Minnesota senator mistakenly listed as board member of nonprofit seeking $15 million grant
A small Minneapolis nonprofit that would receive $15 million under a proposed bill at the Legislature says it made a mistake by listing Sen. Zaynab Mohamed, DFL-Minneapolis, as a board member on its tax filings.
A DFL Senate spokesman said Mohamed was never a board member of WE WIN Institute, although a Zaynab Mohammad is listed on the organization's most recently available tax filing for 2023.
The Senate spokesman shared a statement from the organization's executive director Titilayo Bediako apologizing for the confusion.
The organization asked Mohamed to serve on the board, but she declined. Mohamed's name was included on the tax filing — and spelled incorrectly — by mistake and the organization said it is taking steps to amend the filing to remove her name, according to Bediako's statement.
Bediako did not immediately return calls seeking comment.
The connection between Mohamed and the organization was first reported by the conservative website Minnesota Free State using an online database of government appropriations to nonprofits called Data Republican.
That's when Mohamed became aware she was listed on the organization's 990 and asked to be removed, according to a statement shared by a spokesperson.
WE WIN Institute is seeking $15 million under a bill (SF1140) authored by Sen. Omar Fateh, DFL-Minneapolis, to renovate its facilities and buy additional property in Minneapolis 'for a meeting and gathering space to work with and support community-based organization partnerships.'
The organization provides 'academic, social, and culturally specific programming and food services for Black students in the city of Minneapolis,' according to the bill.
That appropriation would dwarf the small nonprofit's annual budget, which was just $756,272 in 2023.
A spokesman said Fateh plans to pull the bill.
State agencies typically award grants to organizations after performing background checks and analyzing proposals, but state lawmakers also can direct funds to specific groups through 'legislatively named grants.'
WE WIN Institute received $3.5 million from the Legislature in 2024 through a bill authored by Fateh as part of a $1.1 billion bonanza of such legislatively named grants.
Legislators funneling taxpayer dollars to specific organizations has raised concerns about wasteful spending and the potential for fraud; the Office of the Legislative Auditor has urged lawmakers to stop the practice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mississippi Supreme Court map violates Voting Rights Act, judge rules
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — A federal judge has ordered Mississippi to redraw its Supreme Court electoral map, after finding the map dilutes the power of Black voters. U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock ruled the map, which was enacted in 1987, violates the Voting Rights Act and cannot be used in future elections. The Mississippi branch of the American Civil Liberties Union helped litigate the lawsuit, arguing the map cut Mississippi's Delta region — a historically Black area — in half. 'This win corrects a historic injustice," said Ari Savitzky, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU Voting Rights Project. "All Mississippians will benefit from fair district lines that give Black voters an equal voice — and new generations of Black leaders an equal chance to help shape the state's future by serving on the state's highest court.' The lawsuit, which was filed on April 25, 2022, argued the map diminished the Black vote in the Central District. Aycock's ruling notes that only four Black people have served on the Mississippi Supreme Court. All of them held the same seat in the Central District and were first appointed to the position by a sitting governor. Aycock wrote that she will impose a deadline for the Mississippi Legislature to create a new map. Solve the daily Crossword
Politico
37 minutes ago
- Politico
Redistricting kills tax hikes talk
Presented by BACK-BURNERED: Gov. Gavin Newsom's gerrymandering play has effectively ended any possibility, however slim, that lawmakers would seriously consider a push by progressives to raise taxes before the Legislature adjourns next month. It was always a longshot. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire had been more tepid on taxes since wrapping the budget in June. But Newsom's sudden redistricting effort has become all-encompassing at the Capitol, effectively sidelining anything else. 'I think the conversation about raising revenues, it's not something we're going to solve this week or this month,' said Assemblymember Nick Schultz, a Burbank Democrat and Progressive Caucus member. 'It's going to continue.' While extensive cuts in President Donald Trump's megabill likely won't be felt until after the midterm elections, rollbacks of Medi-Cal and other safety net programs that Newsom and lawmakers made in response to a $12 billion budget shortfall are slated to begin in 2026. Progressives had been hoping to push some kind of new tax scheme through the Legislature this year to stave off the reductions, in particular cutbacks to health insurance for undocumented immigrants. A group of more than two dozen mostly progressive lawmakers met regularly to explore options, including a proposal from labor groups like SEIU and members of the Latino Caucus to penalize big businesses that had large shares of employees who depended on Medi-Cal and other public benefits. Assemblymember Damon Connolly was pushing another idea for a tax on business profits stashed in overseas accounts, called a 'water's edge' exemption. His office estimated it could bring in around $3 billion per year. Even before redistricting sucked the air out of the Capitol, winning support for a new tax was going to be an uphill battle, as Newsom has consistently resisted proposals for new taxes. And Democrats in the state's two chambers were decidedly split on the idea. When party leaders in the Assembly polled their caucus on pursuing new revenue streams now, later or not at all, a third of the 60 members said they wanted to move on revenue-raising options, 16 said they were open to it down the road and 15 rejected the idea. Nine members abstained from responding to the survey. Also in favor of a new tax was Los Angeles state Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez, who said in an interview that constituents in her communities want state leaders to provide a safety net to counter the Trump administration's cuts to health care, education and other government-funded services. 'Overwhelmingly, what I hear from my constituents when I engage with them is that this is what they want to see,' Pérez said of revenue-raising. 'That we take care of the little guy, and we take care of working people who have been struggling to get by.' But for now, lawmakers have other things on their minds, said Jim Mangia, director of St. John's Health Center, a network of health care clinics in and around Los Angeles that primarily serve the poor and immigrant communities. 'The redistricting conversation has changed a lot in Sacramento. The Legislature is no longer focused on revenue,' Mangia said. 'We are meeting with many legislators … and having some good conversations and more to come, but it has totally changed the focus of the Legislature right now.' The idea of a new tax isn't totally sunk. Lawmakers have been preparing for the possibility of a special session in the fall to deal with the ongoing fallout of federal budget cuts. Generating a new revenue stream could be part of that agenda. 'It's something where I think we owe it to California to keep all options on the table and to entertain any and all possibilities,' Schultz said. Dawn Addis, chair of the Assembly's health budget subcommittee, said that while the cuts to health care remain an urgent problem, lawmakers need more time to work out all possible solutions. 'We want to do something thoughtful that doesn't have a lot of unintended consequences,' Addis said. 'The timing is a little bit tough to discern at the moment. Part of that is because obviously we're dealing with redistricting and the egregious attacks from the Trump administration … We just have no way not to prioritize that. It's got to take front and center.' IT'S TUESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY REDISTRICTING RUMBLE: Republicans' anger over their near-powerlessness in the face of Democrats' redistricting gambit boiled over today in the Assembly Elections Committee. GOP Assemblymember David Tangipa got into a snipefest with Democratic Assemblymember Marc Berman, who was presenting a bill from the legislative package needed to put the gerrymandered map on the November ballot. When Tangipa said lawmakers didn't have enough time to consider the legislation, Berman snapped back that he was surprised it took so long to read a five-page bill. The Democrat also accused the Republican of making veiled threats to his witness when Tangipa suggested they would become 'really good friends' over the course of his questioning. After Tangipa's queries dragged on, chair Gail Pellerin attempted to cut him off at the behest of other Democrats on the committee. Assemblymember Catherine Stefani sternly told Tangipa not to interrupt her during her comments. 'You play stupid games, you get stupid prizes,' she said, alluding to Texas Republicans' redistricting efforts. 'And that's what you are doing.' Pellerin eventually cut all the committee members' microphones, leaving Tangipa yelling at his colleagues, à la former GOP Assemblymember Bill Essayli during the final hours of session last year. Democrats ultimately approved the bill over his protests. IN OTHER NEWS DEFENSE DOLLARS: California Sen. Adam Schiff has launched a legal defense fund amid the Justice Department probe into his finances, our Hailey Fuchs and Gregory Svirnovskiy report. Schiff, who led the first impeachment effort in the House against Trump and aided the congressional investigation into the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, has become a frequent target of the president in his second term. Earlier this summer, Trump alleged in a post on Truth Social that the California Democrat 'engaged in a sustained pattern of possible Mortgage Fraud' — an allegation Schiff vehemently denies. 'It's clear that Donald Trump and his MAGA allies will continue weaponizing the justice process to attack Senator Schiff for holding this corrupt administration accountable,' Marisol Samayoa, a spokesperson for Schiff, said in a statement. 'This fund will ensure he can fight back against these baseless smears while continuing to do his job.' BITING BACK: California Republicans petitioned the state Supreme Court to block legislative Democrats from voting on their redrawn congressional map this week, raising process issues in a bid to stop redistricting from reaching the ballot in November, our Blake Jones reports for POLITICO Pro subscribers. GOP state legislators announced the filing today. In it, they argue legislative language to carry out Democrats' gerrymander must be in print for 30 days before it can be voted upon — or else three quarters of lawmakers must approve suspending a state constitutional rule laying out that timeline. The bills at hand have technically been in print for months, but were gutted Monday and amended to include the redistricting play. The Legislature frequently guts and amends bills in Sacramento and votes on them within a month without drawing legal challenges, but an attorney for the Republicans argued that does not justify the practice. 'If the Legislature has been flagrantly violating this provision of the Constitution in the past, so what? It should stop,' Dhillon Law Group partner Mike Columbo said at a news conference at the California Republican Party headquarters in Sacramento today. CAP-AND-TRADE UNVEILED: The Assembly is proposing modest reforms to the state's signature cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gas emissions, according to draft legislative language circulating today, our Camille von Kaenel scooped for Pro subscribers. Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin, who is leading the Assembly's negotiations on the program, is proposing significant amendments to her placeholder bill, AB 1207, that would direct the California Air Resources Board to extend the cap-and-trade program from 2030 through 2045, make changes to offsets and allowances and make several multi-year appropriations of its revenues for wildfire, water, air and energy programs. Her office confirmed the language this morning. In addition to serving as the backstop regulation that ensures the state meets its emissions reduction obligations, the cap-and-trade program is also a major revenue generator. But proceeds in the state's quarterly auctions have fallen as traders reckon with the program's impending expiration in 2030 and uncertainty over whether regulators will adjust the market's rules. WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — California State University is spending nearly $17 million to make OpenAI's ChatGPT available to all students and faculty even as it faces a $2.3 billion budget gap. (LAist) — Hundreds of professors at UCLA, including a large swath of Jewish faculty, signed a letter condemning Trump's $1 billion settlement demand over alleged antisemitism on campus and the freezing of million in research grant funding. (The Los Angeles Times) — California now has the largest and fastest growing early education program in the country as at least 200,000 kids are set to attend transitional kindergarten this fall. (CalMatters) AROUND THE STATE — A growing number of working- and middle-class families in the North County are enduring long commutes to work or school as they leave in search of affordability. (Voice of San Diego) — Silicon Valley tech giants Cisco and Oracle are slashing hundreds of jobs across the Bay Area. (San Francisco Chronicle) — The Alameda Health System is preparing for a backup plan after Trump's budget bill in July called for a $1 trillion cut to Medicaid that would likely disproportionately affect the hospital's revenue stream. (East Bay Times) — compiled by Juliann Ventura
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's Tariffs Stymied Black Business Growth
The Trump administration's aggressive stance on tariffs is ravaging small business owners, including Black-owned enterprises. New data from Small Business for America's Future show that 80% of over 860 small businesses worry tariffs could force them to close. And 79% fear a U.S. recession emerging in the next 12 months. The fallout is potentially catastrophic as Black businesses are often unable to absorb unexpected cost increases. And they must decide whether or not to boost prices for budget-strapped customers battling inflation. To boot, Black households are more apt to spend a greater share of income on necessities like food, clothing, and utilities. Those expenses are more prone to being affected by tariffs. BLACK BUSINESSES DEAL WITH OBSTACLES AMID TARIFF UNCERTAINTY Simultaneously, around 80% of Black Americans were getting ready to shift their spending habits and buy fewer items, per this report. Exacerbating matters, unemployment for Blacks in July reached its highest point in nearly four years. The findings could potentially trim spending with Black firms if people become more frugal with their finances. Although this report disclosed greater optimism about conditions over the next six months, sluggish sales are a mounting worry for small businesses. Eleven percent mention say its 'top business problem,' the highest point since February 2021. Around 52% of Black businesses report that they saw declining sales due to tariffs as of June 2025. Another account projects that U.S. consumers' share of paying for tariff-related costs will surge to 67% this October from 22% this past June, with Trump disputing the analysis. With the August 1 tariff deadline by Trump now lifted, Black small business owners have expressed frustrations to BLACK ENTERPRISE on how the charges are harming them. RESTAURANT OWNER FORCED TO MAKE DIFFICULT DECISIONS Gladys Harrison is experiencing the tariff sting. She is the owner of Big Mama's Kitchen in Omaha, Nebraska. The restaurant is known for its oven-fried chicken. The spices and seasonings are blended locally but the ingredients come from several different countries. Harrison stressed the special ingredients are what make her dishes stand out, but the unpredictable nature of current tariff policies is forcing her to make complex business decisions. For instance, Harrison had planned an expansion to roll out signature seasonings to grocery stores nationwide, backed by a big marketing campaign. But she says the plan has been scaled down significantly because of tariff uncertainty. 'When I can't predict what my costs will be from month to month, I can't commit to the kind of investment that expansion requires.' (She talks more about the impact here.) UNPREDICTABLE NATURE OF TARIFFS CATCHES THE OWNER OFF GUARD For Black entrepreneur Legrand Lindor, the unpredictable nature of current tariff policies caught his business off guard. He owns LMI Textiles, a small medical supply and manufacturing company in Milton, Massachusetts. He is the leading distributor for a French firm that makes harm reduction products in Europe. His clients include critical public health organizations like the Boston Public Health Commission and health departments nationwide. Lindor says his business was hit with a retroactive $5,000 charge on a February shipment that had already been delivered when aluminum-based product tariffs were implemented. Plus, he says, his firm's most recent shipment received an increased tariff of 50%. That meant instead of paying $4.000 in pre-February times, the firm now faces a $15,000 tariff bill for the items. 'This kind of surprise cost is devastating for a small operation like mine,' Lindor says. He is encountering medical supply challenges, with those product lines facing pressure from many directions. He reflected further on how his firm is being affected by tariffs. COST OF SUPPLIES FOR THIS PROPRIETOR HIT DOUBLE-DIGIT LEVELS For Katrina Golden, owner of Lil Mama's Sweets & Treats in Augusta, Georgia, the tariffs are affecting businesses like her bakery and coffee shop differently than large corporations. For example, her Chinese supplier offered the chance to lock in coffee cup prices at $225 per case before tariffs hit; however, she couldn't take advantage of that opportunity. 'Unlike big businesses, I don't have the cash flow to make bulk purchases that could save money in the long run,' she says. 'There is no wiggle room in my bottom line.' Another blow has been rising costs. Golden says the cost of nearly everything needed to run the business grew by 20-25%. This includes basic supplies like flour, parchment paper, napkins, paper plates, butter, sugar, and spices. 'My coffee cups are expected to jump from $225 to potentially $300-400 per case for my next order, and I only have about 60 days of supply left,' she says. 'I would hire two more employees today if I knew I could afford to keep them, but how do you create a sustainable business plan when policies change so rapidly? I currently employ four people, and we're all feeling the uncertainty.' Lindor summed up the devastating impact of tariffs. 'We don't have the resources that large corporations must absorb these kinds of sudden changes. This has certainly curtailed our plans to open our own warehouse and provide additional jobs.' RELATED CONTENT: Financing Groceries: More Shoppers Are Buying Now And Paying Later For Food Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
