logo
Blue Peter hosts now from sex tape and cocaine sting to 'porn' role

Blue Peter hosts now from sex tape and cocaine sting to 'porn' role

Daily Mirror01-05-2025

The dark past of some of the legendary BBC childrens' TV show hasn't stopped some them going on to have surprisingly successful careers. We look at the secrets and scandals of the show's hosts and reveal where they are now
Here's a boo-boo I made earlier! The wholesome image of the world 's longest-running children's TV programme, Blue Peter, has often been tarnished by the antics of its presenters.
From the cocaine shame of '90s presenter Richard Bacon to Scottish entertainer's John Leslie 's leaked sex tape and sexual assault allegations; Konnie Huq 's phone-in scandals and TV bosses' failure to protect their youngest ever host Yvette Fielding from depraved paedophile Rolf Harris, since its 1958 launch the show has sometimes made headlines for all the wrong reasons.

But what happened to the hosts after they left the show for pastures new? Here, The Mirror takes a look at the mixed fortunes of Blue Peter's most loved presenters...

Richard Bacon
One of the show's most infamous former presenters, Richard is now a successful US TV producer in LA where he develops new ideas for game shows. But nearly three decades later, Bacon, now 47, is still best known for being fired from Blue Peter for taking cocaine in a London nightclub.
Sacked in October 1998, the 22-year-old became the first presenter on the children's show to have his contract terminated mid-run when he admitted taking the Class A drug after a Sunday tabloid broke the story. However Bacon's telly career did survive the scandal and he went on to present The Big Breakfast and Top of The Pops and had an afternoon slot on BBC Radio 5 Live.
In 2014, Bacon moved across the pond to present a daytime TV show, and also admitted to addictive behaviours in the past, especially around alcohol. He told The Guardian, "My wife would like me to do AA all the time, and I just don't, but I have said I will spend more time with our therapist examining my relationship to drink."
On a trip back to the UK in 2018, Bacon fell sick and took himself to A&E at Lewisham hospital, where doctors discovered he was so desperately unwell with pneumonia, they had to put him in an induced coma.
Later Richard says doctors told him, "You were lying on the hospital trolley, you were crashing. You turned blue. We thought you were going to go into cardiac arrest and die." Waking up nine days later after his near-death experience, Bacon discovered the London hospital ICU team had given him a tracheotomy to save his life.

Now living in LA with his wife Rebecca McFarlane and their two children Arthur, 14, and Ivy, 11, Bacon joked, 'I could bring peace to the Middle East and still, when I die, the top line of the obituary will be 'fired from Blue Peter'.'
John Leslie
Prior to Bacon's stint on the show, Scottish presenter John Leslie hosted Blue Peter with the late Caron Keating and Anthea Turner from 1989 to 1994. Leslie dated Hollywood actress Catherine Zeta-Jones, but he became more even more famous for his relationship with nurse and model Abi Titmuss when a video Leslie filmed of her having sex with another woman was leaked.

But Leslie's high-flying career co-hosting This Morning with Fern Britton came crashing down in 2002 when Swedish TV presenter Ulrika Johnson wrote in her autobiography that 'an acquaintance' had raped her at 19, and his name was mentioned by mistake by Matthew Wright on live TV.
Later cleared of all charges, he told the Scottish Mail, 'I lost everything overnight. I'd gone from earning over £300,000 to not a single penny coming in. And I spent about £500,000 on legal costs.

Forced to sell his £3.5m mansion and move back to his native Edinburgh, Leslie survived on royalties and DJing. Having fought his way back from being a 'depressed and suicidal' recluse, Leslie, now 60, is now a property developer and lives with his girlfriend Kate Moore.
However Leslie has still been haunted by historic assault allegations when a woman claimed he groped her breasts at a celebrity party in 2008 and again in 2017, when he was accused of putting his hand down the back of a woman's trousers while dancing.
Leslie has always strenuously denied both allegations and was found not guilty in both cases.

Yvette Fielding
Predatory paedophile Rolf Harris was a regular on many BBC programmes, but teenage Yvette Fielding, who co- presented with Mark Curry and Caron Keating when she joined aged 18 in 1987, revealed that she was molested by the disgraced entertainer after she was left alone in a TV studio with him.
Last year she accused the BBC of failing in its duty of care to look after her, telling The Sun newspaper, 'It was bizarre to think Rolf Harris was squeezing and patting my bottom and I am standing there, thinking, 'I don't know what to do.' Other people in the industry must have known what he was like and (they) left me alone in the studio with him. That shouldn't have happened. I think a lot of them did know'.'
Now 56, Fielding is best known for going on to host and co-create the paranormal TV show Most Haunted alongside her cameraman and producer husband Karl Beattie.

Konnie Huq
Richard Bacon's co-presenter Konnie Huq, who was the show's longest female presenter from 1997 to 2008, was forced to apologise on air for a phone-in scandal which saw the BBC fined an unprecedented £50,000 by Ofcom.
Bosses admitted the results of a Blue Peter competition to identify the celebrity owner of a pair of shoes were faked when the show allowed a child visiting the studio to pose as a caller when technical problems stopped real calls getting through to the studio. Later Konnie was also involved in the show's cat-naming fix. She admitted later, 'I was horrified. I couldn't believe it was allowed to happen. It was partly because of the scam I made the decision to leave.'

Married to Black Mirror creator Charlie Brooker, the 49-year-old mum-of-two in London swapped TV presenting and celebrity game show panellist roles for writing books and scripts, and is now a successful children's author.
Pet scandals
It wasn't unknown for the show to pull the wool over their young viewers' eyes, and had its first scandal involving an animal in 1962. It came out many years later that the first pet Petra was actually an emergency replacement for the original dog who had died of distemper two days before she first appeared on the show.

Veteran Blue Peter editor Biddy Baxter, who retired in 1988, revealed in her book, The Woman Who Made Blue Peter, 'It was unthinkable to traumatise our youngest viewers, so we had to trawl London for the dead pup's lookalike.'
There was also a custody battle for Blue Peter's favourite dog Shep when legendary presenter John Noakes left after 12 years, having co-presented during the show's golden era with Valerie Singleton and Peter Purves.
The lively border collie, who had lived with John since his TV debut in 1971, and when Noakes left, he said angrily at the time, 'I thought Shep was mine – they told me I could keep him, but they went back on their word.'

Leicester-born Biddy Baxter, now 91, explained in her book that Noakes did keep Shep until he and his wife Vicky went sailing around the world in 1982, before he was adopted by show pet carer Edith Menezes. Noakes later died in 2017.
Peter Duncan
In 1980, daredevil Noakes was replaced by another action man, actor Peter Duncan, who it was revealed appeared nude in a racy film called The Lifetaker.

Despite the furore, Duncan, who co-presented with Simon Groom, Sarah Greene and Janet Ellis, wasn't sacked. He says now, 'They called me a soft porn star and it was nonsense. Yes, there was a little soft-focus nudity, but it wasn't salacious.'
Duncan even made a joke about it in 2014 when he tweeted, 'For your pleasure on my 60th trailer from my 1973 'porn' film that caused trauma and headlines.'

In the early Noughties, Duncan and his wife Annie made a series of family holiday documentaries with their four children. Now 71, former chief scout Duncan is still busy every Christmas for panto season his Jack and the Beanstalk production.
Stars lost too soon
When Duncan left his first stint on the show in 1984, he was replaced by Michael Sundin, who was very controversially sacked when rumours of his homosexuality circulated in the press. Sadly Michael died aged 28 from an Aids-related illness in 1989, although it was reported as 'liver cancer' at the time.
The show also lost another one of its presenters far too young, Gloria Hunniford's daughter Caron Keating, who died after being treated for breast cancer for seven years in April 2004, aged 41, leaving behind two young sons.

Peter Purves
However, Blue Peter's longest serving male presenter Peter Purves, is still going strong today at 86. Purves joined the show in 1967 until 1978, and famously had a brief fling with co-presenter Valerie Singleton while he was married. The veteran presenter later admitted, 'It was only one night. We remained great friends.'
The presenter also developed skin cancer from all his exotic TV destinations, telling The Mail on Sunday: "I travelled to 27 countries with Blue Peter in the 1960s and early 70s.'
Having both defied the curse of Blue Peter, Purves is now living peacefully in rural Suffolk with his wife Kathryn Evans and their dogs, while Valerie, now 88, has never married nor had children, and after a career in radio after the show, has retired to Somerset.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The radio debut of the House of Commons: ‘there could be a long-running series here' – archive, 1975
The radio debut of the House of Commons: ‘there could be a long-running series here' – archive, 1975

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The radio debut of the House of Commons: ‘there could be a long-running series here' – archive, 1975

Permanent radio broadcasts from the House of Commons began on 3 April 1978, and from the House of Lords on 4 April. Television broadcasts began on 21 November 1989. 10 June 1975 Ed Boyle, the commercial radio commentator for the first broadcast of parliament, yesterday spent two hours cooped up in a tiny glass box at a temperature of nearly 90 degrees, wearing a jacket, tie, and buttoned up collar, suffering from a particularly ferocious type of dysentery which has already brought his weight down to eight stone. Just to add a touch of challenge to the job, he was operating a new type of microphone kindly supplied by the BBC with operating instructions entirely in Japanese. In spite of this, Mr Boyle and his BBC colleague, David Holmes, who were trapped together in the same tiny glass box, managed somehow to give composed and informative account of the proceedings. Mr Holmes admitted afterwards that the heat had been so great that at times he had thought he would not be able to carry on, and though listeners may have noticed his voice fading occasionally, he always remained strikingly coherent and apparently in command. Mr Boyle now intends to make a few swift changes to make life slightly more bearable. Apart from sartorial changes to Bermuda shorts, for himself, he plans to make commentating easier by fading out some members when the discussion gets too technical. 'Some of the questions are really on very minor and erudite issues, and I guess the MPs won't mind if we turn them down occasionally so as to explain to the listeners what is happening.' Yesterday the two broadcasters were blessed by a good chunk of pungent topical debates, with Tony Benn using industry questions as the chance to prove himself a good Euro-democrat, and with splendid quotations like: 'If the opposition wants any head on a charger, the leader of the Conservative party will have to be a lot more seductive as a Salome than she has been so far.' At the same time, there were highly complex questions about, for example, the funding of the new pod for the stretched version of the Rolls-Royce RB 211 – a matter of great importance, but one which cannot be explained in the few seconds between question and answer. Both commentators had to trim down their remarks to within a second or so either way: Mr Holmes reckoned that if he did not spot immediately whether the speaker was calling an MP for a supplementary or for the next question on the order paper, he would lose two of the four or five vital seconds of explaining time. Time was so tight that Mr Boyle had to make a definite policy decision to give the first name of each MP as well as his surname and party. Often their time was so limited they could only say: 'This is a question about Europe' or, 'This is about British Leyland.' Mr Holmes hopes to grab a few more seconds of talking time while MPs are laughing and cheering between answers. But both men were pleased with the way things had gone, and came out of the box easier in mind if not in body than they had been when they went in. 'What's encouraging is that it looks as if we can do a proper job without the house having to change its way of going about business or even the tempo of its debates, so no one need feel that we are interfering in any way,' said Mr Holmes. The commercial company plans to use more material than the BBC will use, with prime minister's questions live every Tuesday and Thursday, plus special debates. It will also have an hour of extracts and highlights each morning – twice as long as the BBC – with an instant feedback service from a panel of MPs who took part in the debate; and possibly a Saturday morning edition giving chunks of the week's committees. Val Arnold-Forster, our radio critic, adds: It was a lucky day for broadcasters, according to David Holmes at the end of the transmission – audibly breathing a sigh of relief. It was too, it was a well or luckily chosen parliamentary day. At first, both Holmes and his opposite number, Ed Boyle of IRN, seemed to feel a trifle defensive about parliament. Well they might, for BBC listeners anyway missed not only some of Woman's Hour and a play, but since political events always seem to invade children's entertainment, they also missed Listen with Mother. Before the actual live broadcast started, both political editors showed us round like keen members of a parent-teachers association displaying their school: eager to tell us about the hallowed tradition, the problems that the whole institution had in a changing society, and the usefulness of the work done. The leader of the house, Edward Short, appeared on both channels in his headmasterly capacity to say that this was a particularly noisy House of Commons, but he hoped that the MPs would be on their best behaviour. A bit unruly, he thought, and not only the MPs either. There would have been more room, said Mr Short, in the tiny broadcaster's box if IRN and BBC had done the decent thing and agreed to a joint transmission. Nobody need have worried: from the moment question time started we were in capable hands. Both David Holmes and Ed Boyle chipped into the debate sotto voce, to identify and give party allegiances and explanations. Both tried valiantly to feed the listener with the details that make the House of Commons come alive. 'Mr Bidwell, chairman of the Tribune Group … Mr Denis Skinner, always a lively performer … Mr Benn is smiling to himself.' But they need not really have bothered: the proceedings were jolly enough. For those of us used to hearing politicians debating cautiously in front of untried audiences or answering laboured questions and phone-ins, it was an entertaining experience to hear such skilful parliamentary technicians as Harold Wilson and Tony Benn, parrying questions, riposting, joking, and scolding. The jokes were not always very good, but that's true of other radio comedians. Perhaps the laughter and applause sometimes seemed excessive but the barbed retorts were well placed and, as in other radio shows, what seemed like impromptu repartee must have been rehearsed, if only in the bath. 'I do not require lessons in political morality from an honourable member who regularly signs the oath of allegiance and snipes continually at the royal family,' snapped Tony Benn to Willie Hamilton. The uproar which worried Edward Short was cheerful mostly. The general cosiness, which came through strikingly as everyone complimented everyone else on performances in the referendum debate, seemed as easy to grasp as the Archers: we could become as familiar with William Whitelaw's idiosyncrasies as Walter Gabriel's. Final verdict: early days yet, but there could be a compulsive, long-running series here.

A Scottish legend says cancel culture is over. Yeah right
A Scottish legend says cancel culture is over. Yeah right

The Herald Scotland

time26 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

A Scottish legend says cancel culture is over. Yeah right

He is not alone in his view. The comedian Ricky Gervais was getting his star on the walk of fame the other day and said something similar to Mr Millar. 'We've had a few weird years of cancel culture, people telling you what you can and can't laugh at or talk about,' he said. 'But we pushed back, and we won. I'd love to claim that it was due to my unrivalled genius, but truth be told, it's a cocktail of luck, persistence and a little bit of pushing against the tide.' So that's two big figures in popular culture telling us it's all over. But let's take a minute shall we. For a start, it's significant who's talking here. As I say, Mr Millar sold his empire to Netflix for £25m and Mr Gervais is also someone who's not short of a bob or two. Same thing with another public figure who's spoken out against cancel culture: JK Rowling. The mob did bay for her, and some people did stop speaking to her, and there were calls for her to be ejected from Harry Potter, her own creation. But in the end, like Gervais and Millar, money is a shield and Rowling was too rich to cancel. It's a good thing that Gervais and Millar have spoken out against cancel culture, but their relative immunity to its effects perhaps makes them a little too prone to declaring that it's over before it actually is. Because it isn't, not really. You may have seen the story about the comic Andrew Lawrence who's had shows cancelled after making a joke about the horrible incident at the Liverpool football parade. This is a sensitive area, and the joke was crass and in my view not funny. But I've been in many audiences where the comic has touched on sensitive areas and made jokes that are crass and in my view not funny, and people laughed. And if we cancel comedians for doing jokes some of us don't like, we risk ending up in a place that is, to use Mark Millar's words, safe and benign. Yes, it's awkward to defend someone like Andrew Lawrence but that's how freedom of expression works: it's awkward but important. There are other problems with the idea that cancel culture is over. One of the most high-profile casualties of it all was the comedy writer Graham Linehan, whose career was effectively ended because of his opinions on trans issues. I spoke to Graham about what happened and the effects were absolutely real: jobs fell away, virtually no-one in the media would return his calls, and his plans for a musical version of Father Ted ended when the producers asked him to stop talking about the trans issue and he refused. What's remarkable now is that we can see his opinions were not unusual and are shared by the majority of the population and yet they ended his career and there's still no prospect of Graham working again in British comedy. So if cancel culture is over, it isn't over for Graham. Read more Britain is Scottish: a truth from history that's still true today A Pride hate crime on Arran? No, just a sign of where we are now The best building in Glasgow, and what we can learn from its tragedy But even if we accept the premise that cases such as Graham's are becoming rarer, or will no longer happen, that doesn't mean cancel culture is finished because its effects do not always operate openly. I was speaking to a friend of mine last week who's working on a play that's about to tour the country and he was telling me about the pressures he's been under over script, casting and production, specifically on sex, gender and race. It's clear that anything that strays from the progressive viewpoint sometimes called 'woke' is out of the question and might jeopardise the future of his project and so he finds himself self-censoring to ensure he keeps his job. It's happening in theatre, and it's happening in movies and telly too. And the result? Safe and benign. Perhaps the phrase we should use to describe the phenomenon here is self-cancel culture although it amounts to the same thing as cancel culture because most people don't have as much money as Mr Millar or Mr Gervais or Ms Rowling and worry about losing their job, or the chances of promotion. You see it in academia too, where there have been plenty of examples of overt cancel culture, with speakers de-platformed or forced to withdraw because of protests and so forth. But equally insidious is the self-cancel culture that goes on, the self-censorship. One of the academics I've spoken to about this, Neil Thin, honorary research fellow at Edinburgh, told me how it works. What happens in practice, he said, is that because of overt, aggressive or denunciatory attacks on individuals, people at universities start to monitor and edit their own behaviour. They see what's happened to other people and think 'I don't want that, I'll avoid that topic'. And so freedom of speech is affected and damaged. As I say: self-cancel culture. Doctor Who (Image: PA) It's all of this kind of stuff, plus more recent and more overt cases such as Andrew Lawrence, that make me very wary of accepting Mark Millar's argument that cancel culture is over. What may help his case a bit is that the sort of people who've toed the line are starting to struggle. I'm thinking of the recent Snow White movie, which was heavy with cancel-proof progressive messages and bombed spectacularly at the box office. Same with the recent series of Doctor Who: on message certainly but also on course for the worst viewing figures in the programme's history. And it has now, probably, been rested. Or to use a better word: cancelled. The point is that the situation is probably a lot more uncertain than Mark Millar thinks it is. He may be right that the world is more relaxed again and we're about to see more dangerous stuff on screen and in print. But then again, someone who was working on a television drama being made in Glasgow was telling me last year about their Christmas party and how they'd been issued with a list of do's and don'ts including 'no swearing' and 'no sexual advances'. Relaxed is hardly the word I would use. But let's end by being hopeful shall we. The cultural moments that linger in my mind aren't the cosy ones, they're the crazy ones. The moments where I've been appalled or amused (or both at the same time). The best and most exciting television, movies and books are also much more likely to emerge from a culture of freedom than they are from a culture of fear. So let's hope Mark Millar is right. Let's hope cancel culture is over and writers have indeed regained their freedom to produce edgy material. Let's hope.

Boom or Bust: Could this new Scottish video game be the next Grand Theft Auto?
Boom or Bust: Could this new Scottish video game be the next Grand Theft Auto?

STV News

time41 minutes ago

  • STV News

Boom or Bust: Could this new Scottish video game be the next Grand Theft Auto?

A Scottish video game hailed by some as the next Grand Theft Auto is set for a release on Tuesday, but the build-up to its launch has been marred by controversy and lack of clarity. MindsEye is an ambitious big-budget single-player title developed by Edinburgh-based Build A Rocket Boy studio. Headed by a former GTA producer, Leslie Benzies, the studio's upcoming maiden title has created a buzz on both the local and international gaming scenes, in no small part due to the scope of ambition they have set out for their game. But recently the project has been attracting attention for all the wrong reasons. Last month, a group of journalists and content creators were given access to a limited preview of the game. Their reaction? Less than positive. Some of those given access to the preview went as far as to call on the developers to postpone the game and use the time to fix and polish it into a finished product. The overwhelmingly negative reaction has made the studio double down on confidence in their title, with Build A Rocket Boy's co-CEO, Mark Gerhard, claiming that people are being paid to 'trash the game' before it launches. 'There is a concerted effort by some people that don't want to see Leslie (Benzies) or Build A Rocket Boy to be successful that are making a concerted effort to trash the game and the studio,' Gerhard said. 'It's pretty easy to see the bots and the repeated replies to any content that we put out.' If the negative reaction, be it genuine or paid for, was not enough for the studio to deal with, two executives have left it just a week before the game's release. As expected, the departure of their chief legal officer and chief financial officer did nothing to help alleviate the pressure piling up on the studio, with questions popping up about whether they would be leaving if they genuinely believed MindsEye is going to be successful. And while it's entirely possible their departure has nothing to do with the game's potential fortunes, it only adds wind to the rumour mill that has been with the project for a while. The lack of clarity seems to stem from a relative radio silence about the project from the get-go. Before AI became the new buzzword, everyone was talking about the metaverse. MindsEye was initially described as an 'experience' taking place within one such metaverse, the Everywhere platform that was supposed to rival the likes of Fortnite and Roblox. Apart from that, very little is known about it, with the platform seemingly falling off the radar while the studio focuses on MindsEye. However, one cannot say that here, Build A Rocket Boy have done a much better job explaining exactly what the game is really about. That leaves gamers wondering what it actually is that they may be buying come Tuesday. Build A Rocket Buy Players take on the role of a former soldier, Jacob Diaz. For the record, MindsEye is billed as a linear, narrative-driven, single-player third-person shooter set in a future where artificial intelligence and human greed bring Earth to the brink of collapse. From trailers, the game gives an impression of something between Grand Theft Auto V and Cyberpunk 2077, with players taking on the role of a former soldier, Jacob Diaz. For their part, the studio have never tried to position MindsEye as a GTA competitor, but instead aim to create a unique title, something that has not been seen before. Whether they have been successful in pitching that to the players is up for debate. In a recent interview for Leslie Benzies has opened up on their vision for MindsEye and beyond. One of the key takeaways from it is that the game should act as a gateway into a much larger 'epic universe'. For the next ten years, the studio plans to evolve the game through regular content updates, ranging from standalone ones, like races, with others serving the larger narrative. 'Once players have experienced the full ten-year arc, they'll understand the shape and scope of the MindsEye universe,' Benzies explained. User-generated content will also have a big role to play, with players being able to create their own levels, races and missions via tools called and and share them with others. Those tools were originally part of the aforementioned Everywhere project; what it means for the project itself is unclear, but Benzies insisted that all will become clear 'very soon'. What's not as clear is why the studio decided to wait until a few weeks before launch to reveal those, arguably crucial, details. Build A Rocket Buy MindsEye is billed as a linear, narrative-driven, single-player third-person shooter. Unclarity and controversy aside, there is every chance MindsEye will turn out to be a great game. Those in the industry believe the fact that the title attracted perhaps the most funding out of all the Scottish video game projects ever and the amount of talent working on the game should ensure a high level of quality. Should MindsEye not be in tip-top shape upon its release, Build A Rocket Buy can take slight comfort in the knowledge that other games, such as Cyberpunk 2077 or No Man's Sky, managed to move past 'disastrous' launches and turn their fortunes around. A success would undoubtedly mean another boost in prestige for the local video game industry, but should the game prove to be less impressive, those in the sector believe it's robust enough for its reputation not to be damaged. Players won't have to wait long to decide whether MindsEye is a boom or bust. The game releases on Tuesday, June 10, for PC, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X/S. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store