logo
Senator Anna Caballero Introduces Senate Bill 72, Would Secure Long-term Water Supply for California

Senator Anna Caballero Introduces Senate Bill 72, Would Secure Long-term Water Supply for California

SACRAMENTO, CA, January 27, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- CA Water for All is excited to share that last week Senator Anna Caballero (D - Merced) introduced Senate Bill 72, which will establish statewide water supply targets while requiring the State, water community, and stakeholders come together to achieve comprehensive, long-term water supply solutions that will transform water management in California, ensuring adequate and reliable supplies across the State.
'CMUA is proud to co-sponsor this vital legislation with the California State Association of Counties and the California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance. Our state is long overdue for a new strategy on how to best manage our water supply and plan for the future,' said Danielle Blacet-Hyden, Executive Director. 'With SB 72, California can finally begin to reverse the trend of overreliance on water cutbacks and rationing by working with the water community to rectify the decades-long, water supply threats that are impacting 40 million Californians and our communities statewide.'
SB 72 would secure California's future water supply by doing the following:
Establish necessary water supply targets to capture and produce enough water for all uses.
Modernize the California Water Plan for a 21st-century climate.
Ensure accountability for state agencies on water management issues.
Complement and amplify Governor Newsom's Water Supply Strategy, ensuring water supply targets extend beyond any single Administration.
'By establishing a statewide water supply target and transforming the California Water Plan into a strategic action plan to implement the target, we can finally address critical water supply challenges that are a product of climate change, weather whiplash, and an antiquated system,' said Senator Anna Caballero, author of SB 72. 'We cannot afford to wait any longer to plan and implement solutions to address California's water supply needs. I'm proud to author this proposal and look forward to working with the Legislature and Governor Newsom on this critical bill.'
'Communities, residents, businesses, the economy, and jobs are threatened across the state as our water supply challenges continue to get worse,' said Craig Miller, General Manager, Western Water. 'By establishing water supply targets, SB 72 will give us a new path forward that will not only bolster the Governor's current Water Supply Plan, but will also create necessary accountability and a commitment from the State, the water community, and all stakeholders to establish necessary change.'
As a result of evolving and worsening climate conditions, an aging water infrastructure, a growing population, a global economy, and antiquated state policies, California will continue to face an ongoing water supply shortage of historic proportions. California's current water systems require extraordinary commitment and investment in new water supplies. We all have a responsibility to ensure the future of our water supplies. Policy solutions must be advanced to meet environmental, agricultural and urban uses.
Last year, Senator Caballero authored a similar bill that enjoyed unanimous support from the Legislature in both houses but was vetoed by Governor Newsom due to budget concerns and a budget deficit. SB 72 includes many of the same provisions and with a better budget year projected and increased pressure from climate driven wildfires, the coalition is optimistic that the bill can get a signature from Governor Newsom.
Co-sponsors of SB 72 include the California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA), the California State Association of Counties (CSAC), and the California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance (CCEEB).
To learn more about SB 72, visit the state's Legislative Bill Information portal.
###
SOURCE: CA Water For All

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom criticizes Trump admin for sharing Medicaid data with Homeland Security
Newsom criticizes Trump admin for sharing Medicaid data with Homeland Security

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom criticizes Trump admin for sharing Medicaid data with Homeland Security

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday criticized the Trump administration for reportedly providing personal information from Medicaid recipients to federal immigration authorities. The criticism stems from an Associated Press report that revealed the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, under President Donald Trump, shared data, including immigration status, of millions of Medicaid beneficiaries with the Department of Homeland Security. The report suggests the information could aid immigration enforcement efforts under Trump's broader crackdown. 'We deeply value the privacy of all Californians,' Newsom said in a statement. 'This action by the federal government has implications for every person on Medicaid, but it is especially alarming for our immigrants and American mixed-status families.' Newsom signs executive order advancing California's clean car goals amid pushback from the Trump administration Under federal law, Medicaid is required to provide emergency services regardless of a recipient's immigration like California, which operates the program as Medi-Cal, routinely share limited data with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to comply with federal funding and oversight requirements. California's Department of Health Care Services confirmed that it responded to a federal request last month to validate its use of federal Medicaid funds but emphasized that it did not submit any demographic data beyond what is normally required. California law guarantees broad protections for personal data under the state Constitution and the Information Practices Act. State agencies are also required to adhere to strict privacy protocols and use Medi-Cal data solely for determining eligibility and benefits. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Republicans Launch Investigation Into Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass
Republicans Launch Investigation Into Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Republicans Launch Investigation Into Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee have announced a probe into Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom's response to protests and riots in the state and city over the past week. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer of Kentucky and Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana, both Republicans, sent letters to Newsom, Bass and the Department of Justice on Friday, all of which were published on the House Oversight Committee website. In his letters to Newsom and Bass, Comer accused the two leaders of having "protested President Trump's action to quell the violence caused by the rioters in Los Angeles, even resorting to falsely blaming him for the actions of violent rioters." Comer also accused the leaders of "falsely" claiming that law enforcement had protests under control as "police were clearly unable to quell the violence in Los Angeles prior ot the arrival of the National Guardsmen." "You have championed California's sanctuary policies, which prevent local law enforcement's cooperation with federal immigration authorities," Comer wrote in those letters. "You have also made it clear that you intend to block the objectives of the federal government, and defend aliens, regardless of their immigration status, criminal activity, anti-American views, or incitement to riot." Comer informed the two leaders that they must turn over any documentation of any communications they had between each other and with state, local and federal law enforcement regarding the protests and riots. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Trump Celebrates Temporary Ruling Allowing Troop Deployment: ‘We Saved L.A.'
Trump Celebrates Temporary Ruling Allowing Troop Deployment: ‘We Saved L.A.'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Celebrates Temporary Ruling Allowing Troop Deployment: ‘We Saved L.A.'

President Donald Trump celebrated after an appeals court signed off on his deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops against protestors in Los Angeles. 'The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now. We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!' On Thursday, a federal judge had sided against Trump, ordering him to relinquish control of California's National Guard to Governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom, a Democrat who has sparred with Trump over the handling of protests over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in L.A., was quick to take a victory lap of his own—even as the federal government appealed the decision. 'This win is not just for California, but the nation,' Newsom wrote on X. 'It's a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day.' But just hours later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals intervened and paused the ruling in a one-page order, meaning that Trump can keep the troops in L.A. for the time being. The court set a hearing for Tuesday. It is still possible that Newsom could prevail over Trump once the court considers the case on its merits. The San Francisco judge who originally sided with the governor—Charles Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton—was vehement in rejecting Trump's justification for deploying the guard. 'His actions were illegal,' the judge wrote, 'both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' Trump has also moved 700 Marines to L.A., but the judge's order didn't address these troops because they have not yet been actively involved in the protests. Typically, a state's governor must sign off before the National Guard is mobilized. However, Trump invoked a law that allows the president to do so in cases where there is a rebellion. Over the last week, as protests have raged in L.A.—at times becoming violent—Newsom and Trump have traded barbs. Newsom has likened Trump to 'failed dictators,' calling his deployment of troops a 'brazen abuse of power.' The president, meanwhile, has called Newsom 'grossly incompetent,' suggesting that he could be arrested for his handling of the protests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store