B.C. to appeal landmark Aboriginal title ruling over Fraser River land in Metro Vancouver
The most recent Indigenous rights and title ruling in B.C. is heading back to court after the province released a statement saying it plans to appeal the decision.
The Supreme Court of B.C. ruled last week in favour of the Cowichan Tribes on Vancouver Island, granting it fishing rights and Aboriginal title over a parcel of land on Lulu Island in Richmond, B.C.
Niki Sharma, B.C.'s attorney general, said in a statement that the ruling has unintended consequences for private property rights that must be looked at by a higher court.
"We disagree strongly with the decision. British Columbia will be filing an appeal and seeking a stay to pause implementation until the appeal is resolved," she said in the statement.
"This case is an example of why the Province prefers to resolve land claims through negotiation — where we can protect property rights directly — rather than risk considerable uncertainty through court decisions."
Sharma says that her team is working through what grounds of appeal the province has following the initial ruling.
She says that better resolutions are found by sitting down with First Nations partners, and that her colleagues will be in contact with the Cowichan Nation, which filed the case.
Ancestral village site
Cowichan Tribes is a First Nation community, and the first named plaintiff in the case.
Together with the Halalt, Lyackson, Penelakut, and Stz'uminus First Nations, the five First Nations make up the Quw'utsun (Cowichan) Nation.
Cindy Daniels, chief of the Cowichan Tribes, says that the Fraser River was known as the Cowichan River before colonization, and that her people's presence in the Salish Sea was well known and documented by early settlers in the region.
"We initially tried to move this work forward through the treaty process, but there was no openness to discussing Tl'uqtinus Village lands and Aboriginal rights to fish in the Fraser River at that table, so we pursued truth and reconciliation through the courts," she said.
"While not quick, the courts remain an option for First Nations when we are not heard and our rights are ignored."
Daniels says that she is pleased with the recognition of Cowichan Nation rights and title from the province, and that the area identified by the court is still being reviewed by the nation.
Indigenous opposition
The historic ruling comes with backlash from other First Nations whose land base is connected to the South Fraser River, including Musqueam and Tsawwassen.
In an email to CBC News, the Tsawwassen First Nation says that the nation is aware of the B.C. Supreme Court decision, and that its legal counsel is reviewing it.
In a news release, the Musqueam First Nation says that "Chief and Council are deeply offended by the recent Supreme Court of British Columbia decision on Cowichan Tribes v Canada. Leadership and our entire community fundamentally disagree with the court's decision."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
‘Section 107 needs to go': What CUPE's defiance of labour code could mean for future strikes
A traveller walks past striking Air Canada flight attendants at Vancouver International Airport in Richmond, B.C., Saturday, Aug. 16, 2025. The union representing more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants says its members have walked off the job after it was unable to reach an eleventh hour deal with the airline. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ethan Cairns) The federal government invoking a contentious labour provision, and Air Canada indicating it expected the law to be enforced, has riled unions and workers, prompting predictions that the way the dispute played out could set a precedent. On Saturday, Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered flight attendants back to work, less than a day after they went on strike. She did so using Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, a measure that gives the government the power to end a work stoppage to 'maintain or secure industrial peace.' But, in an act of defiance the major airline's CEO told BNN he hadn't anticipated, flight attendants rebuffed the federal order and remained on the picket line, with the full backing of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). The two sides later reached a tentative deal early Tuesday morning. On Tuesday, Canadian labour leaders said they've been emboldened by flight attendants' fight, and the fact that they managed to make a deal at the bargaining table with Air Canada after all. 'I very strongly hope that the message that this sends to employers and to our federal government, is stay out of interference and collective bargaining, and do not expect government to ride to your rescue,' said Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) President Bea Bruske. Bruske, speaking to CTV News in her Ottawa office on Tuesday, described Section 107 as 'a crutch' that employers, and lately the federal government, have relied on during rail, port and postage labour disputes. 'Over the weekend, the flight attendants made sure that crutch snapped,' she said. 'Every other union going forward is also going to question themselves very strongly as to whether or not they will adhere to any kind of ruling that comes out as a result of the invoking this particular section.' Prime Minister Mark Carney Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to reporters as he arrives on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Monday, Aug. 18, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Patrick Doyle The CLC is now gearing up for a fall lobbying effort on Parliament Hill to push Prime Minister Mark Carney to scrap Section 107 from the federal labour code, and it's expected to have the backing of other union and labour leaders. 'Not allowing workers to withdraw their labor is a huge problem. It is a constitutionally protected right. It is the only avenue that workers actually have … in order to demand better for them from the employer,' she said. 'It's critical that employers be forced to get to that bargaining table and be serious and not wait for government intervention.' 'Misunderstood the public mood' Recent polling commissioned by CUPE suggests the Liberal government may have misread the public in making this move. 'I think it had the effect of really riling up the entire labour movement,' said Abacus Data CEO David Coletto. 'And (Carney) set a precedent now that employers are going to face more conflict than less in the future.' Coletto added that the move seemed to go against 'what the Carney brand is built on,' of being focused, thoughtful and competent. 'I think they misunderstood the public mood a little bit.' 'Maybe hit a wall' Labour expert Steven Tufts said the directive only has power when workers comply with it. 'I think what is going to happen over the next little while is Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, that some people argue have been has been abused in recent years by the federal government, has maybe hit a wall,' Tufts said. CTV News asked Hajdu for her response to unions who say the federal government was 'heavy handed' in its use of Section 107, and whether she was concerned that CUPE's defiance of it has laid the groundwork for it to no longer be a viable tool in future labour disputes. Her office did not provide comment by deadline. In a general statement about the tentative agreement between Air Canada and its flight attendants, Hajdu called the resolution 'good news for workers and Canadians.' Please see my statement on the latest development between CUPE Flight Attendants at Air Canada and Air Canada: // Voici ma déclaration sur les derniers développements entre les agents de bord du SCFP d'Air Canada et Air Canada : — Patty Hajdu (@PattyHajdu) August 19, 2025 The question that remains is whether other unions will take a similar approach when contract talks break down. With Canada Post and the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) heading back to the bargaining table, CTV News asked CUPW for comment, but did not hear back by deadline. 'I think all of labour has been emboldened by this decision of flight attendants to just say no and to stay out,' Bruske said. 'I would anticipate that this decision … is going to inform many other rounds of bargaining that we have yet to see.'
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Elon Musk makes surprise touchdown in small B.C. town
Social Sharing A small B.C town is buzzing after the world's richest man made an unexpected touchdown this past weekend. Elon Musk, the CEO of X and Tesla and a former White House adviser, landed in Bella Bella on B.C.'s Central Coast on Saturday in a small private aircraft before being flown out by helicopter. He returned to the airstrip on Monday and flew out. Local Seán Carter says the fishing community of about 1,500 people in the Great Bear Rainforest, 470 kilometres northwest of Vancouver, is used to seeing the rich and famous — including members of the Royal Family — pass through to take advantage of the recreational opportunities in the area, but Musk is at another level. "It's not every day the richest man comes through," he said. "That's gonna be a tough one to top." Carter says the common belief is Musk was passing through on his way to a property off the coast owned by James Murdoch, the son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch. The Globe and Mail reported in 2017 that the younger Murdoch had purchased a property for recreational use off the B.C. coast due to his love of the area. He is also a board member of Tesla, where Musk serves as CEO. CBC News has reached out to Tesla for comment. An online service which tracks a private jet belonging to Musk shows the craft landed in Vancouver late Friday night and left Monday afternoon. Those times align with photos provided to CBC News, which show Musk arriving in Bella Coola on Saturday and leaving on Monday. Musk, who was born in South Africa, is a Canadian citizen through his mother, Maye Musk, who was born in Regina. As a teenager, he moved to Canada, where he says he lived and worked in Saskatchewan and Vancouver before studying at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont. Earlier this year, he was the subject of a petition calling on the Canadian government to revoke his citizenship due to his role in Trump's White House, as the U.S. president was ramping up rhetoric about using a trade war to make Canada a state. In B.C., Premier David Eby excluded Tesla products from its electric vehicle charger rebate program in response to U.S. tariffs, stating, "It's just for Tesla and it's because of Elon Musk." Multiple Canadian municipalities and government agencies have also been re-evaluating their relationship with X, citing Musk's politics. Meanwhile, many rural communities have signed on to use Musk's satellite internet Starlink service to help provide connectivity in remote areas. Musk has shared differing views on Canada over the years. In 2023, he posted a picture of himself wearing an I Love Canada T-shirt and later that year posted a message stating, "I'm proudly half-Canadian." But in February 2025, in response to the petition to revoke his citizenship, he posted "Canada is not a real country," which he later deleted. Emily Lowan, who is running for the leadership of the B.C. Green Party, shared photos of Musk's arrival in Bella Bella to her social media accounts, writing, "yet another reason to tax billionaires out of existence." In a statement to CBC News, she said the ability of billionaires to build private havens in B.C. while using private jets that fuel the climate crisis is a "stark warning" to governments of the need for action. Carter said there was plenty of debate about Musk over the weekend, but politics aside, having him pass through has been the "talk of the town" in Bella Bella. "No matter what your opinions are of the guy, it was something to follow," he said. And, he said, even though he arrived and left in a private jet, Musk wasn't able to get special treatment at the small-town airport. "It was quite busy, so the plane had to land on one side and the helicopter on the other, so he had to get out and walk a long way," he said.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
B.C.'s Joffre Lakes Park closing for a month for recovery and First Nations' practices
The B.C. government says Joffre Lakes Park will shut for a month in about two weeks' time, to allow it to "recover from a busy summer" and for First Nations to carry out cultural practices. It says the closure from Sept. 2 to Oct. 3 is also in recognition of the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation and will be the last of three closures this year. The park's operation has been contested by the Lil'wat and N'Quatqua First Nations, which temporarily shut access to the park in 2023 to assert title and rights to the territory. A statement from the Ministry of Environment and Parks says the closure at the popular park in B.C.'s Sea-to-Sky region next month will "provide time and space for members of the Lil'wat Nation and N'Quatqua to reconnect with the land." The province says the nations requested additional closures, but the current schedule best balances cultural, conservation and public access needs, and ensures the park remains open during the Labour Day weekend. The park was also closed on April 25 for three weeks, and for two weeks in June.
