Woman uses Neuralink to write name with her mind
Thanks to a brain chip from Elon Musk's Neuralink, Crews used only her thoughts to scribble "Audrey" on a laptop screen. She shared the photo on X, stunning millions across the internet and earning a shoutout from Musk himself.
At age 16, Crews lost all motor function. Now, at 39, she's part of Neuralink's PRIME Study, which tests brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in humans. Her chip, implanted into her motor cortex, reads brain signals and sends them to a computer. It allows her to move a cursor and type, using only her thoughts.
In her own words, "They drilled a hole in my skull and placed 128 threads into my motor cortex. The chip is about the size of a quarter."
While the chip doesn't restore movement, it gives her something powerful: digital autonomy. She shared a picture of her signature on X and wrote, "I tried writing my name for the first time in 20 years. I'm working on it. Lol #Neuralink."
She expressed her gratitude toward the medical team at the University of Miami Health Center. "They treated me like a VIP and are some of the sweetest people I've ever met," she added.
Musk confirmed her achievement online, writing: "Most people don't realize this is possible."
That single quote shook the internet. The post showcasing her scribbled signature quickly went viral, with over 2 million views. Crews clarified that the chip is for "telepathy only," not mobility. But even that level of control can transform the lives of people with paralysis.
Neuralink, founded by Musk in 2016, aims to help people with neurological conditions connect with the digital world in powerful new ways. The company is developing BCIs that allow users to control devices using only their thoughts.
While still in its early stages, this technology is already showing life-changing potential. Looking ahead, Neuralink envisions a future where thought-controlled computing becomes an everyday part of human life.
Crews isn't alone in this journey. Another participant, Nick Wray (P8), shared his progress just days after his own implant activation.
"I haven't had this level of digital autonomy in years," he wrote.
Diagnosed with ALS, Wray called the implant a life-changing opportunity. He views this moment as both personal and historical, writing, "It's not lost on me that without ALS, I would never have been a candidate for this study. I sincerely believe that if ALS is the price of admission to an opportunity of this magnitude, you pay it; gladly, willingly, and without hesitation."
This isn't just about writing a name. It's about what's coming next. Neuralink's brain chip is working in real people. If you're wondering whether brain-computer interfaces could one day let you control your phone, write an email or play a game without touching a screen, that future is inching closer.
While still experimental, these breakthroughs are a glimpse into a new kind of human-machine connection.
Neuralink is now accepting participants from around the globe. If you're curious about brain-computer interfaces, this could be your chance to help shape the future. You can check it out at https://neuralink.com/trials
Audrey Crews rewrote more than her name. She rewrote the limits of what's possible. With a chip the size of a quarter, she became the first woman to control a computer using pure thought. Her story isn't just inspiring, it's a warning to the tech world: the age of mind-powered machines is arriving faster than expected.
Would you volunteer to be part of a brain-computer trial like Audrey and Nick? Or do you think it is too early to trust this technology? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com/Contact.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide - free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM/NEWSLETTER.
Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFL players can still use smelling salts as long as not provided by teams
NFL players will be allowed to use 'smelling salts' during games after all. The NFLPA sent a memo to players on Wednesday saying that the ban that the league informed teams about on Tuesday only prohibits team employees from distributing smelling salts and any other ammonia inhalant during pregame activities, games and halftime on the sideline or locker rooms. 'The NFL Players Association is aware of the memo issued by the league Tuesday regarding the use of smelling salts and ammonia capsules,' said the memo to players, which was obtained by The Associated Press. 'We were not notified of this club policy change before the memo was sent out. To clarify, this policy does not prohibit player use of these substances, but rather it restricts clubs from providing or supplying them in any form. The NFL has confirmed this to us.' The memo from the league prohibited any club personnel from providing or supplying products such as ammonia capsules, inhalers, ammonia in a cup, and any form of 'smelling salts.' The league cited a warning issued from the Food and Drug Administration in 2024 that there was no evidence citing the 'safety or efficacy' of the products and that they have the potential to mask symptoms of concussions. Smelling salts and other similar products have been a staple on NFL sidelines for years with many players believing they can provide a sudden jolt of energy or alertness. ___ AP Pro Football Writer Rob Maaddi contributed to this report ___ AP NFL:
CNET
29 minutes ago
- CNET
AI Sucks at Sudoku. Much More Troubling Is That It Can't Explain Why
Chatbots can be genuinely impressive when you watch them do things they're good at, like writing realistic-sounding text or creating weird futuristic-looking images. But try to ask generative AI to solve one of those puzzles you find in the back of a newspaper, and things can quickly go off the rails. That's what researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder found when they challenged different large language models to solve Sudoku. And not even the standard 9x9 puzzles. An easier 6x6 puzzle was often beyond the capabilities of an LLM without outside help (in this case, specific puzzle-solving tools). The more important finding came when the models were asked to show their work. For the most part, they couldn't. Sometimes they lied. Sometimes they explained things in ways that made no sense. Sometimes they hallucinated and started talking about the weather. If gen AI tools can't explain their decisions accurately or transparently, that should cause us to be cautious as we give these things more and more control over our lives and decisions, said Ashutosh Trivedi, a computer science professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder and one of the authors of the paper published in July in the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. "We would really like those explanations to be transparent and be reflective of why AI made that decision, and not AI trying to manipulate the human by providing an explanation that a human might like," Trivedi said. When you make a decision, you can at least try to justify it or explain how you arrived at it. That's a foundational component of society. We are held accountable for the decisions we make. An AI model may not be able to accurately or transparently explain itself. Would you trust it? Why LLMs struggle with Sudoku We've seen AI models fail at basic games and puzzles before. OpenAI's ChatGPT (among others) has been totally crushed at chess by the computer opponent in a 1979 Atari game. A recent research paper from Apple found that models can struggle with other puzzles, like the Tower of Hanoi. It has to do with the way LLMs work and fill in gaps in information. These models try to complete those gaps based on what happens in similar cases in their training data or other things they've seen in the past. With a Sudoku, the question is one of logic. The AI might try to fill each gap in order, based on what seems like a reasonable answer, but to solve it properly, it instead has to look at the entire picture and find a logical order that changes from puzzle to puzzle. Read more: AI Essentials: 29 Ways You Can Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts Chatbots are bad at chess for a similar reason. They find logical next moves but don't necessarily think three, four or five moves ahead. That's the fundamental skill needed to play chess well. Chatbots also sometimes tend to move chess pieces in ways that don't really follow the rules or put pieces in meaningless jeopardy. You might expect LLMs to be able to solve Sudoku because they're computers and the puzzle consists of numbers, but the puzzles themselves are not really mathematical; they're symbolic. "Sudoku is famous for being a puzzle with numbers that could be done with anything that is not numbers," said Fabio Somenzi, a professor at CU and one of the research paper's authors. I used a sample prompt from the researchers' paper and gave it to ChatGPT. The tool showed its work, and repeatedly told me it had the answer before showing a puzzle that didn't work, then going back and correcting it. It was like the bot was turning in a presentation that kept getting last-second edits: This is the final answer. No, actually, never mind, this is the final answer. It got the answer eventually, through trial and error. But trial and error isn't a practical way for a person to solve a Sudoku in the newspaper. That's way too much erasing and ruins the fun. AI and robots can be good at games if they're built to play them, but general-purpose tools like large language models can struggle with logic puzzles. Ore Huiying/Bloomberg via Getty Images AI struggles to show its work The Colorado researchers didn't just want to see if the bots could solve puzzles. They asked for explanations of how the bots worked through them. Things did not go well. Testing OpenAI's o1-preview reasoning model, the researchers saw that the explanations -- even for correctly solved puzzles -- didn't accurately explain or justify their moves and got basic terms wrong. "One thing they're good at is providing explanations that seem reasonable," said Maria Pacheco, an assistant professor of computer science at CU. "They align to humans, so they learn to speak like we like it, but whether they're faithful to what the actual steps need to be to solve the thing is where we're struggling a little bit." Sometimes, the explanations were completely irrelevant. Since the paper's work was finished, the researchers have continued to test new models released. Somenzi said that when he and Trivedi were running OpenAI's o4 reasoning model through the same tests, at one point, it seemed to give up entirely. "The next question that we asked, the answer was the weather forecast for Denver," he said. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) Explaining yourself is an important skill When you solve a puzzle, you're almost certainly able to walk someone else through your thinking. The fact that these LLMs failed so spectacularly at that basic job isn't a trivial problem. With AI companies constantly talking about "AI agents" that can take actions on your behalf, being able to explain yourself is essential. Consider the types of jobs being given to AI now, or planned for in the near future: driving, doing taxes, deciding business strategies and translating important documents. Imagine what would happen if you, a person, did one of those things and something went wrong. "When humans have to put their face in front of their decisions, they better be able to explain what led to that decision," Somenzi said. It isn't just a matter of getting a reasonable-sounding answer. It needs to be accurate. One day, an AI's explanation of itself might have to hold up in court, but how can its testimony be taken seriously if it's known to lie? You wouldn't trust a person who failed to explain themselves, and you also wouldn't trust someone you found was saying what you wanted to hear instead of the truth. "Having an explanation is very close to manipulation if it is done for the wrong reason," Trivedi said. "We have to be very careful with respect to the transparency of these explanations."
Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Is Legionnaires' Disease? NYC Outbreak Has Left 70 Sick, 3 Dead
This is what can happen when bad stuff in mist gets, well, missed. A Legionnaires' disease outbreak in New York City has already left at least 70 people sick and three dead. All of these cases have been occurring in Central Harlem, which made the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene suspect that something was amiss about the mist being emitted by the cooling towers in the area. Testing of 11 cooling towers there subsequently revealed the presence of Legionella pneumophila bacteria, which the NYC DOHMH believes caused the outbreak. Cooling Towers Seem To Be The Source of the Legionnaires' Disease Outbreak As you can imagine, cooling towers normally should not have such dangerous bacteria in them. Cooling towers are those things on the roofs of buildings that are part of the cooling systems such as air conditioning systems for the buildings. These towers help disperse heat from the buildings into the air in the form of a vapor or mist. Although such cooling towers are not exactly safe enough to lick, the mist that they emit shouldn't normally contain dangerous microbes. But when any water source remains too stagnant for too long with too little cleaning and disinfection, too many different nasty things can grow in it. Legionella bacteria is one of the more dangerous microbes that can enter and grow in such water. Such contamination can essentially turn a cooling tower or whatever might be dispersing water droplets from that source into a Legionella spray bottle or aroma therapy dispenser of sorts. Therefore, if you inhale the resulting vapor or mist, you could end inhaling a whole lot of Legionella. From there the Legionella can get into your lungs and give you Legionnaire's disease, which could bring a legion of problems. But more on that later. That's the typical way of getting infected with Legionella and not through person-to-person transmission. When someone has a legionellosis, which is a Legionella infection, you don't have to treat them as if they are radioactive. But you do want to find what water source might be harboring Legionella like a water fountain, swimming pool, air conditioning system, sauna, hot spring or dental equipment. Legionella Can Cause Other Things Besides Legionnaires' Disease What Legionella can do depends on where it goes on or in your body. If it comes into contact with any breaks in your skin such as wounds, it can result in a skin or soft tissue infection, otherwise known as cellulitis if you want to sound all medical. If Legionella somehow gets into your sinuses, joints or bloodstream, it can cause infections in such locations as well. Legionella in your bloodstream can end up in your heart, causing bad stuff like endocarditis, myocarditis or pericarditis. Now, just because you inhale Legionella and get a respiratory infection doesn't mean that you will necessarily develop full-blown Legionnaires' disease. You could end up with a much milder respiratory infection. Well, mild if you consider flu-like symptoms to be mild. These certainly aren't pleasant symptoms and include things like fever, chills, headaches, muscle pains, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. This is known as Pontiac Fever, not because it makes you desire that now-defunct car, but because the first recognition of this syndrome was in 1968 when an outbreak occurred in Pontiac, Michigan. While Pontiac Fever can put you through a period of significant unpleasantness sort of like having an uncomplicated case of the flu, unlike Legionnaires' disease it should resolve on its own without needing a specific treatment. How Legionnaires' Disease Got Its Name While the aforementioned problems with Legionella may range from not good to very, very bad, getting Legionnaires' Disease tends to shade more on the bad to really, really bad side. Legionnaires' Disease bears its name not because it has anything to do with becoming a Legionnaire, as I have written before for Forbes. This disease and the bacteria causing the disease got their names because they were essentially discovered from a mysterious outbreak occuring at an American Legion meeting held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, back in 1976. At that meeting, a number of the American Legion meeting attendees, known as Legionnaires, there came down with a mysterious disease, characterized by an atypical pneumonia with a fairly high death rate. This made headlines and a bit of a panic at the time as people for a while had no idea why this was happening. It sent disease detectives scrambling for a cause until the causative bacteria was identified in January 1977 and subsequently named Legionella due to the event. What Are The Symptoms Of Legionnaires' Disease The symptoms of Legionnaires' Disease usually begin two to 10 days after the bacteria has gotten into your body. You may start with a headache, muscle aches and a high fever, like 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Celsius) or higher. Respiratory symptoms like a cough, shortness of breath and chest pain can develop in the ensuing days. The cough may or may not be productive. It could even be bloody. You may also have gastrointestinal symptoms like nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Things could even get to the point where you have mental status changes like confusion. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with antibiotics is key with Legionnaires' Disease. Otherwise the risk is that the disease could progress to life-threatening problems like respiratory failure, septic shock or acute kidney failure. All of these complications are more likely if your immune system is weaker because you are older than 50 years of age or have some type of chronic medical condition or your respiratory system is compromised because you have an existing lung disease or are a smoker. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lists the risk of death if you have Legionnaires' Disease as ranging from 10% to 25%, which are odds that no one should like. How Do You Diagnose Legionnaire's Disease You can't tell whether you have Legionnaires' Disease from symptoms alone. A physical exam and chest X-ray can reveal that you have some kind of pneumonia. But pneumonia is a very non-specific term like haircut or pants and simply means that you have some kind of inflammation and fluid in your lungs. Lots of different microbes can cause a pneumonia. Your white blood cell and platelet counts may be off, your liver enzymes may be elevated or your kidney function tests may be decreased. But ultimately the only way to definitively diagnose Legionnaires' Disease is to find Legionella bacteria in your sputum. How Do You Treat Legionnaire's Disease Again, getting a prompt, proper diagnosis is important. The longer you wait, the tougher it is to treat the infection and the more damage can be done. Not all antibiotics are effective against this bacteria. The typical treatment is either fluroquinolones such as levofloxacin and moxifloxacin or macrolides like azithromycin and clarithromycin. These are rather 'big gun' antibiotics that can kill a lot of different microbes. Doxycycline can be used if there is some reason you can't take fluroquinolones or macrolides. Oral antibiotics may suffice if you catch the disease early and things have not progressed to the uh oh range. But if your disease is severe enough to require hospitalization, you may need to go straight to intravenous antibiotics. This will allow you to ensure that you've got high enough levels of the antibiotics to kill the bacteria in your lungs. How Do You Prevent Legionnaire's Disease Naturally, Legionnaire's Disease is the type of thing that you don't want to experience just for the heck of it. It's best to avoid this disease and Legionella as much as possible. So, it's important to be mindful of the different water sources around you and ensure that they are as safe and free of the bacteria as possible. This means keeping any water carrying, storing or dispensing systems up-to-date, working, clean, well-serviced and properly tested. Don't depend on rusty pipes or faucets, drains or pumps that don't work. Remember if proper service and testing of water sources and systems are missed, you could end up with something you don't want in the resulting mist.
