N.J. ballot law ‘meets constitutional muster,' lawmaker says after judge questions its legality
Supporters of a new law that ended New Jersey's controversial county-line ballot system signaled there is no rush to amend the statute, even after a federal judge warned this week that the law may be unconstitutional.
U.S. District Court Judge Zahid Quraishi in a Tuesday order said some balloting practices that were challenged in court last year likely remain unconstitutional despite changes signed into law this March, but Senate President Nicholas Scutari (D-Union) said he thinks the law, which he sponsored, 'meets constitutional muster.'
'Ballot design has always been in the purview of the Legislature, but I'm aware of what he said,' Scutari said.
Scutari added that he had not read the order but had heard some of the judge's concerns through other mediums.
It's unclear what effect Quraishi's order will have on future elections. There are primaries on Tuesday — gubernatorial and Assembly candidates are on the ballot — but it's too soon to change ballots before then.
The new law was spurred by a lawsuit filed in February 2024 by now-Sen. Andy Kim and two other congressional candidates. The three Democrats alleged that the state's county-line ballot system — which groups party-backed candidates on the ballot no matter what office they're seeking — is unconstitutional.
In March 2024, Quraishi ruled that Kim's lawsuit was likely to succeed on its merits, and he barred county clerks from using county-line ballots in the June 2024 primary. Instead, he ordered them to use office-block ballots, which group candidates by the office they're seeking.
The Legislature then acted. Earlier this year, it passed the new ballot law, which revamped the design of primary ballots largely to conform to Quraishi's March 2024 edict. But the judge, in his new order, noted that the law permits candidates to bracket with one another on the ballot and have their ballot positions determined by a single draw instead of individual draws.
Those provisions, he wrote, 'likely do not remove the unconstitutional practices alleged.'
Quraishi's March 2024 order barred clerks from conducting ballot draws that 'do not include a separate drawing for every office and candidate' and required ballot draws offer each candidate an equal chance of securing the best ballot position.
The Kim lawsuit alleged Jersey's bracketing system — which allowed candidates to have their ballot positions drawn as a group if they shared a slogan, as did candidates backed by party leaders — violated other candidates' associational rights by requiring they bracket with others to avoid being disadvantaged by the ballot itself.
Under prior law, ballot draws for candidates for high office could determine placements for those seeking other offices, from the state to local level.
The new law allows candidates seeking the same office, like two running mates for a single Assembly district, to have their ballot positions drawn as a group. Quraishi said this week that leaving ballot draws to clerks' discretion could harm candidates in the future.
One of the law's sponsors said the Legislature would act if Quraishi orders further changes.
'The ballot design legislation was written with unprecedented public input and reviewed by counsel from the Office of Legislative Services, as is the case with any law. If there is a legal challenge and a court determines we need to address something, I'm sure the legislature will,' said Assemblyman Al Barlas (R-Essex), who co-chaired an Assembly panel convened to consider new ballot design.
As the new law was being contemplated, numerous witnesses urged legislators to require randomized electronic ballot draws and rotating candidate ballot positions to ensure each appeared in the first position as often as their opponents and warned that bracketing provisions could disadvantage solo candidates.
Quraishi's concerns haven't spawned wide-reaching worry among the state's most prominent politicians.
'They put the people who are running together together. I don't have a great passion about that one way or the other, but the ballot worked for me,' Gov. Phil Murphy told reporters Thursday. 'It was dead straight forward, dead easy.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Maxwell demands immunity after subpoena from House Oversight Committee
An attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell said she would only speak with the House Oversight Committee if granted immunity — an idea the panel swiftly rejected. The panel last week subpoenaed Maxwell, an associate of Jeffrey Epstein, compelling her testimony amid demands on the Trump administration to release files from the financier who killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Marcus, noted that she has filed an appeal before the Supreme Court and her testimony to the committee could jeopardize efforts to overturn her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking children. 'As you know, Ms. Maxwell is actively pursuing post-conviction relief— both in a pending petition before the United States Supreme Court and in a forthcoming habeas petition. Any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool,' Marcus wrote. 'Public reports—including your own statements—indicate that the Committee intends to question Ms. Maxwell in prison and without a grant of immunity. Those are non-starters. Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity.' A spokeswoman for the committee immediately ruled out any grant of immunity. 'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' committee spokesperson Jessica Collins said in a statement. Marcus had said Maxwell would testify 'if a fair and safe path forward can be established.' Beyond a grant of immunity, Marcus also asked for questions to be shared in advance and for any deposition to take place after the Supreme Court weighs Maxwell's petition. 'To prepare adequately for any congressional deposition—and to ensure accuracy and fairness—we would require the Committee's questions in advance. This is essential not only to allow for meaningful preparation, but also to identify the relevant documentation from millions of pages that could corroborate her responses,' he wrote. The letter then made an indirect reference to a possible pardon, something Marcus has said he has not yet sought from Trump. 'Of course, in the alternative, if Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing—and eager—to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C.,' Marcus wrote. House Oversight Democrats had backed the move from Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) earlier this month to subpoena Maxwell. 'Oversight Democrats just unanimously voted to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's partner,' House Oversight Democrats wrote on the social platform X after the vote. 'This is progress. We will not stop fighting until the Epstein Files are released. Trump and Bondi must stop blocking the American people from the truth.' Epstein ran with high-powered figures, including those in politics as well as President Trump. The Wall Street Journal reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi has told Trump that he is referenced in the Epstein files. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last week flew to Tallahassee, Fla., where Maxwell is serving her 20-year sentence, undertaking two days of questioning with her. 'This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead,' he said ahead of the meetings.


Bloomberg
10 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Hakeem Jeffries to Visit Texas as Trump Pushes Redrawing Congressional Maps
Hakeem Jeffries, the Democratic leader in the US House of Representatives, will meet with Texas Democrats in Austin on Wednesday, according to people familiar with the matter, as a national battle intensifies over President Donald Trump's drive to redraw the state's congressional maps. Trump has said that revamping Texas congressional districts would add as many as five seats for the Republicans, giving the party a leg up as it seeks to defend its narrow House majority in midterm elections next year. Texas state lawmakers have been holding hearings on the controversial effort, but new proposed maps have yet to be released.


Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's endorsement boosts Senate candidate who almost flipped a key swing seat
EXCLUSIVE - Republican Senate candidate and former Rep. Mike Rogers says President Donald Trump's endorsement gives him a "clear shot" as he aims to flip a Democrat-held seat in battleground Michigan in next year's midterm elections. The president's backing of Rogers last week came a day after GOP Rep. Bill Huizenga, who had been seriously mulling a Senate run in Michigan, announced that he would not launch a 2026 Senate campaign after consultations with Trump. Huizenga's announcement and Trump's ensuing endorsement helped clear the field for Rogers, who is making his second straight bid for the Senate. "It's huge," Rogers said of Trump's endorsement. "It shows how far we've come in unifying the Republican Party here in Michigan." And Rogers highlighted in an exclusive Fox News Digital interview that "clearing out any potential opponent in a primary allows us to continue to build on the momentum we have." Rogers pointed to "people jumping on board, wanting to be part of the team" since Trump's endorsement last week. "Having the Trump endorsement, that just kind of seals the deal. And it means we just get to work to win the election against Democrats in November of '26." Rogers is aiming to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, who announced earlier this year that he wouldn't seek re-election. Rogers, a former FBI special agent who later served as chair of the House Intelligence Committee during his tenure in Congress, is making his second straight run for the Senate in Michigan. Rogers won the 2024 GOP Senate nomination in Michigan but narrowly lost to Rep. Elissa Slotkin, the Democrats' nominee, in last November's election in the race to succeed longtime Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who retired. Slotkin, who vastly outspent Rogers, edged him by roughly 19,000 votes, or a third of a percentage point. "We've already seen some opening of checkbooks that maybe weren't willing to do that before," Rogers said of a boost in fundraising since he landed the president's backing last week. "I think it's definitely going to help our fundraising, and it all feeds on itself, so we'll have better fundraising. Better fundraising means more support. More support means broader support. Broader support means we can continue to build out our team and what we have to do across the state," Rogers added. While Rogers appears to have the GOP field to himself, Democrats are facing a crowded and competitive primary. Among the announced candidates are Rep. Haley Stevens, state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, former state House Speaker Rep. Joe Tate, and Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, of Ann Arbor, a former Wayne County health director. "The Democrats are absolutely in a knife fight in the primary. They are a mess and fighting each other. They don't know which way they're going," Rogers argued. Trump narrowly carried Michigan in the 2024 presidential election after losing the state by a razor-thin margin four years earlier. But Republicans haven't won a Senate election in Michigan in over 30 years. You have to go back to former Sen. Spencer Abraham's 1994 victory. But Rogers said his early start this cycle, compared to his 2024 Senate run, as well as Trump's endorsement, could make the difference in 2026. "I wasn't even in the race this early last go round," Rogers said. "So to be in the race this early and get his [Trump's] endorsement just says we are serious about winning." "All good full steam ahead here," Rogers emphasized.