Campaigner walks out of Holyrood in disgust as petition rebuffed
A campaigner fighting to get more help for home-owners hit by the RAAC scandal walked out of the Scottish Parliament in disgust this afternoon [Wednesday] after MSPs rejected their petition.
The National UK RAAC campaign had asked for the Scottish Housing Regulator to expand powers to include owners of former council homes.
But a meeting of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee 'refused to budge' according to veteran campaigner Livingston RAAC campaigner Kerry Macintosh.
She told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that when the call to change rules was declined: 'I was so angry when I came out of the committee room. It was very hard not to say anything. I stood up and said 'shocking' and walked out.'
Speaking after the meeting she told the LDRS: 'The people in parliament, the SNP government. They don't give a toss. They are not listening to what people are going through. They are overlooking things that are affecting people's lives.
'This is as bad as the Post Office scandal. I'm just so annoyed at watching how homeowners are getting treated. The people in parliament are not living with what the people with RAAC in their homes are living with- the stress, the fear and the worry. There's five and half thousand people in Scotland suffering with this.'
RAAC affected homeowners from across Scotland had gathered outside Holyrood on Wednesday morning ahead of scheduled hearing of a petition submitted by the UK RAAC Campaign group calling for an urgent amendment to the remit of the Scottish Housing Regulator to include private owners of ex-council properties.
Currently, the SHR's responsibilities are restricted to social tenants—those who rent from councils or housing associations.
This means that when a private homeowner in an ex-council house discovers dangerous materials like RAAC, they have no regulator to turn to, no statutory advocate, and no co-ordinated government response.
The petition called for an alternative creation of an altogether new body to ensure that owners of ex-council homes are protected during structural crises such as the one currently unfolding because of the use of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete RAAC in the 1960s/ 70s.
Campaign leader Wilson Chowdhry has written to the new Housing Minister Mairi McAllan asking her to meet with homeowners in Tillicoultry and West Lothian.
By Stuart Sommerville, Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Keir Starmer insists assisted dying Bill has not been rushed as dozens of MPs say it should receive more scrutiny
Keir Starmer has dismissed warnings that the proposed legalisation on assisted dying is being rushed. The Prime Minister insisted that plenty of time had been devoted to the controversial plan despite dozens of his MPs pleading for it to receive more scrutiny. He also indicated that he will back the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in the knife-edge vote tomorrow. But he said he would not try to sway opinion as the Government has remained officially neutral – though he previously promised leading campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen he would make time for assisted dying to come to the Commons. Asked during the G7 summit if he will be voting for the Bill, the PM replied: 'I've done my best not to influence the vote. My own view, I think, is well known and long-standing.' When pressed as to whether the critics within his party were wrong to raise concerns about the process, Sir Keir replied: 'It is a matter for individual parliamentarians. 'There has been a lot of time discussing it, both in Parliament and beyond Parliament, and quite right too, it's a really serious issue.' Since the bill passed its first Parliamentary hurdle in November, Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind has introduced a series of changes, including removing the safeguard of a High Court judge signing off applications A majority of 55 voted in favour the Bill last year, meaning that 28 would need to switch sides to bring it down, and at least a dozen have publicly turned against it in recent weeks. Even MPs sympathetic to the principle of legalising assisted dying plan to vote against it due to the actions of Labour's Kim Leadbeater. Since the bill passed its first Parliamentary hurdle in November, she has introduced a series of changes, including removing the safeguard of a High Court judge signing off applications. She instead put forward the concept of a panel of experts who would consider requests. Yet many professionals claim her plan is unworkable and more than 1,000 doctors have urged MPs to reject it. Some 50-plus Labour MPs want the third reading vote be delayed, warning the final version of the Bill has not been published and only 12 of 133 proposed amendments have been voted on.
Spectator
43 minutes ago
- Spectator
What else could Israel do?
Over the past few days British readers have been able to enjoy a number of hot takes on the situation in the Middle East. First, there have been all the politicians, such as the Scottish First Minister John Swinney, who have called for our government to step in and 'de-escalate' the conflict between Israel and Iran. But even leaving aside whether the mullahs in Tehran can be swayed by Britain or Scotland, 'de-escalation' is the only surefire way to ensure that they continue to pursue a nuclear capability. Elsewhere, the BBC has been playing a blinder. When the conflict began, it decided that its audience would be well served by having the celebrity chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall give his thoughts on the matter. At the weekend HFW (as he's known in the Middle East) treated BBC1 viewers to his opinion, too, that 'de-escalation' is the priority and that, to this end, the British government must stop selling arms to Israel. Meanwhile, one of the BBC's own correspondents highlighted the worries of 'those who argue that Israel is violating international law by launching an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation'. I'm not sure what the definition of 'provoked' might be if it doesn't include the Revolutionary Islamic government using the terrorist groups it backs in a seven-front war on you for the past couple of years. Perhaps BBC staff would regard themselves as having been somewhat 'provoked' if they'd been attacked by Hamas, then by Hezbollah, then by the Houthis, then by the Iranian government and so on and so on. Perhaps, then, it's worth going back to first principles. The stated view of the British, American and all European governments is that Iran should never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. The stated view of the International Atomic Energy Agency is that Iran has been enriching uranium to levels required only to develop them. At Fordow and elsewhere, the Iranians have spent decades building facilities deep underground in order to avoid those facilities being bombed from the air. Which is definitely the sort of thing that a government would do if it was not lying and had nothing to hide. During this same period the regime has continued to state its ambition of wiping Israel off the map, calling for the destruction of the 'little Satan' (Israel) and then the 'great Satan' (America). It's unclear if the Iranian government has come up with a 'Satan' category into which Swinney's fiefdom might fall. But I think that we can safely conclude from all Tehran's statements that they consider Britain as a whole very much on the 'Satan' side of the ledger. Indeed, if you want to read accounts of how the UK actually runs the world and is the malevolently scheming power behind the USA and everyone else, you need look no further than Iranian state media. As a side note, it might also be observed that the regime has been sending hit squads to take out opponents in Britain and America. As well as operating in cells within the UK, Iranian agents have been found trying to kill critics in Brooklyn; President Donald Trump's former secretary of state, Mike Pompeo; and his former national security adviser, John Bolton. The Iranians have proved masters at outwitting the international community, and since Israel is their stated first target it was inevitable that the Israeli government could not be as sanguine as, say, the Scottish one over the question of exactly when Iran would develop the levels of enrichment necessary for a deliverable nuke. Anybody who really wants peace should have spent recent years working harder to stop the Iranian regime in its tracks. But in the final analysis what were all these other governments ever going to do about Iran's race to the bomb? The Iranians long ago worked out that they could play for time, not least because they work within a different chronological framework from the rest of us. If you believe that history is to be judged by when the hidden Imam reappears and heralds the end times, you might easily take the view that western governments come and go. As indeed they do. So all the ayatollahs ever needed was to deceive, develop and wait. If Israeli pilots had not bombed the Iranian nuclear project, who else might have done it? The RAF? The French? The Germans? After all these years and all these talks, the only country that ended up taking action was the one with the most skin in the game: the one that the Ayatollah Khamenei and his predecessors have always said they want to annihilate. The world's sole Jewish state takes the threat of its annihilation seriously. Among the few things that can unite the Israeli left, right and centre is the conviction that life in their country will be made impossible – if not ended immediately – once Iran has the bomb. So they acted. In these circumstances, I'm not sure what calls for 'de-escalation' actually mean, other than being a way for irrelevant people to try to prove their relevance. But anyone interested in peace in the Middle East – and the wider world – would do well to wish for something rather different: a swift and intense escalation to finish off the Iranian nuclear project once and for all. That way, a roomful of the country's negotiators won't be able to continue running rings round whichever second-rate muppets govern western countries in the years to come. There's a low-resolution viewpoint in the West that everyone in the world has the luxury of living as we do. But not all people have the good fortune to be in Fife or Inverness. And of course, at times in our own past we didn't enjoy the luxuries of peace either. Perhaps we could recall those times and remember that at our own moments of greatest peril, nothing short of total victory was desirable for us. And nothing short of total victory should be desirable for our allies either.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Cabinet Office ‘brushed aside warnings about HS2 fraud'
The Cabinet Office brushed aside concerns about fraud and financial mismanagement at HS2. Lord Berkeley, the Conservative peer, had urged the government department to open an inquiry into claims that the high-speed rail project was set to cost billions of pounds more than Parliament had been told. He warned that HS2 had been 'promoted and procured by deception and possibly fraud from the start 10 years ago'. Lord Berkeley demanded an investigation into potential breaches of the ministerial code, something that Sir Simon Case – the then cabinet secretary, to whom he wrote – could not do. The Tory peer had alleged that ministers misled Parliament by falsely promising that HS2 would cost less than they knew it would, risking fraud going undetected. 'Fraudulent so-called activities' 'I did want to complain to the Cabinet Office while [Sir] Simon Case was there and suggested that they did an investigation into all the fraudulent so-called activities of HS2,' Lord Berkeley said. 'And his answer was, well, we need to get the Prime Minister's approval before we do anything like that, and he's unlikely to approve of it.' It comes after HMRC launched an investigation into an HS2 contractor accused of tax fraud by submitting 'fake payslips' to disguise self-employed workers as directly-employed staff. The company in question provided staff to Balfour Beatty Vinci (BBV), one of the main contractors on HS2. There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by BBV. Lord Berkeley's concerns, first expressed in 2019, were that HS2's true cost to taxpayers was far in excess of the £55 billion earmarked by ministers. In correspondence seen by The Telegraph, he wrote: 'It is clear that the Prime Minister, his predecessors and other ministers were made aware of the probable out-turn cost, but none chose to inform Parliament. 'I therefore believe that the project has been promoted and procured by deception and possibly fraud from the start 10 years ago, a process that has allowed the project to proceed in stages to ensure that the true costs will only come out when it is too late to change or cancel.' Sir Simon wrote back to Lord Berkeley explaining that breaches of the ministerial code could only be investigated by the Prime Minister – at the time, Boris Johnson – and not the Civil Service. The former Cabinet secretary, who stepped down at the end of last year on health grounds, told The Telegraph: 'Lord Berkeley deserves credit, certainly, for raising the alarm so early on.' The Telegraph understands that in subsequent correspondence, the peer eventually raised his concerns about potential breaches of the ministerial code directly with Mr Johnson. News that potential fraud at HS2 was raised years ago comes as the Labour Government admitted that the high-speed railway line was in an ' appalling mess ' and would be delayed once again beyond its current opening date of 2033. Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, promised that the Government would be able to turn the project around but said on Wednesday that there was 'no route by which trains can be running' by the target date. An HS2 spokesman said earlier this week: 'We treat all whistleblower allegations seriously and are continuing to conduct our own investigation.' The Department for Transport said it has 'a zero-tolerance attitude towards fraud, bribery, and corruption' and would ensure any claims of wrongdoing were thoroughly investigated.
