Sweden's leader uses ChatGPT. Should politicians use AI chatbots?
Kristersson told the Swedish newspaper Dagens Industri that he uses ChatGPT and the French service LeChat, and that his colleagues also use AI in their everyday work.
'I use it myself quite often, if for nothing else than for a second opinion. 'What have others done? And should we think the complete opposite?' Those types of questions,' he said.
The comment sparked backlash, with critics arguing that voters had elected Kristersson, not ChatGPT, to lead Sweden.
Technology experts in Sweden have since raised concerns about politicians using AI tools in such a way, citing the risk of making political decisions based on inaccurate information.
Large language models' (LLMs) training data can be incomplete or biased, causing chatbots to give incorrect answers or so-called 'hallucinations'.
'Getting answers from LLMs is cheap, but reliability is the biggest bottleneck,' Yarin Gal, an associate professor of machine learning at the University of Oxford, previously told Euronews Next.
Experts were also concerned about sensitive state information being used to train later models of ChatGPT, which is made by OpenAI. Its servers are based in the United States.
Kristersson's press team brushed aside security concerns.
'Of course, it's not security-sensitive information that ends up there. It's used more as a sounding board,' Tom Samuelsson, Kristersson's press secretary, told the newspaper Aftonbladet.
Should politicians use AI chatbots?
This is not the first time a politician has been placed under fire due to their use of AI – or even the first time in Sweden. Last year, Olle Thorell, a Social Democrat in Sweden's parliament, used ChatGPT to write 180 written questions to the country's ministers.
He faced criticism of overburdening ministers' staff, as they are required to answer within a set time frame.
Earlier this year, United Kingdom tech secretary Peter Kyle's use of ChatGPT came under fire after the British magazine, New Scientist revealed he had asked the chatbot why AI adoption is so slow in the UK business community and which podcasts he should appear on to 'reach a wide audience that's appropriate for ministerial responsibilities'.
Some politicians make no secret of their AI use. In a newspaper column, Scottish Member of Parliament Graham Leadbitter said he uses AI to write speeches because it helps him sift through dense reading and gives him 'a good basis to work from' – but emphasised that he still calls the shots.
'I choose the subject matter, I choose the evidence I want it to access, I ask for a specific type of document, and I check what's coming out accords with what I want to achieve,' Leadbitter wrote in The National.
And in 2024, the European Commission rolled out its own generative AI tool, called GPT@EC, to help staff draft and summarise documents on an experimental basis.
ChatGPT available to US public servants
Meanwhile, OpenAI announced a partnership this week with the US government to grant the country's entire federal workforce access to ChatGPT Enterprise at the nominal cost of $1 for the next year.
The announcement came shortly after the Trump administration launched its AI Action Plan, which aims to expand AI use across the federal government to boost efficiency and slash time spent on paperwork, among other initiatives.
In a statement, OpenAI said the programme would involve 'strong guardrails, high transparency, and deep respect' for the 'public mission' of federal government workers.
The company said it has seen the benefits of using AI in the public sector through its pilot programme in Pennsylvania, where public servants reportedly saved an average of about 95 minutes per day on routine tasks using ChatGPT.
'Whether managing complex budgets, analysing threats to national security, or handling day-to-day operations of public offices, all public servants deserve access to the best technology available,' OpenAI said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
6 hours ago
- Local France
Analysis: Has France really made it impossible for retirees to get citizenship?
The Local has received an increasing number of reports from retired readers about French citizenship applications being rejected. READ MORE: 'Doesn't seem fair' - British pensioners speak out over apparent change to French citizenship rules In each of the cases reported to The Local, the applicants received a letter stating that they had been rejected because their income comes from foreign sources (non-French pensions), despite fulfilling all other requirements. In previous years, many retirees, whose incomes were composed of foreign pensions and savings, successfully applied for French nationality on the basis of residency. As such, there appears to have been a recent change in the way préfectures approach citizenship applications by retirees, and it may be due to a circulaire (memo) sent out by the interior minister Bruno Retailleau to préfecture staff in May 2025. READ MORE: Why do French ministers love to send 'circulaires'? Has there been a confirmed change? Tracking French citizenship applications is not easy - France also does not publish nationwide figures related to citizenship rejections, making it difficult to tell whether there has been a change in the number of retirees being rejected. Another challenge is that French citizenship applications are first handled at the local préfecture level, and while the law is the same, we know that in practice, there can be quite wide variations between préfectures. There is no official confirmation of a rule change relating to foreign pensions. Advertisement Nevertheless, more and more cases are coming to light of retirees who have had their applications rejected or adjourned since May. One reader of The Local told us that their citizenship interviewer referred to "new rules" being recently brought in. We know that over the past two decades, dozens, if not hundreds, of retirees in France have successfully become French - even if all of their income comes from a pension in their home country. The Local has contacted the interior ministry, as well as individual préfectures with cases of retirees being rejected, to determine whether a different standard has been applied to retirees since May. What happened in May? On May 5th, 2025, interior minister Bruno Retailleau sent out a circulaire (memo) to all préfectures in France on the subject of French citizenship applications. A circulaire cannot change the law, but it can offer 'clarification' for how préfecture staff ought to process citizenship applications. In the third section of the circulaire - titled 'the autonomy of the applicant' - Retailleau instructed staff on what to consider regarding l'insertion professionnelle (professional integration) and le niveau et l'origine des revenues (the amount and origin of income). Retailleau wrote: "You will also, with some exceptions, reject applicants whose income comes mainly from abroad, as this shows they have not completely transferred the centre of their interests to France." Retailleau did not reference any exceptions for retirees, though he did remind préfecture employees not to reject applications with 'insufficient income' if the applicant is ill or disabled. This insistence on French-sourced income would seem - if applied strictly - to make it impossible for people who have retired to France (as opposed to those who worked in France and then retired) to ever gain citizenship. Advertisement So what exactly has this changed? It's always been the case that applications for French nationality based on residency must be able to demonstrate "stable and regular income", as well as one's "integration" into French society. French case law has also made it clear for many years that applicants must demonstrate that France is the "centre of their economic interests". Therefore, it has long been the case that people living in France but working remotely for a foreign company would be highly likely to be refused citizenship. Likewise people who are neither working nor retired have traditionally had a hard time satisfying the income requirement. But préfecture officials were previously told to examine the application "holistically" - as a result, many retirees applying with solely foreign pensions have been able to gain nationality based on residency if they showed a well-rounded application in other areas. Advertisement It seems that some préfectures are now taking more of a 'tick box' approach and rejecting anyone who doesn't fulfil income requirements - even if, as in the case for retirees, it is impossible for them to fulfil the requirement for French income. It's important to stress, however, that decisions are still made on an individual basis. There also remain disparities between different préfectures when it comes to exactly how decisions are made. Other requirements France's immigration law of 2024 changed the language level required for citizenship - from January 1st 2026, applicants will have to demonstrate B2 level French, rather than B1 as is currently the case. Otherwise, the stated requirements to gain French citizenship through residency ( par décret ) remain the same. Applicants for French nationality based on residency must still prove that they have lived in France for five years consecutively before applying (unless they have completed higher education in France). The basic documents requested - proof of address, tax declarations for the past three years, identity documents (passport, birth certificate, marriage/ divorce certificates), and a criminal background check - are still the same. All applicants also have to provide proof of their income - for example payslips/tax returns for those who are working, evidence of a pension or other source of income. READ MORE: New law: What's changing and what's staying the same for French citizenship? The 'assimilation' interview is also still part of the process, but starting in January 2026, a written civics test will be added to assess applicants' "required level of knowledge of French history, culture, and society." If you have applied for French citizenship as a retiree - either recently or in the past, successfully or not, please share your experiences to help us gain a broader picture of the situation.
LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
Direct mayoral elections in Paris, Lyon, Marseille get green light from France's top court
As opponents of the "PLM" law – short for "Paris-Lyon-Marseille" – had anticipated, on Thursday, August 7, the Constitutional Council approved all provisions of the bill to reform the election process for members of the Council of Paris, as well as for municipal councilors in Lyon and Marseille. This marks a revolution in the way the three largest French cities hold elections, bringing them in line with the rules that apply to the approximately 34,000 other municipalities across France, less than a year before municipal elections. Until now, voters in Paris, Lyon, and Marseille chose their arrondissement (district) councilors, with the top-ranking councilors then forming a municipal council that selects the mayor. This meant that the mayor was elected through an indirect form of universal suffrage. But under a new law introduced by Paris MP Sylvain Maillard of the centrist Renaissance party, starting in March 2026, residents of these cities will vote twice on the same day. One vote will directly elect the mayor, who will be at the top of a list of municipal councilors. The other vote will elect arrondissement councilors. In Lyon, voters will also cast a third ballot to choose councilors for the métropole (Greater Lyon Area).
Local France
6 hours ago
- Local France
France strikes down return of banned bee-killing pesticide
The decision infuriated farmers and France's far right and conservative parties but was welcomed by environmentalists and left-wing parties. The law would have permitted the return of acetamiprid – a chemical known to be toxic to bees and other creatures but relied on by some European farmers. A petition against the bill garnered more than 2.1 million signatures after lawmakers adopted it on July 8th. Critics said it was rushed through parliament's lower chamber without a proper debate. The Constitutional Council said in its ruling that a provision in the bill allowing exemptions to the ban of products containing neonicotinoid chemicals such as acetamiprid would violate France's environmental charter, which has constitutional status. In 2020, the council had granted a temporary exemption to the ban, limited to the beet and nut sectors which suffer most from the insects that acetamiprid acts against. But the ruling said the legislature had undermined 'the right to live in a balanced and healthy environment' enshrined in the environmental charter. 'Neonicotinoids have an impact on biodiversity, in particular on pollinating insects and birds, as well as consequences for water and soil quality, and pose risks to human health,' the council said. The council did approve two other measures in the law: one allowing for the construction of water storage for agricultural purposes, and another raising thresholds at which pig and poultry farms require prior authorisation. President Emmanuel Macron took 'note' of the ruling and will enact the law in a form that takes the ruling into account, his office said. But the main farmers' union, the FNSEA, slammed the decision as 'unacceptable and incomprehensible'. Advertisement Laurent Duplomb, the conservative deputy who introduced the law, said it would mean more imports of products containing acetamiprid and reduced French production. Agriculture Minister Annie Genevard, who supported the reintroduction of acetamiprid, said in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that the government would not leave the sectors affected 'without a solution'. Marine Le Pen, the leading figure in the far-right Rassemblement National, said the court's judges had 'behaved like a legislature while they have no democratic legitimacy'. 'The level of interference of constitutional judges is becoming a real problem for our democracy,' said Laurent Wauquiez, parliamentary head of the conservative Les Républicains. Socialist Party leader Olivier Faure, however, called the decision a 'victory for ecology'. Banned in France since 2018, acetamiprid remains legal in the European Union, and proponents said that some French farmers needed it to help them compete economically. Advertisement The insecticide is particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who say that they have no alternative against pests and face unfair competition. A petition on France's lower-house National Assembly's website called the measure an 'attack on public health'. And beekeepers have described the chemical as 'a bee killer'. Its potential effect on humans is also a source of concern, though the risks remain unclear in the absence of large-scale studies. For some opponents, frustration stretched beyond environmental and health concerns to exasperation over the country's political deadlock. One supporter of the petition against the law called it 'democratic revenge' after Macron forced a controversial pension reform through parliament in 2023 and dissolved the national assembly last year, sparking political turmoil that resulted in a hung parliament. In June, before the law's passage, several thousand demonstrators — including some farmers, environmental organisations and scientists – rallied across France calling for the bill to be withdrawn.
