Keir Starmer says good relationship with Donald Trump based on shared family values
To mark the first anniversary of the Labour government coming to power on Friday, the UK's prime minister spoke to the BBC podcast Political Thinking and said it was 'in the national interest' for the two men to connect.
He said: 'We are different people and we've got different political backgrounds and leanings, but we do have a good relationship and that comes from a number of places.
'I think I do understand what anchors the president, what he really cares about. For both of us, we really care about family and there's a point of connection there.'
In the interview, Starmer said he had a 'good personal relationship' with Trump, and revealed that the first time they spoke was after the then-presidential candidate was shot at a campaign rally in July last year.
The prime minister said Trump had reciprocated with a personal phone call a few days after Starmer's brother Nick died on Boxing Day.
Addressing recent political turmoil, Starmer said he would always 'carry the can' as leader after coming under fire over a climbdown on welfare reforms and that he would 'always take responsibility' when asked questions.
'When things go well … the leader gets the plaudits, but when things don't go well, it is really important that the leader carries the can – and that's what I will always do.'
Starmer also backed Rachel Reeves and said she would be chancellor 'for a very long time to come', after she was visibly tearful in the House of Commons.
The scenes came after the government U-turned on welfare reform plans that put an almost £5bn hole in the chancellor's plans.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Reeves said it was a 'personal matter' which had upset her ahead of prime minister's questions.
Appearing on broadcast media on Friday, one year to the day since the 2024 general election, the home secretary, Yvette Cooper was asked on BBC Breakfast to score the government out of 10. 'I don't think it is for cabinet ministers to mark themselves and mark their own homework,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Indefinite jail terms ‘not right and not fair', Lords say in call to end IPP injustice
Peers have demanded answers over the government's refusal to resentence prisoners trapped under 'no hope' indefinite jail terms, insisting: 'It is not right and it is not fair.' In an impassioned debate in the House of Lords, peers urged prisons minister James Timpson to take decisive action to end the injustice of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) jail terms. Successive governments have refused justice committee recommendations to resentence more than 2,500 prisoners still trapped under the abolished jail term. The open-ended sentences were scrapped in 2012, but not retrospectively, leaving those already jailed incarcerated indefinitely. Victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been highlighted by The Independent, include Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for stealing a mobile phone; Thomas White, 42, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. In a speech as his private members bill to resentence IPP prisoners reached committee stage on Friday, Labour peer Lord Tony Woodley, admitted it will not succeed without government support. Addressing IPP prisoners and their families, he told them not to give up hope, but added: 'Sadly, my Bill by itself will not bring you justice. But it can help build pressure on the government to do the right thing, and it can help build public awareness of this industrial-scale miscarriage of justice. 'So please don't have false hope in my Bill. Hope – but not false hope – is my aim here.' Raising a series of 'probing' amendments designed to 'expose the lack of logic' behind the government's refusal to resentence IPP prisoners, he said it is 'as big a scandal as the Post Office and the infected blood scandal'. 'Almost 100 prisoners have taken their own lives – hundreds more have been driven to insanity, with this no-hope, never-ending sentence,' he said. 'The only difference with IPP is that not enough people know about it.' He reminded the government that almost 700 IPP prisoners have served at least ten years longer than their original minimum tariff. He added: 'How can the government deny resentencing to these people – still inside, over 10 years past their minimum sentence? 'My Lords, let me remind you we are talking about people who have been locked up for over a decade longer than someone else convicted of the exact same crime, but before 2005 or after 2012. 'My Lords, a lot of nonsense is spoken about 'two-tier' justice, but this is one situation where that label seems to apply. It is not right and it is not fair.' His proposals were backed by the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Dr Alice Edwards, who said the jail terms have caused 'unlawful psychological torture' to prisoners. In a statement before the debate, she said: 'It is time to end the perpetual damage caused by the IPP scheme. 'These sentences have caused unlawful psychological torture and ill-treatment to too many prisoners under the care of successive British governments. 'A resentencing court is a promising way forward, in which there could be an initial prioritisation exercise of cases, necessary exclusions and, for those whose mental state requires psychiatric or other intensive treatment, their transfer to a secure mental health facility outside the prison service until such time as they are deemed fit, with regular reviews.' However, prisons minister James Timpson said none of the amendments eased his fears over resentencing, insisting the government's priority is public protection. He said the IPP Action Plan, designed to support each prisoner's progress to release by the parole board, is 'where we will sort this out'. However he vowed to 'pull hard on every operational lever' to address the crisis and said he was carefully considering separate proposals put forward last month by an expert panel convened by the Howard League for Penal Reform. The panel, led by former lord chief justice Lord John Thomas, called for all IPP prisoners to be given a release date within a two-year window at their next parole hearing and for fewer offenders to be recalled.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Welfare cuts U-turn shows extent of UK's fiscal challenges, S&P says
LONDON, July 4 (Reuters) - The inability of Britain's government to make cuts to welfare spending this week underscores the extent of the challenges it faces in repairing its finances, credit rating agency S&P Global said on Friday. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer was forced to scrap 5 billion pounds ($6.83 billion) worth of benefits cuts due to opposition from within his own government, reducing the already razor-thin margin it relies on to meet its self-imposed fiscal rules. "We consider the inability to make modest cuts to welfare spending, which has ballooned in the UK since the 2020 pandemic, underscores the UK government's very limited budgetary room for manoeuvre," S&P said in an analysis. S&P has a "stable" outlook on its AA UK credit rating and though it sees the fiscal position as "vulnerable" it said the direct effect of this week's last-minute policy reversal was small in the context of the country's "existing fiscal challenges". The now-cancelled 5 billion-pound-a-year of mainly disability allowance cuts would have amounted to 0.2% of 2025 GDP, by 2029. That compares with last year's headline government deficit of 5.9% of GDP - equivalent to almost 170 billion pounds. "Getting the deficit down to the pre-pandemic five-year average of 3% of GDP would require a roughly 70 billion pound consolidation effort," said S&P, which is next due to review Britain's rating on October 10. "We expect that the UK's fiscal consolidation will remain a slow process," it added. ($1 = 0.7321 pounds)
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Labour giants Corbyn will aim to oust
Jeremy Corbyn's new hard-Left party is expected to target Labour giants including Wes Streeting and Jess Phillips at the next general election. The former Labour leader, who now sits as an independent MP, broke his silence on Friday to confirm he is in talks about a 'real alternative' to Sir Keir Starmer's party. It comes after Zarah Sultana, an ally of Mr Corbyn who was also stripped of the whip by Sir Keir, announced that the pair would co-lead the new movement. Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana are staunchly pro-Palestine. They have both accused the Israeli government of 'genocide' over its military response to the Oct 7 massacre by Hamas. Labour shed a significant amount of support among Muslim voters at the general election last year after Sir Keir initially refused to call for an immediate ceasefire in the Middle East. The election saw five MPs, including Mr Corbyn, returned to the Commons on a pro-Gaza ticket at the expense of their defeated Labour rivals. Now Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana will hope their own electoral vehicle will be able to make similar gains at the next national poll. Both Mr Streeting, the Health Secretary, and Ms Phillips, the safeguarding minister, won their seats on Jul 4 2024 with majorities of less than 1,000 votes. An analysis by The Telegraph shows they have a significantly higher number of Muslim constituents than the last known England and Wales average of 6.5 per cent. Mr Streeting's Ilford North constituency has a Muslim majority of 30.6 per cent. He only just held on to the seat by 528 votes in the general election. Ms Phillips, meanwhile, has a constituency where 42.6 per cent of voters are Muslim. She won with a majority of 693 votes to beat Jody McIntyre, an independent hard-Left candidate. Her victory speech in Birmingham Yardley was interrupted by pro-Palestinian activists who booed and jeered her as well as chanting 'free Palestine' and 'shame on you'. Ms Phillips said the general election was 'the worst election I have ever stood in' and said she had been targeted by activists because she was a 'strong woman'. Other seats that could be targeted by the new party include Bradford West, where Naz Shah has a majority of 707 and almost three in five constituents (58.7 per cent) are Muslim. In Peterborough, Andrew Pakes has a majority of 155 in a constituency where almost 18 per cent of people are Muslim. The slimmest Labour majority in the country is just 15 votes in Hendon, which is represented by David Pinto-Duschinsky. One in six constituents (16.5 per cent) are Muslim according to the most recent census in 2021. Last year, an analysis by Survation and Royal Holloway identified the most culturally Left-wing seats in the UK. These were Nottingham East, Clapham and Brixton Hill and Hackney North and Stoke Newington. All three constituencies are currently represented by Labour MPs on the Left of the party. Diane Abbott, the MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary but has already ruled out joining his new party. Nadia Whittome, the MP for Nottingham East, worked closely with Ms Sultana on various issues – most prominently the Gaza conflict – while both women had the Labour whip. In Clapham and Brixton Hill, Ms Ribiero-Addy, a member of the Socialist Campaign Group, was one of the Labour MPs to defy Sir Keir earlier this week by voting against his welfare Bill. Mr Corbyn has already joined forces with Shockat Adam, Ayoub Khan, Adnan Hussain and Iqbal Mohamed since their election as independent MPs last summer. They formed the so-called Independent Alliance in September and have gone on to vote as a bloc in the Commons while also issuing a number of joint statements ahead of key votes. It remains to be seen whether Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana could persuade Apsana Begum, who was stripped of the Labour whip last year, to join their new party.
