Lack of people standing for Auckland's next local body election worries officials
Photo:
RNZ / Isra'a Emhail
A lack of people putting their hand up to stand in Auckland's upcoming local body elections is worrying officials who are counting down till nominations open next month.
There are 171 positions for local board members, ward councillors and one mayor to be filled, but so far only a few candidates have announced they will stand.
For the mayoralty, so far incumbent Wayne Brown and a councillor Kerrin Leoni have thrown their hats in the ring.
Speculation deputy mayor
Desley Simpson would challenge Brown was quashed
earlier this month when she said she would serve as his deputy again if they were both re-elected.
With nominations opening on July 4 ahead of the October elections, Auckland Council is encouraging those considering their calling to local politics to get busy.
Council's general manager for governance and engagement Lou-Ann Ballantyne said now was the time to prepare.
"July is just weeks away, so I encourage anyone planning to stand to think about your candidate statement, your social media profiles, your community connections, and the issues that matter in your area."
In the 2022 local elections, 466 Aucklanders stepped up as candidates to be elected, including 23 who ran for the position of mayor, while 65 stood for ward councillor positions and 378 stood for local boards.
Meanwhile, 423 candidates stood to be elected in 2019.
People considering standing do not need to live in the area they choose to represent but do require two nominations from those living there.
If only one candidate stands in an area they will be elected but if an area has no candidates, it could trigger a by-election in March 2026.
Electoral officer Dale Ofsoske said if by close of nominations in August an area has no candidates, an extraordinary vacancy would be created.
"An estimated cost for a subsequent by-election ranges dramatically from a mayoral by-election in the millions to the smallest local board, Aotea Great Barrier," he said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
26 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Govt accused of reducing Zero Carbon Act to 'a shell'
environment climate 7:47 am today An RNZ analysis has identified dozens of climate initiatives repealed, defunded, or delayed. In Depth journalist Kirsty Johnston spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Gore mayoralty: Rates, debt hot topics as Ben Bell, Nicky Davis square off
Gore mayor Ben Bell speaks at the meeting on Monday night. Photo: RNZ / Tess Brunton It's a two horse race in the Gore District with a former councillor and the current mayor facing off for the mayoralty. Last election, then-23-year-old Ben Bell became the youngest mayor in the country's history, ousting incumbent Tracy Hicks by just eight votes. This time round he's competing against Nicky Davis, a former councillor and council head of operations. They went head-to-head in a Southland Business Chamber debate in Gore on Monday night. Nicky Davis, left, and Ben Bell front for the debate. Photo: RNZ / Tess Brunton Gore residents arrived at the debate armed with issues they want to see tackled - rates, core infrastructure, central services and debt were top of mind. Bell acknowledged it had not been an easy first 18 months . During that time, he weathered calls for him to step down, a potential vote of no confidence that was ultimately aborted , and a fractured relationship with then-chief executive Stephen Parry, who ultimately resigned . But he said the council pushed through change during the tough times. "We changed from building an imaginary bridge to building a pipeline under the ground. We changed from buying land for no reason to selling assets to pay back debt, and we changed a top heavy council to appointing a new chief executive to running the council properly," Bell said. The district was ripe for an economic boom and he wanted to attract more businesses here, he said. Gore mayor Ben Bell Photo: Supplied / Facebook Davis thought her council days were behind her. However, it was community concern about rates and the direction of the council that encouraged her to stand for mayor. "This year, the rate rise was closer to 24 (percent), but instead the council opted to rate 8.8 (percent) and borrow the rest, giving us all a false sense economy," she said. "This is like putting the groceries on the credit card." She flagged a possible moratorium on new spending and wanted the council and chief executive to investigate how they could cut costs further, including staffing costs. She feared the council might be forced to merge with other local councils or make unwanted change in the future "The preference for me would be to be involved in those discussions. We need to get the best deal we can get for our ratepayers, not shoved into something without a voice," Davis said. Bell was sceptical about possible amalgamation and he was also worried Gore might lose its independence. "That's what you've got to fight for is making sure that the structure is correct before you press go. I don't think that if you dwindle Gore down to one seat on a bigger council or to a community board and then doing away with the Mataura community board, I don't think that's representation that Gore deserves," Bell said. The government's September deadline for submitting their water service delivery plans is looming. Bell said the council recently agreed to partner up. "We're really lucky. We've managed to hold onto both Central Otago and Clutha so we can get those economies of scale," he said. "But in terms of the overall framework, I do think it's been a shambles. It's been a really tough ask." Davis said they needed more councils to hop onboard. "With three councils that are left, I'm not sure that there's enough in the way of numbers to actually bring down the costs enough so I think further discussions and further explorations need to be made," she said. Debate MC Jeff Grant was pleased to see plenty of interest from the public. "At the end of the day, the mayor is the leader of the council in terms of forming the debate and the direction of the district," Grant said. But did the ratepayers get what they were after? It was a mixed response when RNZ spoke to residents after the debate - some were happy with the answers they got while others said they did not hear enough about solutions. With less than two months until election day, Gore ratepayers were keen to hear more before giving their tick of approval.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Homeowners could be left with costs under building consents changes
Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A property lawyer says homeowners could be left vulnerable to costs when building projects go wrong under changes to the building consents regime. The government is moving to a proportionate liability system for the Building Act, so each party is liable for the share of work they carry out. It says councils have been reluctant to sign off building consents because they're liable for defects, causing unnecessary delays in the construction process. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the government would be exploring mechanisms to protect homeowners, such as indemnity insurance or home warranties. Property lawyer James Wollerman told Morning Report it was not clear how that would work. Under joint and several liability a homeowner could claim full compensation for a botched building project from the council, he said. Under the new scheme of proportionate liability - if the council and builder were sharing liability by 50 percent each - the homeowner would be left carrying that 50 percent if the builder went missing. He said there was an option of an insurance scheme, but it was not clear who would underwrite that insurance. "We've seen that insurers are not generally prepared to insure for weather-tightness defects. "So there's a big question out there as to what the government's going to be able to put forward in terms of an insurance scheme that would provide some sort of protection for homeowners." Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said Australia had had a proportionate liability scheme since the 1990s. He said it made sense to shift liability away from councils, which was creating high rates for ratepayers and a risk-averse culture in construction. "If you're a council, and you know that you can end up liable for an entire project, then you get increasingly stressed and often obstructive, when it comes to allowing more innovative building materials, more innovative techniques. "And as a result, we end up with high rates and little innovation in building and high building costs," Seymour said. He said the shake-up of the building consents regime would cut delays and costs for construction projects. "Moving to a regime where the various people involved, those who provide the materials, those who do the work, perhaps those who do the design, and those who do the consent, have liability when things go wrong, is not a scary or different thing. "It takes us to where most of the world is." Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins told Morning Report the current rules were introduced in the early 2000s during the leaky home saga. "Are they slowing things down? Yes they probably are. So I think the government are making the right steps, you know they are heading in the right direction. "The issue will be getting consumer protection right." Hipkins said that the government believed if it pushed house prices up the economy would be fixed. "House building sure creates jobs but the housing market is not the totality of our economy."
