Social media sites failing to protect girls from harm at every stage, NSPCC says
The children's charity created fake profiles of a teenage girl across different sites, and found it was exposed to grooming, harassment and abuse across various platforms.
The research said that many of the features used by platforms to encourage users to expand their online networks, as well as to be online and active for longer, were at the detriment of the user's safety.
The study said that it was often too easy for adult strangers to pick out girls online and send them unsolicited messages.
There needs to be a complete overhaul of how these platforms are built Rani Govender, NSPCC
Alongside the report, the NSPCC has published polling carried out on its behalf by YouGov which found that 86% of UK adults believe tech companies are not doing enough to protect women and girls online.
The survey of just over 3,500 adults found that parents with daughters listed contact from strangers, online grooming, bullying and sexual abuse or harassment as their biggest concerns about their children being online.
More than half of the parents surveyed (52%) expressed concern over their daughter's online experiences.
Rani Govender, policy manager for child safety online at the NSPCC, said: 'Parents are absolutely right to be concerned about the risks their daughters' are being exposed to online, with this research making it crystal clear that tech companies are not doing nearly enough to create age-appropriate experiences for girls.
'We know both on and offline girls face disproportionate risks of harassment, sexual abuse, and exploitation. That's why it's so worrying that these platforms are fundamentally unsafe by design – employing features and dark patterns that are putting girls in potentially dangerous situations.
86%
Proportion of UK adults who believe tech companies are not doing enough to protect women and girls online NSPCC polling carried out by YouGov
'There needs to be a complete overhaul of how these platforms are built. This requires tech companies and Ofcom to step up and address how poor design can lead to unsafe spaces for girls.
'At the same time Government must lay out in their upcoming Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) strategy steps to help prevent child sexual offences and tackle the design failures of social media companies that put girls in harm's way.'
The children's charity said social media sites should introduce 'abusability studies' to identify risky features that included an analysis based on gender, as well as integrate screenshot capabilities into reporting tools, introduce 'cooling off' periods when two users first connect to restrict contact, and place stricter measures on non-trusted adults from being able to video-call younger users.
Under the Online Safety Act, platforms are required to carry out risk assessments to establish how and if their sites could pose a risk to children.
Firms which breach the new online safety rules, which also include duties to protect children from encountering harm on their sites, can be fined up to £18 million or 10% of global turnover, whichever is higher, and in the most serious cases face being blocked in the UK.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
Terrorism the only issue Starmer handling well, poll finds
Terrorism is the only issue that British people think Sir Keir Starmer is handling well, new polling suggests. In a damning audit of Labour's first year in office, voters gave the Government bad marks on 14 out of 15 key policy areas, from taxation to immigration. The YouGov survey, conducted over the past month, makes grim reading for the Prime Minister, who has struggled with plummeting approval ratings since entering No 10. It indicates the scale of the challenge he faces to win back the public's trust amid the rise of Reform UK, with Labour still reeling from disastrous results at last month's local elections. Asked how the Government was faring in 15 key policy areas, voters indicated that terrorism was the only one they thought Sir Keir was handling well, with a net score of +3. The 14 other issues all received net negative ratings, with immigration the lowest at -60, followed closely by taxation on -58 and welfare on -53. Sir Keir also got bad marks on the economy, with a net score of -52, as well as housing, the NHS, crime, inflation, unemployment, Brexit, the environment, education, transport and defence. The survey, published on Thursday, was conducted between May 3 and June 2, using a representative sample of 8,538 British people. It will come as a blow to the Prime Minister before the spending review next week, at which the Chancellor is expected to unveil cuts to day-to-day spending to keep within her self-imposed fiscal rules. The positive feedback on Labour's handling of terrorism will be encouraging for the Government, suggesting Sir Keir is broadly trusted to keep the country safe. But the lack of confidence in the Prime Minister's ability to tackle the small boats crisis will concern No 10 as Reform storms ahead in the opinion polls. A similarly dire score on welfare suggests Sir Keir has work to do to win back Labour's traditional supporters on the Left, many of whom were dismayed by his sweeping cuts to benefits earlier this year. No 11 will also be disappointed by the lack of faith in Labour's ability to handle the economy, despite Rachel Reeves's attempt to put fiscal responsibility front and centre of her plans. Sir Keir declared Reform his main opposition last month, setting him up for a battle with Nigel Farage on highly charged issues such as migration and net zero. Meanwhile, the Reform leader parked his tanks on Labour's lawn by promising to reverse the cut to winter fuel payments for pensioners in full and lift the two-child benefit cap. The YouGov poll found that nearly three-quarters of voters thought Sir Keir was doing 'very badly' or 'fairly badly' on immigration, compared to just 13 per cent who thought he was doing well. Labour has been accused of losing control of Britain's borders after close to 1,200 small boat migrants crossed the Channel in a single day.
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Do we hate our children? Why else would we do them this much damage?
There are changes being wrought on children today that are more like mutations in the human soul. This should scare us, shame us. Indeed, what's happening should render vast swathes of the adult population unfit for parenthood. The World Health Organisation felt compelled to issue recommendations that under-fives spend no more than one hour daily online. Pause and consider that. Read more by Neil Mackay When I see children in pushchairs with iPads in their hands, I feel visceral contempt for the adult in charge. Why don't you just blow cigarette smoke in your baby's face? is the thought that enters my mind. Head teachers in Belfast primary schools have issued a joint statement begging parents to delay giving children smartphones. Ofcom has found that nearly 25% of five-to-seven-year-olds have their own device. Five-year-olds with smartphones. Pause and consider that. What's happening is an act of mutilation. The Scottish criminologist Professor David Wilson told me not that long ago that his new intake of 450 first year students had all watched beheading videos. We're creating monsters. Social media is awash with hardcore pornography that's easily accessed without age verification. Brutality and sadism saturate the online world. You don't need to hear this from me, you know it. You've seen it. Even the most innocent can't help but stumble upon this relentless horror and degradation. How can exposing youngsters – wilfully, knowingly – to hardcore pornography and snuff movies be considered anything other than the murder of childhood? Children are being physically changed, and not simply through their sedentary existence. I listened in bewilderment recently to linguists describing the rise of the "TikTok" accent. Currently, the voices of kids in Britain – a land rich in regional dialects – are merging into a digital blur. You can hear it among the young if you listen. The two main traits are "uptalk" – their intonation rising at the end of a sentence – and what's called "vocal fry", which is a soft, creak in the voice. It's a hand-me-down from American influencers. If children sound more like online influencers than their own parents, something has gone very badly wrong. We wonder about the rise in youth violence, we scratch our head over what could have caused the explosion in mental health problems among the young, we're bemused at the inability of children to socialise, at the loneliness which plagues them, at the self-hatred they exude, at the lack of empathy they display, at the increase in childhood obesity, at their fear, their greed, their anger. "What has damaged them?" we ask. We are the damage. That's the truth. We're allowing this to happen. We wail about "safeguarding" children, yet we buy them a bomb to hold in their hand every waking minute of every single day. The screeching moral majority – the modern-day Mary Whitehouse brigade – lose their minds over sex education policies in schools, but never speak out about the destruction of children mentally, physically and emotionally at the hands of tech companies. It's like singing hymns over your child whilst shooting heroin into their veins. There's a snowball effect now unfolding. GenZ parents in their late twenties have turned on reading. We know that reading is an empathy machine, an intelligence multiplier, a path to social and economic success. Fewer than half of GenZ parents, however, like reading to their children. Screen time has replaced story time. When I die, I know that memories of reading to my children will be among the most cherished images to flash through my mind. The sorrow and pity I feel for these parents is matched only by my contempt. Those GenZ mums and dads feel reading to their children just isn't 'fun'. What can you say to that? A third deem reading a 'subject to learn' rather than enjoy. Among their own children, only a third read frequently for pleasure. In 2012, the figure was more than 50%. GenZ was broken and mutilated through exposure to screens – thanks to their own parents, that's us, incidentally – and now they're handing on the damage. Remember Philip Larkin's famous line: "They f*** you up, your mum and dad." Professor David Wilson said recently that his new intake of 450 first year students had all watched beheading videos (Image: Tern TV/BBC Scotland) The online world is a place where kids go to learn how to kill themselves, or kill someone else. Yet what do we do? Elect politicians who suck their thumb for fear of inciting the ire of tech billionaires. A few nations show guts. Australia is to ban social media for under-16s. The hard truth, though, is that unless we adults take responsibility for our own actions, our children will never be saved. Why should your child care what you say about social media when you're glued to your phone or howling on Twitter? Did you care what your parents said about smoking when they had a fag in their mouth? The thought of confronting technology is daunting. It makes you feel tiny, it brings on a case of Cnutism: that trying to stop what's unfolding is as fruitless as a mad Danish king daring to hold back the sea. But unlike the sea, technology is human-made. It's not our god. Yet. What's the point of rescuing the economy, fighting for democracy, or saving the planet, if we fail to rescue our own children, fight for their future and save them from what's being done to them on our watch as adults? Surely even raw self-interest should make us act. Ask yourself what the adults of the future may be like when you're old, needing care. Are today's children – innocents being shorn of empathy and understanding through our carelessness and folly, rendered desocialised, self-centred and morality-free; more influencer than citizen – really the people you want in charge of you? Neil Mackay is The Herald's Writer at Large. He's a multi-award-winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics.
STV News
2 days ago
- STV News
Scots warned of ‘scamdemic' as £860,000 lost to cyber criminals in 12 months
Scots have lost more than £860,000 to cyber criminals in the last year as digital scams have increased by more than 1,000% in recent years, according to figures from the national consumer advice service. In what is being dubbed a 'scamdemic' by charity Advice Direct Scotland, the number of such crimes rose from 94 in 2021-22 to 1,119 in 2024-25 – a 1,090% increase. The charity, which runs the website offering advice on avoiding scams, says the reality of the so-called scamdemic is likely to be far worse as the figures do not include cases which go unreported or are reported directly to police. It urged the public to remain vigilant as scammers' methods become more sophisticated. Over the same 2021-22 to 2024-25 period, it said social media scams rose 847%, or from 19 to 180. Email-based scams rose from 24 to 88, while SMS scams dropped by 75%, down from 102 to 25. Phone scams remained at a steady level, with 200 in 2021/22 and 202 this year. The financial impact of scams reported to Advice Direct Scotland reached £861,384 over the past 12 months, with £338,758 lost in the last six months alone. The more common forms of fraud are romance scams, cryptocurrency fraud, fake deals sent through phishing emails, and false adverts on social media. The charity says consumers should be wary of high-pressure tactics and unrealistic promises. Scams were previously more easily identified, with poor spelling or grammar being an obvious sign. Criminals are now using AI to create more convincing messages, and according to the charity, some are even creating fake celebrity endorsements to make their schemes seem more authentic. New rules under the Online Safety Act came into force in March which require online platforms to do more to stop user-generated fraud. They must now carry out risk assessments and have effective complaints procedures in place, while large platforms must provide a dedicated way for users to report scams. Hazel Knowles, senior project lead at Advice Direct Scotland, said: 'Unfortunately, we know that Scots have lost more than £860,000 to online scams in the past year, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. 'This is a hugely under-reported issue. Many victims are too embarrassed to speak out or do not even realise they have been targeted until it is too late. 'Our latest figures show a clear shift in tactics. Cyber criminals are moving away from basic text scams and using more sophisticated methods across email, social media and interactive platforms that mimic legitimate services with worrying accuracy. 'While SMS scams are in sharp decline, phone scams remain surprisingly resilient. It shows that some old threats persist even as technology evolves. 'It is important to remember there is no shame in being scammed, and anyone who is worried or needs help can contact our specialist advisers for free, impartial and practical advice. 'We are here to help people stay one step ahead of scammers and protect the digital spaces we all rely on.' Advice is available on or by calling 0808 164 6000. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
