Asia factory outlook at lowest since pandemic on Trump tariffs
Confidence in future output across the region fell to the lowest since July 2020, according to S&P Global purchasing managers' index data published Friday.
The pessimism comes even as overall output improved in July, as the headline index of activity rose for the first time since March to 50.1, just above the 50-line demarcating growth or contraction. That is after contracting in June the most in nearly four years
Manufacturers across the region, which the world relies on for goods, have been whipsawed since early this year by White House trade policy. After unveiling in April some of the highest tariff rates in Asia, President Trump has since set tariff rates of 10% to 40% for the region.
Economies in the region are highly reliant on industrial production and exports, particularly to the United States, and serve as a barometer for global trade activity and demand.
There were other slight improvements in external demand, as new export orders contracted at a softer pace and output prices rose at a faster pace, indicating increased demand from abroad.
'Despite these emerging positive trends, the latest data also indicated a further erosion of confidence,' said Maryam Baluch, economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence. 'While an increase in output is anticipated, the growth rate is expected to remain subdued.'
Meanwhile, overall activity in Japan and South Korea contracted for another month.
The new orders, output and employment measures together account for three-quarters of the PMI index, and surveys are conducted in the second half of each month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
12 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Dollar at risk of being left behind
Europe and Asia could leverage US President Donald Trump's "America First" strategy for their own benefit, eventually spurring the development of regional tripolar FX blocs that could erode the dominance of the US dollar and reshape global markets. The dollar has struggled this year, especially since Mr Trump's April 2 tariff announcement. While the currency is on pace for one of its strongest weeks this year after jumping about 1% on July 28 following the announcement of US-EU trade deal, this short-term move doesn't change the long-term trends that could undermine the greenback's position. MOVING IN REVERSE Economic dominance in the future could largely depend on access to affordable, efficient energy to power artificial intelligence technologies. And in the race to dominate the industries of the future, the US is arguably going in reverse. It's retreating from the renewables space, as seen in the administration's recent move to eliminate many clean energy subsidies. The president appears to be making the bet that the US can maintain energy dominance indefinitely by relying on its own fossil fuel resources. This could ultimately result in uncompetitive power costs in the future, especially given that China is already dominating in clean energy technologies like solar and electric vehicles. As historian Adam Tooze argues, "for the first time in two centuries the West is no longer the leader in future technologies but the follower". TWIN DEFICITS While Mr Trump may be seeking to enhance American self-sufficiency, the administration's policies may actually be increasing the country's dependency on foreign capital. Mr Trump's recently passed budget bill -- which looks pretty ugly to fiscal watchdogs despite its name -- could cement the US's position as the world's biggest capital importer by adding an expected $3.4 trillion to the US deficit over the next decade, according to estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, potentially locking in 6% to 7% budget deficits for years. Importantly, the US has also been running current account deficits of roughly 4% over the past several years, and this widened to 6% of GDP in Q1 2025, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. By spending beyond its means and running these twin deficits, the US will continue to require large amounts of foreign capital inflows. But unfortunately for Washington, this capital may soon be harder to come by, if both Europe and Asia seek to keep more of it closer to home. Europe is pushing for increased defense spending, as seen in its new goal to spend 5% of GDP on defence in the coming decade. While the bloc has agreed to increase US energy purchases through the recently announced US trade deal, much of that agreement remains up in the air and the volumes suggested are pretty unrealistic. Meanwhile, Asia has begun to trade more internally, as China has been focusing on export diversification. TRI-POLAR FX BLOCS A growing regionalisation of supply chains began during the pandemic and appears to be accelerating as Mr Trump seeks to drive production back to the US and all major global powers focus on securing regional raw material access (eg, rare earths and other critical minerals) for national security purposes. This shift could eventually create the foundation for true regional FX blocs across Asia, Europe and the Americas. This development would have a major impact on the global economy, currency values and capital markets, arguably providing a more balanced global economy with three poles of supply and demand, each attuned to their own regional dynamics rather than the current set-up whereby the global economy responds primarily to the Federal Reserve and US internal dynamics. Recently, European policymakers have discussed what ECB President Christine Lagarde has termed a "Global Euro" moment, one built upon a European Savings and Investment Union designed to foster both a European safe-haven asset that could eventually compete with US Treasuries and deeper, more liquid European capital markets to fund European infrastructure and innovation. Of course, this won't be an overnight shift. The dollar remains the world's dominant reserve currency, and the US debt market is estimated to be more than three times the size of Europe's, according to the World Economic Forum. But simply having a larger percentage of European capital stay at home could make a huge difference. Europe's current account surplus has averaged roughly $400 billion over the past few years, and Europe invests roughly $300 billion per year in offshore financial assets, according to the New York Times. Within Asia, Pan Gongsheng, Governor of the People's Bank of China, has recently highlighted China's interest in having the yuan play a larger role in a multi-polar currency world. Other officials soon followed, discussing how China plans to improve home market access for foreign capital while expanding opportunities for the Chinese to invest abroad. While China's capital account remains closed, Asian currencies already primarily trade off the yuan rather than the US dollar. Even though China faces challenges, such as its fight against deflation, its efforts on this front -- namely, boosting consumption and reining in excess supply, especially in the renewable energy space across solar, wind and batteries -- could ultimately help attract more foreign capital by boosting China's growth profile and corporate earnings. There is obviously no guarantee that these measures will be successful, but the government's intense focus on achieving these goals is evident. The recent decision to provide $12.4 billion in childcare subsidies suggests a potential policy Rubicon has been crossed, as China has typically resisted these types of direct fiscal stimulus measures in the past. In a world of currency blocs, both Europe and Asia could emerge as potential winners, as they erode the US's position as the world's financial powerhouse. So while many investors may get lost in the short-term currency noise, it might be wise to instead focus on the long-term signal. Reuters
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump sacks data chief over poor job numbers
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump has fired a top Labor Department official after the release of unexpectedly weak employment figures, accusing her without evidence of manipulating the figures to make his administration look bad. A White House official defended the move, saying there had been concerns for some time about the quality of economic data published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). In a second surprise economic policy development, the door for Trump to make an imprint on a Federal Reserve — with which he clashes almost daily for not lowering interest rates — opened earlier than anticipated when Fed Governor Adriana Kugler unexpectedly announced her resignation on Friday. The two developments further rattled a stock market already reeling from Trump's latest barrage of tariff announcements and the weak jobs data. The benchmark S&P 500 Index sank 1.6% in its largest daily drop in more than two months. Trump accused Erika McEntarfer, appointed by former president Joe Biden, of faking the jobs numbers. There is no evidence to back Trump's claims of data manipulation by the BLS, which compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data. A representative for the BLS did not respond to a request for comment. Friday began with BLS reporting the US economy created only 73,000 jobs in July, but more stunning were net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social network. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he said. He later added that the figures 'were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad'. US data agencies enjoy a global reputation for 'gold standard' statistics — one Trump may now be putting in danger — and economists of all stripes dismissed the idea of politically motivated manipulation. But a Trump administration official who requested anonymity said the White House has been dissatisfied with how large the revisions have been in the recent BLS data, and with lower survey responses. The problem started during the Covid pandemic and has not been addressed in the years since. 'There are these underlying problems that have been festering here for years now that have not been rectified,' the person said. 'The markets and companies and the government need accurate data, and we just weren't getting that.' The BLS has already reduced the sample collection for consumer price data as well as the producer price report, citing resource constraints. The government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies, representing approximately 631,000 individual worksites for the employment report. The response rate has declined from 80.3% in October 2020 to about 67.1% in July, BLS data shows. A Reuters poll last month found 89 of 100 top policy experts had at least some worries about the quality of US economic data, with most also concerned that authorities are not addressing the issue urgently enough. In addition to the concerns over job market data, headcount reductions at BLS have resulted in it scaling back the scope of data collection for the Consumer Price Index, one of the most important gauges of US inflation, watched by investors and policymakers worldwide. Trump's move fed into concerns that politics may influence data collection and publication. 'Politicising economic statistics is a self-defeating act,' said Michael Madowitz, principal economist at the Roosevelt Institute. 'Credibility is far easier to lose than rebuild, and the credibility of America's economic data is the foundation on which we've built the strongest economy in the world. Blinding the public about the state of the economy has a long track record, and it never ends well.' Meanwhile, Kugler's surprise decision to leave the Fed at the end of next week presents Trump an earlier-than-expected opportunity to install a potential successor to Fed chair Jerome Powell on the central bank's board of governors. Trump has threatened to fire Powell repeatedly because the Fed chief has overseen a policymaking body that has not cut interest rates as Trump has demanded. Powell's term expires next May, although he could remain on the Fed board until Jan 31, 2028, if he chooses. Trump will now get to select a Fed governor to replace Kugler and finish out her term, which expires on Jan 31, 2026. A governor filling an unexpired term may then be reappointed to a full 14-year term. Some speculation has centred on the idea Trump might pick a potential future chair to fill that slot as a holding place. Leading candidates for the next Fed chair include Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and Fed Governor Chris Waller, a Trump appointee who this week dissented with the central bank's decision to keep interest rates on hold, saying he preferred to start lowering them now.
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
India under more pressure to shun Russian oil
NEW DELHI — At least two vessels loaded with Russian oil bound for refiners in India have diverted to other destinations following new US sanctions, according to trade sources and data providers. The development comes even as Indian officials are reportedly saying they would keep purchasing oil from Russia despite the threat of steep penalties by US President Donald Trump. The New York Times quoted two senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in policy, and that the government had 'not given any direction to oil companies' to cut back imports from Russia. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House, India's Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas did not immediately respond to requests for comment. On July 14, Trump threatened 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the top supplier to India, responsible for about 35% of India's overall supplies. On Friday, Trump told reporters that he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. Reuters had reported earlier that Indian state refiners had stopped buying Russian oil in the past week as discounts narrowed in July. The US Treasury Department this week imposed sanctions on more than 115 Iran-linked individuals, entities and ships, some of which are involved in transporting Russian oil. Three ships — the Aframaxes Tagor and Guanyin and the Suezmax Tassos — were scheduled to deliver Russian oil to Indian ports this month, trade sources said. All three vessels are under US sanctions. Tagor was bound for Chennai on India's east coast, while Guanyin and Tassos were headed to ports in western India, according to trade sources and Russian ports data. Tighter Western sanctions aimed at cutting Russia's oil revenue, seen as funding its war against Ukraine, have been increasingly hitting Russian oil supplies for India. Tagor is now heading to Dalian in China, while Tassos is diverting to Port Said in Egypt, the data showed. Guanyin remains on course to Sikka, a port used by the Indian conglomerate Reliance Industries and Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd (BCPL). Indian Oil Corp, which was to receive the Tagor shipment, and BPCL did not respond to Reuters' emailed requests for comment. Zulu Shipping, linked to Panama-flagged Tassos and Tagor, and Guanyin-owner Silver Tetra Marine could not be reached for comments. Both companies are under US sanctions. A Reliance spokesperson said that 'neither of these two vessels, Guanyin and Tassos, is coming to us'. Reliance has previously purchased oil in Guanyin. Separately, two other vessels, Achilles and Elyte, loaded with Russian oil, were preparing to discharge Russian Urals crude for Reliance, according to data from LSEG (London Stock Exchange Group). Both these vessels are sanctioned by Britain and the European Union. India has condemned the EU sanctions.
