logo
What Is the Rule of 72 and How Can Investors Use It?

What Is the Rule of 72 and How Can Investors Use It?

Epoch Times28-04-2025

By Charles Lewis Sizemore
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance
If you've dabbled in investing, you've likely heard of the 'Rule of 72.' It's a back-of-the-envelope metric for calculating how quickly an investment will double in value.
Most financial metrics are too complex to be done in your head. You'd likely need a financial calculator or a spreadsheet to calculate the internal rate of return, yield to maturity, or common risk metrics like beta or standard deviation.
The beauty of the Rule of 72 is that it can be calculated by the average 10-year-old.
Let's take a look at what the Rule of 72 is, how it works and how it can be used in investing and financial planning.
What Is the Rule of 72 in Simple Terms?
The Rule of 72 is a straightforward formula that provides a quick-and-dirty approximation of how long it will take for an investment to double in value assuming a fixed annual rate of return.
It's a solid tool for estimating the effects of compound interest and can be used to gauge the potential growth of your investments over time.
Related Stories
3/5/2025
7/6/2024
The formula for the Rule of 72 is incredibly simple. You divide 72 by the annual rate of return you expect to earn on that investment.
For example, if you expect an annual return of 9 percent, it would take approximately eight years for your investment to double (72 divided by 9 equals 8).
What Are Specific Examples of the Rule of 72?
Getting more concrete, let's say you own an S&P 500 index fund and you want to map out a few scenarios. If the index rises at its historical average of around 10 percent, you'd double your money in about 7.2 years (72/10 = 7.2).
If you believed that the S&P 500 is more likely to return, say, 15 percent due to strong earnings or continued tailwinds from the best AI stocks, you'd double your money in 4.8 years (72/15 = 4.8).
And if you believed the S&P would return a more mundane 5 percent due to, say, a recession, you'd double your money in 14.4 years (72/5 = 14.4).
In 2024, the S&P 500 generated a total return (price change plus dividends) of 25 percent. The Rule of 72 would suggest your investment in the S&P 500 fund would double at that rate in 2.9 years—but that's assuming that rate of return stays constant. At last check, the S&P 500 was down 1.5 percent a quarter of the way into 2025.
The Rule of 72 can also be used to assess the impact of inflation on your purchasing power.
If you want to determine how long it will take for the purchasing power of your money to be cut in half due to price pressures, you can use the same formula.
Let's say the inflation rate is 3 percent. You could divide 72 by 3 to get 24 years. Assuming a 3 percent rate of inflation, your purchasing power would be cut in half in 24 years.
The most recent Consumer Price Index report put headline inflation at 2.8 percent on an annual basis.
Using the Rule of 72 at that rate, your purchasing power would be cut in half in 25.7 years. But, again, that's assuming the inflation rate stays the same.
Why Should I Use the Rule of 72?
The benefits of the Rule of 72 are obvious. It's a simple formula that anyone with elementary school math skills can calculate. It doesn't require a Wharton MBA or CFA Charter.
It also allows you to set realistic expectations for your investments and can help you determine whether your financial goals are achievable within your investment time frame.
You can also use the Rule of 72 to compare different investment options. For instance, if you're deciding between a stock fund and a bond fund with two very different expected returns, the Rule of 72 can help you assess which one gets you to your financial goal faster.
Remember, though, the Rule of 72 is designed to be a rough estimate and its assumptions aren't always realistic. It assumes a constant rate of return, and stock returns are anything but constant.
The average return is far from indicative of the return you're likely to get in any given year. It also doesn't account for taxes, fees or other expenses that can chip away at your returns.
And, like all financial models, it's only as good as its inputs: garbage in, garbage out.
While by no means a comprehensive analysis, the Rule of 72 is a useful tool that provides a quick and easy way to estimate the time it takes for an investment to potentially double.
It's valuable in financial planning and in comparing investment alternatives. And it's something even someone new to investing can put to work.
©2025 The Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors. They are meant for general informational purposes only and should not be construed or interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation. The Epoch Times does not provide investment, tax, legal, financial planning, estate planning, or any other personal finance advice. The Epoch Times holds no liability for the accuracy or timeliness of the information provided.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Reasons Why Vanguard's Worst-Performing ETF in 2025 May Be Worth Buying in June
3 Reasons Why Vanguard's Worst-Performing ETF in 2025 May Be Worth Buying in June

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Reasons Why Vanguard's Worst-Performing ETF in 2025 May Be Worth Buying in June

The Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF contains hundreds of companies. The fund is not top-heavy, which protects against concentration risk. The ETF sports a dirt cheap valuation along with a high yield. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF › Investment management firm Vanguard Group has over 90 exchange-traded funds (ETFs), many of which offer low-cost fees. The worst-performing in 2025 is the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (NYSEMKT: VIOV) -- which is down just over 12% year to date at the time of this writing. Here are three reasons why the beaten-down ETF may be worth buying now and one factor that may make it worth passing on. The fund includes 460 holdings with a median market capitalization of just $2.3 billion. This is a far different approach than funds that concentrate on just a handful of holdings. Even the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO), which mirrors the performance of the S&P 500, has over 35% of its holdings in just 10 companies. No single company in the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF has more than a 1.1% weighting. Top holdings include semiconductor company Qorvo, medical device company Teleflex, auto parts company BorgWarner, mortgage lender Mr. Cooper Group, and insurance company Jackson Financial, among others. Many of these companies are hardly household names, but their hidden-gem nature could appeal to value investors looking for exposure to companies they don't already own. One of the most appealing attributes of the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF is that it is spread out across stock market sectors. And the sectors it concentrates on tend to be more value-oriented. Here's a look at how its sector concentration stacks up against the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Sector Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Financials 23.9% 14.4% Industrials 15.5% 8.5% Consumer discretionary 13.8% 10.4% Information technology 10% 30.4% Healthcare 8.2% 10.8% Real estate 7.5% 2.2% Materials 6.4% 2% Utilities 4.1% 2.6% Consumer staples 3.9% 6.2% Energy 3.6% 3.2% Communication services 3.1% 9.3% Data source: Vanguard. The composition of the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF is nothing like the S&P 500, which may interest folks looking for more exposure to value-focused and cyclical sectors like financials and industrials and less exposure to growth-focused sectors like tech. What stands out the most about the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF compared to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is valuation. The small-cap value-focused ETF sports a mere 13.7 price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and a 2.2% dividend yield compared to a 25.9 P/E ratio and 1.4% yield for the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Granted, small-cap stocks arguably deserve to trade at a discount to their large-cap peers because large-cap companies have numerous advantages over smaller companies. For example, Microsoft benefits from its size and exposure to multiple end markets across hardware, software, gaming, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and more. These advantages give Microsoft network effects, meaning more customers who buy into Microsoft's software suite, use tools like GitHub, or join Microsoft Cloud, benefit Microsoft by making these products and services widespread. Network effects support pricing power and lead to margin expansion, which allows Microsoft to grow profits faster than sales and support a growing stock buyback program and dividend. This snowball effect is powerful when compounded over a multiyear time frame. Many small-cap companies simply don't have these advantages and must work much harder to compound in value. Microsoft is the largest company by market cap in the world, so it is a key holding in the S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and many growth-focused funds. It's the kind of stock that can have a high weighting in an ETF, and therefore, play into an investment thesis. But the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF contains no such companies. The Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF could be a useful tool for investors looking to put new capital to work in the market and generate passive income from stocks they don't already own. But there is a glaring disadvantage of the fund compared to other Vanguard ETFs like the S&P 500 ETF, Vanguard Growth ETF, Vanguard Value ETF, or even the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. The small-cap value ETF lacks leadership -- making it difficult to build an investment thesis around companies. With investing, it's important to know what you own and why you own it -- and that applies to individual stocks and ETFs. Even though the S&P 500 ETF contains over 500 components, it's still possible to get a decent grasp of the companies that drive the fund by looking at the top 20 or so holdings. But that's not the case with the Vanguard Small-Cap 600 Value ETF because the fund is ultra-diversified. Again, this structure may appeal to investors looking for general exposure to small-cap value stocks in key sectors like industrials and financials -- but it may not be the best choice for folks looking to build a portfolio around companies they are confident can grow over time. Before you buy stock in Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Admiral Funds - Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Daniel Foelber has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft, Teleflex, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Growth ETF, Vanguard Index Funds-Vanguard Value ETF, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends BorgWarner and Qorvo and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Reasons Why Vanguard's Worst-Performing ETF in 2025 May Be Worth Buying in June was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

HOOD vs. IBKR: Which Fintech Broker is Poised for More Growth?
HOOD vs. IBKR: Which Fintech Broker is Poised for More Growth?

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

HOOD vs. IBKR: Which Fintech Broker is Poised for More Growth?

Robinhood Markets HOOD and Interactive Brokers Group IBKR are prominent online brokerage players offering commission-free trading platforms. Robinhood appeals to newer, mobile-first retail investors, while Interactive Brokers serves more advanced traders with its comprehensive the stock markets witnessing massive volatility and client activity, HOOD and IBKR are expected to benefit from increased trading activities. As such, investors are bullish on both. This year, shares of HOOD have soared 65.8%, while Interactive Brokers is up 18.4%. Also, stocks have fared better than the industry, the Zacks Finance sector and the S&P 500 Index in the same time frame. HOOD & IBKR YTD Price Performance Image Source: Zacks Investment Research So, the question arises: which brokerage stock — Robinhood or Interactive Brokers — offers greater upside in the evolving trading market? Let's break down their fundamentals, financial performance, growth prospects and more before taking any decision. Robinhood became extremely popular among younger generations in early 2021, riding on the meme stock wave. Nonetheless, since its IPO in July 2021, a lot has happened on the business front. It has evolved from a brokerage firm primarily trading in digital assets to a more mature and diversified entity, striving to become a one-stop shop for building generational wealth. In this context, HOOD has launched several initiatives to attract more clients and strengthen its market share. Some notable ones are Robinhood Strategies, Robinhood Banking and Robinhood Cortex to boost the wealth management offerings; the prediction markets hub; a credit card and a desktop trading platform. Additionally, Robinhood is expanding via strategic acquisitions, which are helping it foray into new businesses and complement existing ones. On Tuesday, it announced an agreement to buy Canada-based WonderFi Technologies Inc. in a C$250 million all-cash deal, which will help deepen its presence in the Canadian digital asset market. In February 2025, it completed the $300 million acquisition of TradePMR, a custodial and portfolio management platform specializing in services for Registered Investment in July 2024, Robinhood acquired Pluto Capital Inc. With the integration of Pluto's advanced capabilities, the company has revolutionized the investment experience for its users. Further, the impending buyout of Bitstamp (announced in June 2024), a globally recognized cryptocurrency exchange (featuring more than 85 tradable assets and popular in Europe and Asia), will significantly enhance the company's crypto these efforts reflect HOOD's ambition to become a full-spectrum financial services provider. HOOD Sales Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Interactive Brokers' technological superiority remains one of its strongest aspects. The company processes trades in stocks, futures, options and forex on more than 150 exchanges across several countries and technology usage has kept IBKR's compensation expense relative to net revenues (10.8% in the first quarter of 2025) below its industry peers. Further, the company has been emphasizing developing proprietary software to automate broker-dealer functions, leading to a steady rise in Brokers is expanding globally with a series of strategic moves. Earlier this month, it extended trading hours for Forecast Contracts to nearly 24 hours, after having launched them in Canada. In the U.K., it added mutual funds to its ISA offerings, enhancing tax-efficient investing. IBKR also introduced PEA accounts in France and expanded mobile trading via GlobalTrader. Other innovations include almost 24 hours of Overnight Trading on U.S. stocks and ETFs, crypto trading through Paxos with low fees and the launch of IBKR Desktop, a next-gen trading platform for Windows and Mac, underscoring its focus on advanced, global trading company's technological superiority, combined with easier regulations to improve product velocity, will support its net revenues through higher client acquisitions. Net revenues are also expected to strengthen further in the quarters ahead, given the solid Daily Average Revenue Trades (DARTs) numbers and robust trading backdrop driven by higher market participation. IBKR Sales Estimates Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for HOOD's 2025 and 2026 earnings indicates an 11.9% and 19.4% rise for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Over the past month, earnings estimates for 2025 have remained unchanged, while for 2026, the same have been revised upward. Earnings Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research On the contrary, analysts are less optimistic about IBKR's prospects. The consensus mark for earnings suggests 0.4% and 7% growth for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Earnings estimates for both years have been revised lower over the past 30 days. Earnings Trend Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Hence, on earnings growth prospects, HOOD clearly has an edge over Interactive Brokers. Valuation-wise, HOOD is currently trading at the 12-month forward price-to-earnings (P/E) of 47.17X. The IBKR stock, on the other hand, is currently trading at the 12-month trailing P/TB of 28.86X. Further, both are trading at a premium to the industry average of 13.82X. P/E F12M Image Source: Zacks Investment Research While Robinhood commands a premium over Interactive Brokers, its valuation is justified, given its superior growth trajectory. Additionally, HOOD's return on equity (ROE) of 15.42% is way above IBKR's 4.97%. HOOD also outscores the industry ROE of 11.97%. This reflects Robinhood's efficient use of shareholder funds to generate profits. ROE Image Source: Zacks Investment Research HOOD has undergone a significant transformation since its IPO, evolving from a disruptive trading app into a comprehensive financial services platform. Through strategic acquisitions, it is aggressively expanding its product suite and global reach. It's also investing in advanced tools like Robinhood Cortex and Robinhood Strategies, targeting a broader investor base. These innovations, paired with a robust ROE and accelerating earnings and sales growth estimates through 2026, suggest strong long-term upside the other hand, Interactive Brokers remains a dominant, tech-driven brokerage favored by professional and institutional investors. Its global reach, low-cost model and powerful trading tools continue to support consistent revenue growth. However, while the company's innovation in areas like Forecast Contracts, GlobalTrader and IBKR Desktop is impressive, its earnings outlook is more muted, with only modest growth expected in the next two years. Combined with a lower ROE and downward revisions to earnings estimates, this suggests that while IBKR is a stable, well-run business, it may not match HOOD's upside potential in a growth-focused Robinhood appears to be the better long-term investment for solid returns. At present, Robinhood and Interactive Brokers carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research

5 Popular Fidelity Bond Funds For Your 401(k)
5 Popular Fidelity Bond Funds For Your 401(k)

Forbes

time40 minutes ago

  • Forbes

5 Popular Fidelity Bond Funds For Your 401(k)

Many Fidelity funds also have low expense ratios and functional investment strategies—two important ... More qualities for your retirement portfolio. Fidelity bond funds are generally available within Fidelity-run 401(k)s, making them accessible to millions of retirement savers. Many Fidelity funds also have low expense ratios and functional investment strategies—two important qualities for your retirement portfolio. Let's explore five popular Fidelity bond funds now. One may be the right candidate to provide essential bond exposure and help you reach your retirement goals. The following parameters helped identify the five bond funds highlighted below: Fund fees and charges dilute your returns. Considering that you may hold your retirement portfolio for 50 years or more, keeping these costs low can make a significant difference in your wealth over time. Five Fidelity bond funds to consider for your 401(k) are: A closer review of each fund follows. FIPDX by the numbers: The Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund invests in TIPS. These are U.S. Treasury-issued bonds that adjust in value according to inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. These bonds have a fixed interest rate, but the interest payment is calculated from the bond's value and rate. Therefore, when the bond's value rises due to inflation, the payment also increases. This protects the purchasing power of the bond's income over time. Note that TIPS inflation adjustments can be positive or negative. If prices fall, TIPS lose value and produce lower income. FIPDX pays distributions quarterly. Per-share payouts over the last four quarters have ranged from $0.031 to $0.145. FIPDX is a good choice for savers interested in income that outperforms inflation. The fund is particularly relevant now, as new U.S. tariff policies have stoked inflation concerns. That's one reason why FIPDX has returned more than 5.6% over the past year. Worries about rising prices and an economic downturn have benefited TIPS prices. FCNVX by the numbers: The Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Fund invests in high-quality, investment-grade Treasury bonds (18.5%), corporate bonds (54.5%), asset-backed securities (14%) and cash (13%). Investment-grade describes debt securities that have a low default risk, according to ratings assigned by S&P Global Ratings, Fitch and Moody's. FCNVX is a short-term portfolio, meaning most of the debts mature in two years or less. About one-third of the assets reprice within 30 days. Short maturities encourage pricing stability, since matured bonds can be replaced frequently with new issues carrying market interest rates. By comparison, longer maturities are more reactive to interest rate changes, losing value when rates rise and gaining value when rates fall. FCNVX is for the debt investor who wants competitive yields with low risk. The inclusion of highly rated corporate bonds and asset-backed securities encourages a higher yield than Treasury debts alone can provide, without adding undue risk. Also, the emphasis on short maturities limits price volatility related to interest rates. FAPGX by the numbers: The Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond Fund invests in medium and high-quality, investment-grade Treasury debt (34.5%), corporate bonds (50%) and asset-backed securities (15.5%) with maturities of less than three years. Issuers must also pass an ESG screen to be included in the portfolio. ESG stands for environmental, social and governance, the three pillars of sustainability tracking and reporting. Agencies and companies with good ESG scores are actively managing their impacts on people and the planet. FAPGX aligns with the needs of moderately conservative investors who like supporting sustainability initiatives. More than one-third (40%) of the fund's holdings mature in six months or less, which limits interest-rate sensitivity. The credit ratings within the portfolio range from AAA to BBB, which are all investment-grade. Medium-quality investment-grade holdings, rated BBB, account for 18% of the portfolio. This pushes the fund's yield slightly higher without an excessive risk increase. FXNAX by the numbers: The Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, a benchmark for the entire domestic, investment-grade bond market. The portfolio includes Treasury debt (45%), corporate debt (25%), mortgage-backed securities (25%), plus other government-related debts and cash. Maturities span from ultrashort to beyond 20 years. The largest maturity concentration is 39% in five-to-10-year issues. The portfolio's weighted average maturity is just over eight years. FXNAX suits investors who want broad exposure to U.S. bonds with slightly more risk and yield than Treasury debt alone. This portfolio has some interest-rate sensitivity since it includes intermediate and long-term maturities. But, this may work in your favor. Some experts believe it's a good time to invest in intermediate-term bonds for higher yields with low risk. Note that bond funds have less predictable income patterns than individual bonds due to the fund's diversification, strategy and trading actions. FUAMX by the numbers: The Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund invests in Treasury bonds with maturities ranging from five to 10 years. The intermediate-term approach secures higher yields for the next several years. It could also encourage a price increase for this fund if market rates decline. Treasury debt is investment-grade, with an AA rating from the three main credit rating agencies. While AA is one step below the highest rating of AAA, it still implies a very low default risk. Investors who believe in the full faith and credit of the U.S. government will prefer FUAMX over more diversified bond portfolios. FUAMX has no corporate bonds or asset-backed securities. At one time, U.S. Treasury debt was considered as safe as cash. In recent years, some experts have suggested the risk of Treasury securities is rising due to inflation and high deficits. Moody's downgraded the U.S. government's credit score this year, following similar actions by Fitch in 2023 and S&P Global Ratings in 2011. Investment-grade bond funds complement stock positions within a retirement portfolio. Bonds provide predictability and income, while stocks deliver growth potential. If you're not sure how much to own of each category, see How To Decide How Much To Invest In Stocks Vs. Bonds for essential strategies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store