Gender gap on abortion rights hit record high: Gallup
The gender gap between men and women who identify as pro-choice has widened to its largest point on record, according to a new Gallup poll.
Sixty-one percent of women view themselves as pro-choice when it comes to abortion while 41 percent of men call themselves pro-choice, the poll released Monday found.
The 20-point difference between the genders is the largest gap since Gallup began tracking public opinion on abortion twenty years ago.
The numbers are slightly lower than they were last year, knocking down the overall percentage of U.S. adults who consider themselves to be pro-choice to 51 percent.
Gallup noticed an immediate increase in support for abortion access among Americans after the Supreme Court's decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had established a constitutional right to abortion.
In 2022, the percentage of U.S. adults who considered themselves pro-choice increased to 55 percent, up from 49 percent the previous year.
Women's support for abortion access though has significantly outweighed men's since then.
In 2022, 61 percent of women called themselves pro-choice, marking a 9-point increase from the year before.
Meanwhile, 48 percent of men referred to themselves as pro-choice that same year, representing a 3-point increase from 2021.
Women's support for abortion access has since generally increased or remained steady, while men's support has fallen.
'The net result is that the gender and partisan gaps in Americans' views on abortion are at historical highs, and the country as a whole has moved slightly left in its abortion views,' wrote Lydia Saad, director of social research at Gallup.
'Although some of the changes seen in 2022 have eased, the public opinion landscape remains more accepting of abortion than it was prior to Dobbs.'
Gallup's poll findings are based on telephone interviews of 1,003 adults across all 50 states and Washington, D.C., conducted May 1-18.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
40 minutes ago
- USA Today
Southern Baptists vote to seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling
Southern Baptists vote to seek repeal of historic same-sex marriage ruling Show Caption Hide Caption The Southern Baptist Convention in 2025: The key issues The Southern Baptist Convention is the nation's largest Protestant denomination denomination. It is headquartered in Nashville. The resolution approved seeks to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as the historic U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage. The June 10 vote by the nation's largest Protestant denomination represents a doubling down on issues of gender and sexuality. DALLAS − The Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution supporting a concerted effort to reverse Obergefell v. Hodges as the historic U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage approaches its 10-year anniversary. The June 10 vote by the nation's largest Protestant denomination represents a doubling down on issues of gender and sexuality as the predominant group of evangelical Christians continues to move sharply to the right and signals the SBC's hopes of replicating the successful campaign to overturn Roe v. Wade. Whether the latest vote will move the needle on gay marriage, a right backed by a strong majority of Americans, remains to be seen. Last year, the SBC passed a resolution condemning the use of in-vitro fertilization, only to see President Donald Trump sign an executive order earlier this year seeking to protect IVF access and reduce its out-of-pocket and health plan costs. Related: He was at the center of a Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage. Now, he's worried. Reversing the Obergefell ruling is one of numerous issues related to sex, gender and marriage encompassed by the resolution. Among other things, the resolution affirms that there are only two genders, defines marriage as between a man and a woman, says families are designed for procreation and that human life is sacred 'from conception to natural death.' The measure describes these declarations not just as Christian convictions but as 'universal truths' 'essential for a healthy, just and free society.' 'Our culture is increasingly rejecting and distorting these truths by redefining marriage, pursuing willful childlessness which contributes to a declining fertility rate, ignoring and suppressing the biological differences between male and female, encouraging gender confusion, undermining parental rights, and denying the value and dignity of children,' the resolution says. The resolution also opposes commercial surrogacy and normalization of 'transgender ideology,' saying policies that deny the 'biological reality of male and female' are legal fictions. It opposes laws and policies compelling people 'to speak falsehoods about sex and gender' and calls for the permanent defunding of Planned Parenthood. Last year, the convention narrowly rejected a constitutional ban on female pastors, a measure that required a two-thirds majority to pass. The SBC has disfellowshipped seven churches – including Southern California's megachurch Saddleback Church – for embracing egalitarian views on women in ministry as opposed to the complementarian position espoused by the convention, which holds that men and women have different roles. The Supreme Court's rightward swing and the election of President Donald Trump have emboldened the convention's more conservative factions and Christian political activists, who see the moment as ripe for a shift in American jurisprudence. 'It's time for us to take back our nation,' said Chad Connelly of Faith Wins, an organization focused on getting out the Christian vote. 'I believe we've been given an opportunity and the time is now.' Resolutions are non-binding statements expressing the convention's views on social and cultural issues. Other resolutions at past SBC annual meetings have reasserted Southern Baptist opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, though this year's resolution was the most forceful articulation of their rebuke of the Supreme Court precedent protecting same-sex marriage. Delegates, called messengers, overwhelmingly approved the resolution after little debate on its language. A strongly traditionalist voice in the SBC, Denny Burk, proposed the language in the resolution that messengers ultimately approved. Burk is the president of Louisville-based Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, an advocacy group that was behind two well-known, cross-evangelical statements opposing LGBTQ+ rights. The first statement was the Danvers Statement in 1987 and the second was the Nashville Statement in 2017. 'It is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness,' the Nashville Statement said. 'Approval of homosexual immorality or transgenderism is a matter of moral indifference about which otherwise faithful Christians should agree to disagree.' The new resolution approved by the SBC is another iteration of the Nashville Statement, but more forcefully attacks the U.S. jurisprudence protecting the LGBTQ+ rights that evangelicals oppose. Contributing: Liam Adams of The Tennessean This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Politico
41 minutes ago
- Politico
There's one vice RFK Jr. isn't talking about
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made it his mission to remind Americans that they need to get off the couch and lay off the junk food. But there's one vice he's not talking about: smoking. That's troubled anti-smoking activists, researchers who focus on the diseases tobacco causes and Democrats in Congress who point out that smoking, despite a marked decline in recent years, still leads to more preventable deaths than anything else. Even so, Kennedy didn't mention the health impacts of smoking once in last month's Make America Healthy Again report assessing the biggest threats to Americans' health. That marks a turning point from the priorities of public health officials going back decades, including the Biden administration's, which targeted smoking as part of a moonshot plan to halve cancer death rates. Anti-tobacco advocates fear deemphasizing the dangers of tobacco could slow or even halt progress in driving down smoking rates. 'Attempting to combat chronic disease without tobacco control is like attempting a triathlon without a bicycle,' said Brian King, whom Kennedy pushed out of his job as the Food and Drug Administration's top tobacco regulator in April. 'You're destined for failure before leaving the starting line.' Since President Donald Trump's inauguration, his health agencies appear to have shelved two moves King planned to combat smoking, banning the last remaining legal cigarette flavoring, menthol, and requiring companies to reduce the amount of nicotine in their products. Nicotine is what makes cigarettes addictive. But an HHS spokesperson said the department 'remains steadfast in its mission to protect and promote public health,' adding that the MAHA report is not an 'exhaustive inventory of every HHS program or public health challenge.' 'HHS agencies continue to carry out their responsibilities, including work on tobacco control, with the highest level of integrity and commitment to the American public,' the spokesperson said. A sustained public health campaign to educate Americans about smoking's risks over decades has driven a huge decrease in use. In the 1960s, more than 4 in 10 adults smoked cigarettes. Now it's fewer than 1 in 8. And the public health success among kids is even starker. Fewer than 1 in 26 now smoke cigarettes, according to an analysis of federal data. The negative health impacts of tobacco use are well-studied and vast. For years it has been the top preventable cause of death in the United States, contributing to cancer, heart disease and stroke. But when Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) quizzed Kennedy about that during a budget hearing last month, asking him to name the 'No. 1 cause of preventable death in America today,' Kennedy was stumped. 'I'm not sure what you're talking about,' he said. Kennedy's apparent lack of interest in combating smoking — the word 'tobacco' appears in the MAHA report only within the context of his concerns about food marketing while 'smoking' and 'cigarettes' are never mentioned — also suggests this Trump administration won't be like the first. Then, Trump's FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, put the menthol ban and the limits on nicotine on the table, drawing applause from anti-smoking activists. Congress permitted the agency to make those moves in a 2009 law. That law banned flavorings except menthol — which is a cash cow for Marlboro cigarette maker Philip Morris, whose support helped get the law passed — but gave the FDA the power to decide whether to ban it. It also gave the agency the power to force cigarette companies to reduce nicotine levels. The Obama administration didn't do so. President Joe Biden proposed limiting nicotine levels after the 2024 election but never finalized the rule. A Biden plan to ban menthol cigarettes in 2022 was also not finalized. Menthol is popular among Black smokers and some Democrats feared a ban could alienate crucial voters in a presidential election year. Jerome Adams, who was surgeon general during the first Trump term, said he wants Kennedy to prioritize the tobacco regulations laid out in Gottlieb's tobacco regulation plan — an effort he said would benefit youth and marginalized communities that are disproportionately impacted by menthol cigarettes. 'These proposed regulations align with the MAHA movement's focus on preventing chronic diseases,' Adams said. The tobacco industry spent heavily on Trump's 2024 campaign — and already has a lot to show for it. Trump pledged to 'save' vaping on his social media site, Truth Social, in September after meeting with Vapor Technology Association Executive Director Tony Abboud. The Trump administration pushed King — whom the tobacco industry had criticized for years — out of his job leading the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Job dismissals led by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency also gutted the CDC Office on Smoking and Health, which oversees federal smoking cessation programs and studies. The Trump administration also slashed funds the National Institutes of Health disburses to research facilities, which scientists say could imperil tobacco smoking studies. Asked about the industry's contributions to the Trump campaign, White House spokesperson Kush Desai wrote in an email, 'the only special interest guiding the Administration's decision-making is the best interest of the American people.' Tobacco-control advocates say Trump's early moves could undermine the country's progress diminishing smoking and the diseases it causes. 'These levels are decreasing because we have made such a commitment over the past few decades to enact things to work to get these levels down,' said Catharine Young, a Biden administration official who worked on his cancer moonshot initiative. 'But if you stop that or if you don't increase that effort, they're not going to continue to go down. They're either going to flat line, or they're going to start rising again.' Both Democratic and Republican administrations have hesitated to use all the regulatory authorities the 2009 law granted them. After Gottlieb resigned in March 2019, the agency's efforts to advance his 2017 tobacco plan were snuffed out. 'With his resignation, we lost the champion for the 2017 plan, and some months after he resigned, I was literally ordered by political appointees at FDA to stop talking publicly about menthol and nicotine,' said Mitch Zeller, who led the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products before King. Ultimately, Zeller wasn't able to implement a menthol ban or nicotine limits during any of the three administrations he served. During Biden's administration, then-FDA Commissioner Robert Califf enlisted allies outside the government to lobby the White House after agency efforts to ban menthol cigarettes were held up at the Office of Management and Budget. But the final rule was not published before Biden left office. 'They caved to political pressure from cigarette companies,' Zeller said. The FDA estimated the plan to limit nicotine levels in cigarettes proposed during the Biden administration would avert 4.3 million deaths and prevent 48 million youth and young adults from starting habitual cigarette smoking by the end of the century if implemented. And banning menthol cigarettes in the U.S. would cut 324,000 to 654,000 smoking-attributable deaths by 2060, according to modeling studies cited in the 2022 proposal. Luis Pinto, a spokesperson for Reynolds American, the maker of Lucky Strike, Camel and Newport cigarettes, said the company has not yet met with Trump's FDA commissioner, Marty Makary. Pinto said the company is opposed to a menthol cigarette ban because it believes there are 'more effective and sustainable ways to help adult smokers transition away from combustible cigarettes.' 'Rather than setting a nicotine standard, the focus should be on expanding access to a diverse and innovative portfolio of potentially reduced-risk products,' Pinto said. 'Tobacco harm reduction, not prohibition, is the most effective path forward in reducing the health impacts of smoking.' On Capitol Hill, Kennedy has rarely discussed tobacco despite his focus on preventing chronic disease, disappointing lawmakers like Durbin, the second ranking Democrat in the Senate. In an interview with POLITICO, Durbin emphasized the tobacco industry is still a threat to public health, especially as it markets more novel forms of nicotine exposure like vaping, which has become popular among younger Americans. 'The tobacco companies have not given up. Their basic approach is to addict children to their product, and so now they're using vaping and [other] devices to get … high schoolers in America addicted to forms of nicotine,' Durbin said, referring to Gottlieb as a hero. 'I just don't think you can credibly say you're addressing public health in America and ignore tobacco and vaping.' King, who's now with the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, an anti-smoking group, is still hoping to convince Trump officials that going after tobacco needs to be part of the MAHA agenda. And he says he sees hope in the FDA's crackdown on illegal e-cigarettes, which he interprets as a sign the government is looking to snuff out unapproved vaping products. 'We have seen the decimation of tobacco control infrastructure,' King said. 'It's important you have the resources and the people.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Biden's COVID czar hammers RFK Jr. over vaccine panel overhaul
Former White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha, who served under President Biden, criticized the decision by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to fire all 17 experts on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel. Kennedy announced the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal Monday, saying, 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' But in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Jha pushed back against Kennedy's reasoning. 'Look what he said in his op-ed was a series of nonsense about a group of individuals, experts…who shape what vaccines, if any, are going to be available to the American people,' Jha said in the interview. 'So obviously this is very concerning,' he continued. 'We'll have to see who he appoints next. But this is a step in the wrong direction.' Jha said he is concerned about what the move foretells about the secretary's agenda on vaccines. Jha pointed to what he characterized as a lackluster response from the secretary to 'the worst measles outbreak of the last 25 years.' He also expressed concern about Kennedy raising questions about vaccines causing autism, which Jha dismissed and said was 'settled science.' 'Then you put this in the middle of all of that,' Jha said, referring to the vaccine panel sweep, 'and what you have is a pretty clear picture that what Secretary Kennedy is trying to do is make sure that vaccines are not readily available to Americans, not just for kids, for the elderly.' 'He could go pretty far with this move, and I really am worried about where we're headed,' Jha continued. He said he's particularly concerned about the effect Kennedy's move will have on kids and whether they will continue having access to certain vaccines in the future. 'Kids rely on vaccines. I'm worried about whether the next generation of kids are going to have access to polio vaccines and measles vaccines. That's where we're heading. That's what we have to push back against.' Kennedy said in his op-ed that he was removing every member of the panel to give the Trump administration an opportunity to appoint its own members. Kennedy has long accused ACIP members of having conflicts of interest, sparking concern among vaccine advocates that he would seek to install members who are far more skeptical of approving new vaccines. But Jha pushed back against criticism that the panel was all Biden-appointed experts, saying, 'When the Biden administration came in, almost all of the appointees had come from the first Trump administration.' 'That was fine because they were good people,' he said. 'They were experts. Right now, it's the same thing. The people he is firing are experts — like a nurse in Illinois who spent her entire career getting kids vaccinated, cancer doctors from Memorial Sloan Kettering — like these are really good people.' 'And generally, CDC has not worried about when were they appointed. The question is, are they good and are they conflict free.'
