
‘Resident preference' housing bill unanimously OK'd
Without discussion, the Council voted unanimously Wednesday to adopt Bill 19, meant to ensure the preference for city residents who participate in 'various housing programs offered by the city ' be offered that preference 'to the extent allowed by law.'
As defined by the bill, a 'city resident ' is 'any individual who has a stated intent to reside or be domiciled in the city.'
The measure states it would provide 'city residents with housing opportunities they can afford pursuant to the Oahu General Plan objective ; stem the rapid out-migration of city residents ; provide a sufficient workforce to maintain efficient city functioning ; and stabilize Oahu families and communities.'
It also noted that based on the state Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism analysis 'Hawaii Population Characteristics 2019, ' the Council 'believes that a resident preference for city affordable housing programs will not have a significant, adverse, and disproportionate effect on any protected group under the federal or state housing laws or constitutions.'
For Honolulu, Bill 19 asserts as the state enters nearly a decade of population decline, 67, 257 people left Hawaii between 2021 and 2022.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
'Between July 1, 2020 and July 1, 2023, the city had an average net loss of 9, 894 people per day, or an average out-migration of approximately 27 people per day, according to DBEDT, ' the bill states.
Still, the measure says more housing is still needed on Oahu.
'In March 2024, DBEDT estimated that, based on historical trends, 23, 999 units would need to be built by 2035 to meet the city's housing demand, ' the measure states.
Introduced in March by Council members Tyler Dos Santos-Tam and Radiant Cordero, the original bill was modeled after similar legislation in Boston that eventually became part of that city's municipal code.
After the meeting, Dos Santos-Tam said Bill 19 as adopted was aimed at housing 'our local families.'
'For projects that use city money, it's common sense that Oahu residents should get preference for these units, ' he said in a statement. 'This will help us start chipping away at our housing crisis.'
In her statement, Cordero said, 'With home prices on Oahu reaching a record $1.1 million—nearly three times the national average—many residents can no longer afford to buy or rent, contributing to rising homelessness and more people leaving the islands.'
'This bill directly addresses these challenges by ensuring that residents have equitable access to the housing resources they need, helping to slow the out-migration, stabilize families, and support our communities, ' she added.
Although adopted this week, an early draft of the measure was not fully embraced by the nine-member panel.
During a Council meeting in March, Matt Weyer said although he fully supported Bill 19's intent 'to create housing opportunities for local residents, ' he wanted to proceed differently.
'I do think that my preference … is to focus our efforts on the root causes of the problem, which I would say are the more affluent folks investing in properties and buying properties and converting them into vacant homes or vacation rentals, ' he said.
To that end, Weyer said he'd rather see more done on a possible rental relief bill.
'Maybe providing a lower rate for folks who are renting versus folks who just want to keep their home empty, ' he said previously.
At Wednesday's meeting no one from the public, city administration or the Council spoke for or against Bill 19.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump wields funding card in fight with DC
Republicans are embracing President Trump's bare-knuckled fight with Washington, D.C., as a winning issue for the embattled president and say that Trump will use federal funding for the city as leverage to get Mayor Muriel Bowser and the City Council to crack down on local crime. Conservatives on Capitol Hill are calling for Congress to end the District of Columbia's era of home rule and federalize the city, something that has little chance of happening since legislation to do so would need 60 votes and the support of at least seven Democrats to pass the Senate. Trump and his Republican allies in Congress, however, could extract significant concessions from the mayor and City Council in return for critical funding, as a proposal to restore more than $1 billion in funding for Washington remains stalled in the GOP-controlled House. Republican aides say that one of Trump's top priorities would be to press D.C. to eliminate no-cash bail, a policy whereby individuals arrested on criminal charges do not need to post cash bonds to avoid pretrial detention. Other priorities would be to prosecute teenagers accused of serious crimes as adults and to implement stricter policies mandating pretrial detention of adults and teenagers accused of such crimes. Some Republicans on Capitol Hill, including Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) and Rep. Andy Ogles (Tenn.), are pushing for more drastic action. They are backing legislation to repeal the 1973 District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which gives the city the right to elect its own government and manage local affairs. Lee in an op-ed for The Spectator cited several high-profile attacks, including the fatal shooting of congressional intern Eric Tarpinian-Jachym in July and the 2023 knife attack that left a staffer for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) with a punctured lung and penetrated skull. 'This isn't just a local issue — it's a national embarrassment, and the Constitution itself makes it a national issue. Federal oversight will restore order and make DC a model city again,' Lee posted on the social platform X. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) in an interview on Fox Business applauded Trump's takeover of D.C.'s police and predicted: 'If there's a significant law enforcement presence, these crimes are going to go down.' He said a car belonging to one of his staffers got shot up in a gang fight while it was parked six blocks from the Capitol. 'We spent one of our Steering Committee meetings talking about what we should get our employees to protect themselves when they're walking home. This is our nation's capital, for crying out loud. This is where you bring your family, and you become a patriot, and it's not safe to be here,' he said. 'I'm saluting President Trump. More power to him to do whatever it takes to secure our nation's capital.' Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the chair of the Senate Steering Committee, told reporters Tuesday he hoped Democratic mayors from major cities would follow Trump's lead and increase law-enforcement activities. 'I'm optimistic this will show D.C. you can have safety,' he said. 'The first thing I say to everybody when they're coming to D.C. is, 'You better think about where you're staying, you've got to think about every street you're on, you've got to think about you can't be out at night.' Hopefully that will change.' Early polling is mixed on Trump's takeover of the capital's police department and plan to deploy 800 National Guard troops, along with dozens of FBI agents, to step up law enforcement activity around the city. An Aug. 11 YouGov survey of 3,180 U.S. adults found that 47 percent of respondents strongly or somewhat disapproved of Trump's actions, while 34 percent strongly or somewhat approved. But the poll also found that 67 of respondents said that crime in large American cities is a 'major problem' while 23 percent described it as a 'minor problem.' Focusing on crime in Democratic-run cities has been a successful political tactic for the president going back to his first term and comes at a time when his approval rating has sunk to 37 percent, according to a recent Gallup poll. Democratic lawmakers slammed Trump's action. Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asserted 'there are currently no 'special conditions of an emergency nature' in D.C., which the president has to claim in order to take federal control of MPD under the Home Rule Act.' 'This is unprecedented,' he said. Jim McLaughlin, a Republican pollster who has done work for Trump, said that Trump's takeover of the police force and deployment of National Guard is a popular move but argued it's not motivated by politics. 'He's doing it because he thinks it's really important to keep people safe,' he said, noting that crime and law enforcement in major cities was an issue that Trump identified as a top priority when he was thinking about running years before the 2016 presidential election. 'I know there are a lot of people looking at the political angle here, but it's not politics, it's about doing what he thinks is right,' McLaughlin said. 'D.C. is a special place. We have people not just from all over the country but all over the world come to visit D.C., and they should be safe there. 'We've got members of Congress and their staff getting attacked there,' he said, referring to the assault on Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.) in 2023. Trump will have an opportunity to press his demands ahead of next month's government funding deadline, Sept. 30, when Democrats in Congress and advocates for the District will call for the restoration of the funding held back in the March funding deal. 'I can see that being an anomaly in a [continuing resolution],' said a Republican strategist, who suggested that Trump could also request more federal oversight of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in exchange for funding to hire more police. 'You're working within the confines with what will probably be a' continuing resolution, the strategist said of the expectation that Congress will need to pass a stopgap funding measure to avoid a government shutdown. 'You could do it via a handshake agreement,' the strategist added, referring to concessions Bowser would make in exchange for more federal funding. Bowser 'already opened the door' to a potential deal with the White House, the strategist noted, by acknowledging in a recent statement that beefing up policing in some parts of the city could be a good idea. Bowser at a press conference Monday acknowledged that 'we experienced a crime spike post-COVID' but argued 'we worked quickly to put laws in place and tactics that got violent offenders off our streets and gave our police officers more tools, which is why we've seen a huge decrease in crime.' The mayor pointed out that crime is down compared with 2023 but pledged: 'We're not satisfied, we haven't taken our foot off the gas, and we continue to look for ways to make our city safer.' Bowser met with Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday, a meeting that Bondi called 'productive.' 'I just concluded a productive meeting with DC Mayor Bowser at the Department of Justice. We agreed that there is nothing more important than keeping residents and tourists in Washington, DC, safe from deadly crime,' Bondi posted on social media. Trump on Monday vented his frustrations over no-cash bail and what he views as the lenient treatment of teenagers accused of felony crimes. 'Every place in the country where you have no-cash bail is a disaster,' Trump declared at a White House press conference where he announced a federal takeover of D.C.'s police department and the deployment of 800 National Guard troops to the city's streets. The president called for the District to change its laws to allow for teenagers 14 and older to be prosecuted as adults, complaining of juvenile offenders: 'They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it's going to happen now!' Al Weaver contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
NYC pol rips Jewish activist over photo op with anti-Israel mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani: ‘Don't even bother calling' for funding
A NYC councilwoman warned nonprofits to look elsewhere for funding if they support socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani or others 'Hamas sympathizers.' Brooklyn Republican and staunch Zionist Inna Vernikov made the vow Tuesday regarding her share of council members' annual discretionary funds – which this fiscal year total $810,000 – in response to video posted on X of Jewish activist Mark Meyer Appel shaking hands with the pro-Palestine Mamdani. 'I know it may not be much, but just a small PSA [Public Service Announcement] for the orgs who will be seeking discretionary funding from me for the next four years: In my discretion, I will NOT fund organizations whose leadership supports Hamas sympathizers and October 7th apologists,' Vernikov said on X. 4 NYC Councilwoman Inna Vernikov issued a stern declaration to nonprofits who support socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani or anyone else she believes is 'sympathetic' to Hamas terrorists – no political pork for you. Stephen Yang 'So if you want to be like @MarkMeyerAppel, and support or do photo ops with @Zohran Mamdani, don't even bother calling,' she added, accusing Appel of 'commie/jihadi a– kissing.' And she doubled down Friday, telling The Post 'If someone allows themselves to be in a photo with Mamdani, they're either supporting him or pandering to him.' 'Either way, I will defund them,' she said. 4 Vernikov's post on X ripped Jewish activist Mark Meyer Appel (left) for shaking hands with NYC mayoral candidate and staunch Israel critic Zohran Mamdani on Tuesday during a Brooklyn event. Inna Vernikov/ X Some Democratic Council sources contended Vernikov's remarks were over the top. 'How can you make a blanket statement that you're not giving a group money but because someone appears in a photo op?' a source said. Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (R-Queens) wouldn't comment on Vernikov's rhetoric but said nonprofits should be apolitical. 'They should be focused on their goals of helping New York, not on illegal performative activism,' she said. 4 Vernikov doubled down on her remarks Friday, telling The Post, 'If someone allows themselves to be in a photo with Mamdani, they're either supporting him or pandering to him. Either way, I will defund them.' Stephen Yang 4 Mamdani (pictured, shaking the hand of a supporter) went to the Flatbush Gardens Community Center Tuesday to talk about ways he'll look to boost affordable housing if he's elected NYC mayor. Gregory P. Mango Appel's Flatbush-based group, The Bridge Multicultural and Advocacy Project, scored $60,000 in political pork from the Council in this fiscal year's budget, but none from Vernikov, records show. Messages left with Appel were not returned.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Council forced to back down on graves ‘fat tax'
A council has been forced to back down on plans to implement a 'fat tax' on bigger burial plots following local backlash. Wolverhampton councillors had faced criticism for a 'lack of empathy' after they proposed charging hundreds of pounds more for bigger plots. The Labour-run town hall confirmed to the BBC that a 20pc premium on 6ft-wide spaces had been agreed in May. It would have cost a family £2,700 as opposed to £2,250 for a standard plot. A council spokesman had told reporters that the higher price reflected 'the increased costs incurred in providing them, including disposing of the additional soil'. But when contacted by The Telegraph, a spokesman said it had decided 'not to proceed with the plans'. The council had failed to consult Wolverhampton residents on the changes, instead only speaking to local funeral directors. Ross Hickton, of Hickton Family Funeral Directors in the West Midlands, said the decision was a 'win for the people of Wolverhampton and a dose of common sense'. 'It's a great relief for funeral directors not having to have difficult conversations with families. It's a shame that the council didn't listen to our advice originally [in the consultation] as they would have saved themselves a lot of trouble. 'Other local authorities should take heed of what's happened here.' 'If you've paid into the system your whole life, through council tax and income tax, you shouldn't be forced to pay an additional 20pc tax,' Mr Hickton added. 'The 'fat tax' would 'push more people into funeral poverty. If you live in Wolverhampton, you have the right to be buried here without extra costs. You shouldn't be paying a premium for a basic right. It shows a lack of empathy for what a family goes through.' The decision to introduce the extra charge was made after an increase in demand for larger graves, the council previously told the BBC. The city has higher than normal obesity rates of 33.3pc, compared with the national average of 25.9pc, according to a 2021 survey. The proportion of households that are overweight is gradually increasing, according to government data. In 2023-24, 64.5pc of adults in England were overweight or living with obesity. This is higher than the previous year, 64pc, and follows an upward trend since 2015, when the figure was 61.2pc. The average coffin width has increased in the past decade, from around 20-22 inches to 22-24 inches, according to the National Association of Funeral Directors. One of the first councils to introduce higher fees for larger graves was Houghton Regis Town Council in 2009. On its website, the Bedfordshire town hall said: 'Where the coffin width is such that the burial encroaches into the next available burial plot, such that it cannot be used, the above fees will be increased by 50pc.' It would take the cost from £364 to £728. Local authorities in Telford, Birmingham, Walsall, Coventry and Staffordshire also charge extra for wider coffins. The National Society of Allied and Independent Funeral Directors asked its members if their council charged more for bigger plots. Out of 165 respondents, 25pc said yes. The BBC found that a third of 27 local authorities in the West Midlands charged more for wider graves. A City of Wolverhampton Council spokesman said: 'No formal decision was ever taken on plans to charge more for larger burial plots. 'This is a common practice taken by councils around the country where higher charges cover the costs of providing a larger plot. 'However, while under consideration, we have decided not to proceed with the plans.'