Homeowners facing bills of £23,000 to deal with RAAC join call for national emergency fund
Homeowners facing bills of £23,000 to deal with RAAC join call for national emergency fund
Dozens of properties in the Gower estate in Hirwaun were discovered to have RAAC with 14 of these being privately owned
(Image: Wilson Chowdhry )
Homeowners facing bills of around £23,000 to deal with RAAC in their properties have joined calls for a national remediation fund and emergency government support.
Residents in Hirwaun who own their properties which are affected by RAAC say they are being left to deal with the issue which was discovered in 77 homes on the Gower estate back in 2024 and at a recent meeting residents joined forces with the UK RAAC campaign group in calling for a national remediation fund and emergency government support.
It's in a bid to prevent what the group calls a 'looming disaster that could see families bankrupted or made homeless'.
Reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) is a lightweight building material used in housing between the 1950s and 1980s and it hit the headlines in 2023 structural issues were identified with it.
Of the affected homes in Hirwaun 14 were purchased under the Right to Buy scheme and are now privately owned leaving owners facing five-figure repair bills without financial assistance, the group says.
One resident said: 'We're stuck. We can't sell, we can't insure, we can't borrow, and we can't afford to fix the problem. We're being left behind.'
Article continues below
Campaigners are urging the public to back their petition to the UK Government, which demands a national remediation fund, a public inquiry into the handling of RAAC by councils and housing associations, and legal reforms to protect owners of affected homes.
The petition must reach 10,000 signatures by June 17 to receive an official response from the government, the group says. To get all the latest on Welsh politics, health, education and more, sign up to our Wales Matters newsletter.
A second petition aimed at the Welsh Government will also be launched specifically demanding financial support and long-term solutions for affected residents in Hirwaun.
At the recent meeting residents discussed forming a constituted Welsh group aligned with the UK RAAC Campaign to maintain pressure on both the Welsh and UK Governments.
They say the silence from mortgage lenders and insurance companies is exacerbating their fears with many now ineligible for standard insurance products and some fearing they may end up facing threats of repossession.
Wilson Chowdhry, who is helping to coordinate the campaign, said: 'This is a national issue and needs a national response. If nothing changes people are going to lose their homes through no fault of their own.'
The Welsh Government said: 'We recognise how difficult the situation is for all residents affected by RAAC in both private and social homes on the Gower estate in Hirwaun and the strain this is having on them.
'We are working closely with both the local authority and Trivallis to continue to monitor the situation and would strongly encourage all homeowners to undertake surveys to identify the extent of the RAAC within their homes before contacting Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council who stand ready to support them.'
Building safety is devolved to the Welsh Government and a national remediation fund for homeowners affected by RAAC is not under consideration by the UK Government.
Article continues below
The UK Parliament petition can be seen here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
New pension changes for 20m people in Pension Schemes Bill
Pension changes introduced today could make managing accounts easier for millions of workers planning their retirement across the UK. The Government's new Pension Schemes Bill is designed to support working people plan for their retirement by making pensions simpler to understand, easier to manage, and drive better value over the long term. Keeping track of pensions is notoriously challenging, with the average worker accumulating 11 different pension pots over their lifetime. This has resulted in £26.6 billion in lost pensions across the UK, according to the Pensions Policy Institute and the Association of British Insurers. One of its biggest benefits is the merging of small pension pots. The bill also introduces a new system to show how well pension schemes are performing, this will help savers understand whether their scheme is giving them good value and protect them from getting stuck in underperforming schemes for years on end, to help working people feel more secure about their retirement savings. For those approaching retirement, the changes will mean clear default options for turning savings into a retirement income. This means people will have clearer, more secure routes to decide how they use their pension money over time. The full changes are listed in detail here. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall says: "Hardworking people across the UK deserve their pensions to work as hard for them as they have worked to save, and our reforms will deliver a huge boost to future generations of pensioners." Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves describes the bill as "a game changer", giving "bigger pension pots for savers and driving £50 billion of investment directly into the UK economy– putting more money into people's pockets." Government launches plans to automatically combine small pension pots, here's what it's likely to mean for you... — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) April 24, 2025 What do these pension changes mean for workers? The bill will transform the £2 trillion pensions landscape to ensure savers get good returns for each pound they save, and drive investment into the economy, through a suite of measures, including: Requiring DC schemes to prove they are value for money, to protect savers from getting stuck in underperforming schemes. Simplifying retirement choices, with all pension schemes offering default routes to an income in retirement. Bringing together small pension pots worth £1,000 or less into one pension scheme that is certified as delivering good value to savers, making pension saving less hassle and more rewarding. New rules creating multi-employer DC scheme 'megafunds' of at least £25 billion, so that bigger and better pension schemes can drive down costs and invest in a wider range of assets. Consolidating and professionalising the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS), with assets held in six pools that can invest in local areas infrastructure, housing and clean energy. Increased flexibility for Defined Benefit (DB) pension schemes to safely release surplus worth collectively £160 billion, to support employers' investment plans and to benefit scheme members. What is the difference between a Defined Benefit (DB) scheme and a Defined Contribution (DC) pension? There are two different ways pension schemes work. With a Defined Benefit (DB) pension scheme, also referred to as final salary pension schemes, the amount you get is usually based on your salary and how long you've been part of the pension scheme. For a Defined Contribution (DC) pension, the figure you get is based on how much you and your employer invest in the pension and how your investments perform. Recommended reading: What's the expert view on the new pension changes? Nausicaa Delfas, chief executive of The Pensions Regulator (TPR) says: "The Pension Schemes Bill is a once in a generation opportunity to address unfinished business in the UK pension system. "Making sure all schemes are focused on delivering value for money, helping to stop small, and often forgotten pension pots forming, and guiding savers towards the right retirement products for them, will mean savers benefit from a system fit for the future. "We have long advocated for fewer, larger well-run schemes with the size and skill to deliver better outcomes for savers. As such we are also pleased to see the proposed legislative framework for DB superfunds, providing options and choice in defined benefit consolidation." Andy Briggs, CEO, Phoenix Group says: "The bill sets a clear direction for the future of pensions with the emphasis on building scale and ensuring savers receive value for money. "People across the country will feel the impact of these changes with plans to consolidate small pots, ensure the dashboard delivers and provide default retirement income options at the point of retirement. Patrick Heath-Lay, Chief Executive, People's Partnership adds: "This is a pivotal moment in pension reform. The bill contains many measures that will require providers to deliver better outcomes for savers and improve the workplace pension system."
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
How Trump's first buddy Elon Musk became enemy number one
On the surface, it was a dream reciprocal alliance. Musk reportedly contributed some $250m to support Trump and other Republicans in the November elections, while Trump, impressed with the disruptive energy of the tech billionaire, got him to head up the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). But just five months later, their relationship appears to be blowing up in a spectacularly explosive fashion. This week, Musk, whose Tesla business has been hit hard by his association with the president, slammed Trump's flagship tax and spending bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination'. The outburst came just days after an Oval Office send-off from the president, which was attended by Musk sporting a black eye. Trump presented him with a brown box containing a large golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia, which he said he only gave to 'very special people'. Less than a week has passed and that special relationship is now becoming one of enmity and rage. Musk's resentment toward Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', was on full display on X/Twitter when the tech billionaire wrote: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore, this massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged that Trump was aware of Musk's stance on the bill, a package that cuts trillions in taxes while scaling back programmes like Medicaid and subsidies that benefit Tesla. Leavitt tried to downplay the conflict, saying Musk's view 'doesn't change the president's opinion' of him, though tensions have clearly been simmering. The Independent noted this week that concerns Musk raised about the administration's crackdown on immigration (he wanted access to the world's best scientific brains, regardless of where they're from) were routinely ignored. And the frustration between him and the Republicans has been stewing for months. Now that Musk has fired the first public shot, his critics aren't holding back. 'He's a complete joke. He had no idea what the f*** he was doing,' one republican told Axios anonymously, fearing retaliation from Musk. 'Nobody really wanted him here. We couldn't wait to get rid of him.' Axios also reported that House speaker Mike Johnson told House Republicans in a closed-door conference meeting on Wednesday that Trump himself is 'pi**** off' at Musk. Johnson said at a press conference after the meeting that he talks to Trump 'multiple times a day' and that the president is 'not delighted that Elon did a 180'. Another republican, backed up that assertion, told Axios: 'I knew it was a matter of time before the two alpha males would explode, fight each other.' Elsewhere, Trump's former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, a bitter enemy of Musk, has suggested that the first schism in their relationship came in March when the president refused to show the billionaire the Pentagon's attack plans for a hypothetical war with China. Speaking to The Atlantic last month, Bannon said of that moment: 'You could feel it. Everything changed. The fever had been broken.' Others believe the final nail came when Trump abruptly decided over the weekend to withdraw the nomination of Musk ally and investor, Jared Isaacman, to be Nasa's next administrator. Appearing on the All-in Podcast yesterday, Isaacman said he was disappointed when he learned that his nomination had been revoked, noting that the fact it coincided with Musk's departure from the White House wasn't a coincidence. 'There were some people who had some axes to grind, and I was a good visible target,' he said. This claim has been disputed, however, with complaints from Republican senators about Isaacman's track record as a Democratic donor also given as a reason for the decision. That Musk now feels angry and disillusioned is no surprise to those who have long believed that such oversized egos were destined to collide. But the roots of this volatile dynamic go beyond tariffs and immigration. Some say the toxicity of their relationship stems from the formative paternal influences that shaped both men. For Donald Trump, the blueprint for leadership was laid by his stern and demanding father, Fred Trump Sr. From a very young age, Donald was taught that there were only 'winners – or 'killers' – and losers', a lesson his father relentlessly imparted. According to Tony Schwartz, who co-authored The Art of the Deal with Trump, Fred was a 'very brutal guy' with 'very, very little emotional intelligence'. 'I strongly suspect that he had a relationship with his father that accounts for a lot of what he became,' Schwartz told PBS's Frontline website. Trump's niece, Mary, a clinical psychologist who wrote the bestselling book Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man, says Fred Sr 'destroyed' Donald by hindering his 'ability to develop and experience the entire spectrum of human emotion'. Elon Musk 's own childhood was similarly difficult and his relationship with his father, Errol Musk, was fraught with tension. Musk said in a 2022 TED Talk: 'I did not have a happy childhood, to be frank. It was quite rough.' His father is said to have taken the side of his son's school bullies, calling him 'worthless', something which he has denied. When Elon Musk moved to America, Errol allegedly told him: 'You'll be back in a few months. You will never be successful.' Being raised in environments where dominance, ruthlessness, and an inability to show weakness are paramount is unhelpful, particularly when it comes to father son relationships. 'In my field,' says Dr Frank Ochberg, a pioneering psychiatrist and trauma expert who helped define PTSD, 'if you have been abused by a parent when you're very young, that's of consequence. And there are various ways in which people who eventually had a powerful impact on the world for better or worse are evaluated in terms of parental impact. 'It doesn't take a rocket scientist – although Elon is a rocket scientist – to say having a bully as a father can make you a bully as a man, and an effective one at that. And if you do have the combination of Musk and Trump together, you can also empower other bullies, male and female – and they have.' Ochberg says Trump and Musk have both succeeded in bringing bullies and bullying tendencies into what we might consider sacred spaces – the workplace and, in Trump's case, one we associate with high morality such as the seat of government. But, he says, 'I think seeing them publicly disagreeing with each other diminishes the moral and political force of each of them.' It seems that a long-term, equitable partnership between the two was always an impossibility, especially one where one, Trump, demands utter loyalty, which Musk, a man his biographer Walter Isaacson points out engages 'Demon Mode', a state of intense focus and anger while working on projects, is unwilling to give. Cornell law professor Sarah Kreps notes, there's simply 'not room at the centre of politics for two such massive egos'. It was only November when Trump's son Eric, dismissing reports of a breakdown in his father's relationship with Musk, said his dad 'loves' and 'adores' the SpaceX owner, and considers him a 'super genius'. In the end, perhaps this was always the only way it could go: two men raised in the shadow of domineering and difficult fathers with something to prove; both intoxicated by their own authority, colliding in drama and chaos of their own making. The rift between Trump and Musk may read like a celebrity feud, but it's far more consequential. For now, Trump and Musk remain locked in a game of egos, and the rest of us are just along for the ride.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Siemens Energy replaces 11 bln eur government-backed funding facility
FRANKFURT, June 5 (Reuters) - Siemens Energy on Thursday said it had replaced a 11 billion euro ($12.6 billion) government-backed funding facility that was put in place in 2023 to stabilise the power equipment maker, a key step to restore its ability to pay dividends. The government had to backstop billions of euros worth of project guarantees in late 2023 to ensure Siemens Energy - a critical player in the energy infrastructure industry - could fulfil its order book in the wake of major quality issues at its wind turbine business. "The federal government's counter-guarantee was instrumental in 2023 during a challenging phase to secure our strong anticipated growth," Siemens Energy's Chief Financial Officer Maria Ferraro said. One of the conditions of the facility was the suspension of dividend payments at Siemens Energy. "Due to our performance in the past two years and the positive market environment we were able to improve margins, cash flow and strengthen our balance sheet," Ferraro said. "This enabled us to replace the facility before the end of our fiscal year and deliver on our commitment as promised." Siemens Energy Chief Executive Christian Bruch last month said that replacing the government facility would enable the company to resume dividend payments for the 2026 fiscal year. ($1 = 0.8701 euros)
