logo
More Commentary from Katelyn Zimmer

More Commentary from Katelyn Zimmer

The Carlton Trail-Eagle Creek candidates were given additional opportunities to comment on topics such as agriculture, manufacturing, housing affordability, healthcare, efforts to lessen our dependence on American produce, as well as anything they saw as key issues. What follows are Liberal candidate Katelyn Zimmer's comments.
Agriculture has long been the backbone of the Saskatchewan economy, and when asked about the Liberal Party's plans to protect and support the industry here, Katelyn pointed to the measures already in place. The Federal Government currently funds 60% of the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC) AgriStability Program, which helps protect farmers against significant revenue losses. In the event that a Liberal Government is elected, they propose to substantially enhance this support by doubling the revenue protection limit for individual farms from $3 million to $6 million. This increase aims to provide a stronger safety net for agricultural operations facing revenue declines due to factors such as tariffs imposed on exports and the effects of extreme weather events, which are becoming all too common.
In addition to these financial protections, she said, the Liberals plan to invest in expanding domestic food processing capabilities. A new $200 million Domestic Food Processing Fund will be established to encourage the development of food processing facilities, particularly in rural and remote areas. This initiative aims not only to create jobs but also to reduce dependency on foreign processing and to ensure that local farmers have greater access to markets for their produce.
Moreover, there will be an increased commitment to helping farmers, ranchers, and food producers access new markets for their products. An additional $30 million will be allocated to the AgriMarketing Program, which is designed to assist agricultural businesses in promoting their products and reaching consumers more effectively. This funding will help farmers expand their market reach and enhance the competitiveness of their goods.
Lastly, the proposed plan includes a significant boost for farmers and ranchers looking to invest in new, more efficient farm equipment. An injection of $30 million will be added to the Agriculture Clean Technology Program. This funding will support the adoption of advanced technology that improves farm productivity while also promoting sustainable farming practices. These initiatives collectively aim to strengthen the agricultural sector, making it more resilient and more capable of meeting both local and global food demands.
On the topic of manufacturing and value-added ventures, the Liberal Party vows to take decisive action in response to the U.S. tariffs by implementing targeted trade measures. The goal is to ensure that these measures have a significant impact on the U.S. economy while keeping any repercussions on Canadian businesses and workers to a minimum.
Katelyn said that during these challenging times, their primary focus would be on safeguarding Canadian workers and supporting local industries. However, their vision extends beyond mere protection, committing to building a new, resilient Canadian economy that can thrive in the face of global challenges. By unifying the economy, moving away from the fragmented system of 13 provinces and territories, their ambition is to foster a stronger Canada and create an economy that allows businesses to sell their products to consumers across the country and beyond, while providing individuals the freedom to work wherever they feel their talents can be best utilized.
To achieve this vision, the Liberals will make substantial investments in critical infrastructure that supports trade and enhances productivity. This includes modernizing and expanding ports, railways, airports, and highways to ensure that Canadian products can move seamlessly to markets both domestically and internationally. By laying a solid foundation for trade, Canadian businesses will be enabled to compete more effectively on the global stage and ultimately contribute to the prosperity of all Canadians.
Affordability and housing are of great concern to people across the country, and when questioned about how the Liberal party would respond and support consumers, Katelyn noted that Mr. Carney has officially cancelled the carbon tax, which is expected to save Canadians an average of 18 cents per litre on gasoline prices. This measure aims to alleviate the financial burden on families and individuals who rely on fuel for their daily commutes and essential activities.
Additionally, she said, a new middle-class tax cut will be introduced, providing financial relief to two-income households with potential annual savings of up to $825. This initiative is designed to help middle-class families retain more of their hard-earned income to support their household expenses and savings.
A Liberal government is committed to housing development and significantly increasing the number of homes built within a decade, to double the rate of construction, targeting nearly 500,000 new homes annually. This initiative is crucial in addressing the ongoing housing shortage and making homeownership more achievable for Canadians. As well, first-time homebuyers will benefit from the complete elimination of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on homes priced at or below $1 million. This change can result in substantial savings, up to $50,000, making it easier for newcomers and young people to enter the housing market and invest in their first property.
Dental coverage will be expanded by a Liberal government to include all Canadians aged 18 to 64, effectively providing access to dental care for approximately 4.5 million people. This expansion aims to ensure that more Canadians receive essential dental services, promoting better oral health and overall well-being. Through these efforts, Canadians are projected to save about $800 in dental care costs, enabling them to allocate their resources more effectively towards other essential needs and improving their quality of life.
All sides of Canada's healthcare system, from long-term care to acute care to primary care, struggle to find enough people to fill vacancies, to protect, preserve and improve access to Canada's public health care system. Katelyn said a Liberal government will add thousands of new doctors and health professionals. This will be achieved by increasing training spaces, building new medical schools, and addressing labour mobility issues so that health care workers can be employed anywhere in the country. Streamlining credential recognition for internationally trained health professionals will make it easier for those already living here to contribute, and utilizing a new global recruitment strategy will attract physicians practicing abroad.
A critical issue that Katelyn identified is the representation of the rural West. As Canada continues to focus on efficiently transporting resources from coast to coast, the insights and perspectives of rural and prairie communities will be increasingly vital. Addressing infrastructure needs, advocating for sustainable practices, and ensuring access to essential services are all areas where rural representatives can provide invaluable input. Their firsthand experience of the challenges and opportunities in these areas and understanding of local conditions and priorities enables them to contribute meaningfully to national discussions, ensuring that the voices of rural Canadians are heard and considered in the decision-making process. Individual MPs from western Canadian regions are highly qualified advocates for their constituents' needs. They represent an equal number of voters as those in Ontario and Quebec, yet they must navigate a much larger and more diverse geographic area. This vast territory includes varied landscapes, economies, and cultures, which can complicate the delivery of services and resource distribution.
In light of President Trump's economic attacks and his persistent verbal aspirations to make Canada the 51st state, many Canadians are boycotting American products and produce. Katelyn shared that a Mark Carney-led Liberal government will strengthen Canada's food security by investing in greenhouses, hydroponics, and other controlled environment agriculture that allow us to grow more types of food, here at home. They will work with the private sector to protect Canadian food security. This will help to ensure that Canadian families have access to fresh, nutritious, and affordable food while supporting Canadian farmers and food producers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Scofflaw Strongman
The Scofflaw Strongman

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Scofflaw Strongman

DONALD TRUMP SAYS HIS LATEST VENTURE into dictatorship—deploying the National Guard and Marines against American citizens, over the opposition of state and local officials—is about safeguarding the rule of law. 'If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, we'll be very, very strong in terms of law and order,' Trump told reporters on Sunday, as protests escalated in Los Angeles against his deportations. 'It's about law and order.' Don't believe it. Trump is using the Guard and the military to enforce his will, not the law. The evidence of his insincerity is what he did four years ago: When rioters were on his side, he didn't call in the Guard. He embraced the criminals, pardoned them, and purged the law enforcement officials who prosecuted them. He's a despot and a scofflaw. In the Los Angeles uprising, Trump—like every authoritarian before him—claims to be saving his country from chaos. 'Violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents,' he declared on Sunday afternoon. 'These lawless riots only strengthen our resolve.' A few hours later, he called for 'bringing in the troops . . . RIGHT NOW!!! Don't let these thugs get away with this.' And on Monday afternoon, he ridiculed any suggestion that the protesters were peaceful. 'Just one look at the pictures and videos of the Violence and Destruction,' he wrote, 'tells you all you have to know.' Insurrectionist mobs. Lawless riots. Videos of violence. We've heard such alarming descriptions before. And on January 6, 2021, we saw how little Trump cared about them. Share AT 1:21 P.M. THAT DAY, AS TRUMP returned to the White House after instructing his supporters to march on the Capitol, he was told twice by a member of his staff, 'They're rioting down at the Capitol.' The exact moment of this encounter was captured in a photograph. Trump replied, 'All right, let's go see.' He went to his dining room and watched on TV as the riot proceeded. For the next hour, TV networks aired videos of the violence and destruction. Like this week's videos from Los Angeles, they told the president all he needed to know. But Trump did nothing. Toward the end of that hour—somewhere between 2:13 and 2:24 pm, according to the final report of the House January 6th Committee—Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, informed White House Counsel Pat Cipollone that Trump 'doesn't want to do anything' about the ongoing assault. A few minutes later, Cipollone was heard to tell Meadows, 'They're literally calling for the Vice President to be F'ing hung.' And Meadows was heard to reply, 'You heard him, Pat. He thinks Mike [Pence] deserves it. He doesn't think they're doing anything wrong.' Meanwhile, in a phone call, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy warned Trump that the rioters 'literally just came through my office windows, and my staff are running for cover. I mean, they're running for their lives. You need to call them [the assailants] off.' Trump responded by rebuking McCarthy: 'Well, Kevin, I guess they're just more upset about the election theft than you are.' These conversations took place as Fox News, which Trump was watching, reported that police had been injured and that rioters inside the Capitol were 'feet from the House chamber.' On the screen, according to the House committee report, Fox 'was showing video of the chaos and attack, with tear gas filling the air in the Capitol Rotunda.' Throughout the afternoon, Trump's aides, family, and friends implored him to tell the rioters to go home. He refused. Not until 4:17 p.m., nearly three hours after being informed about the riot, did he comply. Join now TRUMP NOW CLAIMS that he told the rioters to be peaceful and that he offered ten thousand National Guard troops to protect the Capitol. The first claim is misleading. The second is a lie. The House report shows that before and during the assault, Trump resisted entreaties to call for peace. On January 6th, a text message to one of his top aides, Hope Hicks, said Trump 'should tweet something about Being NON-violent.' Hicks wrote back: 'I suggested it several times Monday and Tuesday and he refused.' At one point in his incendiary speech that morning, Trump did ask his followers to march to the Capitol 'peacefully.' But that phrase, according to the House report, was 'scripted for him by his White House speechwriters.' The main theme of the speech was to 'fight like hell.' Another Trump aide, Sarah Matthews, told the committee that once the riot was underway, Trump resisted pleas to call for peace. He did use the term 'peaceful' in a tweet at 2:38 p.m., but only grudgingly. Trump's press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, told Matthews that Trump 'did not want to include any sort of mention of peace in that tweet.' Trump's other January 6th story, about the National Guard, is also a sham. His acting defense secretary, his Army secretary, and his chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff all testified that he never ordered the Guard to deploy that day. He never even spoke to these officials. Instead, during the riot, he used his phone to press members of Congress to do what the mob wanted: overturn the election. It's true that before the attack, Trump talked about the possibility of needing guardsmen. But it was never about protecting the Capitol. It was, in Meadows's words, to 'protect pro Trump people' from anti-Trump protesters. In short, everything Trump decries in Los Angeles happened on January 6th, and more. A violent, insurrectionist mob swarmed and attacked police. And instead of bringing in the Guard 'RIGHT NOW,' Trump watched the assault, encouraged the mob, and waited to see whether it would keep him in power. In fact, when he returned to office this year, Trump pardoned nearly everyone who had pleaded guilty to or had been convicted of assaulting police on January 6th. He said the insurrectionists were right: 'They were protesting a crooked election.' He purged the prosecutors who had handled those cases. And in a speech at the Department of Justice, he boasted that he had 'removed the senior FBI officials' who, in his words, had persecuted the 'J6 hostages.' Share NOW, AS HE DEPLOYS THE MILITARY against protesters in an American city, Trump invokes 'law and order' as a bogus excuse. And he vows to go further. On Monday, he announced a policy of escalation against protesters. 'If they spit, we will hit,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'This is a statement from the President of the United States. . . . The Insurrectionists have a tendency to spit in the face of the National Guardsmen/women, and others. . . . IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before.' On Tuesday, speaking to troops at Fort Bragg, Trump said he was seizing control of the National Guard and ending the tradition of consulting governors. 'We will use every asset at our disposal to quell the violence and restore law and order right away,' he declared. 'We're not going to wait . . . for a governor that's never going to call.' And in remarks in the Oval Office, Trump said his policy of escalating state violence would apply to anyone who protests the military parade on June 14, his birthday. 'If there's any protester [who] wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' he warned. 'For those people that want to protest. . . . They will be met with very heavy force.' This is not a man defending the rule of law. This is a man continuing the project he began in his first term and tried to complete on January 6th: replacing the rule of law with himself. Share The Bulwark

'Unprecedented pressure:' Businesses want infrastructure projects expedited, says KMPG survey
'Unprecedented pressure:' Businesses want infrastructure projects expedited, says KMPG survey

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Unprecedented pressure:' Businesses want infrastructure projects expedited, says KMPG survey

Businesses want all levels of government to 'quickly align' to expedite and streamline the review process for infrastructure projects, according to a survey by KPMG Canada. The survey itemizes what Canadian businesses say needs to be done as the federal and provincial governments work to finalize a list of large nation-building projects. These range from improving existing ports and transportation networks to building an energy-agnostic utility and digital infrastructure corridor. 'We're seeing unprecedented pressure on our infrastructure and construction industries to deliver projects quickly and urgently,' Zach Parston, KPMG Canada's partner and national leader for infrastructure, said in a press release. KPMG notes financing these projects will be key. Nine out of 10 business leaders said Canada will need to 'unlock' public-private investment in infrastructure to incentivize institutional investors and private capital to participate, the survey said. Ninety-two per cent of respondents said that investment in infrastructure improvements, such as transportation networks, ports, pipelines, etc., would help their company grow or expand their business nationally and overseas. 'Canada is already in a megaproject era that's about to intensify in a big way,' said Parston, adding productivity will need to increase exponentially. The survey said 90 per cent want Canada to invest in a policy and infrastructure agenda that will unlock the country's economic potential, including a national utility corridor and digital infrastructure. Meanwhile, 89 per cent said Canada's ports are 'woefully unproductive' and need major investments to make good on the promise of wider global trade. The same percentage also said that governments must collaborate and create pre-approved industrial zones across the country. They say this would cut red tape and speed up approval times to 'build refineries, mines or factories that would allow for expansion within Canada and open up access to coastal ports and put a stamp on Arctic sovereignty.' 'The success of these projects will hinge on how they are structured and financed,' said John Cho, KMPG's national private capital leader in Canada. 'If they can be structured in such a way to attract institutional investor and private capital ownership, it will allow the federal government to continue to invest in other areas critical for maintaining and improving the lives of Canadians.' KMPG Canada surveyed 250 business leaders in all industry sectors across Canada between May 9 and 20 using Methodify's online research platform. 87% of energy executives think it's time to build a west-to-east pipeline, KPMG survey says Rising interest rates pushing EVs out of reach for Canadians: KPMG poll Janet Rieksts Alderman, chair of KMPG Canada's board leadership centre, said megaprojects are notorious for running late and overbudget. 'The primary reason megaprojects fail is poorly designed governance,' she said. • Email: dpaglinawan@

‘A team that I'm proud of': How Irving Oil's John Laidlaw built an East Coast legal legacy
‘A team that I'm proud of': How Irving Oil's John Laidlaw built an East Coast legal legacy

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘A team that I'm proud of': How Irving Oil's John Laidlaw built an East Coast legal legacy

by Jim Middlemiss John Laidlaw never imagined he would spend the twilight years of his career navigating Ireland's complex energy markets, but sometimes the best opportunities arrive when you least expect them. The 2025 recipient of the CGCA's BLG Stephen Sigurdson Lifetime Achievement Award made what he calls 'a leap of faith' in 2016, leaving a 32-year partnership at law firm Cox & Palmer in Saint John, N.B. to become chief legal officer at Canadian energy giant Irving Oil Ltd. 'I was at a point in my life where my youngest of four was wrapping up her undergrad degree, and we were empty nesters,' recalled Laidlaw, now in his 10th year at the Saint John-based energy company. 'You start to look around and say, 'Maybe I've gone as far as I'm going to go in private practice, and maybe I should think about what lies ahead.'' The conversation that changed his trajectory began innocently enough — a casual discussion with Irving Oil's then-president Ian Whitcomb about whether he would move in-house. For someone who had built his reputation as a corporate commercial lawyer handling everything from public-private partnerships to advising clients in aquaculture, fisheries and agriculture, a move to the oil and gas industry represented a dramatic pivot in the latter stages of his career. 'Those around me whose judgment I respected were all of the view that this was something I should really think about,' said Laidlaw. 'Irving Oil has a stellar reputation, and opportunities like that don't always come along when you're in your late 50s.' He admits it was a huge change, likening it to drinking from a firehose. Fortunately, he learned early in his career how to be a quick study. 'You never stop learning in any business, but particularly so being a corporate commercial lawyer. Whoever walks in the door, you've got to learn their business fairly quickly to be able to provide good, sensible and competent advice,' he said. The company supported him through the transition. 'They were very patient with me as I got up to speed. This is a very fascinating, complicated business, and one where you never stop learning.' The transition from external counsel to corporate insider proved transformative. Within months, Laidlaw found himself at the centre of Irving's historic expansion into Ireland, advising on the 2016 acquisition of that country's only oil refinery from Phillips 66. The Whitegate facility purchase was followed in 2019 by Irving's acquisition of the Tedcastle group, which operates under the Top Oil brand. 'The great thing about being here is you get to see things end to end,' Laidlaw said, contrasting his in-house role with private practice where deals concluded when documents were signed. Now, he says, 'when it's all said and done, you get to hang out at the party' after the deal and figure out how to 'integrate this and make it all work.' Irving Oil, founded in 1924 and still family-owned, operates Canada's largest refinery and has 900 fuelling stations spanning eastern Canada and New England. When Laidlaw arrived, Irving's legal department consisted of just his predecessor and one other lawyer. Today, he oversees eight legal professionals plus a 'very strong regulatory compliance team' — reflecting both the company's growth and the increasing complexity of energy sector regulations. 'I've built a team here that I'm proud of,' Laidlaw said, noting that four of his current team members followed him from Cox & Palmer. 'Many are lawyers and support staff who believed in what we were building here.' For Laidlaw, who was called to the New Brunswick bar in 1984 after earning his law degree from the University of New Brunswick, the most rewarding aspect of his career has been developing talent. During his Cox & Palmer years, he served as an instructor for the commercial law portion of the New Brunswick bar admission course for nearly 20 years and maintained an open-door policy for junior lawyers seeking guidance. He believes strongly in mentorship and coaching, because that's how he learned. 'I had some tremendous, mentors that cultivated me and brought me along,' he said. 'As you get a bit older, you realize the positive impact it had and so in my view, it's a duty or an obligation. I like to think the profession is pretty good at that, but it's something that everybody has to play a part.' Laidlaw's community involvement has also been extensive. He has served as chair of the Saint John area New Brunswick Provincial Mental Health Tribunal, the Centracare Foundation and the Horizon Health Network, one of the province's two health authorities. 'I was brought up in a household where you were expected to give back,' he explained. 'To whom much is given, much is expected.' At 67, Laidlaw shows no signs of slowing down. 'I'm obviously in the downward slope given my age, but I don't intend to leave Irving Oil anytime soon,' he said. 'I'm not sure I would ever fully stop doing something.' His advice to young lawyers reflects the humility that colleagues consistently note: be the first to arrive and last to leave, see everything as an opportunity, and remember that success often comes down to being in the right place at the right time — then having the courage to walk through the door when it opens. Irving Oil president steps down amid strategic review Arthur Irving out as chairman of Irving Oil For Laidlaw, that door opened nearly a decade ago in Saint John, leading to what he describes as some of the most fulfilling years of his legal career. 'It sort of reignited things for me at a point where I wasn't quite ready to wind down,' he said. 'This has been absolutely wonderful.' Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store