Green Shoots: Reflections on the National Dialogue
There are political parties from left and right of the spectrum who have declared they will boycott the entire thing, for quite different reasons.
The legacy foundations of the Tutus, Sisulus, Biko and others will boycott the First Convention that is happening as I write this, but not the entire dialogue process.
They say there has not been enough time to prepare, and I sympathise with that. But there has been a litany of negative reactions to the announcement to the president's announcement of the dialogue.
Many have argued that we know what's wrong with South Africa and don't need a national dialogue about crime, corruption, unemployment, poor public service, and all the other things that are betrayals of the promise of liberation. It will just be a talk shop that will distract us from making the tough decisions that are needed to fix our problems.
And it's a waste of money. A very telling critique from some quarters is that it will be an elite-driven process, essentially a conversation whose agenda and execution are determined by people with political and economic power.
There is precious little representation of marginalised groups in the eminent persons group established to promote the dialogue, so perhaps that hasn't helped with this particular criticism.
I don't think it is a bad thing to rally the country through creating opportunities for conversations. We are not particularly good at listening to each other.
You just have to navigate Joburg rush hour traffic, or try to have a conversation about immigration, or people's sexuality.
Nuance is not a strong point for the contemporary South African. If designed properly, a national dialogue will allow space for those whose voices are excluded from the public narrative to be heard.
Too often, political parties and NGOs take on themselves the role of representing the concerns of people at the margins.
They do very little to create opportunities where those people can speak for themselves, something that can be so liberating and empowering. If I am heard, I am far more likely to become an agent of my own development and emancipation.
The great Brazilian educator and philosopher Paolo Freire told us that true liberation comes from the oppressed taking agency and actively participating in the transformation of society.
By enabling community voices to be heard, and amplifying those voices, we also provide a counterpoint to the dominant narratives in society that are shaped by the vested interests of the privileged and the powerful.
The country will be less likely to be misled by the narrow-minded type of populism that pits poor people against other poor people while the privileged escape critique. Local communities survive through networks of collaboration and compassion that we don't see reflected in much of the national narrative. Perhaps engaging in a thoughtful dialogue will allow those positive elements to be seen, heard and amplified.
Even as we start planning for this dialogue, we must guard against being performative, where we simply create the impression of having conversations. As much as there will be processes aimed at reaching as many people as possible, let us not make those numbers the objective.
Instead, let's focus on facilitating deep engagement with each other on the issues affecting us all. These critical engagements will do more to build cohesion than any of the feel-good moments so often provided by our sports men and women.
If we build a culture and practice of critically and constructively conversing with each other, we make space for people to organise and coalesce for action to change society. If we get this right, it will strengthen the resolve and build the ability of people living in South Africa to hold duty-bearers – our politicians, faith and business leaders, community leaders, and civil servants – accountable to do their jobs.
*Green-Thompson runs an organisation that supports social justice action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
4 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
PROF ZONDI: Despite early controversy, Ramaphosa's National Dialogue signals a path forward
The idea of a National Dialogue to get the nation talking about things that matter for the present and the future has been on our lips for a while now. It was first suggested as a Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) 2 over 15 years ago. It was also suggested as an economic CODESA in the past, but there was no urge to convene it. Now that President Cyril Ramaphosa has kick-started the process, there is contestation about the process and approach to this. The controversies preceding the 15-16 August National Convention put these differences in the open for all to see. First, the legacy foundations representing the legacies of major political figures in South African history announced a dispute within the preparatory team and pulled out of the convention. In a joint letter, these entities, including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation and the FW De Klerk Foundation, protested against a government takeover of what was announced to be a citizen-led national dialogue. As a result of this alleged government takeover, the foundations said, there was a rush to convene the convention before all was ready for this and decisions to undertake emergency procurement in possible violation of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA). The government, through the Presidency, disputed this, and the president convened the preparatory task team to confirm that there was no merit to the foundations' concerns. Indeed, the National Convention happened with much fanfare and produced some notable decisions. The convention went off quite smoothly and signalled a thoughtful process. It seemed the foundations' decisions had not harmed the process and signalled that they do not have as much influence as some thought. But their decision had put a damper on the idea and caused many questions to be raised, including in talk shows, on social media and other public exchanges. Of course, a discussion of this nature could not avoid displaying the agony of many about the failure of the post-apartheid transition to deliver a better life for all. This is the failure to overcome poverty and reduce unemployment. The transition has not been successful in reducing inequalities according to race, class, gender and other dimensions. The beautiful post-apartheid democracy has been marked by a long period of lower economic growth, growing crime and corruption, fragmentation and disillusionment in the population. The sixth administration elected with great hope has delivered failures and disappointments while promising positive change. Couple this with a growing population, including illegal immigration swelling the numbers of the poor and climate change effects, the crisis keeps deepening, and despair is growing. This was evident in the discussions and submissions at the national convention. Some of the areas of consensus achieved are significantly important for moving forward. The decision to give a strong focus to discussions of problems and solutions in the economy towards an inclusive economy and livelihoods is a noble one. This subject is closely tied to the matter of land reform, agrarian transformation and food security. This was elevated into a priority on its own. We hope the discussion will reflect on why we have failed to achieve what was set out in the National Development Plan about this. Crime and corruption were ranked the second most important priority by virtue of public concern and the scale of it as a national crisis. On that score, the scourge of gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) stood out as a matter for focused attention as the dialogue begins. The subject of education and health is framed as about winning the future. The discussions elevated the State as a subject of discussion because of its association with problems and its key role in managing many solutions to national crises. Indeed, the National Development Plan (NDP), too, made building a capable developmental State a key task of the nation back in 2012. If discussions clarify what has been achieved and what has not been achieved, and why it would have helped the country move forward. The subject of values and culture as a matter critical for rebuilding the social fabric on which the nation and the State are built was made prominent by civil society voices worried that failures were not incidental but systemic. The NDP had enjoined us to work hard to achieve social cohesion, a sort of renewal for the nation's soul. The convention re-emphasised the vagaries of inter-generational trauma and called for healing. This dialogue could help us find out how progress can be achieved. In the final analysis, what is said and recommended in response to growing poverty and inequality will be a measure by which the success of the dialogue will be judged. All these issues were interlinked. The attainment of one relies on the achievements in other areas. It seems that the National Dialogue is now back on track. But there are pointers to consider, which, when applied, would improve the process. The first is that it is to be expected that the National Dialogue will not be a smooth, quiet and united discussion but could have tough edges as stakeholders jostle for the nation's soul. It could even be messy and chaotic, without being a disaster. It can be dogged by controversy without collapsing. Professor Siphamandla Zondi Director: Institute for Pan-Africa Thought & Conversation; and co-director: Institute for Global African Affairs Professor: Department of Politics and International Relations
eNCA
6 hours ago
- eNCA
Deputy police commissioner Sibiya challenges 'unlawful' suspension
JOHANNESBURG - South African National Commissioner for Crime Detection, Lieutenant-General Shadrack Sibiya, is fighting back against National Police Commissioner, Fannie Masemola's, notice of suspension against him. Sibiya's legal team says the suspension is unlawful and riddled with irregularities. They're demanding it be withdrawn immediately. Sibiya's lawyers are also pushing to stop parallel proceedings against him. This application is scheduled to be heard on the 26th of August. Sibiya's lawyers warn they may seek court orders against the process and even pursue costs against Masemola.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump tariffs a stone in the shoe of 'made in USA' cowboy boots
Ryan Vaughan, the CEO of Rio of Mercedes cowboy boot factory tests ostrich leather in Mercedes, Texas. In an unusual consequence of Donald Trump's tariffs, cowboy boots "made in the USA" will suffer from the 30% tariff due to come into force on South Africa, which produces the overwhelming majority of the ostrich leather so prized for these boots. The manufacture of iconic "made in the USA" cowboy boots is set to suffer from President Donald Trump's 30-percent tariffs on South African exports that came into force in August. Texas's most renowned makers of the southern US fashion staple source the ostrich leather they require exclusively from Oudtshoorn. Known as the world's "ostrich capital", Oudtshoorn is home to a few hundred thousand people and about as many of the giant flightless birds. "We just don't know how bad the impact will be, but positive it wouldn't be," said ostrich farmer Laubscher Coetzee of the tariffs that kicked in after South Africa appeared unable to negotiate a new trade deal with Trump. More than half of the global supply of ostrich-derived products - from feathers to leather and meat - comes from nearly 200 farmers around Oudtshoorn who are joined in the Cape Karoo International (CKI) group, said its managing director Francois de Wet. South Africa supplies about 70 percent of the world's production, he said. Luxury handbag manufacturers in France and Italy are among the CKI's main clients. It also ships 20 percent of its ostrich leather to top Texas bootmakers such as Lucchese, Justin and Rios of Mercedes, whose boots are sold at several hundreds of dollars a pair. Ostrich is "an extremely important leather in our industry", Ryan Vaughan, CEO of the Rios of Mercedes manufacturer, said. "It's very resilient, it forms to the foot," he said, wearing a typical cowboy hat. Coming from "a long line of cattle ranchers", his family brand was born in Texas in 1853 and employs 250 people. The tariffs "would make a dramatic impact in our business and in the western industry," he said, "because it's not just us that build a lot of cowboy boots out of ostrich leather". It is also the case of Tony Lama, an El Paso bootmaker supplied by CKI that has given a pair to every recent Republican president. Donald Trump received cowboy boots emblazoned with "MAGA" made out of "American alligator" skin. De Wet from the CKI said he believed the South African supply of ostrich leather to the US manufacturers did not run counter to a push by the Trump administration for production to be brought home. The United States did not have enough ostriches to provide the required leather, he said. "We export the raw material, the ostrich leather. They can't produce it from local ostriches in the US. They don't have them," he said. "They do all the value-adding in the United States," he said. "So therefore, in terms of the pure definition of what the Trump administration would like to see, in this case, we do it already." The soft skins, recognisable by spots left by the large ostrich feathers, are currently sold to American manufacturers for around $20 a square foot. "We exported more than the usual volume of ostrich leather to the US in the past two-three months, so we have a little bit of a buffer," said de Wet. "For the moment we don't expect any layoffs in the short term," he said. But "in the long term, if we have to pick up the full tariff, it will definitely... cause a shrinkage of our business." The consumer could also not be expected to pay an extra 30 percent for the already pricey boots, he said. "So the tariff will have to be split between the exporter... and the importer, and preferably also a part paid by the end consumer." It is the unique climate of the Little Karoo, which gets less than 400 millimetres of rain a year, that makes it ideal for ostrich rearing, said Coetzee, a fourth-generation Oudtshoorn farmer. "That is the reason the ostrich industry is still here 200 years after (it started)," he said. His great-grandfather built the family home in 1896, when the price of ostrich feathers rivalled that of gold because of their value to the women's fashion industry. The extravagant "ostrich palaces" of the time are a reminder of the industry's previous major crisis, when the market collapsed in the early 1900s as the arrival of the low-roofed motor car ended the fashion for high-feathered hats. | AFP
