CyCraft Launches XecGuard: LLM Firewall for Trustworthy AI
CyCraft Co-Founders (from left to right): Benson Wu (CEO), Jeremy Chiu (CTO), and PK Tsung (CISO) are leading the mission to build the world's most advanced AI security platform.
Trustworthy AI Matters
The transformative power of Large Language Models (LLMs) brings significant security uncertainty, requiring enterprises to urgently safeguard their AI models from malicious attacks like prompt injection, prompt extraction, and jailbreak attempts. Historically, AI security has been an 'optional add-on' rather than a fundamental feature, leaving valuable AI and data exposed. This oversight can compromise sensitive data, undermine service stability, and erode customer trust. CyCraft emphasizes that 'AI security must be a standard feature—not an optional add-on,' believing it's paramount for delivering stable and trustworthy intelligent services.
The Imminent Need for Proactive AI Defense
The need for immediate and effective AI security is more critical than ever before. As AI becomes increasingly embedded in core business operations, the attack surface expands exponentially, making proactive defenses an absolute necessity. CyCraft has leveraged its extensive 'battle-tested expertise across critical domains—including government, finance, and high-tech manufacturing' to precisely address these emerging AI-specific threats. The development of XecGuard signifies a shift from 'using AI to tackle cybersecurity challenges' to now 'using AI to protect AI' , ensuring that security and resilience are embedded from day one.
'AI security must be a standard feature—not an optional add-on,' stated Benson Wu, CEO, highlighting XecGuard's resilience and integration of experience from defending critical sectors. Jeremy Chiu, CTO and Co-Founder, emphasized, 'In the past, we used AI to tackle cybersecurity challenges; now, we're using AI to protect AI,' adding that XecGuard enables enterprises to confidently adopt AI and deliver trustworthy services. PK Tsung, CISO, concluded, 'With XecGuard, we're empowering enterprises to embed security and resilience from day one' as part of their vision for the world's most advanced AI security platform.
CyCraft's Solution: XecGuard Empowers Secure AI Deployment
CyCraft leads with the global launch of XecGuard, the industry's first plug-and-play LoRA security module purpose-built to defend LLMs. XecGuard provides robust protection against prompt injection, prompt extraction, and jailbreak attacks, ensuring enterprise-grade resilience for AI models. Its seamless deployment allows instant integration with any LLM without architectural modification, delivering powerful autonomous defense out of the box. XecGuard is available as a SaaS, an OpenAI-compatible LLM firewall on your cloud (e.g., AWS or Cloudflare Workers AI), or an embedded firewall for on-premises, NVIDIA-powered custom LLM servers. Rigorously validated on major open-source models like Llama 3B, Qwen3 4B, Gemma3 4B, and DeepSeek 8B, it consistently improves security resilience while preserving core performance, enabling even small models to achieve protection comparable to large commercial-grade systems.
Even small models gain enterprise-level defenses, approaching large commercial-grade performance.
Real-world validation through collaboration with APMIC, an NVIDIA partner, integrated XecGuard into the F1 open-source model, demonstrating an average 17.3% improvement in overall security defense scores and up to 30.1% in specific attack scenarios via LLM Red Teaming exercises. With XecGuard and the Safety LLM service, CyCraft delivers enterprise-grade AI security, accelerating the adoption of resilient and trustworthy AI across industries, empowering organizations to deploy AI securely, protect sensitive data, and drive innovation with confidence.
To learn more about how XecGuard can protect your LLMs and to request a demo, visit: www.cycraft.com/en/xecguard
Hashtag: #CyCraft #LLMFirewall #AISecurity
https://www.cycraft.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/cycraft/
https://x.com/cycraft_corp
The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
About CyCraft Technology
CyCraftis a leading AI-driven cybersecurity company in the Asia-Pacific region. Trusted by hundreds of organizations in defense, finance, and semiconductor industries, our AI is designed to prevent, preempt, and protect against cyber threats. Our expertise has been recognized by top-tier institutions like Gartner and IDC and showcased at prestigious global conferences, including Black Hat, DEFCON, EMNLP, and Code Blue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
21 hours ago
- Associated Press
Central Europe Technologies recognized as one of the Best Places to Work in Romania for 2025
BUCHAREST, ROMANIA - Media OutReach Newswire - 2 July 2025 – Central Europe Technologies has been officially recognized as one of the Best Places to Work in Romania for 2025. Central Europe Technologies is a Shared Service Center for BNP Paribas Group, providing IT, Operations and Risk expertise to BNP Paribas Personal Finance entities and beyond, reaching millions of users worldwide. This prestigious certification reflects the organization's unwavering commitment to fostering a positive, inclusive, and high-performing workplace environment. Commenting on the achievement, Brigitte Doguet, CEO of Central Europe Technologies, said: 'We are incredibly proud to receive the Best Places to Work certification. This is a significant milestone for Central Europe Technologies as it reflects our deep commitment to fostering a culture where employees feel engaged, valued, and empowered to grow. This recognition reinforces our position as an employer of choice and directly supports our commitment to delivering meaningful value and consistent excellence to our clients, because engaged teams deliver exceptional results.' Florenta Hamzu, HR Director at Central Europe Technologies, added: 'At Central Europe Technologies, our greatest strength lies in our people: their passion, creativity, and drive are what shape our culture every day. Being named one of the Best Places to Work is more than a recognition—it's a celebration of the environment we've built together, where individuals are encouraged to grow, contribute meaningfully, and bring their whole selves to work. Our people are the foundation of our success, and we remain deeply committed to creating a workplace where they feel inspired and supported every step of the way.' The Best Places to Work certification is a highly sought-after achievement that recognizes organizations demonstrating excellence in employee experience and workplace culture. By earning this distinction, Central Europe Technologies reinforces its position as an employer of choice within the Romanian market. For more information about Central Europe Technologies, please visit: For more information about the certification program, please visit LinkedIn: Twitter: Facebook: Hashtag: #BestPlacesToWork The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Associated Press
21 hours ago
- Associated Press
OneMagnify India earns Best Place to Work certification for the fourth consecutive year
CHENNAI, INDIA - Media OutReach Newswire - 2 July 2025 - OneMagnify, a global leader in marketing, data, and technology solutions, has once again been recognized as a Best Place to Work in India for 2025 — marking our fourth consecutive year of being certified. This prestigious recognition is a testament to the culture of trust, collaboration, and excellence that our teams continue to nurture and elevate year after year. The certification is based on a comprehensive assessment of workplace culture, employee engagement, and organizational practices. OneMagnify India scored significantly above the market average in key areas such as purpose, belonging, leadership, and opportunities for growth. Daniel Raj, Managing Director of OneMagnify India, shared: 'It is truly humbling and energizing to see OneMagnify India named a Best Place to Work for the fourth year in a row. This recognition belongs to each and every member of our team, past and present, whose passion, integrity, and commitment to excellence fuel our progress. As we continue to scale, transform, and evolve as a global capability center, we remain grounded in what matters most: our people. I am proud of what we have built, and even more excited about what we will create together in the years ahead. Congratulations to our team, and thank you for making OneMagnify not just a workplace, but a place where people thrive.' The Best Places to Work certification is a highly coveted achievement that reflects consistent and intentional dedication to enhancing the employee experience. By earning this recognition, OneMagnify India stands out as one of the top employers in the country, providing a positive and engaging workplace for all its employees. Each year, the Best Places to Work program partners with leading organizations across India and various other countries to help them measure, benchmark, and improve their HR practices. Through this certification, organizations gain access to insights, tools, and expertise needed to drive meaningful and sustainable change in their workplace culture. For more information, visit For more information about the certification program, please visit Hashtag: #BestPlacesToWork The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Are We Finally Ceding Control To The Machine? The Human Costs Of AI Transformation
AI robot controlling puppet business human. Generative Artificial Intelligence has exploded into the mainstream. Since its introduction, it has transformed the ways individuals work, create, and interact with technology. But is this adoption useful? While technology is saving people considerable time and money, will its effects have repercussions on human health and economic displacement? Jing Hu isn't your typical AI commentator. Trained as a biochemist, she traded the lab bench for the wild west of tech, spending a decade building products before turning her sights on AI research and journalism. Hu's publication on Substack, 2nd Order Thinkers AI's impact on individual and commercial world, as Hu states, 'thinking for yourself amid the AI noise.' In a recent episode of Tech Uncensored I spoke with Jing Hu to discuss the cognitive impacts from increasing usage of Chatbots built on LLMs. Chatbots like Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT continue to herald significant progress, but are still wrought with inaccurate, nonsensical and misleading information — hallucinations. The content generated can be harmful, unsafe, and often misused. LLMs today are not fully trustworthy, by the standards we should expect for full adoption of any software products. Are Writing and Coding Occupations at Risk? In her recent blog, Why thinking Hurts After Using AI, Hu writes, 'Seduced by AI's convenience, I'd rush through tasks, sending unchecked emails and publishing unvetted content,' and surmises that 'frequent AI usage is actively reshaping our critical thinking patterns.' Hu references OpenAI and UPenn study from 2023 that looks at the labor market impact from these LLMs. It states that tasks that involve science and critical thinking are the tasks that would be safe; however, those which involve programming and writing would be at risk. Hu cautions, 'however, this study is two years old, and at the pace of AI, it needs updating.' She explains, 'AI is very good at drafting articles, summarizing and formatting. However, we humans are irreplaceable when it comes to strategizing or discussing topics that are highly domain specific. Various research found that AI's knowledge is only surface level. This becomes especially apparent when it comes to originality.' Hu explains that when crafting marketing copy, 'we initially thought AI could handle all the writing. However, we noticed that AI tends to use repetitive phrases and predictable patterns, often constructing sentences like, "It's not about X, it's about Y," or overusing em-dashes. These patterns are easy to spot and can make the writing feel dull and uninspired.' For companies like Duolingo whose CEO promises to be an 'AI-first company,' replacing their contract employees is perhaps a knee-jerk decision that has yet to be brought to bear. The employee memo clarified that 'headcount will only be given if a team cannot automate more of their work.' The company was willing to take 'small hits on quality than move slowly and miss the moment.' For companies like this, Hu argues that they will run into trouble very soon and begin rehiring just to fix AI generated bugs or security issues. Generative AI for coding can be inaccurate because models were trained on Github, or similar databases. She explains, 'Every database has its own quirks and query syntax, and many contain hidden data or schema errors. If you rely on AI-generated sample code to wire them into your system, you risk importing references to tables or drivers that don't exist, using unsafe or deprecated connection methods, and overlooking vital error-handling or transaction logic. These mismatches can cause subtle bugs, security gaps, and performance problems—making integration far more error-prone than it first appears.' Another important consideration is cybersecurity, which must be approached holistically. 'If you focus on securing just one area, you might fix a vulnerability but miss the big picture,' she said. She points to the third issue: Junior developers using tools like Copilot often become overly confident in the code these tools generate. And when asked to explain their code, many are unable to do it because they don't truly understand what was produced. Hu concedes that AI is good at producing code quickly, however it is a only part (25-75%) of software development, 'People often ignore the parts that we do need: architecture, design, security. Humans are needed to configure the system properly for the system to run as a whole.' She explains that the parts of code that will be replaced by AI will be routine and repetitive, so this is an opportune moment for developers to transition, advising 'To thrive in the long term, how should we — as thinking beings —develop our capacity for complex, non-routine problem-solving? Specifically, how do we cultivate skills for ambiguous challenges that require analysis beyond pattern recognition (where AI excels)?' The Contradiction of Legacy Education and The Competition for Knowledge Creation In a recent article from the NY Times. 'Everyone is Cheating their Way through College,' a student remarked, 'With ChatGPT, I can write an essay in two hours that normally takes 12.' Cheating is not new, but as one student exclaimed, 'the ceiling has been blown off.' A professor remarks, 'Massive numbers of students are going to emerge from university with degrees, and into the workforce, who are essentially illiterate.' For Hu, removing AI from the equation does not negate cheating. Those who genuinely want to learn will choose how to use the tools wisely. Hu was at a recent panel discussion at Greenwich University and Hu commented to a question from a professor about whether to ban students from using AI: 'Banning AI in education misses the point. AI can absolutely do good in education, but we need to find a way so students don't offload their thinking to AI and lose the purpose of learning itself. The goal should be fostering critical thinking, not just policing the latest shortcut.' Another professor posed the question, 'If a student is not a native English speaker, but the exam requires them to write an essay in English, which approach is better? Hu commented that not one professor on this panel could answer the question. The situation was unfathomable and far removed from situations covered by current policy and governance. She observes, 'There is already a significant impact on education and many important decisions have yet to be made. It's difficult to make clear choices right now because so much depends on how technology will evolve and how fast the government and schools can adapt.' For educational institutions that have traditionally been centers of knowledge creation, the rise of AI is powerful — one that often feels more like a competitor than a tool. As a result, it has left schools struggling to determine how AI should be integrated to support student learning. Meanwhile, schools face a dilemma: many have been using generative AI to develop lessons, curricula, even review students' performance, yet the institution remains uncertain and inconsistent in their overall approach to AI. On a broader scale, the incentive structures within education are evolving. The obsession with grades have 'prevented teachers from using assessments that would support meaningful learning.' The shift towards learning and critical thinking may be the hope that students need to tackle an environment with pervasive AI. MIT Study Sites Cognitive Decline with Increasing LLM Use MIT Media Lab produced a recent study that monitored the brain activity of about 60 research subjects. These participants were asked to write essays on given topics and were split into three groups: 1) use LLM only 2) use traditional search engine only 3) use only their brain and no other external aid. The conclusion: 'LLM users showed significantly weaker neural connectivity, indicating lower cognitive effort and engagement compared to others.' Brain connectivity is scaled down with the amount of external support. This MIT brain scans show: Writing with Google dims your brain by up to 48%. ChatGPT pulls the plug, with 55% less neural connectivity. Some other findings: Hu noticed that the term 'cognitive decline' was misleading since the study was conducted over a four-month period. We've yet to see the long-term effects. However, she acknowledges that in one study about how humans develop amnesia suggests just this: either we use it or lose it. She adds, 'While there are also biological factors involved such as changes in brain proteins, reduced brain activity is thought to increase the risk of diseases that affect memory.' The MIT study found that the brain-only group showed much more active brain waves compared to the search-only and LLM-only groups. In the latter two groups, participants relied on external sources for information. The search-only group still needed some topic understanding to look up information, and like using a calculator — you must understand its functions to get the right answer. In contrast, the LLM-only group simply had to remember the prompt used to generate the essay, with little to no actual cognitive processing involved. As Hu noted, 'there was little mechanism formulating when only AI was used in writing an essay. This ease of using AI, just by inputting natural language, is what makes it dangerous in the long run.' AI Won't Replace Humans, but Humans using AI Will — is Bull S***! Hu pointed to this phrase that has been circulating on the web: 'AI won't Replace Humans, but Humans using AI Will.' She argues that this kind of pressure will compel people to use AI, engineered from a position of fear explaining, 'If we refer to those studies on AI and critical thinking released last year, it is less about whether we use AI but more about our mindset, which determine how we interact with AI and what consequences you encounter.' Hu pointed to a list of concepts she curated from various studies she called AI's traits — how AI could impact our behavior: Hu stresses that we need to be aware of these traits when we work with AI on a daily basis and be mindful that we maintain our own critical thinking. 'Have a clear vision of what you're trying to achieve and continue to interrogate output from AI,' she advises. Shifting the Narrative So Humans are AI-Ready Humanity is caught in a tug of war between the provocation to adopt or be left behind and the warning to minimize dependence on a system that is far from trustworthy. When it comes to education, Hu, in her analysis of the MIT study, advocates for delaying AI integration. First, invest in independent self-directed learning to build the capacity for critical thinking, memory retention, and cognitive engagement. Secondly, make concerted efforts to use AI as a supplement — not a substitute. Finally, teach students to be mindful of AI's cognitive costs and lingering consequences. Encourage them to engage critically — knowing when to rely on AI and when to intervene with their own judgement. She realizes, 'In the education sector, there is a gap between the powerful tool and understanding how to properly leverage it. It's important to develop policy that sets boundaries for both students and faculty for AI responsible use.' Hu insists that implementing AI in the workforce needs to be done with tolerance and compassion. She points to a recent manifesto by Tobi Lütke's Shopify CEO, that called for an immediate and universal AI adoption within the company — a new uncompromising standard for current and future employees. This memo shared AI will be the baseline for work integration, improving productivity, setting performance standards which mandates a total acceptance of the technology. Hu worries that CEOs like Lütke are wielding AI to intimidate employees to work harder, or else! She alluded to one of the sections that demanded employees to demonstrate why a task could not be accomplished with AI before asking for more staff or budget as she asserts, 'This manifesto is not about innovation at all. It feels threatening and if I were an employee of Shopify, I would be in constant fear of losing my job. That kind of speech is unnecessary.' Hu emphasized that this would only discourage employees further, and it would embolden CEOs to continue to push the narrative of how AI is inevitably going to drive layoffs. She cautions CEOs to pursue an understanding of AI's limitations for to ensure sustainable benefit for their organizations. She encourages CEOs to pursue a practical AI strategy that complements workforce adoption, considers current data gaps, systems, and cultural limitations that will have more sustainable payoffs. Many CEOs today may be more likely to pursue a message with AI, 'we can achieve anything,' but this deviates from reality. Instead, develop transparent communication in lock-step with each AI implementation, that clarifies how AI will be leveraged to meet those goals, and what this will this mean for the organization. Finally, for individuals, Hu advises, 'To excel in a more pervasive world of AI, you need to clearly understand your personal goals and commit your effort to the more challenging ones requiring sustained mental effort. This is a significant step to start building the discipline and skills needed to succeed.' There was no mention, this time, of 'AI' in Hu's counsel. And rightly so — humans should own their efforts and outcomes. AI is a mere sidekick.
