logo
Protests broke out against Hamas in Gaza. What do Palestinians think about the militant group?

Protests broke out against Hamas in Gaza. What do Palestinians think about the militant group?

The Hill02-04-2025

Thousands of Palestinians chanted against Hamas during anti-war protests last week in the Gaza Strip, the biggest show of anger at the militant group since its attack on Israel ignited the war.
Protesters said they were venting anger and desperation as they endure a new round of war and displacement after Israel ended a ceasefire. They leveled unusually direct criticism at Hamas even while remaining furious at Israel, the United States and others for their plight.
Public expressions of dissent have been extremely rare since Hamas seized power in Gaza in 2007. The militant group has violently dispersed occasional protests and jailed, tortured or killed those who challenged its rule. Hamas has faced no significant internal challenge since the start of the war and still controls Gaza, despite losing most of its top leaders and thousands of fighters.
There is also nearly universal anger at Israel, whose offensive has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians and flattened entire neighborhoods. Israel has blocked all humanitarian aid for a month and renewed its offensive. Israel blames the high death toll on Hamas because it operates in densely populated areas, accusing it of showing no concern for Palestinian civilians.
'The protest was not about politics. It was about people's lives,' said Mohammed Abu Saker, a father of three from the bombed-out town of Beit Hanoun who joined a demonstration. 'We can't stop Israel from killing us, but we can press Hamas to give concessions.'
Is Hamas popular?
Nearly all Palestinians support some form of resistance to Israel's military occupation and expansion of settlements — which predate Hamas' founding in the 1980s.
In general, support for Hamas in the occupied West Bank and Gaza tends to increase when it battles Israel and subside during periods of relative calm.
The Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, which has conducted scientific polling in Gaza and the West Bank for decades, found before this war began that about equal numbers of Palestinians supported Hamas and the secular Fatah movement led by President Mahmoud Abbas, who recognizes Israel and cooperates with it on security.
But polls taken since the start of the war show Hamas has been consistently more popular than Fatah. The change is particularly pronounced in the West Bank, where support for Hamas rose immediately after the Oct. 7, 2023, attack. Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people that day, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostages.
In Gaza, the polls provide some evidence that support for Hamas rose slightly in the immediate aftermath of the attack, but since then has returned to about where it stood previously. Hamas has not had the support of most Palestinians, in either territory, either before or after the war began.
Wartime polling in Gaza is especially challenging due to a lack of access to some regions and mass displacement. There is also potentially even more pressure on respondents to answer a particular way.
Tahani Mustafa, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, said it's difficult to gauge Hamas' support. 'I wouldn't say it's either popular or unpopular at this point in time,' she said.
The Associated Press contacted dozens of Palestinians about Hamas in recent months. The vast majority declined to be interviewed or requested anonymity, fearing retribution from Hamas — or from Israel if they voiced support for the group. Many said they were just struggling to stay alive.
Israel's offensive has killed over 50,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were civilians or combatants. The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers.
Israel says it has killed some 20,000 militants, without providing evidence. Hamas has not disclosed the full extent of its losses.
How does Hamas handle dissent?
Hamas has violently suppressed dissent since seizing power from the Palestinian Authority —led by Fatah. Rights groups say both Palestinian authorities crack down on protests and detain and torture critics.
In the past, Hamas has killed people it accused of being collaborators with Israel, as well as some who have challenged its rule. There are no confirmed reports of anyone being killed for taking part in the latest protests.
Israel and Western nations consider Hamas a terrorist organization because of its long history of attacks that have killed Israeli civilians.
Gaza residents, speaking on condition of anonymity out of security concerns, say plainclothes Hamas security men have patrolled the territory throughout the war, maintaining law and order while also quashing dissent.
But Hamas' detractors may have other reasons for staying quiet.
Any perceived criticism of armed resistance against Israel is generally frowned upon in Palestinian society and seen as treasonous by some, especially during wartime.
Family elders of Beit Lahiya, where the first protest erupted last week, released a statement backing demands to end to the war while reaffirming their support for armed resistance.
Saeed Abu Elaish, a medic from Jabaliya, one of the most heavily damaged areas in Gaza, lost his wife, their two daughters and several relatives in an Israeli airstrike. He said he's sick of hearing Hamas leaders call for more sacrifice. 'Stop this war. Stop these massacres,' he said.
But he was also angry at Israel's expressions of support for the protests, accusing it of exploiting them. 'It's mainly against Israel before it's against Hamas,' he said.
Many Palestinians see armed resistance as the only path to independence because peace negotiations and forms of nonviolent resistance — like boycotts — have largely failed.
'There is a red line in the Palestinian national discourse. You simply don't criticize armed resistance,' Mustafa said. 'To do that will then provide the kind of pretext that Israel and the international community are looking for' to support Israel's actions.
Why is there no alternative to Hamas in Gaza?
The last serious Israeli-Palestinian peace talks broke down in 2009, at the start of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's nearly unbroken 15 years in power. Abbas, who is 89 and deeply unpopular, is still committed to a two-state solution, while the Israeli government is opposed to Palestinian statehood.
Netanyahu has vowed to eliminate Hamas and ruled out any role for Abbas' Palestinian Authority in Gaza, saying it is not truly committed to peace. He says Israel will maintain open-ended security control, as it does in the West Bank, where the Palestinian Authority administers population centers.
That means there is no one around whom opponents of Hamas might rally, and no postwar plan.
Most Palestinians alive today were not old enough to vote the last time national elections were held, in 2006, when Hamas won a landslide victory. Abbas, whose mandate ended in 2009, has repeatedly promised elections only to postpone them, blaming Israeli restrictions. Polling indicates he would struggle to win reelection.
Hamas has said it's willing to cede power in Gaza to other Palestinians but has rejected Israeli and U.S. demands that it disarm and go into exile. An armed Hamas would maintain influence in Gaza even if it gives up nominal authority.
With no clear alternative to Hamas and no end in sight to the war, some protesters have expressed despair.
'Our children have been killed. Our houses have been destroyed,' said Abed Radwan. He said the protest he joined last week was against the war, Hamas, other Palestinian factions, Israel and 'the world's silence.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State Department considers giving $500 million to the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
State Department considers giving $500 million to the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

State Department considers giving $500 million to the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

The State Department is discussing allocating $500 million for funding of the U.S. and Israel backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) that has been delivering food to Palestinians in Gaza in recent weeks, a U.S. official and a source with direct knowledge told Axios. Why it matters: If the U.S. goes ahead with this massive funding, it will become the biggest donor to the foundation and will de facto "own" the operation. While such a move will increase the U.S. credibility in asking other countries to donate money to the foundation, it would also draw the U.S. deeper into active involvement in the Gaza war and make it more responsible for the humanitarian situation in the enclave. Without funding from foreign governments, the GHF will have difficulty operating in the coming months. Israeli officials asses that the GHF needs around $100 million a month to continue delivering aid in Gaza. Driving the news: In recent weeks, the GHF launched a new mechanism aimed at delivering aid to Palestinian civilians without Hamas taking control of or getting credit for it. The GHF and Israeli officials say hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have already received food, medicine and other supplies at the aid sites. But over the last week, two mass casualty events took place near the aid centers. In one of the incidents, the IDF confirmed that it fired at Palestinians who were on their way to the aid distribution center. Zoom out: In several other incident, the distribution centers were overwhelmed by the number of people who came to receive aid. The shooting and the chaos led the GHF to suspend operations for 24 hours on Wednesday and ask the Israeli military to take steps to avoid similar incidents. The UN and other aid organizations who refuse to cooperate with the GHF have warned for weeks that exactly these kind of incidents would result from civilians needing to pass through IDF lines to reach the newly established aid centers. Behind the scenes: A U.S. official said that State Department officials who oppose the U.S. funding of the GHF are concerned about the U.S. becoming responsible for future mass casualty incidents around the aid distribution centers. Those who support the idea on the other hand claim that U.S. funding means more U.S. ability to improve the humanitarian situation on the ground. A U.S. official said the idea of funding the GHF has been discussed in working levels within the State Department and Secretary of State Marco Rubio and president Trump, who will have to make this decision, hasn't been briefed about it yet. "It will probably happen next week and until then we will see if the situation stabilizes and there are no more incidents and then we will decide," the U.S. official said. Reuters first reported the discussions in the State Department on possible U.S. funding for GHF. The State Department did not respond to requests for comment. Between the lines: The funding on the GHF has been kept under a veil of secrecy by its senior leaders and by the Israeli government. A senior Israeli official said the GHF secured $100 million to launch its operation. The money came from foreign governments and from private sector donors who all asked for anonymity, the Israeli official said. Israel's public broadcaster Kan reported earlier this week that the Israeli government has given more than $200 million to the GHF in a secret appropriation to the ministry of defense without revealing where the money will go to. The Israeli prime minister's office denied Israeli tax payer money was given to GHF. Udi Levy, the former head of the Mossad's economic intelligence unit, told Israel's channel 12 last week that Qatar and Turkey are funding GHF. The Qatari and Turkish governments denied that. But the Israeli military censor ordered channel 12 to delete the interview from its website.

Detained Columbia graduate describes ‘visceral' harm of missing son's birth
Detained Columbia graduate describes ‘visceral' harm of missing son's birth

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Detained Columbia graduate describes ‘visceral' harm of missing son's birth

Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University graduate detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over his campus activism, said he has suffered 'visceral' harm after missing the birth of his son while in federal custody. 'The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' Khalil, a green-card holder, wrote in court documents filed Thursday. 'I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me,' he added. The Trump administration said it plans to revoke Khalil's legal status and urged him to deport himself voluntarily, according to reports from The Associated Press. Khalil was denied permission to go to the birth of his first child last month. Secretary of State Marco Rubio initiated removal efforts for Khalil in March, citing a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act over the government's allegation that he participated in pro-Hamas rhetoric at campus protests amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war. 'To not be able to see them, hold them, speak with them freely, enjoy everything I imagined our first days as a family would be like, is devastating. Worst still is knowing that they must face all the fear and notoriety of this case without me,' Khalil wrote in this week's court documents. 'The Rubio Determination is casting a shadow of suspicion across our entire family. I could never have imagined this would happen, and it is horrifying to experience this as a husband and father,' he added. Khalil, in the court filings, denied accusations that he supports Hamas but questioned the Israeli government's strikes on 'innocent Palestinians.' Democrats and advocacy organizations have urged officials to immediately release Khalil, alleging that his constitutional right to free speech has been ignored. 'This arrest is unprecedented, illegal, and un-American. The federal government is claiming the authority to deport people with deep ties to the U.S. and revoke their green cards for advocating positions that the government opposes. To be clear: The First Amendment protects everyone in the U.S. The government's actions are obviously intended to intimidate and chill speech on one side of a public debate,' Ben Wizner, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, said in a statement. The State Department did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store