logo
SNAP Rules Tighten To Restrict Junk Food, Sodas: Advocates Praise Online Access Boost

SNAP Rules Tighten To Restrict Junk Food, Sodas: Advocates Praise Online Access Boost

Yahooa day ago
As top federal officials gathered in the capital on Monday to promote a new push to restrict soda and junk food from SNAP purchases, a Texas food access expert was hundreds of miles away, explaining how recent changes to the same program have expanded healthy options for people experiencing poverty.
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins hosted a joint press event in Washington as part of President Donald Trump's 'Make America Healthy Again' initiative, unveiling new SNAP waivers and calling for broader federal restrictions on sugary drinks, as previously covered by The Dallas Express.
'If you want to buy a sugary soda — the U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it,' Kennedy said. 'The U.S. taxpayer should not be paying to feed kids foods, the poorest kids in the country, that will give them diabetes.'
The Breakdown:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to ban SNAP users from buying soda nationally.
New waivers approved for Florida, Texas, and four other states on Monday.
Kennedy and Rollins say the goal is to improve health and reduce Medicaid costs.
Meanwhile in Texas, advocates say online SNAP expansion is helping.
The tension underscores a national debate on food access vs. government regulation.
Speaking at the Great American Farmers Market in Washington, Kennedy said sugary drinks and candies make up nearly 17% of current SNAP expenditures and argued the government 'pays twice' — first through SNAP benefits, then through the downstream cost of chronic diseases.
Rollins echoed that message.
'One way … is disallowing taxpayer-funded benefits to purchase unhealthy items like soda, candy, and other junk food,' Rollins explained. 'SNAP is a supplemental nutrition program meant to provide food benefits to low-income families … essential to health and well-being.'
Rollins signed new waivers on Monday for Florida, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, and Colorado. These come in addition to previous waivers in Arkansas, Utah, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, and Nebraska, which restrict soda and candy in various forms starting in 2026.
In her remarks, Rollins framed the effort as both fiscally responsible and morally urgent, citing statistics about obesity, diabetes, and mental health challenges in children.
'Over 75% of American youth between the ages of 17 and 24 are ineligible for military service because of obesity, poor physical fitness, or mental health challenges,' explained Rollins.
Yet some believe Kennedy and Rollins' work to limit soda to promote health is misguided.
'The problem with soda consumption in the U.S. is not SNAP users,' Hilary Seligman, a public health researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, previously told The New York Times. 'If you try to solve this problem using SNAP as a lever, so only SNAP people are impacted by it, what we're likely to do is just increase stigma for people who are trying to make ends meet.'
Some former Obama and Biden officials agree with Seligman.
'It doesn't pay for everyone's food for the entire month,' former Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told NYT. 'So what would prevent people from spending their own money on sugary drinks or soda? The notion of restricting it for nutritional purposes really isn't a valid reason.'
While the Trump administration officials were speaking about SNAP, Celebrindal Roberts, procurement and logistics manager for Farmshare Austin, was addressing attendees at the Southern Family Farmers and Food Systems Conference, held at Texas State University.
Roberts offered a more local perspective on SNAP, noting that her nonprofit has accepted SNAP since 2016 and began accepting online SNAP in October 2024. She described online payments as a 'game-changer,' explaining that they reduce delivery and administrative costs, allow for unattended home delivery, and increase access to healthy food for people in areas with limited grocery infrastructure.
'You sell more food with Double Up Food Bucks and SNAP online,' Roberts said.
Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB) is a program that allows SNAP users to double the value of their benefits when buying fruits and vegetables. Roberts praised the program but noted it currently does not cover canned goods or honey, which limits its reach in some food-insecure households.
Roberts also said the online system has improved safety for delivery drivers and staff by reducing the need for carrying cash. Refunds from canceled or delayed orders are now returned directly to customers' SNAP cards, making the entire process more seamless for users and vendors alike.
Farmshare Austin's 13-acre certified organic farm supplies a mobile market, home delivery program, and postpartum food access initiative. The group serves 25 ZIP codes in the Eastern Crescent of Austin and Travis County.
While battles continue to rage about the prudence of various changes and innovations with SNAP, Kennedy insists that change is long overdue.
'For 20 years Democrats and Republicans have been talking about this on Capitol Hill,' he said. 'We have no problem with [soda consumption] … taxpayer dollars should not be funding these injuries to our children,' Kennedy said.
Despite previous legal hurdles faced by states seeking to restrict SNAP purchases, Rollins and Kennedy say the administration is now working to bypass congressional gridlock and encourage all governors to submit waivers.
It remains to be seen whether the growing push for restrictions will be met with resistance from health equity advocates, grocers, or SNAP recipients themselves. But both Kennedy and Rollins framed the reforms as a defining front in Trump's broader push for 'nutrition, not just food assistance.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires
Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires

By Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Wildfires that devastated parts of the Los Angeles area in January indirectly led to hundreds of deaths in the ensuing weeks, far exceeding the official toll of 31 fatalities, according to a study released on Wednesday. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, estimated 440 "excess deaths" were attributable to the fires from January 5 to February 1, using models that compared predicted mortality under normal circumstances to actual numbers documented during that period. The additional deaths likely reflect a mix of factors, including increased exposure of people with heart and lung disease to poor air quality from smoke and toxins released by the fires, as well as healthcare delays and disruptions, the study said. The findings "underscore the need to complement direct fatalities estimates with alternative methods to quantify the additional mortality burden of wildfires and of climate-related emergencies more broadly," the researchers wrote. Two wind-driven wildfires that erupted during the first week of January on opposite sides of Los Angeles damaged or destroyed nearly 16,000 structures combined - laying waste to much of the seaside district of Pacific Palisades and the foothill community of Altadena. Together, the blazes scorched 59 square miles (152 sq km), an area larger than Paris. The official tally of people who perished as a direct result of the fires stands at 31, after the most recent set of human remains were unearthed in Altadena in July, six months after the fires. Governor Gavin Newsom in February requested nearly $40 billion in wildfire aid from Congress. Some estimates put economic losses from the fires at more than $250 billion, making the conflagration one of the most costly natural disasters in U.S. history. The JAMA study acknowledged some limitations, saying the data may need to be revised upward in the future and the research did not reflect any fire-attributable deaths beyond Feb. 1.

Rep. Nancy Mace touts ties to Trump in campaign-style town hall
Rep. Nancy Mace touts ties to Trump in campaign-style town hall

CNN

time13 minutes ago

  • CNN

Rep. Nancy Mace touts ties to Trump in campaign-style town hall

Republican Rep. Nancy Mace, fresh off an announced bid for South Carolina's governor's mansion, jockeyed for an endorsement from President Donald Trump and sought to tie herself closely to him in a public meeting with a friendly crowd Wednesday. While members of her party have been encouraged to hold town halls over their August break from Washington to sell Trump's agenda out in the country, Mace's event – billed as 'The Mother of All Town Halls' – more closely resembled a campaign event. Mace spoke at length about her plans for governor and answered some questions from a crowd of supporters at a venue outside of South Carolina's First Congressional District, which Mace has represented since 2020. She teased plans to hold similar events across the state. The three-term congresswoman spent much of her remarks aligning herself with Trump and touting what she's done for the president, specifically citing her 2024 interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos that resulted in a $15 million defamation settlement, paid toward Trump's presidential library. 'Trump won that defamation suit, right, and how Nancy Mace will not back down, and Nancy Mace will hold the line,' Mace said. She continued, 'I haven't told the president this, but my one ask, I just want one ask, because the $15 million is supposed to be used to build his presidential library. I just want my name over a women's bathroom,' she continued, nodding to her pushes to ban transgender women from women's restrooms. Mace lobbied for an endorsement from Trump, one that will be critical in a crowded GOP gubernatorial primary that includes fellow Trump ally and South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman and state Attorney General Alan Wilson, who was the target of multiple Mace jabs Wednesday. 'I'm just saying, I've done a lot for the president,' Mace said. 'If you talk to him, I would really like his support for governor.' In her speech, the congresswoman also continued to claim credit for a $195 million infrastructure grant in the Palmetto State, a grant only possible because of former President Joe Biden's infrastructure law. 'One of the things the press will not tell you: I am one of the leading members of Congress who's gotten resources for our state,' Mace said. 'In fact, our office assisted in getting the largest infrastructure grant in South Carolina history, at $195 million earlier this year. The press won't tell you that.' Mace at the time joined some of her House Republican colleagues in voting against the measure. Asked by CNN about her ability to tout the grant as an accomplishment despite having not voted for the bill, Mace said she 'absolutely' could. 'We fight over how we spend the money, how we appropriate it, but once the appropriations happen, I'm gonna make sure that South Carolina, that we get our fair share, because that money's getting spent and our tax dollars in South Carolina is equal to anybody else's in California, New York, Tennessee,' she said. She later continued, 'Just because we disagree on how the money's spent means we shouldn't get money for our roads and bridges? Isn't that kind of hypocritical, that's ironic?' Mace on Wednesday also backed Texas' efforts to redraw its congressional map, telling reporters she 'would arrest the Texas Legislature' and supports '[Texas GOP Gov. Greg] Abbott in the Texas Legislature to do what's fair, what's right.' The congresswoman set herself apart from Norman, who pushed Wednesday for the South Carolina State Assembly to redraw the Palmetto State's congressional lines. 'I think our lines are good. We did a great job. The state. Congress doesn't do anything with drawing the lines. We don't have any legal authority, alright? It's done by the state legislature, the judiciary specifically. But the lines were drawn.' Mace later further separated herself from Norman, who singled out Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn's district as one to target. 'Well, constitutionally, there has to be a seat for a Democrat in a Black, you know, census for Jim Clyburn for a Democrat seat,' Mace said. 'So that's constitutionally, civil rights that exists. It's always going to be a Democrat seat.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store