Two Scottish men shot dead by hooded gunman outside Irish pub in Costa del Sol
Two Scottish men have been shot dead by a hooded gunman outside an Irish pub in the Costa del Sol, according to reports in Spain.
A spokesperson for the Spanish National Police told Sky News that two people had been killed but would not confirm further details on the victims.
The force said an investigation was under way.
The double shooting occurred outside Monaghans bar in Fuengirola on Saturday evening, which had been screening the UEFA Champions League final.
Local authorities were quoted as saying that both victims were Scottish nationals.
According to newspaper Sur in English, a hooded attacker got out of a car and opened fire.
One of the men was reportedly shot point-blank in the chest, while the second victim was shot in the chest and abdomen while attempting to flee and later died at the scene.
The newspaper added that the wife of one of the men reportedly escaped unscathed.
The gunman then fled on foot. It is believed he met up with his accomplice and they continued to escape by car.
The attack is one of several shootings to have taken place in the Costa del Sol region this year, according to reports in Spain.
It also comes amid a gangland feud in Scotland, but Police Scotland said it had "nothing further to add at this time" whether the double shooting in Spain was linked to the criminal activities taking place on UK soil.
The force instead directed Sky News towards the Spanish authorities.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) said it had not been contacted for consular assistance in relation to the incident but would offer assistance if asked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
29 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Wednesday's briefing: Bruno Fernandes says no to Saudi and Fran Kirby retires
England's hopes of Women's Nations League glory were dashed by world champions Spain in their Group A3 decider while Euro 2022 winner Fran Kirby announced she was retiring from international football. Caoimhin Kelleher completed his move from Liverpool to Brentford in the hunt for regular first-team action. Not Fer sale Manchester United skipper Bruno Fernandes has decided to stay at Old Trafford (Bradley Collyer/PA) Manchester United skipper Bruno Fernandes has confirmed he turned down a money-spinning move to Saudi Arabia because he wants to 'stay at the highest level'. The 30-year-old midfielder has been the subject of speculation linking him with a £100million switch to Al Hilal, with the Saudi Pro League side reportedly prepared to pay him £700,000 per week, but he rejected the opportunity after speaking to head coach Ruben Amorim and his family. Fernandes said: 'I simply want to stay at the highest level, playing in the big competitions, because I still feel capable of that. 'I want to continue to be happy and do what I love most. I'm still very passionate about this sport. It's my way of seeing football and I'm happy with my decision.' Lionesses miss out England missed out on the Nations League finals after defeat in Spain (Bradley Collyer/PA) England missed out on a place in the Women's Nations League finals after Claudia Pina's brace earned Spain a 2-1 comeback win in Barcelona. Alessia Russo put England ahead on her 50th international appearance. But substitute Pina spearheaded the comeback for the world champions, finding an equaliser only moments after being brought on before adding a second 10 minutes later. Defeat meant England finished second in Group A3, while top-of-the-table Spain secured their spot in October's semi-finals. Kirby calls it a day Euro 2022 winner Fran Kirby has called time on her England career (Nick Potts/PA) England midfielder Fran Kirby has announced her retirement from international football on the eve of the Euro 2025 finals. The 31-year-old, a veteran of the Lionesses' victorious European Championship campaign in 2022, has brought an end to her international career after 77 caps and 19 goals. Brighton's Kirby wrote on social media: 'After being in the England team since I was 21, it's time to close that chapter of my life. 'I didn't ever want this day to come, but I cannot tell you how proud I am it happened. It's been the biggest honour to represent my country, one that I had only dreamt about as a young girl.' Special K is a Bee Republic of Ireland keeper Caoimhin Kelleher has left Liverpool for Brentford (John Walton/PA) Brentford completed the signing of Republic of Ireland goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher from Liverpool in an £18million deal having seen Mark Flekken join Bundesliga side Bayer Leverkusen. Kelleher made 20 appearances last season – largely in two spells when Alisson Becker was injured – and collected a Premier League winners' medal to go with his two Carabao Cup successes, but wanted more first-team football. The 26-year-old told the club's official website: 'I felt for my own career that the time was right for me to go, to be a number one and to play every week.' What's on today? Germany and Portugal go head-to-head in the first Nations League semi-final with either Spain or France awaiting the winners. Meanwhile the early transfer window rumbles on, with Tottenham's Son Heung-min the latest player said to be attracting interest from Saudi Arabia, Brentford forward Bryan Mbeumo linked with a move to Manchester United, Cesc Fabregas reportedly in line for the vacant Inter Milan job and AC Milan goalkeeper Mike Maignan a rumoured target for Chelsea.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Abramovich billions may never reach Ukraine – and ‘Government knew it' from day one
The row centres on the interpretation of a 'deed of undertaking' between the Government and Abramovich in which he agreed for the money to be committed to charity 'for the purposes of helping victims of the war in Ukraine'. When putting Chelsea up for sale, Abramovich publicly stated that he wanted the proceeds to be used 'for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine' – including those from his native Russia, something successive governments have refused to countenance. An official involved in the negotiations in 2022, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Telegraph Sport: 'Day one, we were concerned. We went eyes open with the fact that this was a possibility. But there genuinely wasn't an alternative.' The official said the danger of Abramovich blocking the release of the Ukraine fund had taken a back seat to fears he 'would let Chelsea go to the wall' if a deal was not struck to sell the club before the end of that season, or that he would try to 'legally get the money back himself' if sanctions against him were lifted. 'The decision was to put it in a place where we knew he couldn't get at it, and then there was a principle that this charity would be formed and that it would spend the money wisely,' the official added. 'That it's dragged on to this point is just as much a testament to the fact that the Government hasn't invested financial pressure, resources or political capital in dealing with what was, from day one, very clearly going to be a problem.' Three-year delay 'incomprehensible' Indeed, Reeves and Lammy have taken until this week to threaten legal action, something Telegraph Sport has been told the previous Conservative government had ruled out. That is despite a report by a House of Lords committee in January last year finding it 'incomprehensible' the issue had not been resolved and urging ministers 'to use all available legal levers to solve this impasse rapidly, so that Ukraine can receive much-needed, promised, and long overdue relief'. The report was published by the European Affairs Committee, chaired by cross-bench peer Lord Ricketts, a former permanent secretary to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, British ambassador to France and national security adviser. He told Telegraph Sport it had taken too long for the Government to act upon the report's recommendations and acknowledged an acrimonious legal battle could delay things much further when it comes to accessing a fund likely to have accrued more than a hundred million pounds in interest. 'It's getting ridiculous that this delay should be dragging on and on,' Ricketts said. 'I'm not a lawyer and I can't explain exactly what the Government are going to do, but I think it's now really urgent to get this sorted. And I think 'incomprehensible' is still a pretty good word to describe why, three years later, we're still waiting for the money to go to the people who really need it in Ukraine.' Concerns over the delay had been raised even earlier, including by Mike Penrose, the former chief executive of Unicef UK, heading the independent foundation set up to administer the fund. He was joined two years ago by Oxfam, Save the Children, Kyiv-based charities and UK families hosting Ukrainian refugees in calling for then prime minister Rishi Sunak to urgently break the deadlock. That was after the European Union, like the Government, ruled the money could only be spent within Ukraine's borders, an edict the charities urged Sunak to ignore. Labour peer Lord Foulkes also wrote to then chancellor Jeremy Hunt in September 2023 over the 'unacceptable delay' in releasing the funds, adding in his letter: 'The only barrier, as far as I can tell, seems to be bureaucracy, and it strikes me as ridiculous that we should let a matter of paperwork confound these efforts, when our Ukrainian allies overcome incredible adversity on a daily basis.' Foulkes told Telegraph Sport: 'The trouble is we've been playing by the rules that the Russians never acknowledge, never play by, and we have been trying to get some agreement on it. 'That was always likely to fail – and certainly take a long time. I'm glad that, at last, they're now taking action and I think it's the right thing to do, and they should press ahead with it as quickly and as forcibly as possible.' Seizing of Russian assets 'politically explosive' Telegraph Sport has been told the previous government ruled out legal action after concluding there were too many downsides, including the risk investors could shun the UK. Various sources with knowledge of negotiations with lawyers for Abramovich have branded the ongoing row as a 'nightmare issue', describing the seizing of Russian assets as 'politically explosive'. Explaining the difference between freezing and seizing assets, a source said: 'Seizing assets is a whole new ball game. There's a sizeable chunk that is frozen in Britain that are Russian-state assets. There are huge numbers of countries and lots and lots of lawyers who would explain to you that if you even try taking it and just seizing it and say that money is now ours, you are facing intense pressure.' The source said that could include 'lobbying' from other countries which invest in the UK who might say: 'OK then, we're pulling out billions of billions from your economy now.' Bart De Wever, the Belgian prime minister, also warned in March that confiscating almost €200 billion (£168 billion) of frozen Russian assets would be 'an act of war' and would carry 'systemic risks to the entire financial world system'. Telegraph Sport has also been told the last government was split on whether to compromise on Abramovich's demands, with Andrew Mitchell said by one source to have discussed ways ministers could 'cut a deal' with the oligarch when he was at the Foreign Office. Explaining the power Abramovich currently held over the frozen Chelsea sale fund, a source said: 'He can't access the money. He can't spend the money, but he can stop the trust spending it and, at the moment, he's always hidden behind, 'No, the terms that I agreed to the sale are not quite the same as the terms that the British Government are now insisting on'.' Telegraph Sport has approached a representative for Abramovich for comment on the Government's legal threat against him. A book entitled Sanctioned is being released next week in which he is expected to be quoted about the sale of Chelsea and the sanctions imposed on him.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The spirit of Liz Truss, ridiculous but relentless, stalks British politics
We need to talk about Liz Truss, although there are reasons not to bother. The prime minister who failed faster than any previous holder of the office has much to say about her dismal record, but nothing insightful. She cuts a pitiful spectacle padding out the schedule at rightwing conferences, chasing attention and relevance with an addict's fervour. Last week, Truss was at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Budapest, sharing the big lesson she learned in government. It was that British institutions have been captured by a leftist doctrine and that they 'hate western civilisation'. She couldn't possibly counter this threat from No 10 because supposedly the real power was wielded by a well-financed 'globalist network', operating through such engines of anti-democratic subterfuge as the International Monetary Fund and the World Health Organization. Truss believes these nefarious forces authored her downfall. They taught her that gradual reform is impossible. Only a 'Trump-style revolution' will do. This is her routine spiel. Indeed, it was the theme of her paranoid, self-pitying memoir-cum-manifesto, Ten Years to Save the West, published last year. Her disquisitions on the topic go unreported in her home country. She made more headlines last week from a two-month-old cameo appearance in a promotional video for a whiskey brand launched by a bare-knuckle fighter with a conviction for violent assault. (How that endorsement advances the restoration of western civilisation was unclear.) But a thorough summary of the CPAC speech was dutifully published by Tass, Russia's main state news agency. Their report led with the claim that 'globalists are trying to control the political process across Europe'. It is standard practice for Russian news channels to weave selective quotes from western politicians into tendentious propaganda, except there is no need to take Truss's words out of context. She narrates the west's slide into godless decadence without an edit. She provides the frothy conspiracy theories that Kremlin-friendly bots amplify on social media, and hallmarks them with the authority of a former prime minister. A British audience knows the caveats to that status: Truss was ousted within 50 days; a lettuce had more staying power. But the title stands. She really did rise to the top, and not through some freak system malfunction. She played and won the Westminster game by its rules. She had multiple ministerial briefs under three prime ministers. She persuaded a clear majority of members of Britain's venerable establishment party to make her their leader. Colleagues who suspected (or knew from experience) that Truss was unhinged stayed silent or endorsed her candidacy once her momentum looked unstoppable. Client journalists who had benefited from her notorious indiscretion, and looked forward to ever greater intimacy with power, colluded in the fiction of her fitness to govern. Even now, when the former prime minister's name is a byword for economic incompetence, Conservatives are euphemistic in contrition. When invited to apologise on behalf of her party for the disastrous mini-budget of September 2022, Kemi Badenoch has said only that she wants to 'draw a line' under the episode. The obstacle is not a residue of loyalty but a continuity of belief. The dogmatic engine of Trussonomics – that tax cuts always pay for themselves by stimulating enterprise to generate growth – is still an axiom of mainstream Conservatism. So is Trussite suspicion of the public sector as a redoubt of bureaucratic socialism. Badenoch, like Truss, backs a Maga-style revolution to rip chunks out of the government apparatus. She has spoken enthusiastically about Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, adding that Doge methods are not 'radical enough' for the bloated British state. The fact that Musk's purgative rampage through Washington has failed to produce the advertised cost savings doesn't deter imitators. Nigel Farage has announced the creation of a mercenary Doge 'unit' to hunt down waste in the councils that Reform UK won in last month's local elections. This exercise serves a double function. First, Farage will scapegoat any local officials whose duties can be branded under the rubric of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Second, he will overstate the expense of such schemes, generating improbable nationwide savings to justify tax cuts in a Reform manifesto. Trussonomics will be rehabilitated and rearmed with imported US culture war rhetoric. Farage was once a fan of Truss's economic policy. He praised her fiscal farrago as 'the best Conservative budget since 1986'. The year harked back to the heyday of Thatcherism. These days Farage has to be careful about fetishising the Iron Lady. His party's electoral base lives in Labour's former heartlands, so he is a convert to the cause of industrial nationalisation. He now shakes his magic money tree to the left as well as the right. The Tories lack such ideological elasticity. In any case, Badenoch doesn't seem interested in economics. She is more animated by the crusade for free speech. This, like the demonisation of DEI, is a fixation borrowed from the US right. When JD Vance declared that European democracy was more imperilled by censorious liberals than by Russian military aggression, Badenoch admired the US vice-president's deployment of 'truth bombs'. Here, too, she is on the same page as Truss, who told last week's CPAC audience that free-thinking dissidents from Keir Starmer's Britain find refuge in Viktor Orbán's Hungary. (Orbán is Europe's foremost admirer of Vladimir Putin. He has suffocated independent media and political opposition.) It is hard to know how much of this derangement is conviction and how much is cupidity. There is money to be earned bad-mouthing Britain on the ultra-nationalist lecture circuit, but it is also easy to self-radicalise in that milieu. It is also hard to know how receptive a UK audience is to US conservative manias. Much of the UK right dwells in a US-coded online hallucination of Britain where criminal hordes of migrants have turned city centres into no-go areas and liberal thought police harass law-abiding white Christians. The danger is not that millions of voters will recognise the bleak dystopia as a factual representation of their country, but that it resonates as an allegory of national decline. It is not the complaint that Britain is in bad shape – dilapidation and economic strife are self-evident – but the cultivation of despair by projecting hard problems through a facile, conspiratorial lens. It is the insinuation that existing democratic institutions are not merely failing to make life better but maliciously orchestrating misery. This is the nihilistic cynicism that vaporises trust, corrodes civic culture and makes simple, authoritarian solutions attractive. It is music to Vladimir Putin's ears and grist to his digital disinformation mills. Perhaps we should be grateful to Liz Truss for playing the archetype of unwitting accomplice to tyranny – the 'useful idiot' of cold war parlance – so ineptly. She contaminates any cause she touches. That is why the British right shuns her. But social ostracism isn't ideological repudiation. The current Tory and Reform leaders are embarrassed by association with Truss, not because they despise what she says but because she looks ridiculous. Her offence was not the grift, but its exposure in ways that might discredit more skilful practitioners. She is not too extreme, only artless in applying the camouflage. She is the crumpled, discarded packaging from a product that, rewrapped, could be delivered once again to Downing Street. Rafael Behr is a Guardian columnist One year of Labour, with Pippa Crerar, Rafael Behr and more On 9 July, join Pippa Crerar, Raf Behr, Frances O'Grady and Salma Shah as they look back at one year of the Labour government and plans for the next four years
