Navigating Automotive Supply Chain Disruption: Insights From DP World's David D'Annunzio
The automotive supply chain is being actively reshaped by global disruption, rapid innovation, and shifting trade dynamics. In this interview, 'Inside the Automotive Supply Chain with DP World's David D'Annunzio,' learn more about why the automotive supply chain is in constant flux, how DP World balances 'asset appropriate' strategies, the rising influence of Chinese automakers, and what's driving change in inter-Americas trade.
Navigating a 'pressure-cooked' sector
Drawing from decades of experience, D'Annunzio underscored the intense pressures unique to automotive supply chains, where factories rely on precise sequencing to produce vehicles every 60 seconds. Any misstep, he noted, could halt operations, making it an intensely 'pressure-cooked' sector.
Adding to this high-stakes environment is the long-term effects of outsourcing parts production from local suppliers to low-cost countries such as China, India, and Pakistan. While this has increased efficiency and lowered costs over the past few decades, it has also increased market and supply chain vulnerability as global disruptions persist.
DP World's proactive approach to disruption
DP World's distinctive 'asset-appropriate' strategy – acquiring assets strategically rather than adhering strictly to an 'asset-light' model – positions them advantageously. Simply put, 'asset-light' companies prefer not owning physical assets like ships or trucks, opting instead to lease or outsource.
In contrast, DP World chooses to own these assets strategically when it makes financial and operational sense, ensuring readiness and reliability during disruptions. As D'Annunzio pointed out, companies with resources readily available are primed to lead when inevitable supply chain disruptions occur.
China's disruption of the global automotive industry
Highlighting emerging industry trends, D'Annunzio spoke of the rapid ascendence of Chinese automotive manufacturing. Chinese electric vehicles, like BYD's Seagull, are poised to upend the global market – a Seagull can be purchased for $10,000 and offers features and quality equivalent to a $40,000 U.S.-manufactured car. D'Annunzio speculated that we could soon see Chinese automakers entering the U.S. market through partnerships with domestic firms – a scenario mirroring China's own strategy from decades past when U.S. manufacturers entered their market.
Learn more
To hear more from David D'Annunzio and explore deeper insights on the future of automotive supply chains, watch the full interview here.
Visit 3BL Media to see more multimedia and stories from DP World
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
China automakers' price war, overcapacity hurt finances
(Reuters) -China's auto sector is reeling from overcapacity and an extended price war, raising alarm among regulators and industry executives who warn the turmoil is undermining the sector's long-term viability. China's top leaders have pledged to step up regulation of aggressive price-cutting and support the orderly phasing out of outdated production capacity, state media reported earlier this month. LSEG data for 33 listed automakers headquartered in China show a broad deterioration in key financial metrics over the past six years, highlighting the impact of a brutal price war that began in 2023. Data showed that the average time carmakers took to pay their suppliers and other short-term creditors widened to 108 days in 2024 from 99 days in 2019. On June 1, new regulation kicked in, requiring large companies to settle payments within 60 days of receiving goods, engineering services or materials. Joerg Wuttke, Washington-based partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, said that European and German suppliers generally paid suppliers within 40 to 50 days. "That (new regulation) is going to enforce a more level playing field and basically stop these automakers from turning their suppliers into bankers," he said. Among major brands, top electric vehicle seller BYD took an average of 127 days to pay suppliers and other short-term creditors in 2024, up from 81 days in 2019, the LSEG data showed. When asked about the data, BYD said its average payment period to suppliers that covered both accounts payable and notes payable dropped to 127 days by 2024 from 139 days in 2019. Geely Automobile's payment period also rose to 193 days in 2024 from 139 days in 2019, according to LSEG data. Geely declined to comment. Bucking the trend, Great Wall Motor Co shortened its payment cycle to 94 days in 2024 from 115 days in 2019. The company did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. The sector's combined inventory levels more than doubled to 370 billion yuan ($51.55 billion) in 2024 from 2019, even as dealers complained of many firms dumping cars on them to meet high sales targets. Total debt among carmakers surged 56% to 959 billion yuan last year from 2019's level. The median debt-to-equity ratio climbed by 21 percentage points to 51.3%. The sector's median net profit margin fell to just 0.83% in 2024 from 2.7% in 2019. BYD, however, boosted its profit margin to 5.4% from 1.7% in 2019. The company, which makes cars and mobile phone components, attributed the improvement to a change in its business mix as the contribution of automotive-related revenue as a share of total revenue grew from 49.5% to 79.4% over the period. Nio Inc and Xpeng Inc, two of China's best-known EV brands, had among the longest payment periods among the 33 firms. The two companies stretched their payment periods to suppliers and other short-term creditors to 223 days and 237 days, respectively. Both companies continued to remain in the red, although both improved their negative margins sharply over the period. Nio said it would commit to paying suppliers within 60 days. Xpeng said its cash liquidity continued to improve and referred to comments its CEO He Xiaopeng made last Thursday at a media event that the company would also, like other firms, endeavour to meet a commitment to pay suppliers within 60 days as soon as possible. ($1 = 7.1769 Chinese yuan renminbi) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
China automakers' price war, overcapacity hurt finances
(Reuters) -China's auto sector is reeling from overcapacity and an extended price war, raising alarm among regulators and industry executives who warn the turmoil is undermining the sector's long-term viability. China's top leaders have pledged to step up regulation of aggressive price-cutting and support the orderly phasing out of outdated production capacity, state media reported earlier this month. LSEG data for 33 listed automakers headquartered in China show a broad deterioration in key financial metrics over the past six years, highlighting the impact of a brutal price war that began in 2023. Data showed that the average time carmakers took to pay their suppliers and other short-term creditors widened to 108 days in 2024 from 99 days in 2019. On June 1, new regulation kicked in, requiring large companies to settle payments within 60 days of receiving goods, engineering services or materials. Joerg Wuttke, Washington-based partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, said that European and German suppliers generally paid suppliers within 40 to 50 days. "That (new regulation) is going to enforce a more level playing field and basically stop these automakers from turning their suppliers into bankers," he said. Among major brands, top electric vehicle seller BYD took an average of 127 days to pay suppliers and other short-term creditors in 2024, up from 81 days in 2019, the LSEG data showed. When asked about the data, BYD said its average payment period to suppliers that covered both accounts payable and notes payable dropped to 127 days by 2024 from 139 days in 2019. Geely Automobile's payment period also rose to 193 days in 2024 from 139 days in 2019, according to LSEG data. Geely declined to comment. Bucking the trend, Great Wall Motor Co shortened its payment cycle to 94 days in 2024 from 115 days in 2019. The company did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. The sector's combined inventory levels more than doubled to 370 billion yuan ($51.55 billion) in 2024 from 2019, even as dealers complained of many firms dumping cars on them to meet high sales targets. Total debt among carmakers surged 56% to 959 billion yuan last year from 2019's level. The median debt-to-equity ratio climbed by 21 percentage points to 51.3%. The sector's median net profit margin fell to just 0.83% in 2024 from 2.7% in 2019. BYD, however, boosted its profit margin to 5.4% from 1.7% in 2019. The company, which makes cars and mobile phone components, attributed the improvement to a change in its business mix as the contribution of automotive-related revenue as a share of total revenue grew from 49.5% to 79.4% over the period. Nio Inc and Xpeng Inc, two of China's best-known EV brands, had among the longest payment periods among the 33 firms. The two companies stretched their payment periods to suppliers and other short-term creditors to 223 days and 237 days, respectively. Both companies continued to remain in the red, although both improved their negative margins sharply over the period. Nio said it would commit to paying suppliers within 60 days. Xpeng said its cash liquidity continued to improve and referred to comments its CEO He Xiaopeng made last Thursday at a media event that the company would also, like other firms, endeavour to meet a commitment to pay suppliers within 60 days as soon as possible. ($1 = 7.1769 Chinese yuan renminbi) Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Rubio will meet Russian foreign minister in Malaysia with Ukraine tensions high
Advertisement The resumption comes as Russia fires escalating air attacks on Ukraine and as President Donald Trump has become increasingly frustrated with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'Putin is not, he's not treating human beings right,' Trump said during a Cabinet meeting Tuesday, explaining the pause's reversal. 'It's killing too many people. So we're sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine, and I've approved that.' A US diplomatic push could be overshadowed by tariff threats Rubio will also see other foreign ministers, including many whose countries face tariffs set to be imposed on Aug. 1. That threat could overshadow the top diplomat's first official trip to Asia, just as the U.S. seeks to boost relations with Indo-Pacific nations to counter China's growing influence in the region. Trump notified several countries on Monday and Wednesday that they will face higher tariffs if they don't make trade deals with the U.S. Among them are eight of ASEAN's 10 members. Advertisement State Department officials said tariffs and trade will not be Rubio's focus during the meetings, which Trump's Republican administration hopes will prioritize maritime safety and security in the South China Sea, where China has become increasingly aggressive toward its small neighbors, as well as combating transnational crime. But Rubio may be hard-pressed to avoid the tariff issue that has vexed some of America's closest allies and partners in Asia, including Japan and South Korea and most members of ASEAN, which Trump says would face 25% tariffs if there is no deal. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has warned that global trade is being weaponized as U.S. tariffs loom over Southeast Asia. Speaking at an ASEAN foreign ministers' meeting on Wednesday, Anwar urged the bloc to strengthen regional trade and reduce reliance on external powers. Rubio's 'talking points on the China threat will not resonate with officials whose industries are being battered by 30-40% tariffs,' said Danny Russel, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute and a former assistant secretary of state for East Asia and the Pacific during the Obama administration. When Anwar said 'ASEAN will approach challenges 'as a united bloc' — he wasn't talking about Chinese coercion but about U.S. tariffs,' Russel noted. 8 of ASEAN's 10 members face major tariff hikes Among ASEAN states, Trump has so far announced tariffs on almost all of the 10 members of the bloc, which would face a 25% tariff that could specifically hit its electronics and electrical product exports to the United States. Trade Minister Zafrul Aziz said Wednesday that while Malaysia is ready to resume tariff negotiations, it would not cross its red lines, including U.S. requests for changes to government procurement, halal certification, medical standards and digital taxes. Advertisement Trump sent tariff letters to two more ASEAN members Wednesday: Brunei, whose imports would be taxed at 25%, and the Philippines, at 20%. Vietnam recently agreed to a trade deal for 20% tariffs on its imports, while Singapore wasn't part of Trump's original April 2 tariffs. Both are ASEAN countries. The Trump administration has courted most Southeast Asian nations in a bid to blunt or at least temper China's push to dominate the region. In Kuala Lumpur, Rubio also will likely come face-to-face with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his brief visit of roughly 36 hours. Russel noted that Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is a veteran of such gatherings and 'fluent in ASEAN principles and conventions,' while Rubio 'is a rookie trying to sell an 'America First' message to a deeply skeptical audience.' Issues with China, including on trade, human rights, the militarization of the South China Sea and China's support for Russia in Ukraine, remain substantial. U.S. officials continue to accuse China of resupplying and revamping Russia's military industrial sector, allowing it to produce additional weapons that it can use attack Ukraine. Associated Press writer Eileen Ng in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, contributed to this report.
