister added: 'Allowing the status quo to continue is wholly unacceptable, providing a feeding ground for unrest.' Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, said the alleged planning breach was 'not flagrant', and that it was 'entirely wrong' for the council to 'suggest the use has been hidden from them'. The barrister told the court that the hotel previously housed asylum seekers from 2020 to 2021, and from 2022 to 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. He said company applied for planning permission for a 'temporary change of use' in February 2023, but this was later withdrawn as it had not been determined by April 2024. Asylum seekers then began being placed in the Bell Hotel again in April 2025, with Mr Riley-Smith stating that a planning application was not made 'having taken advice from the Home Office'. Addressing the public protests at Epping, the barrister said: 'The court should bear in mind - as recognised by the claimant - that these have spread far beyond locals who might have a genuine concern about their area to a wider group with more strategic national and ideological aims, but that does not necessarily mean the concerns are well-founded. 'Fears as to an increase of crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger to schools are common, but that does not make them well-founded. 'It also sets a dangerous precedent that protests justify planning injunctions.' Mr Justice Eyre refused to give Somani Hotels the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal. In his judgment, he said that while the council had not 'definitively established' Somani Hotels had breached planning rules, 'the strength of the claimant's case is such that it weighs in favour' of granting the injunction. He continued that the 'risk of injustice is greater' if a temporary injunction were not granted. A further hearing on whether the injunction should be made permanent is expected to be held at a later date, and is expected to last two days.
