logo
'It's called negotiation': Trump bristles at ‘TACO trade' betting on him backing down

'It's called negotiation': Trump bristles at ‘TACO trade' betting on him backing down

Japan Timesa day ago

U.S. President Donald Trump bristled at suggestions that Wall Street believes he's ultimately unwilling to follow through on extreme tariff threats, saying his repeated retreats are instead part of a strategy to exert trade concessions.
"It's called negotiation,' Trump said on Wednesday, adding that he intentionally would "set a number at a ridiculous high number' and then "go down a little bit' as part of talks.
Trump was asked during an Oval Office event to respond to reports of what is being called "TACO' trade, in which investors seize on market tumbles after the president makes tariff threats, predicting he will ultimately relent and equities will rebound.
The acronym — which stands for Trump Always Chickens Out — was coined by a Financial Times columnist and has since been adopted by traders attempting to navigate the dozens of changes to tariff policy Trump has announced over the early months of his presidency.
In the most recent case, stocks tumbled Friday after Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on European goods beginning June 1, only to rally after he agreed to delay the levies more than a month to allow for negotiations.
Trump's tariff policy has been marked by frequent retreats and recalibrations. Consider:
As Trump's 145% levies on Chinese imports drove fears of soaring costs for consumer goods and threatened a recession, the U.S. president agreed to roll back duties on most of those goods to 30%. The detente announced May 12 — which was matched by a pullback from Beijing — followed talks between the world's two largest economies and is designed to allow at least 90 days for additional negotiations.
Trump ignited market turmoil and a pullback from U.S. treasuries in April when he hit dozens of U.S. trading partners with levies as high as 50%. The White House denied a report of a possible reprieve, and the president took to social media, urging investors to "BE COOL!' while calling it "A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!' Hours later, Trump announced he was pausing his higher tariffs, resetting them to 10% for 90 days in a bid for talks. In response, stocks staged their best rally since 2008.
Trump's March announcement he was slapping a 25% tariff on imported automobiles and auto parts ignited furious lobbying by carmakers, who said the levies would cripple the industry and undermine investments made under Trump's renegotiated North American trade deal. A month later, Trump yielded to that pressure, effectively easing separate metals duties for the auto industry while offering a temporary offset for American-made vehicles.
Consumers had fretted about higher expected prices for consumer electronics under Trump's April tariffs, when the administration, in a surprise move, exempted smartphones, computers and other technology. Administration officials said those tariff exclusions were designed to allow time for the Commerce Department to conduct a separate trade probe targeting semiconductors.
All of those moves followed Trump's earlier retreats on sweeping Canada and Mexico tariffs, as well as shifting plans to collect levies on low-cost packages.
Still, the stock market has increasingly been shrugging off Trump's tariff threats, shrinking the money-making potential of the TACO trade. A recent analysis from Dennis DeBusschere of 22V Research found that the S&P 500 Index's sensitivity to tariffs has fallen dramatically since April.
A little more than a third of the S&P 500's daily move now can be explained by tariff-related headlines — in line with a long-term median for any factor that can tip the market, the data show. That's down from 80% in early April.
The benchmark index is up since every key tariff-related announcement that initially set the markets on edge. The S&P 500 has gained 1% since the March 4 tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, and it is higher by 4% since the April 2 announcement of levies on trading partners.
"The thesis behind the TACO trade is: Buy the Trump tariff dip,' Tom Essaye of the Sevens Report wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday. "Essentially, Trump has proven to investors that he won't actually follow through with draconian tariffs. As such, any sell-off following a dramatic tariff threat should be bought.'
The president argues his approach — threaten big levies and use the leverage to exact concessions — has yielded quick success.
For instance, after Trump vowed a 50% tariff on goods from Colombia unless the country accepted deportees, Colombian President Gustavo Petro ultimately backed down, accepting those deportation flights.
Yet analysts have warned the tactic offers diminishing returns every time Trump scales back a previous threat, since counterparties are less likely to view them as credible from the start.
On Wednesday in the Oval Office, a reporter's question about the TACO trade elicited a fiery response from Trump, who said he was more often criticized for being too harsh in his executive actions. He labeled the query "nasty.'
"They wouldn't be over here today negotiating if I didn't put a 50% tariff on,' Trump said. "The sad thing is, now, when I make a deal with them — it's something much more reasonable — they'll say, 'Oh, he was chicken. He was chicken.' That's unbelievable.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China has 'totally violated' agreement with US on tariffs: Trump
China has 'totally violated' agreement with US on tariffs: Trump

Nikkei Asia

timean hour ago

  • Nikkei Asia

China has 'totally violated' agreement with US on tariffs: Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, holds up a chart next to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the White House's Rose Garden in Washington on April 2. © Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday said China had violated an agreement on tariffs with the United States. "China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform.

The next great job churn is already starting
The next great job churn is already starting

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

The next great job churn is already starting

The geography of employment in the U.S. is being shaped by two distinct trends. The first is low levels of housing churn and, therefore, interstate migration, a normal part of the business cycle that should eventually turn around. More consequential are signs that artificial intelligence is beginning to suppress hiring in some of the most technology-centric parts of the country such as the San Francisco Bay Area — a shift that may portend a structural change in the labor market. This is a useful time to look at changes in employment growth in different parts of the country and compare these with the pre-pandemic economy, since overall job growth is currently only a touch lower than it was in 2019. U.S. employment grew 1.2% in April from a year earlier, close to the 1.3% growth seen in 2019. Let's start with the reduced migration from cold states to warm states that is showing up in the employment data of the metros most affected. House prices are a useful proxy for interstate migration. The two large metros with the weakest home price growth are Dallas, Texas, and Tampa, Florida, according to the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller indices. Employment in Dallas grew 1.4% in March from a year earlier, roughly half its 2019 pace, while in Tampa, it grew just 0.9%, a third of its 2019 pace. Reduced outmigration from the Northeast and Midwest, on the other hand, helps explain why job growth is above the pre-pandemic pace in Buffalo, New York and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In theory, less interstate migration should also boost the fortunes of the San Francisco Bay Area, a region famous for people leaving to get away from high housing costs. Yet employment in the region has been declining since its post-pandemic peak in November 2022 — coincidentally, the month OpenAI's ChatGPT launched. This could be chalked up to tech companies laying off workers in 2023 and early 2024 to preserve profitability after a hiring binge in the years previous. Meta Platforms's headcount fell by 22% on a year-over-year basis in its "year of efficiency' push in 2023. But that post-COVID-19 culling is behind us — big tech companies are collectively investing hundreds of billions of dollars into AI, and Meta's headcount has grown 10% over the past year. So, it's noteworthy that employment in the country's tech heartland continues to decline at a time when, in theory, the Bay Area has the tailwinds of massive investment and fewer people leaving the region. The most likely culprit is the impact that AI is having on labor demand. The types of white-collar jobs shrinking the fastest in the U.S. include categories such as software engineers, data engineers and application engineers. On recruitment site Indeed, job postings for software engineers are currently lower than they were in the spring of 2020. Some of this drop is likely due to efficiency gains from AI, while some may be due to companies needing to control headcount where they can while they pile huge sums of money into advanced chips and data centers. Boston is another knowledge job-centric metro area showing signs of labor market softness, with its unemployment rate rising from 3.5% to 4.5% over the past year, the highest level outside of the pandemic period since 2015. The education hub may be more vulnerable than some other cities to AI adoption since the technology tends to be good at the kind of work that would typically be offered to young college graduates. These are dynamics we should expect to see, according to "From San Francisco to Savannah? The Downstream Effects of Generative AI,' a paper by researchers at Louisiana State University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Metro areas with both high educational attainment and high costs of living are the most vulnerable to AI disruption. These metros have many of the kinds of jobs AI can replace and cuts there help reduce headcount expenses more quickly. Authors Scott Abrahams and Frank S. Levy highlight parallels with the 1980s when manufacturing-centric communities with a low share of educational attainment were hit hardest by the negative shock of automation and globalization. This doesn't mean that San Francisco will turn into a technological Rust Belt — the region is at the forefront of AI innovation, after all, and even if it ends up with fewer software development jobs, those could be replaced by different kinds of AI-enhanced knowledge work. Abrahams and Levy point out that the manufacturing shock benefited the southern U.S., not just Asian exporting countries, and it's possible an AI shock will lead to more balanced economic development across the U.S. That may take time, though, particularly while interstate migration remains constrained by a dysfunctional housing market. Given our experience with manufacturing job losses and signs that another labor-market reordering is coming, it's time policymakers at the local and national level start to take the potential for AI disruption seriously. Conor Sen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist.

Western businesses will not return to Russia
Western businesses will not return to Russia

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

Western businesses will not return to Russia

In recent weeks, Russian officials have promoted the idea that once the war in Ukraine ends, Western businesses — particularly American companies — would be welcome to return to Russia. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has responded with interest. But how realistic is that prospect? Would Western investments and joint ventures really come back? The Greek philosopher Heraclitus once famously observed, 'No man ever steps into the same river twice, for it's not the same river, and he's not the same man.' The same could be said of Russia. In the 1990s, following the Soviet Union's collapse, Western businesses poured into the country. Over the next 30 years, these businesses invested hundreds of billions of dollars in Russia, bringing not just capital but also expertise and institutional connections. In many ways, they helped integrate Russia into the global economy. That legacy has been largely erased. On paper, several thousand Western companies still operate in Russia, but most are little more than mailboxes or fronts for Russian business entities. The few remaining Western firms with meaningful operations are effectively trapped: they either cannot exit the market or are being pressured to sell their assets — often at huge losses — to well-connected Russians.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store