Renewed calls to end colony-cage egg farms
By Gianina Schwanecke of RNZ
There are renewed calls from animal rights advocates for an end to colony-cage egg farms.
The Open Wing Alliance launched an international campaign about conditions in caged egg production farms which they said were harmful for chickens' welfare and created conditions that increased the risk of disease like avian influenza.
However, the Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand rejected such claims as "a nonsense".
Jennifer Dutton, of Animals Aotearoa, which is part of the Open Wing Alliance, shared their concerns.
She said colony cages weren't much better than battery, or conventional cages, which were phased out of use in New Zealand over 10 years by 2023.
"New Zealanders are under the impression we don't have caged eggs and that's been deliberately cultivated," she said.
"We still very much have the colony cage. Sometimes called the enriched cage."
Dutton said she wanted an end to colony cages in New Zealand too.
"When we look at birds that have been trapped in colony cages stacked up as if they are a product, you see birds that are massively missing feather patches, you see pale cones. They're totally deprived of all those natural in-built chicken behaviours, scratching in the dirt, foraging for bugs, even fully stretching out their wings."
However, Michael Brooks of the Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand said colony egg farms were a "credible system".
He said the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) "unanimously and independently" decided to allow egg producers to move to colony cages, barns and free-range systems after the ban of battery cages.
"The height is higher, they have a nesting area, they have a scratch pad, and they have perches for every bird. And the three primary welfare behaviours of a layer hen are nesting, perching and scratching," he said.
"Therefore that is one of the reasons there was support for the colony system. Combine that with the reduced risk from environmental reasons is one of the reasons it was approved by NAWAC."
Of concerns raised about the potential spread of avian influenza in such set-ups, he said it was "a nonsense".
"Avian influenza is in the environment. It's actually our free-range operations that are most at risk from avian influenza. It's not the colony sector that's going to be a major risk."
Brooks said the federation and the Poultry Industry Association of New Zealand (PIANZ) had been working closely with farmers, along with the Ministry for Primary Industries, to try and mitigate the risks of avian influenza spreading.
MPI's director of compliance and response Glen Burrell said of the seven complaints received by the ministry this year about the welfare of layer hens on commercial farms, no offending was found in six, with one case still being investigated.
Burrell said following the ban of conventional, or battery cages, egg producers had the option to move to colony cages, barns and free-range systems.
He said it was decided by NAWAC that colony cages and barns provided more space than battery cages, and enable hens to express normal behaviours such as perching, pecking, nesting, and scratching.
NAWAC plans to review of the Code of Welfare for layer hens as part of its work programme.
Meanwhile the Commerce Commission has opened a compliance project in relation to the labelling of colony-laid eggs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Feral Cats On The Predator Free 2050 List? Why It's Dangerous And Unethical
New Zealanders have just days to stop feral cats from being officially labelled a ' predator for eradication' in the Predator Free 2050 strategy. Public submissions close 5pm Monday, 30th June 2025. The proposal to list feral cats as a target for eradication by 2050 is a serious threat to animal welfare and public values, and it is being advanced without a genuine national conversation or broad public engagement. Feral cats certainly pose a risk to sensitive New Zealand ecosystems, but inclusion on the PF2050 list promotes a fanatical, eradication-at-all-costs mentality that is neither humane nor scientifically sound. Here's why Flora and Fauna of Aotearoa opposes the move to add cats to the list, and why we need you to speak up. Feral cats come from us – not the wild Feral cats are not a distinct species. They originate from lost, abandoned, or unneutered pet cats. With 40% of New Zealand households sharing their homes with at least one cat (1), there is a continual flow of domestic cats into the stray and feral population. This is a human-made issue. Trying to 'eradicate' feral cats while ignoring the source is like bailing out a boat without fixing the leak. The answer lies in responsible pet ownership: desexing, microchipping, and preventing abandonment. A national strategy is needed at the source of the problem. Eradication is not only impossible – it is inhumane PF2050 is an eradication framework that seeks to eradicate certain predator species by 2050. Including feral cats in this list would invite cruelty under the guise of conservation. We already see horrific experimentation, abuse and hate towards cats and other 'pest animals' in New Zealand, and this step will make things worse. The infamous 'possum punch' that was videoed and shared on social media (2) and the kitten from Beach Haven who had its 'tail ripped off' and a threatening note sent to its owner stating 'Ur cats are dead,' (3) show the kind of abuse these animals can be subject to. Another example is the highly questionable use of 1080-poisoned rat carcasses to indirectly kill cats on Rakiura, Stewart Island, by The Department of Conservation (4). These secondary poisoning methods cause prolonged sickness and painful deaths in violation of the Animal Welfare Act 1999 (sec. 12 (c)) (5). This is not humane pest control – it is state-sanctioned animal cruelty. What is secondary poisoning? Secondary poisoning happens when an animal eats another animal that has already ingested poison – for example, a cat consuming a poisoned rat. In DOC ' s current operations, this is not accidental – it is intentional. The method causes prolonged suffering, as poisons like 1080 can take hours or days to kill. It is indiscriminate, inhumane, and deeply unethical, especially when aimed at sentient animals like cats. A threat to your pets – and social licence Adding feral cats to the list will make them fair game for anyone with a trap. The Predator Free vision includes 'everyone from professionals to school children'. That means cats – feral or not – are at risk from amateurs targeting stray or pet cats and using poorly set, infrequently checked traps. The reality is, many people do not draw a clear distinction between feral, stray and pet cats and are not responsible or compassionate enough to carry out work that should be done by professionals. We are already seeing it happen. Reported in Paerata Rise, south of Auckland in 2024, 20 cats went missing in a single year. Residents suspect feral cat trapping is the cause. One stray, adopted by a dementia patient, was found hanging from a trap. Local SPCA data showed at least 12 pet cats were caught and released by the same programme. Others were never seen again. (6) Pet cats have been commonly targeted by neighbourhood self-proclaimed 'cat haters' and comments sections online are frequently littered with comments like 'the only good cat is a dead cat' and other hate directed at cats. This is not 'predator control' – it is the destruction of people's family members and emotional support animals. No safeguards, no accountability Unlike stoats or rats, cats are emotionally significant animals to many New Zealanders. Yet, no mechanisms have been proposed to prevent pet or stray cats from becoming collateral damage if feral cats are listed. Calls for trappers to check for microchips or photograph their catch have been ridiculed by Predator Free advocates. In one response, a community trapper dismissed suggestions to use microchip scanners as 'ridiculous' – stating it is impossible to scan a panicked animal in a trap. (7) Yet SPCA policy clearly advocates for humane treatment, desexing, and scanning stray animals to reunite them with owners. There are no enforcement tools or accountability measures to prevent backyard trapping from turning lethal. Feral cats do affect wildlife – but they also control pests We do not deny that feral cats pose a threat in ecologically sensitive areas. In some places, targeted control is necessary – and it is already happening. But the story is more complex. Feral cats also prey on rabbits, rats, mice, and even stoats. If feral cats were to be removed from areas where they are actually managing other pest species adequately, we risk triggering a 'mesopredator release–' which means allowing smaller pests like rats, mice, and stoats to surge. This can result in native wildlife losing predatorawareness over time. (8) Research shows that when predators are removed, prey species often fail to recognise threats. (9) This reduces the resilience and natural instincts of our native species, making them even more vulnerable. Taking a holistic, sustainable approach means caring for the environment in a way that honours balance, relationship, and long-term responsibility – it requires taking the whole picture into account. Rather than chasing eradication as an ideological goal, a holistic approach guides us to seek thoughtful, humane, and ecologically grounded solutions that respect all life, including animals caught in the margins of human impact. Management works. It just needs support. Feral cats are highly adaptive and widespread, and with a huge population of domestic and stray cats, eradication is simply not achievable across mainland New Zealand. What is achievable, though, is significantly improved management – and this is exactly what welfare groups and many others working in animal management have been asking for. What we need is not a new predator listing, but proper investment in feral cat management. Humane strategies already exist. They include: Desexing and microchipping to reduce stray populations at the source. Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) programmes for strays, which have proven effective in areas.(10) Professionally-led control in ecologically sensitive zones. National education campaigns around responsible pet ownership. Targeted funding for programmes, councils and community groups already doing the work. Cats are woven into our homes, hearts, and culture Cats have lived alongside humans for thousands of years. In Aotearoa today, more than 1.26 million cats live in people's homes. They provide companionship, emotional support, and pest control. Companion Animals NZ notes that 68% of people acquire cats for love and affection.(11) The backlash to Gareth Morgan's infamous 2013 call to eliminate domestic cats (12) proved just how deeply this country cares about its cats. The SPCA and other animal welfare advocates have made their position clear: while feral cat populations may need to be controlled, eradication through inhumane or indiscriminate methods is unacceptable.(13) Eradication is not ethical. It is not practical. And it is not the New Zealand way. See the Flora and Fauna of Aotearoa website to read our full recommendations and answer to the DOC's consultation questions. Flora and Fauna website: References and Links: Link to the online submission form. Questions 15 and 16 (at the very end) relate to feral cats. Read more about the strategy review. 1 'Companion animals in New Zealand: NZ pet data report 2024', 2 'Animal cruelty or pest control? Video shows possum being punched in the face', 3 'Beach Haven community rally around mother after kitten's tail 'ripped off' and threatening note left', 4 'Planned Rakiura 1080 drop criticised', 5 Animal Welfare Act 1999, 6 'The trapper, the developer and the case of Paerata's missing pets', 7 'The trapper, the developer and the case of Paerata's missing pets', 8 'The rise of the mesopredator', 9 'Predicting predator recognition in a changing world', 10 'Assessment of a targeted Trap-Neuter-Return pilot study in Auckland, New Zealand', 11 'Companion animals in New Zealand: NZ pet data report 2024', 12 'The cat menace',
Otago Daily Times
16 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Animal rights advocates renew calls to end colony-cage egg farms
By Gianina Schwanecke of RNZ There are renewed calls from animal rights advocates for an end to colony-cage egg farms. The Open Wing Alliance launched an international campaign about conditions in caged egg production farms which they said were harmful for chickens' welfare and created conditions that increased the risk of disease like avian influenza. However, the Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand rejected such claims as "a nonsense". Jennifer Dutton, of Animals Aotearoa, which is part of the Open Wing Alliance, shared their concerns. She said colony cages weren't much better than battery, or conventional cages, which were phased out of use in New Zealand over 10 years by 2023. "New Zealanders are under the impression we don't have caged eggs and that's been deliberately cultivated," she said. "We still very much have the colony cage. Sometimes called the enriched cage." Dutton said she wanted an end to colony cages in New Zealand too. "When we look at birds that have been trapped in colony cages stacked up as if they are a product, you see birds that are massively missing feather patches, you see pale cones. They're totally deprived of all those natural in-built chicken behaviours, scratching in the dirt, foraging for bugs, even fully stretching out their wings." However, Michael Brooks of the Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand said colony egg farms were a "credible system". He said the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) "unanimously and independently" decided to allow egg producers to move to colony cages, barns and free-range systems after the ban of battery cages. "The height is higher, they have a nesting area, they have a scratch pad, and they have perches for every bird. And the three primary welfare behaviours of a layer hen are nesting, perching and scratching," he said. "Therefore that is one of the reasons there was support for the colony system. Combine that with the reduced risk from environmental reasons is one of the reasons it was approved by NAWAC." Of concerns raised about the potential spread of avian influenza in such set-ups, he said it was "a nonsense". "Avian influenza is in the environment. It's actually our free-range operations that are most at risk from avian influenza. It's not the colony sector that's going to be a major risk." Brooks said the federation and the Poultry Industry Association of New Zealand (PIANZ) had been working closely with farmers, along with the Ministry for Primary Industries, to try and mitigate the risks of avian influenza spreading. MPI's director of compliance and response Glen Burrell said of the seven complaints received by the ministry this year about the welfare of layer hens on commercial farms, no offending was found in six, with one case still being investigated. Burrell said following the ban of conventional, or battery cages, egg producers had the option to move to colony cages, barns and free-range systems. He said it was decided by NAWAC that colony cages and barns provided more space than battery cages, and enable hens to express normal behaviours such as perching, pecking, nesting, and scratching. NAWAC plans to review of the Code of Welfare for layer hens as part of its work programme. Meanwhile the Commerce Commission has opened a compliance project in relation to the labelling of colony-laid eggs.
Otago Daily Times
16 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Renewed calls to end colony-cage egg farms
By Gianina Schwanecke of RNZ There are renewed calls from animal rights advocates for an end to colony-cage egg farms. The Open Wing Alliance launched an international campaign about conditions in caged egg production farms which they said were harmful for chickens' welfare and created conditions that increased the risk of disease like avian influenza. However, the Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand rejected such claims as "a nonsense". Jennifer Dutton, of Animals Aotearoa, which is part of the Open Wing Alliance, shared their concerns. She said colony cages weren't much better than battery, or conventional cages, which were phased out of use in New Zealand over 10 years by 2023. "New Zealanders are under the impression we don't have caged eggs and that's been deliberately cultivated," she said. "We still very much have the colony cage. Sometimes called the enriched cage." Dutton said she wanted an end to colony cages in New Zealand too. "When we look at birds that have been trapped in colony cages stacked up as if they are a product, you see birds that are massively missing feather patches, you see pale cones. They're totally deprived of all those natural in-built chicken behaviours, scratching in the dirt, foraging for bugs, even fully stretching out their wings." However, Michael Brooks of the Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand said colony egg farms were a "credible system". He said the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) "unanimously and independently" decided to allow egg producers to move to colony cages, barns and free-range systems after the ban of battery cages. "The height is higher, they have a nesting area, they have a scratch pad, and they have perches for every bird. And the three primary welfare behaviours of a layer hen are nesting, perching and scratching," he said. "Therefore that is one of the reasons there was support for the colony system. Combine that with the reduced risk from environmental reasons is one of the reasons it was approved by NAWAC." Of concerns raised about the potential spread of avian influenza in such set-ups, he said it was "a nonsense". "Avian influenza is in the environment. It's actually our free-range operations that are most at risk from avian influenza. It's not the colony sector that's going to be a major risk." Brooks said the federation and the Poultry Industry Association of New Zealand (PIANZ) had been working closely with farmers, along with the Ministry for Primary Industries, to try and mitigate the risks of avian influenza spreading. MPI's director of compliance and response Glen Burrell said of the seven complaints received by the ministry this year about the welfare of layer hens on commercial farms, no offending was found in six, with one case still being investigated. Burrell said following the ban of conventional, or battery cages, egg producers had the option to move to colony cages, barns and free-range systems. He said it was decided by NAWAC that colony cages and barns provided more space than battery cages, and enable hens to express normal behaviours such as perching, pecking, nesting, and scratching. NAWAC plans to review of the Code of Welfare for layer hens as part of its work programme. Meanwhile the Commerce Commission has opened a compliance project in relation to the labelling of colony-laid eggs.
