logo
LIZ PEEK: Trump, Zeldin bring a key ingredient to America's 'green agenda'

LIZ PEEK: Trump, Zeldin bring a key ingredient to America's 'green agenda'

Fox News25-03-2025

Where is Greta Thunberg? Where are the enormous protests that should be greeting President Donald Trump's assault on Joe Biden's onerous climate mandates? Is climate activism dying?
EPA chief Lee Zeldin recently announced a massive reversal of "green" policies that were likely to put Detroit out of business and stymie our country's dominance of 21st century industries. He is eliminating or modifying 31 environmental regulations that would have, at the least, raised prices and limited choices for consumers. At the worst, they would have had us follow Europe toward sky-high power costs and stagnant growth.
Many were programs adopted by the Joe Biden White House in an effort to attract funding and votes from leftist climate activists. None would have moved the needle on global emissions; for that to happen, China and India would have to climb aboard. Those countries account for roughly 40% of global emissions, while the U.S. contributes less than 14%. So far, China and India have only paid lip service to international rule-making that would curb American growth and prosperity, while continuing to build more coal-fired power plants.
The rules tossed by Zeldin, who called the overhaul the "biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history," include redoing the regulations slapped on power plants by Biden's Clean Power Plan 2.0, tossing many of the restrictions currently "throttling the oil and gas industry," reviewing Obama's "endangerment finding" and reconsidering Biden's "backdoor EV mandates."
He also vowed to terminate the $20 billion in controversial grants shoveled out the door in the final weeks of the Biden administration.
All these measures are consequential, including possibly ditching Obama's "endangerment finding," which deems greenhouse gases a pollutant subject to agency regulation.
Forbes writes: "The national and global impacts stemming from EPA's 2009 endangerment finding are impossible to overstate," as it has "served as the foundation for a massive expansion of EPA authority, enabling it to impose its will into most aspects of American life."
That expansion of authority shows up in Biden's Clean Power Plant Rule, concluded last April, which would have mandated adoption of carbon capture techniques by existing coal and new gas-fired power plants by 2032, technology which is not even commercially viable today.
This foolhardy attack on both coal and natural gas would have driven greater reliance on unreliable renewable energy sources like wind and solar, likely leaving the U.S. with inadequate electricity to meet the demands of emerging industries like AI. One of the reasons many international companies are promising to increase their investments in the U.S is the availability of abundant cheap energy, something Zeldin's move will help guarantee.
Note that Biden's rule governing power plants was an extension of a similar Obama-era regulation which was rejected by the Supreme Court in 2022. The court found the EPA had gone beyond its authority in attempting to restructure the country's entire power system in favor of renewable energy.
Another critical change is the reversal of the "backdoor EV mandates" that supercharged efforts to get rid of gas-powered cars. Specifically, Zeldin is committed to rewriting the tailpipe and emissions regulations for cars and trucks that would have required 56% of new vehicles sold by 2032 to be electric. Since less than 9% of new car sales last year were EVs, that would have been quite a jolt.
Our electric grid is not ready to cope with such a massive shift; neither are consumers, who are still concerned about the inconvenience and costs of EVs A Pew poll last year even showed Americans unconvinced that EVs are better for the environment.
Most worrisome: Detroit automakers, which continue to lose money on EVs, are not ready for that change. The Big Three automakers will face even steeper competition ahead. China's automaker BYD has become the world's largest EV producer, just surpassing Tesla. While the company does not yet sell cars in the U.S., it announced in 2023 its intention to open a plant in Mexico, which would produce around 150,000 cars per year. BYD said it would not try to sell in the U.S., a promise many found unlikely.
Chinese EVs are cheaper and better than those made in the U.S. and in Europe. EV imports from China into the EU grew more than tenfold in value terms from 2020 to 2023. In response, European authorities imposed tariffs on car imports from China for the first time.
Climate zealots may be right that EVs are the future, but for the present, Detroit is better off making profitable cars that Americans actually want to buy.
Millions of people protested about climate change in 2019, one of the largest global demonstrations ever. Demonstrations have continued, but at a more modest level. Today, even after Zeldin's announcement, and although climate groups are suing to stop his sensible measures, public outrage seems muted. Many are rejecting the high-handed climate mandates which have hurt Europe and threaten the U.S.
Voters have become more skeptical about the climate apocalypse routinely forecast by activists like Al Gore (the end of polar bears) and New York Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ("The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don't address climate change…")
Polling from Pew Research last fall showed that the country was split on whether Biden's climate policies helped or hurt the country, and that "51% of U.S. adults say they've felt suspicious of the groups pushing for action on climate change." That skepticism will doubtless have grown in the wake of revelations that billions of dollars allocated by Congress in the Inflation Reduction Act flowed to Democrat-aligned NGOs in the final weeks of the Biden administration. And, that some of those newly-formed organizations have little history of climate activism, like the $2 billion that flowed to Democratic activist and politician Stacey Abrams.
Voters elected Donald Trump last year because he embraced common sense. Dialing back some of Joe Biden's extreme climate diktats is just that.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges
Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges

Boston Globe

time25 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Today in History: June 8, Trump indicted on classified document charges

In 1789, in an address to the US House of Representatives, James Madison proposed amending the Constitution to include a Bill of Rights. In 1949, George Orwell's novel '1984' was first published. In 1966, a merger was announced between the National and American Football Leagues, to take effect in 1970. In 1967, during the Six-Day War, 34 American crew members were killed when Israel attacked the USS Liberty, a Navy intelligence-gathering ship in the Mediterranean Sea. (Israel later said the Liberty had been mistaken for an Egyptian vessel.) In 1968, US authorities announced the capture in London of James Earl Ray, the suspected assassin of civil rights leader the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In 1978, a jury in Clark County, Nev., ruled the so-called 'Mormon Will,' purportedly written by the late billionaire Howard Hughes, was a forgery. Advertisement In 1995, US Marines rescued Captain Scott O'Grady, whose F-16C fighter jet had been shot down by Bosnian Serbs on June 2. In 2009, North Korea's highest court sentenced American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee to 12 years' hard labor for trespassing and 'hostile acts.' (The women were pardoned in early August 2009 after a trip to Pyongyang by former President Bill Clinton.) In 2017, former FBI Director James Comey, testifying before Congress, asserted that President Trump fired him to interfere with Comey's investigation of Russia's ties to the Trump campaign. In 2021, Ratko Mladić, the military chief known as the 'Butcher of Bosnia' for orchestrating genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in the Balkan nation's 1992-95 war, lost his final legal battle when UN judges rejected his appeal and affirmed his life sentence. In 2023, PresidentTrump was indicted by a grand jury in Miami on 37 felony counts related to the alleged mishandling of classified documents that had been moved to Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida home. (The case against Trump was abandoned following Trump's November 2024 presidential election victory.)

New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London
New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London

Hamilton Spectator

time37 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London

BEIJING (AP) — U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. Both sides agreed in Geneva last month to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession . Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. Technology is a major sticking point The latest frictions began just a day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to 'pause' tariffs for 90 days. The U.S. Commerce Department issued guidance saying the use of Ascend AI chips from Huawei , a leading Chinese tech company, could violate U.S. export controls. That's because the chips were likely developed with American technology despite restrictions on its export to China, the guidance said. The Chinese government wasn't pleased . One of its biggest beefs in recent years has been over U.S. moves to limit the access of Chinese companies to technology, and in particular to equipment and processes needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors. 'The Chinese side urges the U.S. side to immediately correct its erroneous practices,' a Commerce Ministry spokesperson said. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wasn't in Geneva but will join the talks in London. Analysts say that suggests at least a willingness on the U.S. side to hear out China's concerns on export controls . China shows signs of easing up on rare earths One area where China holds the upper hand is in the mining and processing of rare earths . They are crucial for not only autos but also a range of other products from robots to military equipment. The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production. Trump, without mentioning rare earths specifically, took to social media to attack China. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on May 30. The Chinese government indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well. A Commerce Ministry statement said it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations.' The scramble to resolve the rare earth issue shows that China has a strong card to play if it wants to strike back against tariffs or other measures. Plan to revoke student visas adds to tensions Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a U.S. announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students has emerged as another thorn in the relationship. China's Commerce Ministry raised the issue when asked last week about the accusation that it had violated the consensus reached in Geneva. It replied that the U.S. had undermined the agreement by issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China and saying it would revoke Chinese student visas. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its website. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a May 28 statement that the United States would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' More than 270,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. in the 2023-24 academic year. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Gen Z Doesn't Seem To Care About Protesting Against Trump
Gen Z Doesn't Seem To Care About Protesting Against Trump

Newsweek

time44 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gen Z Doesn't Seem To Care About Protesting Against Trump

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "Where the f*** is Gen Z?" asked TikTok creator @djangita in a video, which has at the time of reporting been viewed 2.3 million times, filmed at a protest in April. Since the reelection of President Donald Trump, thousands of people have turned out at protests across the country, including the "Not My Presidents Day" demonstrations in February, "Hands Off!" protests in April and "May Day" protests last month. And while protest movements have historically been driven by young people, the crowds at these protests seem noticeably older. So, where is Gen Z? Has the generation committed to a life of tradwives and the manosphere, leaving activism behind? Are they simply disenfranchised? Or has activism taken on a new meaning for a generation raised on tech? Newsweek spoke with experts to find out more. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Where Is Gen Z, politically? Looking at the perceived absence of Gen Z from the protest scene, the easy conclusion to make is they're not protesting Trump because they support him. The reality is a bit more complicated. As with much of American politics, where Gen Z sits politically is in a state of sharp polarization. Trump has had a significant amount of support from young men, having secured 55 percent of the vote from men aged 18 to 29 in 2024. There is, though, a wide gender gap in this age group, with 61 percent of women from the same demographic having voted for Vice President Kamala Harris. As of late April 2025, though, polling found that Trump's support among Gen Z had tailed off since the election, with 37 percent approving of him and 58 percent disapproving. Shifting Protest Culture It's not that young people are completely absent from political protests. "Young people's participation in major protests on issues like gun violence after the Parkland school shooting in 2018, racial justice after the George Floyd murder in 2020 and the Israel-Palestine conflict in the past two years have been a major feature of this generation's political engagement," Alberto Medina, communications team lead at the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), told Newsweek via email. But there's been a recent shift, and the image of an angry young person at a protest could now be relegated to the historical archives. "At the hands-off rally, there was a very clear demographic representation that excluded younger people," Dana Fisher, director of the Center for Environment, Community & Equity and a professor at America University, told Newsweek, adding that young people are "just not turning up at these mainstream protest events." As for why, Fisher said: "Young people are feeling really frustrated with the political process. They're feeling really frustrated with the two-party system in America, and they have lost confidence in the notion that democracy in America can work for them." She recounted an interaction with a young student in her research team who put it bluntly, telling her: "Young people have given up on democracy in America." And young people's relationship with activism is changing, too. Newsweek spoke with Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run for Something, about this. "We have to consider that over the last year and a half, or last two years, when Gen Z has showed up to protest at college campuses in the last year in particular around what's happening in Gaza, they have been harangued, harassed, kicked out of school," Litman said. "They have faced incredible consequences. "I think the culture of protest, even in the last two years, has changed drastically." The current conflict between Israel and Hamas began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched an attack on Israel in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage. Israel retaliated and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to eradicate Hamas. The Gaza Health Ministry reports that at least 54,677 Palestinians have been killed since the conflict began, and there is a widespread humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with nearly all of the population having been displaced, according to the U.N. Students at universities across America have protested the conflict, with Columbia University becoming the epicenter of pro-Palestinian protests last spring. Protests have led to arrests, unrest and concerns have been raised about antisemitism. Commitment To Other Causes But just because Gen Z isn't out on the streets protesting Trump doesn't mean they're not out on the streets protesting. "A lot of young people who were engaged in all sorts of activism [are] shifting their focus to Gaza in the past year, year and a half since the violence broke out," Fisher told Newsweek. Newsweek spoke with Hatem Abudayyeh, national chair of the U.S. Palestinian Community Network (USPCN) about Gen Z presence at pro-Palestine protests. "We're still organizing protests every single week, and we still have a lot of college students, and even high-school-age students, Gen Z kids, who are coming to those," he said. "College-age young people and campus organizers and activists have been a part of all the social justice movements in the United States for decades." Pointing to the encampments and college protests, he said: "That clearly was something that not only the Palestine Support Movement had not seen in the United States before, but none of the social justice movements had seen [it] in the U.S. before since probably the Vietnam War era," and described Israel vs. Palestinians as "the Vietnam War issue of this era." New Era Of Activism It seems that activism, and political engagement itself, is changing significantly for young people. "It's evolving," Litman said. "Not all activism is flashy. It doesn't always make for a compelling video or photo. That doesn't mean it doesn't work." "In the first Trump administration, protesting was one of the primary ways that people showed their anger at Trump. And that was good for that moment. But we also saw the limits of that as a tactic. Gen Z is thinking about different ways that they can make their voice heard. "We're seeing young people be really intentional about the ways in which they can move the needle," Litman added, pointing to consumer activism and social media activism and highlighting that Trump cares about the latter. Medina told Newsweek:"Engagement online can serve as an entry point for youth to learn about and find opportunities to engage in issue advocacy or other forms of political participation. The key is ensuring that those opportunities are available and accessible to young people, that the structures and support systems are in place for youth to get involved and find political homes. "Young people are looking for opportunities to learn, to be heard and to have an impact on issues they care about. That process can begin with a post on social media but requires more sustained support that can empower youth to do more than be passive consumers of political ads or information." And beyond the discourse online or on the streets protesting, Litman highlighted one thing young people are clearly thinking about: running for office, she said. "Run for Something has had nearly 50,000 young people raise their hands to say they want to run for office in the last seven months," she said. "We've had more people raise their hands since the election than we did in the first three years of Trump's first term."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store