logo
Is AI Technology The Biggest Risk For Hedge Fund Growth And Market Stability?

Is AI Technology The Biggest Risk For Hedge Fund Growth And Market Stability?

Forbes27-03-2025

The U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs is not at the top of anyone's list for hedge fund commentators but it does have serious views on the subject.
Its report in June last year said that hedge funds use of AI and machine learning technologies to assist in trading decisions, which has been a practice by some for years, raises several concerns as this technology evolves, including the risk of inadequate disclosures to clients and the potential for increased threats to market stability.'
It quoted the then SEC Chairman Gary Gensler's view that a financial crisis triggered by AI is 'nearly unavoidable' within the next decade and cited the May 2023 incident when an AI generated image of an explosion at the Pentagon led to a drop in stock market indices. Gary Gensler is gone and AI regulation in the new administration is certain to be lighter but the issue remains.
Arguably, the biggest concern often raised by policymakers and regulators about AI in financial services is the use of GenAI and Large Language Models (LLMs) which are complex and nuanced, often with a lack of transparency with the underlying information used in generating a response that is used to make investment decisions. This is especially the case in the regulated financial services sector.
The CFTC released Report on Responsible AI in Financial Markets, in May 2024, was authored by an independent Commitee of experts to facilitate an understanding of the impact and implications of the evolution of AI on financial markets with five recommendations to as to how the CFTC should approach this AI evolution in order to safeguard financial markets - regulating AI in financial services was not one of the recommendations.
Commenting on the report, Commissioner Goldsmith Romero said, 'I herald the foundational, iterative approach of the Committee to recognize both that AI has been used in financial markets for decades, and that the evolution of generative AI introduces new issues and concerns, as well as opportunities."
'Herding' is often cited as a concern, where similar common models are used systemically important financial institutions or large cohorts of market participants, creating concentration risks, as pointed out in IOSCO's newly released member survey report, Artificial Intelligence in Capital Markets: Use Cases, Risks, and Challenges, though the report claims there is a lack of sufficient data in this specific area.
The European Commission is consulting the industry on the use of AI in financial services with a view to regulating it, which is more the European way.
Jack Inglis, ceo of The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), says, 'A prescriptive approach to policy-making in this area could stifle innovation, placing European investment managers at a competitive disadvantage globally.'
AIMA, which represents many hedge funds, stressed advanced technologies have been used in the sector for years 'to increase business and compliance efficiencies, but generative AI now offers new opportunities for enhanced efficiency gains.'
Firms in the hedge fund industry, and across the financial services sector as a whole, invests heavily in their own technology, and in fintech and technology investments. After the Fed started rate cutting Goldman Sachs noted that hedge funds were buying technology stocks at the fastest rate for four months placing nearly almost three times as many long positions on the bet that information technology stocks would rise, compared to those with bets against them.
That has of course changed since the start of the year and coinciding with the launch of DeepSeek. The Magnificent Seven or Mag7, now dubbed the Lag7, are down 16 percent so far this year. Markets being markets, there are claims now that Lag7 stocks are oversold.
Goldman Sachs now says hedge funds are fuelling the biggest tech buying spree since 2021 with Clif Marriott in Goldman Sachs Global Banking & Markets saying, 'We think 2025 is going to be a breakout year for the number of tech IPOs globally.'
The amount of capital invested in artificial intelligence is growing and similarly in cyber security, 'European tech has evolved immensely over the past decade,'add Marriott.
Investment by hedge funds in technology for their own business operations as well as for their investors is a major issue and one that research from Beacon Platform Inc. has explored in depth in a new research report, Hedge Funds in 2024: Risks, Resilience, and Technology.
Asset Tarabayev, chief product officer at Beacon, sums it up the report saying, 'Hedge funds clearly understand that data and systems integration are essential components of both risk visibility and competitive advantage.'
The report from Beacon, a cross-asset portfolio analytics and risk management platform for multi-strategy hedge funds, contains some good news and some not so good news about hedge funds' use of technology.
The good news is that institutional investors are predicting strong growth and attractive risk-adjusted returns in the hedge fund sector and are planning to back expansion with increased allocations. Almost all (93 percent) questioned expect an increase in fundraising by hedge funds of 10 percent or more over the next three years with 14 percent predicting growth of more than 20 percent.
All institutional investors questioned believe investing in hedge funds will be attractive in terms of risk-adjusted returns over the next five years, with 17 percent describing it as very attractive.
Data from Hedge Fund Research shows that at the end of 2024 total global hedge fund capital rose to an estimated $4.51 trillion, increasing $401.4 billion in the year. A major growth area has been crypto and blockchain with the HFR Cryptocurrency Index showing annualized returns of 51.4 percent and cumulative gains of 694.6 percent over five years.
The not so good news is that, for all the investment in technology and talk of the use of generative AI and innovation, the research discovered the old ways have not gone away yet with 90 percent questioned saying their fund or department is wasting time with Excel spreadsheets and other manual activities.
Almost all (92 percent) believe their system spends too much time on consolidating data from multiple sources while 81 percent say too much time goes in investment evaluation and 79 percent admit time is wasted on aggregating and measuring risk.
Nearly three out of four (73 percent) say too much time goes into manual or spreadsheet-based analytics and 71 percent say this about trying to define P&L residuals.
Kirat Singh, co-founder and ceo, at Beacon said: 'Excel spreadsheets clearly have a place in managing trading activity and risk management in the hedge fund sector, however, with so many saying that they are spending too much time on spreadsheets, there is a strong case for greater use of the available technologies.
'Leading funds are turning massive spreadsheets with millions of cells into cloud-enabled analytics, increasing the scale and speed of their analysis and decision making.'
Technology and its use in risk management emerged as one of the biggest risks. Most institutional investors questioned (88 percent) agree that the quality of information and transparency in hedge funds needs to improve, with 22 percent saying it needs to improve dramatically.
It is an issue that is costing hedge funds money.
85 percent of institutional investors questioned have decided not to invest in a particular fund because of concerns over its management of risk, and almost all (93 percent) think that this will be a growing trend.
Almost all (93 percent) of senior hedge-fund executives questioned said risk parameters are becoming stricter at their firm in terms of what they can and cannot trade. Almost all (95 percent) say they are having to reduce or abandon trading in some areas because of the growing risks or because they don't have a good enough understanding of the risks in that area.
Credit trading is the area hedge fund executives believe is most likely to be reduced or abandoned due to tighter risk parameters.
Technology is the answer or at least a big part of the answer in helping to improve risk management. Almost all (99 percent) of hedge fund executives questioned say their fund will increase spending on risk management over the next two years. 90 percent questioned admit transparency provided to clients and investors must improve with 23 percent saying it has to improve dramatically.
More than half (55 percent) say investment in technology is helping improve risk management and technology is seen as a source of competitive advantage across a range of factors. It is also a major factor making it easier to launch new funds with 60 percent of hedge fund executives questioned pointed to technology as a driver for growth in the number of funds.
Technology is just about as important as being able to raise funds with 61 percent questioned indicating this.
The research found launching a new fund is so popular that most hedge fund executives suspect colleagues are planning to quit and launch their own fund with 85 percent of senior executives questioned are concerned about a colleague launching their own fund. They just need the technology, which is becoming both cheaper to buy and build.
Technology is central to the development of the hedge fund industry and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future, however it is often a tale of two domains from LLMs to spreadsheets.
While the U.S. is focused more on voluntary guidelines for AI use in industries like financial services, the EU AI Act looks to be focused on comprehensive regulatory efforts, and classifying AI systems in high risk areas like financial services and healthcare.
A good common ground for the hedge fund industry and policymakers and regulators is transparency - technology that delivers the transparency and outcomes that investors increasingly require will go some way to satisfying the drive to better oversight.
The use of newer and greater technology monitoring systems to underpin financial stability would be a great and innovate breaththrough and improvement - physician, heal thyself.
It is time that governments and regulators master this new and innovative technology to satisfy the monitoring (RegTech) and supervisory (SupTech) requirements in industries like financial services that are technology driven to meet the requirements of our complex society.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Elon Musk's feud with Trump means for Tesla shareholders
What Elon Musk's feud with Trump means for Tesla shareholders

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What Elon Musk's feud with Trump means for Tesla shareholders

For Tesla investors, Elon Musk's involvement with Donald Trump has been a car wreck that's unfolded in two chapters, one in slow motion, the next on dizzying fast-forward. During Musk's 130 days running DOGE, a crusade whose dogged aggression virtually defined the administration's mindset in the early months, the EV chief infuriated European customers by backing far-right politicians, and as sales dropped in the likes of Germany and France, and severe competition shrank its market share in China, neglected tackling Tesla's mounting problems by doubling down by famously battling to slash departments and headcount from the White House. In his absence, Tesla's stock and earnings tanked. Bad as that episode proved for Tesla, it at least provided a potential upside. 'Even before DOGE, Musk clearly had too many spoons in too many pots through SpaceX, Neuralink, X and his other ventures, then he got even more preoccupied by putting another spoon in another pot,' says Eric Talley, a professor of law and business at Columbia University. 'But being in the White House also included a bit of an insurance policy for Tesla….sitting close to the seat of decision making was a big potential advantage.' Now, says Talley, Musk has singlehandedly turned that 'insurance policy' into a liability—the threat that the administration will penalize the EV-maker, or at best do nothing to protect it. When Musk departed DOGE on May 30 amid the fanfare of Trump's Oval Office sendoff, Tesla shareholders still had little to toast, since the CEO wasn't offloading his empire's myriad duties to refocus on the troubled manufacturer. Then, the Musk-Trump feud that exploded on June 5th, triggered by the former's lacerating takedown of the President's signature budget bill, put Tesla overnight into a spot where it's threatened not only by poor finances but the insults unleashed at his former sponsor that both invite retaliation by Trump and endanger Musk's survival as the enterprise's leader that's so critical to its gigantic valuation. 'The thing that's different in the last 24 hours,' says Talley, 'is that Musk not only walked away from an insurance policy of having a CEO situated high in government. He took out an anti-insurance policy. Any moment could erupt in a flameout from either side over social media that puts a target on Tesla's back.' He notes that Tesla's rivals are confronting the same headwinds from the wind-down in EV subsidies to purchasers subsidies proposed the so-called 'Great Big Beautiful Bill,' but the the overhang from antagonizing the president 'is a target its competitors don't have.' Indeed, the day it detonated, the blowup sent Tesla shares reeling 14.3% in a freefall that erased $153 billion in market cap, the biggest one-day drop in the company's history. Though it clawed back around a third of those losses the following day, the stock's still sitting 40% below its recent summit in mid-December. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, and one of the leading experts on the rules and ethics governing boards, told Fortune that in any other major public company but Tesla, Musk would be gone—and the dumping would have happened well before the new hurricane. 'If his name had been Joe Dokes, he'd be gone in a nano-second,' says Elson, 'given the reputational damage he did alienating a good number of customers by going into politics at DOGE. It's a mess. No other board would have let a CEO get involved in that way. You don't have time to be a CEO!' What keeps Musk in the job is his iron grip on the board, says Elson. He notes that Musk controls 30% of the shares, and that his influence extends beyond the power of that stake due to the loyalty built, in part, by awarding directors large options grants that made many of them extremely rich. Elson reckons that it would be extremely difficult for disgruntled shareholders to prevail in lawsuits versus board members that might work toward forcing out Musk. 'The road to winning liability cases against directors is a twisting, bumpy one,' he avows. 'That Tesla re-incorporated from Delaware to Texas makes it much tougher. That's why Tesla moved to Texas. It was a race to the bottom and they ran all the way to the bottom of the barrel.' For Elson, Musk can't be forced to leave, and won't go unless he wants to, 'and there's nothing anybody can do about it.' Nevertheless, the size of Musk's ownership stake that's the source of his control, and his attachment to Tesla going forward that's attached to that position, are being tested by a landmark decisions in the Delaware courts. The rulings, handed down last year, negated the $56 billion stock package awarded by the board in 2018 that accounts for two-thirds of Musk's holdings. Tesla's now appealing to get that comp restored. If the Delaware Supreme Court upholds the decision, Tesla's certain to attempt getting that compensation reinstated. But that route courts much higher risks now. According to Talley, the board under Texas law could either attempt to restore the package unilaterally, or put the issue to a shareholder vote. He reckons that the former, more direct approach is now looking a lot less attractive to the directors than a few days ago. 'The board may prefer now to go with a shareholder vote,' he says, given the potential backlash from rewarding Musk so royally when Tesla's struggling, mainly because of his own actions. 'It might appeal to the board to go that way and count on a rejection,' he adds. A turn down raises another potentially ghoulish outcome. 'If they have a shareholder vote, and it goes negative, then you have a succession problem. You don't want a CEO to take vengeance on the company,' a path the mercurial legend could take. It's also unclear how Musk will react if the Delaware Supreme Court rules against him—same upshot, he owns far less of Tesla, and his incentive to rebuild his the greatest source of his wealth would be greatly diminished. Tesla enjoys a gigantic premium courtesy of Musk's iconic status and the serial promises of delivering self-driving technology that will transform Tesla from a metal-bender into a fabulously lucrative tech player. As I detailed after Tesla reported Q1 results, it actually lost money selling cars and batteries and only managed a tiny profit through the sales of regulatory credits. Its 'hardcore,' repeatable earnings from the auto and battery franchises over the previous four quarters totaled just $3.5 billion, down from $12 billion in 2022. At a PE of 30 that's three times the auto industry average, Tesla—based on bedrock fundamentals—might be worth $100 billion. But even after the recent selloff, its valuation stands at $960 billion. Hence, the difference of well over $800 billion arises from what I'll call the 'Musk magic premium,' created by his promises of epic innovations to come. If Musk were to depart, a big part of that magic premium exits with him. It may be fading already. So for Tesla shareholders, it's bad either way. Musk leaves and a hands-on leader arrives, but the genius' halo no longer shields the stock, or he stays and keeps starting fights that undermine the brand and spreads his time among half a dozen pioneering ventures that he may find more riveting. As Elson puts it, 'Anyone else would be fired after this but he feels he can't be. He has this aura that makes him feel untouchable. He's got a cult status that seems to follow him and make folks think it's okay that he doesn't operate in a normal way.' But, Elson cautions, as Musk's behavior gets more and more outrageous, the burden he's heaping on Tesla, now and what investors increasing perceive is looming, is catching up with him. We've just seen a shocking example of how fast that can happen, and how rapidly the myth can dissolve. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Infosys inaugurates new Development Center at GIFT City to boost BFSI Tech services
Infosys inaugurates new Development Center at GIFT City to boost BFSI Tech services

Business Upturn

time3 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Infosys inaugurates new Development Center at GIFT City to boost BFSI Tech services

Infosys (NSE, BSE, NYSE: INFY), a global leader in digital services and consulting, has inaugurated its new Development Center (DC) at Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City), Gandhinagar. The newly launched facility is designed to support over 1,000 employees operating in a hybrid work model. The center will serve as a strategic TechFin hub, focusing on delivering advanced digital solutions to global Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI) clients. Key service areas include digital banking, regulatory compliance, capital markets, trade finance, cards and payments, and risk management. Infosys will harness cutting-edge technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Generative AI (Gen AI), cloud, APIs, blockchain, and cybersecurity to provide seamless cross-border digital services and enhance client engagement. The Development Center was inaugurated by the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Gujarat, Shri Bhupendrabhai Patel. Infosys CFO Mr. Jayesh Sanghrajka, Senior Vice Presidents Mr. Niladri Prasad Mishra and Mr. Rajneesh Malviya, along with senior government officials, were present at the event. Aligned with Infosys' ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals, the facility integrates sustainable design features including energy efficiency, water conservation, and smart operational systems. The workplace also supports collaboration, productivity, and innovation through a future-ready hybrid office model. This initiative reinforces Infosys' commitment to strengthening India's role as a global financial technology hub and driving innovation in the BFSI sector. Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at

Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears
Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Poles march for LGBTQ+ equality after presidential vote raises fears

By Thomas Holdstock GDANSK, Poland (Reuters) -Thousands of Poles took part in a Pride march in the northern port city of Gdansk on Saturday, showing their support for the LGBTQ+ community amid fears for its future after nationalist candidate Karol Nawrocki won a presidential election. Participants waved rainbow flags and the blue, pink, and white banners representing the transgender community. Many carried placards bearing messages such as "Love is love" and "12 years together - when civil partnership?". A parallel Pride event was also held in the western city of Wroclaw. Nawrocki, supported by the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, has raised alarm among LGBTQ+ advocates. During its time in power from 2015 to 2023, PiS made opposition to what it termed "LGBTQ+ ideology" a central part of its platform, framing it as a threat to traditional values in the predominantly Catholic country. "I was devastated to be honest," 23-year-old student Agata said when asked about Nawrocki's victory. "I am scared. I don't know what our future looks like." Although LGBTQ+ issues were less prominent in Nawrocki's campaign than in that of his PiS-backed predecessor Andrzej Duda in 2020, his platform included commitments to resist "ideology in schools" and to oppose adoption by same-sex couples. He has stated that marriage should remain between a man and a woman and, while rejecting civil partnerships, expressed a willingness to discuss legal recognition for a "close person", regardless of sexual orientation. In contrast, a pro-European coalition that came to power in 2023 introduced a draft bill to legalise civil partnerships. However, with the presidency holding veto power, the bill's future remains uncertain. Agata said that she hoped a law on civil partnerships could come into effect, but that it was unlikely during Nawrocki's presidency. "I want more equality in our society, in our country," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store