Cleverly set to return to Tory front bench as shadow housing secretary
Sir James served in the foreign office and as home secretary when the Conservatives were in power.
He stood as a candidate in last year's Conservative leadership election, but lost out on the Tory top job ahead of the final heat between Mrs Badenoch and her now shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick.
Since the leadership contest, he had returned to the Tory back benches as the MP for Braintree.
As well as Sir James's appointment, it is understood Kevin Hollinrake will move to the role of party chairman, replacing Nigel Huddleston, who will become shadow culture secretary.
Mr Hollinrake was previously in the shadow MHCLG job, which will be filled by Sir James.
Stuart Andrew will become shadow health secretary, replacing Edward Argar, who resigned citing health reasons.
Further changes are expected to be confirmed later on Tuesday, and a Conservative source said earlier that they will 'reflect the next stage of the party's policy renewal programme and underline the unity of the party under new leadership'.
As he prepares for his last parliamentary oral questions from the front bench, I want to put on record my sincere thanks to Ed Argar for serving in my Shadow Cabinet.
I wish him the very best for a speedy recovery and return to full health, and so I will be making a few changes… pic.twitter.com/FWoC7L19nd
— Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) July 22, 2025
Allies of shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride believe he will remain in his post, while attention will be focused on whether Mrs Badenoch keeps Mr Jenrick in his current role.
The former leadership contender has strayed well beyond his justice brief, building a prominent social media presence with campaigns on a range of issues from tackling fare dodgers on the London Underground to the impact of immigration on housing.
Since moving to the backbenches, Sir James has used his influential position as a former minister to warn against pursuing populist agenda akin to Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
Appearing at the Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) think tank last week, the senior Tory hit out at calls to 'smash the system' and 'start again from scratch', branding them 'complete nonsense'.
He also appeared to take a different position on net zero from party leader Mrs Badenoch in a recent speech, urging the Conservatives to reject climate change 'luddites' on the right who believe 'the way things are now is just fine'.
Earlier on Tuesday, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'saddened' that Mr Argar feels 'unable to continue' in his position, but agreed 'that you must put your health first'.
In a letter to the party leader dated July 9 and shared by Mrs Badenoch on X on Tuesday, Mr Argar said: 'I had a health scare earlier this summer and remain grateful to the doctors and hospital staff who looked after me.'
He added: 'I have been well looked after, but have also listened to what the doctors said to me, and have listened to my family, and have concluded that lightening my front-bench workload over the coming months, in order to complete my recovery and fully restore my health in that period, is the sensible approach.'
This afternoon I have decided to step back from my role in the Shadow Cabinet.
Despite the offer of an alternative role, I have decided to focus on constituency matters and I wish my successor in the Shadow DSIT brief all the best in what is a fantastic role. pic.twitter.com/w6QMOvAFuW
— Alan Mak MP 🇬🇧 🏴 (@AlanMakMP) July 22, 2025
Havant MP Alan Mak said that he will be 'stepping back' from the role of shadow science and tech secretary after being offered another job.
In a letter to Mrs Badenoch posted on X, Mr Mak said that it would 'enable me to focus on my constituency'.
Labour Party chairwoman Ellie Reeves said: 'No amount of deckchair shuffling can hide that the architects of 14 years of Tory failure still sit around Kemi Badenoch's top table.
'The Conservatives haven't changed and they haven't once apologised for the mess they left behind.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Recognising Palestine will not solve Labour's electoral woes
In Scottish Labour ranks there used to be a saying: you can't out-nat the Nats. This was usually in response to armchair strategists who expressed the view that if only Labour in Scotland would embrace a more robust form of devolution – the 'full fiscal autonomy' model, or devo max, as it was called – then those who yearned for independence would consider supporting us. Naturally, such self-delusion was almost childishly easy to dismiss: why would nationalists vote for a unionist party that denied them the very thing they wanted? Why settle for 90 per cent of your ambition when an alternative party (the SNP) were promising to deliver 100 per cent? Labour's current troubles over whether to recognise Palestine formally as a nation reeks of the same cynicism and strategic folly. There are other hurdles to navigate before we even get to Labour's (relatively unimportant) internal squabbles: how do you recognise a country that doesn't exist? What is the point of recognising even a hypothetical country when no one can agree what its borders should be, where its capital is and who represents its leader or its government? More importantly, how would recognition by the UK aid the peace process? It is far more likely to do the opposite, since Hamas would (correctly) see it as a reward for the grotesque act of barbarism they inflicted on Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023, which led directly to the calamity now befalling their own people. Labour MPs, already nervous about their chances of re-election in a few years' time, believe that their chances of survival depend upon the recovery of their party's support among Britain's Muslim voters and recognition of Palestine, even though it can have no practical beneficial impact except in terms of propaganda. They are understandably concerned, not only about the imminent emergence of Jeremy Corbyn's latest political party – one that will specifically target voters disillusioned by Labour's current approach to Israel and Palestine and whose formation has been largely motivated by that conflict – but by others on the Left seeking to exploit the current conflict for their own electoral ends, like the Greens. So put yourself in the shoes of a British Muslim voter, one who has traditionally backed Labour, mainly because of its relaxed approach to mass immigration, not least from your ancestral home country. Two things have happened: first, the Conservatives have proved that Labour does not have a monopoly on support for mass immigration without the consent of the indigenous population. In fact, while in office they established that they were more enthusiastic about an open-door immigration policy than even Labour. And second, the conflict in Gaza exposed Labour as fair-weather friends to both Israel and Palestine. If, as Nye Bevan once said, those who cannot ride two horses at the same time shouldn't be in the circus, then the current administration might have to retire from the ring. The government started out supporting Israel in the face of the Islamist threat. Then, once in office, after it recognised the threat to its electoral strongholds from independent pro-Gaza candidates, it pivoted and jumped on the International Criminal Court bandwagon by allowing arrest warrants to be issued for Israel's prime minister for alleged 'war crimes'. Yet still ministers resist calls from shouty middle-class people in our city centres every weekend to boycott, disinvest and sanction Israel. Still they defend Israel's 'right to exist' – a point of principle that few pro-Palestinian protesters would concede. And now numerous Labour MPs actually seem to believe that recognising Palestine will bring all those disillusioned Muslim and far-Left voters home to Labour. But why would they come back? Why return to a party that, however much it has served their purposes in past decades, is now prevaricating over the one conflict in the region they have chosen to feel strongly about? Just as Scottish Labour could only hope to attract the support of nationalists by fully signing up to the fight for independence, so Labour cannot hope to thwart the appeal of Corbyn's new party on this issue – unless it follows Palestinian recognition, from the river to the sea, with a refusal to recognise Israel's right to exist or defend itself. It would also have to ban all Israeli imports and ban British companies from exporting to that country. Even then, would those lost voters return to Labour in big enough numbers? Why support a 'Johnny-come-lately' to the Palestinian cause when Jeremy has a proud record of describing Hezbollah and Hamas terrorists as his 'friends'? Beat that, Keir Starmer! The Prime Minister mustn't even try. You can't beat the far Left at their own game, at least not while hoping to retain the much more centrist and sensible voters who put you in office. The various weirdos, extremists and weekend paper-sellers that will form the activist base of Corbyn's new party have a lifetime's experience in opposing the only liberal democracy in the Middle East and yearn to see it replaced by the kind of Islamist dictatorship that has brought so much misery to ordinary Palestinians. Far better for Starmer to take the side of Israel as our long-term ally in western democracy's fight against worldwide Islamism.
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Musk brands online safety crackdown ‘suppression of the people'
Elon Musk has said Britain's online safety laws amount to 'suppression of the people', as he joined a backlash against rules to protect children from adult content. 'Its purpose is suppression of the people,' Mr Musk, who has described himself as a free speech absolutist, wrote on X over the weekend. The Tesla founder also retweeted support of a petition to repeal the Online Safety Act, which has garnered more than 330,000 signatures. It's purpose is suppression of the people — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 26, 2025 X, owned by the billionaire entrepreneur, introduced age checks to stop children from watching pornography and other inappropriate content last week, shortly before the rules came into force. However, the platform has been a vocal critic of the new regime. Mr Musk's latest comments come after he has frequently attacked British policing of the internet, including the case of individuals who were arrested and prosecuted for posts related to last summer's riots. Ofcom started enforcing measures in the Online Safety Act last Friday, meaning that websites are now required to check people's ages before showing them porn or other inappropriate content. The measures are designed to protect children, but every person accessing major adult websites must also verify their age through a credit card, bank account, or by using their email or phone number. Some social media sites have also deployed facial age recognition, in which they record a short video selfie to estimate how old users are. The rules have led to a surge in downloads of virtual private networks (VPNs), which mask a user's internet address to appear as if they are in another country. Four of the top six apps on the iPhone App Store in the UK were VPNs on Monday. X introduced age checks last Thursday, saying it was doing so because it was 'required by regulations'. Donald Trump is reportedly pressing Britain to water down the laws as part of discussions around the UK-US trade deal. Sir Keir Starmer is poised to meet the US president on Monday. Zia Yusuf, Reform UK's former chairman, has also criticised the legislation's requirements to protect people from 'psychological harm', saying it 'plunges Britain into an authoritarian surveillance state'. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, appeared to criticise the laws as well, posting an image of an article supporting the laws by Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, with the caption: 'The Conservatives should be in hiding. Never forget who they really are.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Somerset to take 'critical actions' to reduce planning backlog
Council officers have been forced to take "critical actions" to try and speed up their planning Council said the growing backlog of applications meant the workload of its staff remains the 28 July, the council will put into place a number of measures for three months, including reducing staff attendance at meetings, asking the public not to chase applications and only accepting limited Conservative opposition group at the council said the planning system had been "neglected" since the creation of the unitary authority in 2023. There are around 1,600 outstanding cases to clear according to the council, with some waiting months to get a decision on their council blames recruitment difficulties and IT issues on the long wait leader of the opposition Conservative group on Somerset Council, Councillor Diogo Rodrigues, said the system is at "breaking point", calling the new measures an "emergency shut down".He claimed applications which have been in the system for a long time will not be prioritised, in favour of new ones which can be progressed quickly."We're concerned as democratically-elected councillors that we're being pushed back and decisions are being made by officers, day in, day out, and we're not given the opportunity to have our say," he Democrat Councillor Mike Rigby, who is the portfolio holder for planning at the council, called comments by Mr Rodrigues "silly", adding planning applications will be handled in the usual said: "We need to focus on the work itself, rather than providing constant updates."I fully understand why applicants want to know where their application is but our officers are spending far too much time providing those updates rather than actually making decisions."
