logo
Octopus Energy ad banned over heat pump cost claim

Octopus Energy ad banned over heat pump cost claim

The Facebook ad, seen in September, said 'Installs from £500' and continued: 'The government grant covers up to 90% of the costs of a new heat pump. Replace your old broken boiler with an award-winning energy supplier and help stop our reliance on gas.'
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received two complaints, including from the Energy and Utilities Alliance trade body, which challenged whether the 'installs from £500' claim could be substantiated, and whether the ad omitted material information.
Octopus told the ASA that the claim was based on what their customers would pay, rather than the industry average cost of heat pumps.
The firm provided sales data from April 2024 to January 2025 that showed 13.9% of consumers who purchased a heat pump through Octopus Energy paid £500 or less.
In those cases, the total cost of installing a heat pump was £8,000, which, when the £7,500 Bus (Boiler Upgrade Scheme) funding was deducted, gave a final cost of £500.
Octopus said they targeted the ad at consumers in their installation coverage area, which accounted for around 86% of postcode districts.
They referred to a consumer opinion survey they had commissioned from a third party after receiving notification of the complaints from the ASA, to see what people understood from the claim, finding that 58% of respondents understood that the cost of having a heat pump installed by Octopus Energy could be as low as £500 with help from government funding.
The ASA said advertising regulations required that price claims such as 'from' must not exaggerate the availability or amount of benefits likely to be obtained by the consumer.
Competition and Markets Authority guidance similarly stated that 'from' prices should reflect what a significant proportion of consumers were likely to pay for the advertised product.
The ASA said consumers would understand the claim 'Installs from £500″, in the context of the ad, to mean that a significant proportion of consumers could purchase a heat pump and have it installed by Octopus Energy for £500.
However, its assessment of sales data showed that at the time the ad appeared, in September 2024, 5.8% of heat pump sales had been made at or below the price claimed in the ad.
In the preceding months for which Octopus held data, less than 5.8% of sales made had been at or below the claimed price.
For the final two months of 2024, the proportion of heat pumps sold at or below £500 stood between 23% and 24%. However, the data did not show that a significant proportion of sales, at the time the ad appeared, were at the claimed price of £500.
The ASA said: 'We therefore considered the price did not reflect what a significant proportion of consumers were likely to pay at the time the ad appeared.'
It added: 'We had not seen sufficiently robust evidence that a significant proportion of consumers to whom the ad was targeted could purchase a heat pump and have it installed by Octopus Energy for £500. We therefore concluded the ad was likely to mislead.'
The ASA ruled that the ad must not appear again in the form complained about, adding: 'We told Octopus to ensure that suitably robust evidence was held to demonstrate that any claimed 'from' price could be achieved by a significant proportion of consumers.
'We further told them to ensure ads making price claims for heat pump installation included all material information, including clarification of any government grant included in the advertised price, and the existence of eligibility criteria.'
Rebecca Dibb-Simkin, chief product and marketing officer at Octopus Energy, said: 'We disagree with this ruling. 13% of all heat pumps sold by Octopus during the campaign were £500 or less, exceeding the ASA's guideline of 10%.
'This clearly has the fossil fuel lobby worried, which is why they are relentlessly pressuring the authorities to undermine the clean energy sector.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two heat pump adverts banned for ‘misleading' customers over £7,500 grant
Two heat pump adverts banned for ‘misleading' customers over £7,500 grant

Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Telegraph

Two heat pump adverts banned for ‘misleading' customers over £7,500 grant

Two 'misleading' heat pump adverts which suggested anybody could qualify for a £7,500 Government grant have been banned by the advertising watchdog. EDF Energy and home heating supplier, Aira, were each ordered to take down separate adverts which neglected to highlight eligibility criteria for a government grant of up to £7,500 to fit a heat pump. It comes a week after the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) ordered Octopus Energy to remove an advert claiming it could install heat pumps for as little as £500, which was also judged to be misleading. The Government's drive to reach net zero has involved pushing households to switch from gas boilers to heat pumps, even after Labour quietly ditched the Conservatives' target to have 600,000 fitted each year. The Google ad for EDF stated: 'Get A £7,500 Grant – EDF Air Source Heat Pumps'. Aira's advert, on Meta platforms, stated: 'Ditch your gas boiler for an Aira heat pump today [...] £7,500 grant available'. The watchdog said that both adverts 'gave the impression consumers would be automatically eligible to receive a government grant of £7,500, and it did not make clear the government funding for a heat pump was subject to eligibility'. It added: 'We considered that was material information that should have been included. Because the ad omitted material information, we concluded it was likely to mislead.' EDF Energy told the watchdog that its ad linked through to one of three landing pages on its website which contained all relevant information about the eligibility criteria for government heat pump funding. Aira said its ad was only targeted at homeowners in England and Scotland, where £7,500 grants were available, adding that it did not believe a consumer would interpret the ad as meaning that the grants were given automatically. Octopus Energy's online advert boasted that households could heat their homes without gas by switching to a heat pump 'from as little as £500'. But the ASA said the advert 'was likely to mislead' because it omitted 'material information' and did not provide enough evidence that a typical consumer could have a heat pump installed by the company for £500. Octopus Energy denied that the advert was misleading, and claimed to have used a predictive model based on energy performance certificates to underpin the claim made in the advert. The Government's flagship Boiler Upgrade Scheme offers up to £7,500 to homeowners looking to install a ground or air source heat pump. However, official figures show that just 44,000 households used the scheme to install a heat pump last year. Octopus Energy has played a key role in this heat pump push. The company, led by chief executive Greg Jackson, sells its own brand of heat pumps and runs a research and development facility in Slough to make them cheaper and easier to install. Mike Foster, of the EUA trade body, said: 'With any new technology, or a technology that people aren't familiar with such as a heat pump, it's essential that those wishing to sell these products into people's homes are absolutely transparent with the costs and the benefits. 'Exaggerating the benefits or minimising the costs in any advert just brings the whole of the low-carbon industry into disrepute.' An EDF Energy spokesman said: 'Neither the ASA or ourselves received any complaints about the advert, however, we accept their ruling as we are fully aligned to their objective of improving the clarity of customer communications. 'We have already updated our marketing accordingly and would have done so if requested as we take a collaborative approach. We have encouraged the ASA to reach out informally should they have any concerns in the future.' Chris Collinson, chief executive of Aira UK, said: 'We are committed to providing complete transparency around the eligibility criteria and material information surrounding the availability of government grants for heat pumps in the UK, and to compliance with industry codes of conduct. 'Aira has taken immediate steps to address the points raised in ASA's ruling, ensuring that all advertising material clearly and consistently outlines the eligibility criteria required to apply for grants. 'Aira is committed to clear, transparent communication with our customers. Our intention has always been to raise awareness of the Boiler Upgrade Scheme to help as many households as possible benefit from it.'

BrewDog ad banned for implying beer beats boredom and loneliness
BrewDog ad banned for implying beer beats boredom and loneliness

BBC News

timea day ago

  • BBC News

BrewDog ad banned for implying beer beats boredom and loneliness

A poster for BrewDog has been banned by the advertising watchdog for implying that alcohol can beat boredom, loneliness or ad for the firm's Wingman beer, seen in May, was headlined: "BrewDog. Always Got Your Back."It continued beneath: "Some things in life go AWOL - WiFi fails, the weather turns hostile, and your buddy's 'five minutes' turns into a full-scale delay. But Wingman? Wingman stands firm. Always on station, always mission-ready, always got your back. Because every great operation deserves a great Wingman."The Advertising Standards Watchdog (ASA) said it received one complaint. BrewDog said the ad promised reliable quality rather than implying any sort of relief. The firm said it did not believe the ad claimed or implied that the beer had any therapeutic or mood-altering effects, nor that the ad suggested alcohol was essential or a priority in ASA acknowledged that the poster had an air force theme, including the product's name, references to "always on station, always mission-ready", and some of the imagery, which included a bird wearing a flying jacket, helmet and also noted BrewDog's comments that the advert portrayed Wingman Session IPA as being of reliable it said the comparison of scenarios where someone was "frustrated and bored, potentially lonely" was "likely to be viewed as problematic".It added: "The implication was that Wingman was a solution to overcoming those problems that were likely to result in boredom, frustration and potentially loneliness."For those reasons, we considered the ad implied that drinking alcohol could overcome boredom, loneliness or other problems and concluded it breached the code." The ASA ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: "We told BrewDog to ensure their future ads did not imply that drinking alcohol could overcome boredom, loneliness or other problems."A spokesman for BrewDog said: "We acknowledge the ASA's ruling on our recent Wingman advert and we are disappointed with the outcome, which we believe does not reflect the spirit or intent behind the campaign."It is not the first BrewDog advert to be criticised by the July 2022, an email was sent to BrewDog customers suggesting its fruit-flavoured beers counted as "one of your five-a-day". The regulator said the advert could not appear again and warned BrewDog not to repeat the claim. The previous year, the Scottish brewer offered shoppers the chance to find a gold can worth £15,000 hidden in cases sold from its online some winners complained to the ASA after they discovered the cans were not solid gold, but were gold-plated regulator banned the adverts, with BrewDog co-founder James Watt admitting the firm had got the campaign "wrong". The company was founded by Mr Watt and Martin Dickie, both fishermen at the time, in Fraserburgh, Aberdeenshire, in 2007, before growing into a £1bn brand in just a is known for its craft beers and IPAs, and has breweries and pubs across the globe, including 71 in the UK, of which 17 are in Scotland. It also has bars in Dubai, the US and earlier this month, BrewDog announced plans to shut 10 of its bars, saying they were no longer "commercially viable", sparking a furious response from unions over fears of job Watt stepped down as CEO in May last year, saying he would move to a newly created position of "captain and co-founder" while retaining his shares in the company.

UK watchdog bans heat pump adverts over funding small print
UK watchdog bans heat pump adverts over funding small print

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

UK watchdog bans heat pump adverts over funding small print

The UK 's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has banned heat pump advertisements from Aira and EDF Energy. The ads were found to be misleading as they failed to include crucial information regarding the eligibility criteria for government funding. Both Aira's Meta ad and EDF Energy's Google ad prominently mentioned a £7,500 grant without making it clear that the funding was subject to conditions. The ASA concluded that the omission of this material information was likely to mislead consumers, implying automatic eligibility for the grant. This decision follows a similar ban last week on an Octopus Energy ad, with the ASA now requiring all future heat pump ads to clearly state grant eligibility and any included government funding.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store